2025-11-192025/26:SkU8 · p.2SkUTaxation
Administrative burden for companies
Administrative burden on companies from the new interest-deduction rules
What's at stake: The rules limiting interest deductions and the concept of artificial arrangements are meant to prevent tax avoidance through internal loans, but they can force companies, particularly small and medium-sized ones, to produce extensive documentation to show that a loan is not an artificial arrangement. The outcome affects how much administrative and legal burden companies - especially smaller firms without in-house tax expertise - must bear, as well as the predictability of the rules for international investment.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should already come back with proposals to ensure that the new, EU-aligned rules limiting interest deductions do not create a disproportionate administrative burden for companies, or whether it is enough to wait and monitor how the rules affect companies before any action is taken.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion calling for a formal statement to the government on this issue. The reason is that abstract concepts such as artificial arrangements are unavoidable in rules meant to counter tax avoidance, that the provision cannot be specified further, and that the committee expects the government to closely monitor how the rules affect companies and to come back with measures if needed - so no formal statement is required now.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (C)
The reservation (C) calls for the government to already come back with proposals ensuring that the new interest-deduction rules do not create a disproportionate administrative burden, particularly for small and medium-sized companies. The reasoning is that companies risk having to produce extensive documentation to show that internal loans are not artificial arrangements, that the concept of artificial arrangements is poorly defined, that the rules risk overlapping with existing rules and leading to double assessments, and that the framework could undermine predictability for international investment.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 277–19Ja 156–140
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/4 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:3818 by Anders Ådahl et al. (C).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3818 av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal to adapt the interest deduction rules to EU law. The proposal means that interest expenses to a company in the same interest group that is domiciled in the European Economic Area (EEA) may not be deducted if the debt relationship is part of an artificial arrangement whose purpose is for the interest group to obtain a substantial tax advantage. Companies are deemed to be in an interest group with each other if one of the companies owns shares in the other company or if it otherwise has a substantial influence in the other company, whether directly or indirectly. The legislative changes enter into force on 1 January 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure that the new rules on interest deduction do not create disproportionate administrative burden for companies. (C) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The counter-proposal wants the government to immediately ease the documentation requirements of the new interest deduction rules.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants the government to immediately ease the documentation requirements of the new interest deduction rules. The plan prioritizes instead combating tax evasion through greater public scrutiny of businesses and effective follow-up, and wants to see a tax system where the richest begin to pay their share again. The plan does speak for simple rules and good conditions for sound businesses, so the conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill att regeringen omgående lättar på de nya ränteavdragsreglernas dokumentationskrav. Planen prioriterar tvärtom att komma åt skatteundandragande genom större samhällelig insyn i företag och effektiv uppföljning, och vill se ett skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del. Planen talar visserligen också för enkla regler och goda villkor för sunda företag, varför slutsatsen är osäker.
- combat tax frauddecisive»Det handlar i hög utsträckning om överlagda beslut, där risken för upptäckt kan spela stor roll. Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn i företag där det behövs för att stävja fusk med till exempel skatter och anställningar.« (party programme ↗)“It is to a large extent about deliberate decisions, where the risk of detection can play a large role. We want to move toward greater public scrutiny of businesses where needed to combat cheating with, for example, taxes and employment.”
- solidaristic tax system»Vi vill se ett enkelt, stabilt och solidariskt skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a simple, stable and solidaristic tax system where the richest begin to pay their share again.”
- capital should contribute more»Vänsterpartiet har en skattepolitik som ser till vilka behov som finns och där de med stora kapitaltillgångar eller höga löner får bidra mer till välfärden än de gör idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party has a tax policy that considers what needs exist and where those with large capital assets or high incomes contribute more to welfare than they do today.”
The plan commits to security for small businesses as well as good business climate and strong competitiveness, and the election manifesto wants to strengthen the long-term conditions for enterprise.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to security for small businesses as well as good business climate and strong competitiveness, and the election manifesto wants to strengthen the long-term conditions for enterprise. Immediately ensuring that the interest deduction rules do not create a disproportionate administrative burden for small and medium-sized businesses is in line with this. At the same time, the plan is uncompromising against tax fraud, which qualifies but does not nullify the support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig trygghet för småföretagare samt gott företagsklimat och stark konkurrenskraft, och valmanifestet vill stärka de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande. Att omgående säkerställa att ränteavdragsreglerna inte skapar en oproportionerlig administrativ börda för små och medelstora företag ligger i linje med detta. Samtidigt är planen kompromisslös mot skattefusk, vilket kvalificerar men inte upphäver stödet.
- security for small businessesdecisive»Trygghet för småföretagare.« (party programme ↗)“Security for small businesses.”
- good business climate»Innovationskraft, gott företagsklimat och stark konkurrenskraft för ökad tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“Innovation capacity, good business climate and strong competitiveness for increased growth.”
- strengthened business conditions»Vi vill satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning så att företagsklimatet stärks och kompetensförsörjningen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to invest in green technology, digitalization and education so that the business climate is strengthened and skill supply is improved.”
- stopped tax fraud»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare fraud and money laundering shall be stopped.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants it to be easy to start, run and grow as a business and states that most new jobs are created in small and medium-sized enterprises.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants it to be easy to start, run and grow as a business and states that most new jobs are created in small and medium-sized enterprises. The counter-proposal does not question the rules against tax evasion but requires that the administrative burden for smaller companies does not become disproportionate, which is compatible with the plan. The plan simultaneously drives hard against tax planning, which is why the support is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att det ska vara enkelt att starta, driva och växa som företag och konstaterar att de flesta nya jobb skapas i små och medelstora företag. Motförslaget ifrågasätter inte reglerna mot skatteundandragande utan kräver att den administrativa bördan för mindre företag inte blir oproportionerlig, vilket är förenligt med planen. Planen driver samtidigt hårt mot skatteplanering, varför stödet är svagt.
- easy to run a businessdecisive»vara enkelt att starta företag, växa och anställa sina första medarbetare.« (party programme ↗)“be easy to start a business, grow and employ one's first employees.”
- the importance of small enterprises»Sverige skapas i små och medelstora företag, särskilt inom tjänstesektorn.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden is created in small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in the service sector.”
- counter tax planning»Storföretag och förmögna personer kan med hjälp av skatteplanering ofta undvika att« (party programme ↗)“Large companies and wealthy individuals can often avoid by means of tax planning”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to cleaning up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small, and reducing the administrative burden for smaller businesses.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to cleaning up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small, and reducing the administrative burden for smaller businesses. Interest deduction rules that force small and medium-sized businesses to document that internal loans are not artificial arrangements, with an unclear concept and double assessments, are exactly the burden the plan wants to remove. The requirement for predictable rules reinforces the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små, och att minska den administrativa bördan för mindre företag. Ränteavdragsregler som tvingar små och medelstora företag att dokumentera att interna lån inte är konstlade upplägg, med ett otydligt begrepp och dubbla prövningar, är precis den börda planen vill bort. Kravet på förutsägbara spelregler förstärker slutsatsen.
- deregulation for businessdecisive»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
- reduced administrative burden»minska den administrativa bördan för små och nystartade företag.« (party programme ↗)“reduce the administrative burden for small and newly started companies.”
- good conditions for small business»Goda villkor för entreprenörer, egenföretagare och små företag är därför avgörande för att skapa nya jobb.« (party programme ↗)“Good conditions for entrepreneurs, sole proprietors and small businesses are therefore crucial for creating new jobs.”
- predictable rules»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy should have fixed and predictable rules.”
The plan requires that the regulatory burden on small businesses decrease and that tax rules are competitive and easy to understand.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the regulatory burden on small businesses decrease and that tax rules are competitive and easy to understand. It wants rules that make it easy to do right and a tax policy that is as simple and transparent as possible. The counter-proposal's requirement for measures against disproportionate administrative burden in the new interest deduction rules, particularly for smaller businesses, thus follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att regelbördan för små företag minskar och att skattereglerna är konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga. Den vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra rätt och en skattepolitik som är så enkel och transparent som möjligt. Motförslagets krav på åtgärder mot en oproportionerlig administrativ börda i de nya ränteavdragsreglerna, särskilt för mindre företag, följer därmed av planen.
- reduced regulatory burdendecisive»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska, genom ansträngningar på både kommunal, statlig och« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden on small businesses shall decrease, through efforts at both municipal, state and”
- easy-to-understand tax rules»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax levels shall be competitive and easy to understand to encourage business, education and investments.”
- simple and transparent tax policy»Skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna, vara så enkel och transparent som« (party programme ↗)“Tax policy shall benefit wealth-creating forces, be as simple and transparent as”
- easy to do right»Vi vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra« (party programme ↗)“We want rules that make it easy to do”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the rules the state sets for companies are long-term and that bureaucracy and complicated rules are countered, with an expressed small business perspective in business policy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the rules the state sets for companies are long-term and that bureaucracy and complicated rules are countered, with an expressed small business perspective in business policy. The counter-proposal's requirement for measures against disproportionate administrative burden from the new interest deduction rules, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, follows directly from this. The plan provides no support for allowing unclear concepts and double reviews to remain without action.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att de regler staten ställer upp för företagen är långsiktiga och att byråkrati och krångliga regler motverkas, med ett uttalat småföretagarperspektiv i näringspolitiken. Motförslagets krav på åtgärder mot en oproportionerlig administrativ börda av de nya ränteavdragsreglerna, särskilt för små och medelstora företag, följer direkt av detta. Planen ger inget stöd för att låta otydliga begrepp och dubbla prövningar bestå utan åtgärd.
- long-term and foreseeable rulesdecisive»Det är viktigt att de regler staten ställer upp för företagen är långsiktiga.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the rules the state sets for companies are long-term.”
- counter bureaucracy and complications»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall”
- general means in business policy»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel« (party programme ↗)“Business policy shall be conducted with general means”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to removing one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory burden, simplifying the tax system and strengthening the conditions for investment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to removing one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory burden, simplifying the tax system and strengthening the conditions for investment. To immediately ensure that the new interest deduction rules do not impose a disproportionate documentation burden on small and medium-sized companies is precisely that commitment in practice. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet, att förenkla skattesystemet och att stärka förutsättningarna för investeringar. Att omgående säkerställa att de nya ränteavdragsreglerna inte lägger en oproportionerlig dokumentationsbörda på små och medelstora företag är precis det åtagandet i praktiken. Planen ger därför stöd åt motförslagets krav.
- reduced administrative burdendecisive»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory burden”
- simpler tax rules»Förenkla 3:12-reglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify 3:12 rules”
- good investment conditions»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen incentives for investment, research and entrepreneurship through lower taxes on business”
- predictable government process»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten agencies' processing times with a time limit”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly commits to working for simplification of rules and easing small businesses' administrative burden, and to removing unnecessary rules where the cost does not match the benefit.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly commits to working for simplification of rules and easing small businesses' administrative burden, and to removing unnecessary rules where the cost does not match the benefit. The counter-proposal's requirement for proposals that prevent a disproportionate documentation burden from the interest-deduction rules for small and medium-sized enterprises is precisely this. The plan also requires that new rules should be cost-effective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig uttryckligen att verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda, och att onödiga regler där kostnaden inte motsvarar nyttan tas bort. Motförslagets krav på förslag som förhindrar en oproportionerlig dokumentationsbörda av ränteavdragsreglerna för små och medelstora företag är just detta. Planen kräver också att nya regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva.
- reduced administrative burdendecisive»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for simplification of rules and ease small businesses' administrative burden”
- remove unnecessary rules»För att få fler och växande företag är det viktigt att ta bort onödiga regler där kostnaderna för företagen inte motsvarar nyttan för samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get more and growing businesses it is important to remove unnecessary rules where the costs for businesses do not match the benefit to society.”
- cost-effective rules»Nya regler ska vara kostnadseffektiva och befintliga regler behöver ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New rules should be cost-effective and existing rules need to be reviewed.”
- competitive taxation»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish businesses in international competition”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SkU8)
- Committee report full text (HD01SkU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:3818 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:20 Anpassningar av ränteavdragsreglerna till EU-rätten av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2025/26:20 — Anpassningar av ränteavdragsreglerna till EU-rätten
Source: The Swedish Parliament