2023-05-102022/23:MJU17 · p.8MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Management of Protected Nature and Restoration of Habitats
Management of protected nature and restoration of habitats
What's at stake: More resources for managing already protected areas and restoring habitats such as eelgrass meadows could strengthen biodiversity on land already under protection, but competes for resources with the work of protecting new land, which also concerns landowners and local communities.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should issue specific calls for increased resources to manage already protected nature and restore habitats, such as eelgrass meadows, or whether the ongoing work on nature protection and national parks is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that nature conservation work is long-term, that decisions on new reserves are made at the municipal and regional level, and that under the forestry bill the government intends to increase the pace of establishing new national parks to protect valuable nature and strengthen outdoor recreation and rural development, and therefore sees no reason to issue specific calls now regarding management and restoration.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 16 (C)
The reservation calls for more focus on managing already protected areas rather than forming new ones, with sufficient resources to maintain natural values and restore degraded areas, in particular by establishing and restoring eelgrass meadows in coastal waters, in close cooperation with affected landowners and with greater public involvement.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 16 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 174–21Nej 51–144
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/94/13 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:854 by Daniel Bäckström et al. (C) point 15, 2022/23:908 by Stina Larsson et al. (C) points 3, 8 and 13, 2022/23:2073 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) point 27.2 and 2022/23:2110 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) points 28 in this part, 38 and 48.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:854 av Daniel Bäckström m.fl. (C) yrkande 15, 2022/23:908 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 3, 8 och 13, 2022/23:2073 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 27.2 och 2022/23:2110 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 28 i denna del, 38 och 48.
Riksdag decision: There is a need for a reduction in the cormorant population. Parliament urges the government to prioritize this issue. According to the committee, a revised management plan for cormorants and equivalent management throughout the country is required to achieve a reduction in the cormorant populations. The government has appointed an investigation into a new management plan for cormorants. Parliament wishes to ensure that the investigation, without delay, results in an updated management plan for cormorants. Parliament particularly emphasizes the importance of better cooperation between the regional administrations and the Agency for Marine and Water Management. The government is urged through what is called a notification (tillkännagivande) in response to two proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to increase international cooperation for preservation and restoration of biodiversity. (C) — Reservation 16
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto makes protection of forest and coastal areas an important part of work for biological diversity and requires that more areas be protected, while drained wetlands shall be restored.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes protection of forest and coastal areas an important part of work for biological diversity and requires that more areas be protected, while drained wetlands shall be restored. The counter-proposal instead wants to focus on management of already protected areas rather than creating new ones, which in substance means a deprioritisation of expanded area protection. The requirement for restoration aligns with the plan, but the weighing against new protection means the plan weighs against the proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör skyddet av skogs- och strandområden till en viktig del av arbetet för biologisk mångfald och kräver att fler områden skyddas, samtidigt som torrlagda våtmarker ska återställas. Motförslaget vill däremot lägga fokus på skötsel av redan skyddade områden framför att bilda nya, vilket i sak innebär en nedprioritering av utökat områdesskydd. Kravet på restaurering ligger i linje med planen, men avvägningen mot nytt skydd gör att planen väger emot förslaget.
- expanded area protectiondecisive»Skyddet av skogs- och strandområden är en viktig del för att värna den svenska allemansrätten och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protection of forest and coastal areas is an important part of safeguarding the Swedish right to roam and biological diversity.”
- wetland restoration»Skogens roll att naturligt minska och lagra utsläpp behöver stärkas och torrlagda våtmarker som läcker utsläpp ska återställas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The forest's role in naturally reducing and storing emissions needs to be strengthened and drained wetlands that leak emissions shall be restored.”
- environmental considerations prioritised»de långsiktiga miljöhänsynen måste vara överordnade« (party programme ↗)“long-term environmental considerations must be prioritised”
- stop species depletion»till denna utarmning av den biologiska mångfalden« (party programme ↗)“to this depletion of biological diversity”
flags: blandad_traff
The party programme states that biological diversity must be protected and that natural resources and ecosystems are already being used beyond the limits of long-term sustainability, which speaks for managing and restoring existing nature values.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that biological diversity must be protected and that natural resources and ecosystems are already being used beyond the limits of long-term sustainability, which speaks for managing and restoring existing nature values. The election manifesto notes that species extinction is accelerating. Requirements for sufficient resources for management and restoration of degraded habitats thus follow from the plan, while weighing against forming new areas is not addressed.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att den biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas och att naturtillgångar och ekosystem redan i dag utnyttjas över gränsen för det långsiktigt hållbara, vilket talar för att förvalta och restaurera befintliga naturvärden. Valmanifestet konstaterar att artdöden accelererar. Krav på tillräckliga resurser för skötsel och restaurering av degraderade livsmiljöer följer därmed av planen, medan avvägningen mot att bilda nya områden inte berörs.
- protect biological diversitydecisive»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
- restore overexploited ecosystems»naturtillgångar och ekosystem utnyttjas i dag över gränsen för det långsiktigt hållbara« (party programme ↗)“natural resources and ecosystems are today used beyond the limits of long-term sustainability”
- stop species extinction»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile, species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto's binding commitment is to protect 30 percent of Sweden's nature, and the party programme says that the protection of seas, forests and wetlands must be expanded and strengthened because the protected areas are too small.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto's binding commitment is to protect 30 percent of Sweden's nature, and the party programme says that the protection of seas, forests and wetlands must be expanded and strengthened because the protected areas are too small. The counter-proposal instead wants to focus on management of already protected areas rather than creating new ones, which goes against that expansion ambition. The requirement for restoration of coastal environments, however, aligns with the plan's commitment to recreate destroyed environments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestets bindande åtagande är att skydda 30 procent av Sveriges natur, och partiprogrammet säger att skyddet av hav, skogar och våtmarker måste utvidgas och skärpas eftersom de skyddade arealerna är för små. Motförslaget vill i stället lägga fokus på skötsel av redan skyddade områden framför att bilda nya, vilket går emot den utbyggnadsambitionen. Kravet på restaurering av kustmiljöer ligger däremot i linje med planens åtagande att återskapa förstörda miljöer.
- expanded area protectiondecisive»skydda 30 procent av Sveriges natur, bland annat våra unika sammanhängande fjällskogar och skyddsvärda skogar i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect 30 percent of Sweden's nature, including our unique continuous mountain forests and forests worthy of protection across the country.”
- protection must be expanded»Skyddet av hav, skogar, våtmarker, stränder och flera andra biotoper måste utvidgas och skärpas.« (party programme ↗)“The protection of seas, forests, wetlands, shores and several other biotopes must be expanded and strengthened.”
- more marine reserves»sätt att öka skyddet är att inrätta marina reservat och införa fiskefria områden.« (party programme ↗)“way to increase protection is to establish marine reserves and introduce fishing-free areas.”
- restoration of coastal environments»rädda kustens ekosystem — återskapa förstörda miljöer .« (2022 manifesto ↗)“save the coast's ecosystem — recreate destroyed environments.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan builds nature conservation on stewardship, restoration and landowners' voluntary participation rather than new designations, and explicitly wants to do more to restore valuable environments.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds nature conservation on stewardship, restoration and landowners' voluntary participation rather than new designations, and explicitly wants to do more to restore valuable environments. It also requires that coastal marine environments be saved from damage. Focusing on stewardship of already protected areas and restoration of eelgrass meadows in cooperation with landowners thus lies close to the plan's core.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger naturvården på skötsel, restaurering och markägares frivilliga medverkan snarare än på nya avsättningar, och vill uttryckligen göra mer för att restaurera värdefulla miljöer. Den kräver också att kustnära havsmiljöer räddas från skador. Att lägga fokus på skötsel av redan skyddade områden och restaurering av ålgräsängar i samarbete med markägare ligger därmed nära planens kärna.
- restoration with landownersdecisive»Sveriges natur ska vårdas och den biologiska mångfalden utvecklas. Mer måste göras för att restaurera våtmarker, bekämpa invasiva arter och underlätta för markägare att bidra, då frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's nature must be nurtured and biological diversity developed. More must be done to restore wetlands, combat invasive species and facilitate landowners' contribution, as voluntariness and property rights are the foundation for better nature conservation.”
- save coastal and marine environment»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav. Våra barn ska kunna bada utan att utsättas för gifter, nedskräpning eller algblomning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas. Our children must be able to bathe without being exposed to toxins, litter or algal blooms.”
- protect coastal ecosystems»Skadlig bottentrålning ska inte få förstöra för varken havsmiljön, den småskaliga fiskenäringen eller sportfisket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Harmful bottom-trawling must not be allowed to destroy either the marine environment, the small-scale fishing industry or sport fishing.”
- conservation as investment»Bevarande av biologisk mångfald, och de miljöer den beror av, är en investering i framtiden« (party programme ↗)“Conservation of biological diversity, and the environments it depends on, is an investment in the future”
The party programme demands increased restoration efforts for biological diversity and that the state strives for good cooperation with landowners and the local population in nature conservation, and the election manifesto wants to strengthen natural carbon sequestration by restoring more wetlands.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands increased restoration efforts for biological diversity and that the state strives for good cooperation with landowners and the local population in nature conservation, and the election manifesto wants to strengthen natural carbon sequestration by restoring more wetlands. The counter-proposal's demand for resources for maintenance and restoration, including eelgrass beds, in cooperation with landowners and the public follows from this. Prioritizing away new areas, however, conflicts with the plan's desire to protect the most valuable sea areas.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver ökade restaureringsinsatser för den biologiska mångfalden och att staten strävar efter god samverkan med markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvården, och valmanifestet vill stärka den naturliga koldioxidinlagringen genom att återställa fler våtmarker. Motförslagets krav på resurser för skötsel och restaurering, inklusive ålgräsängar, i samarbete med markägare och allmänhet följer av detta. Att prioritera bort nya områden skaver däremot mot planens vilja att skydda de mest värdefulla havsområdena.
- increased restoration effortsdecisive»ökade restaureringsinsatser och fler skyddade sammanhängande områden« (party programme ↗)“increased restoration efforts and more protected contiguous areas”
- cooperation with landowners»Staten ska sträva efter god samverkan med markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvård« (party programme ↗)“The state shall strive for good cooperation with landowners and the local population in nature conservation”
- restore natural environments»Den naturliga koldioxidinlagringen ska stärkas genom att fler tidigare våtmarker återställs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Natural carbon sequestration shall be strengthened by restoring more previously wetland areas.”
- protect valuable sea areas»Kampen mot övergödningen ska fortsätta, industrifisket ska begränsas och de mest värdefulla havsområdena skyddas som marina reservat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against eutrophication shall continue, industrial fishing shall be limited and the most valuable sea areas shall be protected as marine reserves.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's stewardship implies no passive preservation but a responsible use and improvement, which argues for prioritizing management and restoration over setting aside new land.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's stewardship implies no passive preservation but a responsible use and improvement, which argues for prioritizing management and restoration over setting aside new land. The plan identifies landowners as a major resource in nature conservation and wants wetlands to be preserved and, if needed, restored, which corresponds to the demand for restoration in cooperation with landowners. Nature's accessibility for outdoor recreation also supports participation from the public.
Original (Swedish)
Planens förvaltarskap innebär inget passivt bevarande utan ett ansvarsfullt brukande och förädlande, vilket talar för att skötsel och restaurering prioriteras framför att avsätta ny mark. Planen pekar ut markägarna som en stor resurs i naturvården och vill att våtmarker bevaras och vid behov återställs, vilket motsvarar kravet på restaurering i samverkan med markägare. Naturens tillgänglighet för friluftsliv stöder också delaktighet från allmänheten.
- active stewardshipdecisive»Förvaltarskapsprincipen innebär inget passivt bevarande, utan ett ansvarsfullt brukande och förädlande av tillgångarna.« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle implies no passive preservation, but a responsible use and improvement of resources.”
- landowners as a resource»här en stor resurs, inte minst då det gäller att bevara« (party programme ↗)“here a major resource, not least when it comes to preserving”
- restoration of habitats»Våtmarker behöver bevaras och vid behov återställas,« (party programme ↗)“Wetlands need to be preserved and, if needed, restored,”
- accessible nature for outdoor recreation»av hög kvalitet och att allemansrätten bevaras så att« (party programme ↗)“of high quality and that public access is preserved so that”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises to better care for already protected forest for biodiversity and that more state resources should go to managing and maintaining valuable nature, while the area of exempted land should not grow.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises to better care for already protected forest for biodiversity and that more state resources should go to managing and maintaining valuable nature, while the area of exempted land should not grow. This is precisely the counter-proposal's prioritization of management and restoration over new formation. The plan also wants to strengthen the Baltic work and salvage environmentally hazardous waste in the seas, which bears restoration of near-coastal habitats.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att vårda redan skyddad skog bättre för den biologiska mångfalden och att mer statliga resurser ska gå till att sköta och förvalta värdefull natur, samtidigt som arealen undantagen mark inte ska växa. Det är precis motförslagets prioritering av skötsel och restaurering framför nybildning. Planen vill dessutom förstärka Östersjöarbetet och bärga miljöfarligt avfall i haven, vilket bär restaurering av kustnära livsmiljöer.
- management before new formationdecisive»Vårda redan skyddad skog bättre för att stärka den biologiska mångfalden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Better care for already protected forest to strengthen biodiversity”
- resources for stewardship»Det behövs mer statliga resurser för att sköta och förvalta områden med värdefull natur« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More state resources are needed to manage and maintain areas with valuable nature”
- restoration of marine environment»Förstärka det gemensamma Östersjöarbetet för åtgärder mot övergödning och nedskräpning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen joint Baltic work for measures against overfertilization and dumping”
- cooperation with landowners»Stärka skogsägarnas äganderätt genom att formellt skydd av skog ska ske genom frivillighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen forest owners' property rights by ensuring formal forest protection occurs through voluntary means”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that adapted forestry shall be prioritised ahead of reserve designation and wants to increase the pace of work restoring the marine environment in the Baltic.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that adapted forestry shall be prioritised ahead of reserve designation and wants to increase the pace of work restoring the marine environment in the Baltic. The counter-proposal's demands for management and restoration of already protected areas, including eelgrass meadows, ahead of new reserves is the same prioritisation. The plan also demands that authorities work in community of interest with landowners.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att anpassad skogsskötsel ska prioriteras före reservatsavsättning och vill öka takten i arbetet med att återställa havsmiljön i Östersjön. Motförslagets krav på skötsel och restaurering av redan skyddade områden, inklusive ålgräsängar, framför nya reservat är samma prioritering. Planen kräver också att myndigheterna arbetar i intressegemenskap med markägarna.
- management ahead of new reservesdecisive»Att anpassad skogsskötsel prioriteras före reservatsavsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That adapted forestry is prioritised ahead of reserve designation”
- restore marine environment»Öka takten i arbetet med att återställa havsmiljön i Östersjön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the pace of work restoring the marine environment in the Baltic”
- cooperation with landowners»Rättssäkerheten behöver stärkas för den som bedriver näring inom jord- och skogsbruk och myndigheternas arbete behöver i högre grad anpassas för att verka i intressegemenskap med markägare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rule of law needs to be strengthened for those conducting business in agriculture and forestry and the authorities' work needs to be adapted to a greater degree to operate in community of interest with landowners.”
- new methods in nature conservation»Använda nya tekniker i naturvården« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Use new technologies in nature conservation”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:MJU17)
- Committee report full text (HA01MJU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1006 — Långsiktigt planerande och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1081 — Förenklande av bostadsbyggande i attraktiva strandnära lägen av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1091 — Frivillig sekretess för skyddsjaktsansökare av Alexandra Anstrell (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1104 — Den svenska vargstammen av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2022/23:116 — Allmän jakt på skarv och andra åtgärder av Viktor Wärnick och John E Weinerhall (båda M)
- Motion 2022/23:119 — Vargföryngringar inom renskötselområdet av Helén Pettersson (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1218 — Hållbart och livskraftigt fiske i Östersjön av Aron Emilsson (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1221 — Ökad jakt på skarv av Aron Emilsson (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1246 — Hållbart skogsbruk för biologisk mångfald och klimatet av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1247 — Minskad övergödning av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1251 — Förvildat Sverige av Rebecka Le Moine och Marielle Lahti (båda MP)
- Motion 2022/23:1290 — Bekämpning av översvämningsmyggen vid nedre Dalälven av Sanne Lennström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1409 — Avskaffande av strandskyddet av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1411 — Åtgärder för ett mer hållbart och konkurrenskraftigt yrkesfiske av Johan Hultberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1420 — Skarven i Roxen av Jonas Andersson (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1497 — Skyddsjakt på säl och skarv av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1546 — Vargjakt av Patrik Björck (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1580 — Skyddsjakt och allmän jakt på säl av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1591 — Beståndet av skarv av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1631 — Förändrad lagstiftning för jakt av Martina Johansson (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament