2024-04-032023/24:SkU12 · p.2SkUTaxation
Dividends and capital gains to owners in closely held companies
Dividends and capital gains for owners of closely held companies
What's at stake: The decision concerns owners of small, owner-managed companies and how much of their income is taxed as lower capital income rather than more heavily taxed employment income - which also matters for state tax revenue and for the incentives to start and run a business.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should now direct the government to adjust the 3:12 rules for closely held companies - including the tax rate within the threshold amount and the cap at which employment-income taxation switches to lower capital taxation - or whether this should wait for an ongoing government inquiry into simplified rules.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions. The reason is that a government inquiry has already been tasked with analysing how the 3:12 rules can be simplified, including to ease ownership transfers to relatives and staff, with its report due in March 2024. The committee is not prepared to pre-empt the ongoing inquiry.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (S)
The reservation (S) calls for certain adjustments to the 3:12 rules to increase neutrality between employees and business owners, including the tax rate within the threshold amount and the cap at which higher employment-income taxation switches to lower capital taxation - since the cap, which is linked to the income base amount, has not kept pace as top salaries have pulled further ahead.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 187–93Nej 64–216
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 14/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:1445 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:2480 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) request 17 and 2023/24:2645 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) request 9.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:1445 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:2480 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 17 och 2023/24:2645 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 9.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 60 proposals on business, capital and property in motions from the general motion period 2023. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that the Riksdag has already taken a position on the relevant issues or that investigations are ongoing.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to adjust tax rules for small businesses to increase neutrality between employees and entrepreneurs. (S) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires increased taxation of capital and higher tax on the highest incomes, and that those with large capital assets contribute more.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires increased taxation of capital and higher tax on the highest incomes, and that those with large capital assets contribute more. The counter-proposal wants to increase neutrality between employees and business owners by adjusting the tax rate within the limit amount and the ceiling for the transition to lower capital taxation, that is, limit the opportunity to convert high earned income into lower-taxed capital income. This aligns with the plan's requirement that equal incomes be taxed more equally.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ökad beskattning av kapital och högre skatt på de högsta inkomsterna, och att de med stora kapitaltillgångar bidrar mer. Motförslaget vill öka neutraliteten mellan anställda och företagare genom att justera skattesatsen inom gränsbeloppet och taket för övergången till lägre kapitalbeskattning, det vill säga begränsa möjligheten att omvandla höga arbetsinkomster till lägre beskattad kapitalinkomst. Det ligger i linje med planens krav på att lika inkomster ska beskattas mer likvärdigt.
- increased capital taxationdecisive»en ökad beskattning av kapital och högre skatt på de högsta« (party programme ↗)“increased taxation of capital and higher tax on the highest”
- capital-rich contribute more»Vänsterpartiet har en skattepolitik som ser till vilka behov som finns och där de med stora kapitaltillgångar eller höga löner får bidra mer till välfärden än de gör idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party has a tax policy that considers what needs exist and where those with large capital assets or high incomes contribute more to welfare than they do today.”
- limit top incomes»Samtidigt tjänar en direktör över 60 gånger mer än en arbetare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile a director earns over 60 times more than a worker.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's tax principle is broad tax bases and that all earned income and compensation are taxed equally, and that taxes are progressive and assessed according to ability to pay.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's tax principle is broad tax bases and that all earned income and compensation are taxed equally, and that taxes are progressive and assessed according to ability to pay. The counter-proposal's adjustments to the tax rate within the threshold and to the ceiling for lower capital taxation aim precisely at neutrality between employees and entrepreneurs. The plan also wants the tax system to contribute to a fair distribution of the resources created by production.
Original (Swedish)
Planens skatteprincip är breda skattebaser och att alla förvärvsinkomster och ersättningar beskattas lika, samt att skatterna är progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft. Motförslagets justeringar av skattesatsen inom gränsbeloppet och av taket mot lägre kapitalbeskattning syftar just till neutralitet mellan anställda och företagare. Planen vill också att skattesystemet bidrar till en rättvis fördelning av produktionens resurser.
- equal taxation of incomedecisive»breda skattebaser och att alla förvärvsinkomster och ersättningar« (party programme ↗)“broad tax bases and that all earned income and compensation”
- progressive taxation»Skatterna ska vara progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be progressive and assessed according to ability to pay”
- fair distribution of resources»en rättvis fördelning av de resurser produktionslivet skapar« (party programme ↗)“a fair distribution of the resources created by production”
The counter-proposal wants to increase neutrality between employees and entrepreneurs by adjusting the tax rate within the threshold and ceiling towards lower capital taxation, that is, reducing the tax benefit for large family business distributions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to increase neutrality between employees and entrepreneurs by adjusting the tax rate within the threshold and ceiling towards lower capital taxation, that is, reducing the tax benefit for large family business distributions. The election manifesto wants those with most money to contribute more through progressive taxation of capital and the party programme that economic disparities should decrease. The plan therefore supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill öka neutraliteten mellan anställda och företagare genom att justera skattesatsen inom gränsbeloppet och taket mot lägre kapitalbeskattning, alltså minska skatteförmånen för stora fåmansföretagsutdelningar. Valmanifestet vill att de med mest pengar bidrar mer genom progressiv beskattning av kapital och partiprogrammet att de ekonomiska klyftorna ska minska. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- progressive capital taxationdecisive»att de med mest pengar, som också orsakar större utsläpp, ska bidra mer till omställningen och välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those with the most money, who also cause greater emissions, should contribute more to the transition and welfare through a progressive taxation of capital.”
- decreased economic disparities»De ekonomiska klyftorna ska minska.« (party programme ↗)“Economic disparities should decrease.”
- economic equality»Den ekonomiska politiken ska sträva efter jämlikhet.« (party programme ↗)“Economic policy should aim for equality.”
- support for small business enterprise»Vi vill stärka möjligheterna för människor med goda idéer att starta och driva företag.« (party programme ↗)“We want to strengthen opportunities for people with good ideas to start and run businesses.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto commits to reducing taxes on work and business, especially for small businesses and sole proprietors, and the party programme wants to make the tax burden on job creation in companies as small as possible.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to reducing taxes on work and business, especially for small businesses and sole proprietors, and the party programme wants to make the tax burden on job creation in companies as small as possible. Adjustments to the 3:12 rules that increase neutrality between employees and entrepreneurs and raise the ceiling are in that line. The plan's demand to clean up the regulatory jungle also speaks for simplified rules for closely-held companies.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att sänka skatten på jobb och företagande, särskilt för småföretag och egenföretagare, och partiprogrammet vill göra skattebördan på jobbskapande i företag så liten som möjligt. Justeringar av 3:12-reglerna som ökar neutraliteten mellan anställda och företagare och höjer taket ligger i den linjen. Planens krav på uppröjning i regelträsket talar också för förenklade regler för fåmansföretagare.
- lower tax on businessdecisive»Sänk skatten på jobb och företagande, särskilt för småföretag och egenföretagare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce taxes on work and business, especially for small businesses and sole proprietors.”
- low tax on job creation»Skattebördan på jobbskapande i företag ska göras så liten som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“The tax burden on job creation in companies should be made as small as possible.”
- simpler rules for entrepreneurs»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
- work and effort should pay»Det ska löna sig att arbeta.« (party programme ↗)“It should be worthwhile to work.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants unity in capital income taxation to increase and tax levels to be competitive and easy to understand, especially capital taxes.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants unity in capital income taxation to increase and tax levels to be competitive and easy to understand, especially capital taxes. Adjustments to the tax rate within the threshold and to the ceiling for transition to capital taxation increase precisely the neutrality between employed persons and entrepreneurs. The plan does not explicitly mention closely-held company rules, so the position is derived from tax policy principles.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att enhetligheten i kapitalinkomstbeskattningen ökar och att skattenivåerna är konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga, inte minst kapitalskatterna. Justeringar av skattesatsen inom gränsbeloppet och av taket för övergången till kapitalbeskattning ökar just neutraliteten mellan anställda och företagare. Planen nämner inte fåmansföretagsreglerna uttryckligen, så ställningstagandet är härlett ur skattepolitikens principer.
- uniform capital taxationdecisive»bolagsskatten fortsätta sänkas och enhetligheten i kapitalinkomstbeskattningen öka« (party programme ↗)“corporate tax continue to be lowered and unity in capital income taxation increase”
- competitive capital taxes»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax levels shall be competitive and easy to understand to encourage business, education and investments.”
- tax benefiting entrepreneurship»Skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna« (party programme ↗)“Tax policy shall benefit wealth-creating forces”
- better conditions for small business»Därför vill vi att det ska bli enklare och billigare att anställa genom att arbetsgivaravgifterna sänks för både småföretagare och för dem som vill anställa unga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want it to become simpler and cheaper to employ by lowering employer fees for both small businesses and for those who want to employ young people.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that taxation follows tax law principles such as taxation according to ability to pay and equal treatment, which is precisely the neutrality between employees and business owners the counter-proposal wants to increase.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that taxation follows tax law principles such as taxation according to ability to pay and equal treatment, which is precisely the neutrality between employees and business owners the counter-proposal wants to increase. The tax system should also be designed so that profits can be generated and savings in the company itself are encouraged, and the election manifesto wants to facilitate owner and generational transfers. Adjustments of thresholds and ceilings are in line with that.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att beskattningen följer skatterättsliga principer som skatt efter bärkraft och likabehandling, vilket är just den neutralitet mellan anställda och företagare motförslaget vill öka. Skattesystemet ska dessutom utformas så att vinster kan genereras och sparande i det egna företaget uppmuntras, och valmanifestet vill underlätta ägar- och generationsskiften. Justeringar av gränsbelopp och tak ligger i den linjen.
- equal treatment in taxationdecisive»ska utformas enligt vedertagna skatterättsliga principer som skatt efter bärkraft och likabehandling.« (party programme ↗)“shall be designed according to established tax law principles such as taxation according to ability to pay and equal treatment.”
- facilitated ownership transfers»Underlätta personalägande och generationsskifte av företag - så att fler företag kan drivas vidare av personalen om ägaren vill sluta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate employee ownership and generational transfer of companies - so that more companies can be run by staff if the owner wants to quit.”
- tax that favours business»Skattesystemet ska vara sådant att vinster kan genereras samtidigt som sparande i det egna företaget uppmuntras.« (party programme ↗)“The tax system shall be such that profits can be generated while savings in the company itself are encouraged.”
- small businesses in focus»De små och medelstora företagen, som ofta är familjeföretag« (party programme ↗)“Small and medium-sized enterprises, which are often family businesses”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly promises to simplify 3:12 rules and to lower taxes on business to strengthen incentives for investment and entrepreneurship.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises to simplify 3:12 rules and to lower taxes on business to strengthen incentives for investment and entrepreneurship. The counter-proposal's adjustments to the tax rate within the threshold and the ceiling between service and capital taxation are precisely such changes in favor of the entrepreneur. The plan also states that the tax system should become simpler and capital taxes competitive.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att förenkla 3:12-reglerna och att sänka skatterna på företagande för att stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar och entreprenörskap. Motförslagets justeringar av skattesatsen inom gränsbeloppet och av taket mellan tjänste- och kapitalbeskattning är just sådana ändringar till företagarens fördel. Planen slår också fast att skattesystemet ska bli enklare och kapitalskatterna konkurrenskraftiga.
- simplified 3:12 rulesdecisive»Förenkla 3:12-reglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify 3:12 rules”
- lower tax on business»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen incentives for investment, research and entrepreneurship through lower taxes on business”
- simpler and competitive taxation»Ska det ske måste skattesystemet bli enklare, och bolags-, kunskaps- och kapitalskatter vara konkurrenskraftiga och uppmuntra till investeringar i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If that is to happen, the tax system must become simpler, and corporate, knowledge and capital taxes must be competitive and encourage investment in Sweden.”
- better conditions for owners and personnel»Möjliggöra för fler företag att kunna använda sig av reglerna för personaloptioner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it possible for more companies to use the rules for employee share options”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto wants to explicitly modernize the 3:12 rules to stimulate entrepreneurship.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to explicitly modernize the 3:12 rules to stimulate entrepreneurship. The counter-proposal's adjustments of the tax rate within the threshold amount and of the ceiling where service taxation transitions to capital taxation is precisely such a modernization to the benefit of entrepreneurs. The plan also establishes that it must be worthwhile to take risks to grow and that taxes should not hamper Swedish businesses.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen modernisera 3:12-regelverket för att stimulera entreprenörskap. Motförslagets justeringar av skattesatsen inom gränsbeloppet och av taket där tjänstebeskattning övergår i kapitalbeskattning är just en sådan modernisering till företagarnas fördel. Planen slår också fast att det måste löna sig att ta risker för att växa och att skatterna inte får hämma svenska företag.
- modernize 3:12 rulesdecisive»Modernisera 3:12 regelverket för att stimulera entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Modernize the 3:12 rules to stimulate entrepreneurship”
- risk-taking should be worthwhile»Det måste löna sig att ta risker för att kunna växa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must be worthwhile to take risks to be able to grow.”
- promote entrepreneurship»Skapa förutsättningar för nyföretagande och entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new business ventures and entrepreneurship”
- competitive taxes»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish businesses in international competition”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:SkU12)
- Committee report full text (HB01SkU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1389 — Skattetrappa för företagare av Peter Ollén (M)
- Motion 2023/24:141 — Möjlighet till lägre reavinstskatt vid försäljning av privatbostad av Jörgen Grubb (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1445 — Förenklade regler för familjeföretag av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1446 — Skatt kopplad till poängsystem för skogs- och lantbruk av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1481 — Ekonomisk rättvisa mellan boendeformer av Louise Thunström och Jessica Rodén (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1581 — Sänkning av stämpelskatten för lagfart och pantbrev av Lars Engsund och Jan Ericson (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1634 — AI:s betydelse för framtidens arbetsmarknad och skola av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1655 — Skatteförfarande av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1656 — Punktskatt av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1716 — Låg skatt på investeringssparkonton av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1787 — Enklare regler för uthyrning av komplementbostad av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1818 — Beskattning av naturvårdsavtal av Anders W Jonsson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1885 — Kulturpolitiska frågor av Amanda Lind och Jacob Risberg (båda MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2035 — Skatteöversyn för ekonomisk rättvisa mellan boendeformer av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2068 — Skogspolitik med helhetssyn av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2164 — Könsneutralt system för idrottssponsring av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2171 — Lägre flyttskatter för ökad rörlighet på bostadsmarknaden och ökad tillväxt av Johanna Hornberger (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2264 — Differentierad reavinstskatt vid försäljning av bostad av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2321 — Ett rättvist skattesystem av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2433 — Förbättrade tonnageskatteregler och slopad stämpelskatt på fartyg av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament