2025-04-092024/25:FiU22 · p.3FiUEconomy & finance
The second amortization requirement
Abolishing the second mortgage amortisation requirement
What's at stake: The amortisation requirement governs how much and how quickly mortgage borrowers must pay down their loans. The question is whether the requirement in its current form disproportionately affects young adults and single people, who may be forced onto an insecure rental sublet market or forgo job opportunities in major cities, while also contributing to households' resilience against economic shocks.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motion wanted to abolish the second mortgage amortisation requirement, while the committee held that the issue should await the processing of a recently completed government inquiry into borrower-based macroprudential measures.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion, pointing out that a committee reviewing borrower-based macroprudential measures has recently submitted its final report to the government, that the proposals are now being processed within government offices, and that the committee does not want to pre-empt that work.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (SD)
The reserving party (SD) wants to abolish the second amortisation requirement, citing the Financial Supervisory Authority's recurring conclusion that households have good resilience against price falls, rate rises and income loss, and noting that the requirement disproportionately affects young adults and single people, who may be forced onto an insecure rental sublet market or forgo job offers in major cities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 216–61Ja 203–74
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/61/1/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SDGöran Hargestam (SD, Östergötlands län) | Abstain — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:165 by Oscar Sjöstedt et al. (SD) and 2024/25:2950 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) amendment 31.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:165 av Oscar Sjöstedt m.fl. (SD) och 2024/25:2950 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 31.
Riksdag decision: Parliament has considered a communication from the government regarding the activities of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank Group and regional development and investment banks in 2023 and 2024. The communication addresses, among other things, the institutions' work on issues relating to financial and monetary stability and measures that have been of particular importance during 2023 and 2024. Parliament shares the government's view on what is prioritized in the institutions' work. It is important that the institutions have adequate resources and good reserves to be able to contribute to financial stability and economic development in their member countries even during economically and financially turbulent times. Parliament placed the communication in the records, that is to say closed the matter. Parliament also rejected approximately 100 proposals in motions on financial market issues from the general motion period 2024. The motions address, among other things, macroprudential supervision, credit information and debt collection activities, money laundering and bank and payment fraud as well as cash handling and payment services.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to abolish the second amortization requirement. (SD) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan sees debt as something that weakens people's independence and bargaining power, and wants loan terms to be regulated based on common needs rather than finance capital's interests.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees debt as something that weakens people's independence and bargaining power, and wants loan terms to be regulated based on common needs rather than finance capital's interests. Abolishing the amortisation requirement increases household debt and benefits banks. The plan's answer to young people and single people's housing situation is instead rental apartments with reasonable rents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser skuldsättning som något som försvagar människors självständighet och förhandlingsstyrka, och vill att lånevillkoren regleras utifrån gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets. Att avskaffa amorteringskravet ökar hushållens skulder och gynnar bankerna. Planens svar på ungas och ensamståendes boendesituation är i stället hyresrätter med rimliga hyror.
- debt weakensdecisive»Skuldsättning försvagar många människors självständighet och förhandlingsstyrka.« (party programme ↗)“Debt weakens many people's independence and bargaining power.”
- regulated loan terms»Regleringen av lånevillkor behöver utgå från våra gemensamma behov snarare än finanskapitalets.« (party programme ↗)“The regulation of loan terms needs to start from our common needs rather than finance capital's interests.”
- deep debt benefits capital»Ett samhälle där människor fastnar i djupa skulder är både lönsamt för bankerna och fördelaktigt för kapitalet i stort.« (party programme ↗)“A society where people get trapped in deep debt is both profitable for banks and advantageous for capital in general.”
- rental apartments ahead of loans»Vi vill prioritera att bygga hyresrätter med rimliga hyror.« (party programme ↗)“We want to prioritise building rental apartments with reasonable rents.”
The party programme explicitly warns of the unstable debt economy that grows when households raise their living standard with larger loans, and requires instruments that increase stability and counter short-termism.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly warns of the unstable debt economy that grows when households raise their living standard with larger loans, and requires instruments that increase stability and counter short-termism. The election manifesto emphasizes the same responsibility line with guarded stabilization policy and warning of higher mortgage rates. Abolishing the second amortization requirement goes against that line, even though the plan's goal that young people should be able to get their own home pulls in the other direction.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet varnar uttryckligen för den instabila skuldekonomi som växer när hushåll höjer sin levnadsstandard med större lån, och kräver instrument som ökar stabiliteten och motverkar kortsiktighet. Valmanifestet betonar samma ansvarslinje med värnad stabiliseringspolitik och varning för högre bolåneräntor. Att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet går mot den linjen, även om planens mål att unga ska kunna skaffa en egen bostad drar åt andra hållet.
- warning of household debtdecisive»har människor kompenserat detta med att ta större lån« (party programme ↗)“have people compensated this by taking larger loans”
- stable financial systems»finanssystemen, motverkar kortsiktiga spekulationer och gynnar långsiktiga investeringar.« (party programme ↗)“financial systems, counter short-term speculation and favour long-term investments.”
- responsible stabilization policy»Vi värnar Riksbankens oberoende och ansvar för att stabilisera den allmänna prisnivån« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We guard the Riksbank's independence and responsibility to stabilize the general price level”
- young people need housing»förhindrar unga människor att skaffa en egen bostad« (party programme ↗)“prevent young people from getting their own home”
The plan states that excessively high private debt is a risk for both the individual and the national economy and that over-indebtedness and speculation should be countered.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that excessively high private debt is a risk for both the individual and the national economy and that over-indebtedness and speculation should be countered. Abolishing the second amortization requirement would allow higher debt and therefore contradicts this. The plan's answer to young people and single people's housing situation is instead more rental apartments and a regulated rental market.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att en alltför hög privat skuldsättning är en risk för både individen och samhällsekonomin och att överskuldsättning och spekulation ska motverkas. Att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet skulle tillåta högre skuldsättning och strider därför mot detta. Planens svar på unga och ensamståendes boendesituation är i stället fler hyresrätter och en reglerad hyresmarknad.
- limit household debtdecisive»hög privat skuldsättning är en risk för individen« (party programme ↗)“high private debt is a risk for the individual”
- counter over-indebtedness»Girighet, överskuldsättning och spekulation ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Greed, over-indebtedness and speculation should be countered.”
- protect the rental apartment»det särskilt viktigt att värna hyresrätten och en« (party programme ↗)“it is particularly important to protect the rental apartment and a”
- more rental apartments»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents, develop and expand investment support that made it cheaper to build and ensure that more people can own their homes.”
The plan explicitly states that the enhanced amortisation requirement is forced saving for those with the lowest incomes and should be abolished when interest rates normalise.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that the enhanced amortisation requirement is forced saving for those with the lowest incomes and should be abolished when interest rates normalise. The counter-proposal wants to abolish the second amortisation requirement, citing that it hits young people and single people. The plan specifically points out young people trying to save for their first home and does not want to see measures that make housing more expensive. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att det förstärkta amorteringskravet är ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster och bör avskaffas när ränteläget normaliseras. Motförslaget vill just avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet, med hänvisning till att det slår mot unga och ensamstående. Planen pekar särskilt ut unga som försöker spara till sin första bostad och vill inte se åtgärder som gör det dyrare att bo. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- abolish enhanced amortisation requirementdecisive»bör avskaffas när ränteläget nu normaliseras« (2022 manifesto ↗)“should be abolished when interest rates now normalise.”
- review the amortisation requirement»Därför vill vi se över amorteringskravet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to review the amortisation requirement.”
- young and single people are pressured»Det handlar bland annat om ensamstående föräldrar, småbarnsfamiljer och unga som försöker spara ihop till sin första bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“This includes single parents, young families with small children and young people trying to save up for their first home.”
- housing must not become more expensive»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will not participate in any tax increases that harm jobs, private savings or make housing more expensive.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises to abolish the elevated amortization requirement so that more people can afford to own their own home.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to abolish the elevated amortization requirement so that more people can afford to own their own home. The counter-proposal's demand to eliminate the second amortization requirement is precisely this commitment. The plan also points out that the housing market's lock-in effects particularly affect those seeking to enter the market.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet för att fler ska ha råd med en egen bostad. Motförslagets krav på att avskaffa det andra amorteringskravet är just detta åtagande. Planen pekar dessutom på att bostadsmarknadens inlåsningseffekter särskilt drabbar dem som ska ta sig in på marknaden.
- abolished elevated amortization requirementdecisive»slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“abolish the elevated amortization requirement”
- more should own their home»Att få uppleva frihetskänslan av en egen bostad är något många fler ska få göra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To experience the feeling of freedom of owning one's own home is something many more should be able to do.”
- reduced lock-in effects»Bostadsmarknaden på expansiva orter präglas av inlåsningseffekter och stelhet.« (party programme ↗)“The housing market in growth areas is characterized by lock-in effects and rigidity.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that personal ownership is positive and that those who wish should be given the opportunity to own their home, and particularly highlights young people and students' opportunity for good housing standards.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that personal ownership is positive and that those who wish should be given the opportunity to own their home, and particularly highlights young people and students' opportunity for good housing standards. The stricter amortization requirement closes out exactly these groups according to the counter-proposal, which argues for the requirement being abolished. The plan's demand for high household savings pulls in the opposite direction, so certainty is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det personliga ägandet är positivt och att den som vill ska ges möjlighet att äga sin bostad, och lyfter särskilt unga och studerandes möjlighet till en god bostadsstandard. Det skärpta amorteringskravet stänger enligt motförslaget ute just dessa grupper, vilket talar för att kravet avskaffas. Planens krav på högt hushållssparande drar åt motsatt håll, varför säkerheten är låg.
- opportunity to own one's homedecisive»ge dem som så önskar möjlighet att äga sin bostad.« (party programme ↗)“give those who wish the opportunity to own their home.”
- housing for vulnerable groups»Lågavlönade barnfamiljer, pensionärer och studerande måste ges möjligheter till en god bostadsstandard.« (party programme ↗)“Low-income families with children, pensioners and students must be given opportunities for good housing standards.”
- more housing»FLER BOSTÄDER« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE HOUSING”
- personal ownership»bygga på en hög grad av personligt ägande.« (party programme ↗)“based on a high degree of personal ownership.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal demands that the second amortization requirement be abolished, because it particularly affects young and single people who want to own their own home.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal demands that the second amortization requirement be abolished, because it particularly affects young and single people who want to own their own home. The plan establishes that everyone should dare dream of owning their own home and protects households' housing economy by retaining the interest deduction and making it easier to save for a home. The demand is in line with that ambition, which is why the plan supports it.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver att det andra amorteringskravet avskaffas, eftersom det särskilt drabbar unga och ensamstående som vill äga sin bostad. Planen slår fast att alla ska våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad och värnar hushållens boendeekonomi genom att behålla ränteavdraget och göra det lättare att spara till en bostad. Kravet ligger i linje med den ambitionen, varför planen stöder det.
- owned housing for moredecisive»I Moderaternas Sverige ska alla våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the Moderate Party's Sweden, everyone should dare dream of owning their own home.”
- protected housing economy»Behålla ränteavdraget för bolån« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Retain the interest deduction for mortgages”
- easier to save for home»Sänka skatten på investeringssparkonton (ISK) – så att du lättare kan spara till en bostad eller till pensionen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on investment savings accounts (ISK) – so you can more easily save for a home or for retirement”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that many groups, including young Swedish people, have difficulty acquiring housing and wishes to enable more financing forms for young people and first-time buyers and to slow runaway housing costs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that many groups, including young Swedish people, have difficulty acquiring housing and wishes to enable more financing forms for young people and first-time buyers and to slow runaway housing costs. The elimination of a second amortisation requirement lowers precisely the threshold that hits hardest against young and single people. The counter-proposal's demands thus align with the plan, even though the plan does not mention the amortisation requirements.
Original (Swedish)
Planen konstaterar att många grupper, däribland svenska ungdomar, har svårt att skaffa bostad och vill möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare samt bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna. Ett avskaffat andra amorteringskrav sänker just den tröskel som slår hårdast mot unga och ensamstående. Motförslagets krav ligger därför i linje med planen, även om planen inte nämner amorteringskraven.
- more financing formsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, sänka elpriserna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare av bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats wish to stop plans for reintroduction of property tax, lower electricity prices and enable more financing forms for young and first-time home buyers.”
- young people's first home»Förbättra möjligheterna för unga att skaffa sin första bostad« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve opportunities for young people to acquire their first home”
- young people's housing shortage»Många grupper, däribland svenska ungdomar, har idag svårt att skaffa bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many groups, including young Swedish people, today have difficulty acquiring housing.”
- lower housing costs»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures must also be taken to slow runaway housing costs so that more can afford a home.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:FiU22)
- Committee report full text (HC01FiU22)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1248 — Kontanter som betalningsmedel av Louise Thunström (S)
- Motion 2024/25:129 — Bankskatt och rättvisa i skattesystemet av Isak From och Helén Pettersson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:130 — Inkassolagen och inkassobolagen av Isak From och Åsa Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1384 — Konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1387 — Finansiering inom bostads- och fastighetsområdet av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1418 — Åtgärder för att stärka kulturella och kreativa näringar av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:145 — Ukraina och ryska tillgångar av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1486 — Skatt på bankernas övervinster av Arber Gashi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1622 — Innovation på finansmarknaden av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C)
- Motion 2024/25:163 — Aktiemarknaden av Oscar Sjöstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:164 — Förstärkt integritetsskydd vid kreditupplysning av Oscar Sjöstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1642 — Företagskredit av Anders W Jonsson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:165 — Avskaffande av det skärpta amorteringskravet av Oscar Sjöstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1657 — Kriminalisering av det ekonomiska våldet av Karin Sundin (S)
- Motion 2024/25:166 — Synliggörande av likviditetsrisker på företagsobligationsmarknaden av Oscar Sjöstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1797 — Kontanternas roll för god beredskap och tillgängliga betalningar av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1876 — Kunders behov av kontanter av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1904 — Åtgärder mot organiserad brottslighet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:195 — Konsumenträtt av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2033 — Bluffakturor och konsekvenser för företag och enskilda av otillräckliga krav för att få bedriva inkassoverksamhet av Mats Green och Anna af Sillén (båda M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament