2026-03-182025/26:UU16 · p.1UUForeign affairs

UN in Swedish foreign policy

Sweden's role in the UN system and calls for an international equality commission

What's at stake: According to Oxfam, the world's five richest men have doubled their fortunes since 2020 while five billion people have become poorer, and the gaps have widened further through the pandemic, inflation and more conflicts. The outcome affects how Sweden chooses to channel its commitment to a fairer global economic order — through a new institution or via existing UN structures.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Sweden should take the initiative to create a new international equality commission within the UN system to bring together global work against rising economic inequality, or whether this work is best pursued through existing UN structures and Agenda 2030, where Sweden already has influence.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee stresses that Sweden already works with like-minded countries within the UN system's established norms and agreements, which promote human rights, sustainable development and humanitarian aid, and that Sweden is a major donor in that work. The committee maintains that work to reduce inequality, which is explicitly part of Agenda 2030, is best pursued within these existing structures where Sweden already has established influence, rather than by creating a new body, and therefore recommends rejecting the motions calling for an equality commission.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The reservation holds that, given sharply widening global inequality, Sweden should be a driving and active voice for a fair and equal world order and take the initiative to create an international equality commission within the UN system to build a concerted international effort for a fairer world.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 12/0/3/7departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/16/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
CYesAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LYesYes 10/0/0/6follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 17/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: highderived
SDYesYes 62/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

VAndreas Lennkvist Manriquez (V, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes
VJessica Wetterling (V, Västra Götalands läns västra)Abstain — party line: Yes
VKarin Rågsjö (V, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:3107 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) demand 25, 2025/26:3509 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) demand 45, 2025/26:3623 by Morgan Johansson et al. (S) demands 46 and 49 and 2025/26:3729 by Kerstin Lundgren et al. (C) demand 66.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3107 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkande 25, 2025/26:3509 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 45, 2025/26:3623 av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 46 och 49 samt 2025/26:3729 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C) yrkande 66.

Riksdag decision: Parliament voted no on eighteen proposals in motions concerning the UN in Swedish foreign policy. Seventeen proposals were submitted during the regular motion period 2025 and one proposal was submitted during the regular motion period 2024. The proposals concern, among other things, Swedish initiatives at the UN in the areas of the UN in Swedish foreign policy and women, peace and security. Parliament considers that Sweden is already actively working on the issues raised by the motionists.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that global inequality must be significantly reduced and that Sweden should work for the UN to play a larger role in world politics.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that global inequality must be significantly reduced and that Sweden should work for the UN to play a larger role in world politics. It also wants to democratise UN structures and drive solidarity-based aid and fair trade terms. An initiative for an international equality commission within the UN system is a way to realise these very commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt måste minskas och att Sverige ska verka för att FN spelar en större roll i världspolitiken. Den vill dessutom demokratisera FN:s strukturer och driva solidariskt bistånd och rättvisa handelsvillkor. Ett initiativ till en internationell jämlikhetskommission inom FN-systemet är ett sätt att förverkliga just dessa åtaganden.

  • reduce global inequalitydecisive»I en rättvis värld måste den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt minskas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a just world, global inequality must be significantly reduced.”
  • strengthened role for the UN»Vi vill därför att Sverige verkar för att FN ska spela en större roll« (party programme ↗)“We therefore want Sweden to work for the UN to play a larger role”
  • democratise the UN»Vi vill se en demokratisering av FN:s strukturer« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a democratisation of UN structures”
  • fair trade terms»solidariskt bistånd och rättvisa handelsvillkor.« (party programme ↗)“solidarity-based aid and fair trade terms.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan makes the fight against poverty and growing inequalities an international task and wants Sweden to be a strong global voice within the UN, which bears the counter-proposal's requirement for a Swedish initiative for an equality commission in the UN system.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the fight against poverty and growing inequalities an international task and wants Sweden to be a strong global voice within the UN, which bears the counter-proposal's requirement for a Swedish initiative for an equality commission in the UN system. The plan also points to concrete global redistribution measures such as the one-per-cent target and global corporate taxation. There is no position on new UN bodies, so the assessment is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör kampen mot fattigdom och växande klyftor till en internationell uppgift och vill att Sverige är en stark global röst inom FN, vilket bär motförslagets krav på ett svenskt initiativ till en jämlikhetskommission i FN-systemet. Planen pekar också ut konkreta globala fördelningsåtgärder som enprocentmålet och en global företagsbeskattning. Något ställningstagande om nya FN-organ finns inte, så bedömningen är härledd.

  • reduced global povertydecisive»Arbetet för att minska fattigdomen måste fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to reduce poverty must continue.”
  • uphold the UN's role»Vi kommer att fortsätta värna FN:s roll i arbetet för folkrätten och det internationella samarbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will continue to uphold the UN's role in work for international law and international cooperation.”
  • global redistribution»Global överenskommelse om ökad beskattning av företag.« (party programme ↗)“Global agreement on increased taxation of companies.”
  • one per cent target for aid»Enprocentmål för biståndet.« (party programme ↗)“One per cent target for aid.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that the justice perspective is also global and that resources in a just world shall be distributed equitably.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the justice perspective is also global and that resources in a just world shall be distributed equitably. The UN is pointed out as the central forum for global cooperation, and the party is prepared to change the organisation, even to abolish the veto in the Security Council. A new UN organ against global disparities lies therefore in line with the plan, although a specific equality commission is not mentioned.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att rättviseperspektivet även är globalt och att resurserna i en rättvis värld ska vara likvärdigt fördelade. FN pekas ut som det centrala forumet för globalt samarbete, och partiet är berett att förändra organisationen, till och med att avskaffa vetot i säkerhetsrådet. Ett nytt FN-organ mot globala klyftor ligger därför i linje med planen, även om just en jämlikhetskommission inte nämns.

  • global justicedecisive»Vårt perspektiv på rättvisa är även globalt.« (party programme ↗)“Our perspective on justice is also global.”
  • UN as global forum»FN är ett viktigt forum för globalt samarbete« (party programme ↗)“The UN is an important forum for global cooperation”
  • reform the UN»ta bort vetot i säkerhetsrådet« (party programme ↗)“remove the veto in the Security Council”
  • humanitarian superpower»Sverige ska återigen bli en humanitär stormakt« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall once again become a humanitarian superpower”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to see leadership that prioritises effective measures over symbolic politics, and its path towards a fairer world goes via free trade, open markets and people in poor countries being able to provide for themselves.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to see leadership that prioritises effective measures over symbolic politics, and its path towards a fairer world goes via free trade, open markets and people in poor countries being able to provide for themselves. Establishing yet another body within the UN system for global equality does not address any commitment in the plan. The basis is weak and the conclusion derived from the nearest principle.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill se ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik, och dess väg mot en rättvisare värld går via frihandel, öppna marknader och att människor i fattiga länder kan försörja sig själva. Att inrätta ännu ett organ inom FN-systemet för global jämlikhet svarar inte mot något åtagande i planen. Underlaget är svagt och slutsatsen härledd ur närmast liggande princip.

  • effective measures over symbolic politicsdecisive»Ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Leadership that prioritises effective measures over symbolic politics or inactivity.”
  • free trade against poverty»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel. Öppna upp fler marknader för svenska varor och tjänster.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot get by without free trade. Open up more markets for Swedish goods and services.”
  • shared global responsibility»Fred, skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter och hållbar utveckling är hela världens ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Peace, protection of human rights and sustainable development are the responsibility of the whole world.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that liberal justice is about equal conditions, not equal results, and that development is driven by democracy, market economy and free trade rather than by redistributive world orders.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that liberal justice is about equal conditions, not equal results, and that development is driven by democracy, market economy and free trade rather than by redistributive world orders. It also wants to make the UN more effective within existing structures, not build new organs. An international equality commission therefore lies outside the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att liberal rättvisa handlar om lika förutsättningar, inte om lika resultat, och att utveckling drivs av demokrati, marknadsekonomi och frihandel snarare än av omfördelande världsordningar. Den vill dessutom göra FN mer handlingskraftigt inom befintliga strukturer, inte bygga nya organ. En internationell jämlikhetskommission ligger därför utanför planens linje.

  • market economy drives developmentdecisive»Demokrati, jämställdhet, utbildning, marknadsekonomi, frihandel, privat äganderätt, rättsstat« (party programme ↗)“Democracy, equality, education, market economy, free trade, private property, rule of law”
  • equal conditions not outcomes»lika förutsättningar, inte om lika resultat.« (party programme ↗)“equal conditions, not equal results.”
  • more effective UN»ett FN som är mer handlingskraftigt och mer trovärdigt.« (party programme ↗)“a UN that is more effective and more credible.”
  • freedom as foreign policy aim»Målet med vår utrikespolitik är en friare värld för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The aim of our foreign policy is a freer world for all.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan shares the problem description and calls the global gaps unacceptable, but prescribes another means: freer world trade with fairer rules is according to the plan the prerequisite for the gaps to decrease.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan shares the problem description and calls the global gaps unacceptable, but prescribes another means: freer world trade with fairer rules is according to the plan the prerequisite for the gaps to decrease. Responsibility for global rules is placed on the EU and on existing structures, and the UN should be strengthened in its current role rather than supplemented with new bodies. Taking the initiative for a new international equality commission therefore does not follow from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen delar problembeskrivningen och kallar de globala klyftorna oacceptabla, men anvisar ett annat medel: friare världshandel med rättvisare spelregler är enligt planen förutsättningen för att klyftorna ska minska. Ansvaret för globala spelregler läggs på EU och på befintliga strukturer, och FN ska stärkas i sin nuvarande roll snarare än kompletteras med nya organ. Att ta initiativ till en ny internationell jämlikhetskommission följer därför inte av planen.

  • free trade reduces gapsdecisive»rättvisare spelregler är en förutsättning för att klyftorna ska kunna minska.« (party programme ↗)“fairer rules are a prerequisite for the gaps to be able to decrease.”
  • global gaps unacceptable»De globala klyftorna är med denna utgångspunkt oacceptabla.« (party programme ↗)“The global gaps are from this perspective unacceptable.”
  • EU responsibility for global rules»EU har ett ansvar att bidra till rättvisa globala spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The EU has a responsibility to contribute to fair global rules”
  • strengthened UN within existing structures»Därför måste FN:s ställning skyddas och stärkas« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, the UN's position must be protected and strengthened”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan explicitly opposes tax funds being channelled uncritically through unreformed UN organs and wants instead to work for a reformed UN.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly opposes tax funds being channelled uncritically through unreformed UN organs and wants instead to work for a reformed UN. A new international equality commission within the UN system is precisely the kind of new organ the plan does not call for. The plan's line is to focus efforts where they do the most good.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vänder sig uttryckligen mot att skattemedel okritiskt kanaliseras genom oreformerade FN-organ och vill i stället verka för ett reformerat FN. En ny internationell jämlikhetskommission inom FN-systemet är just ett nytt organ av det slag planen inte efterfrågar. Planens linje är att fokusera insatserna dit de gör störst nytta.

  • critical stance towards UN organsdecisive»Dina skattepengar ska inte försvinna i korruption eller hamna i fickorna på odemokratiska ledare, och inte heller okritiskt kanaliseras i ökande volymer genom oreformerade FN-organ som brister i transparens och uppföljning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Your tax money must not disappear in corruption or end up in the pockets of undemocratic leaders, and must not either be channelled uncritically in increasing volumes through unreformed UN organs that lack transparency and accountability.”
  • reform the UN, not expand it»Verka för ett reformerat FN« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a reformed UN”
  • focused aid»Fokusera det svenska biståndet till de länder, organisationer och tematiska områden där det gör störst nytta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus Swedish aid towards the countries, organisations and thematic areas where it does the most good”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal wants to establish an international equality commission within the UN system for a fairer world order.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wants to establish an international equality commission within the UN system for a fairer world order. The plan in contrast directs foreign policy toward preserving Swedish interests and requires that international aid be greatly reduced and made more efficient instead of building more supranational structures. A new UN body for global redistribution lies outside that prioritization.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill inrätta en internationell jämlikhetskommission inom FN-systemet för en rättvisare världsordning. Planen riktar tvärtom utrikespolitiken mot att värna svenska intressen och kräver att det internationella biståndet kraftigt minskar och effektiviseras i stället för att fler överstatliga strukturer byggs. Ett nytt FN-organ för global omfördelning ligger utanför den prioriteringen.

  • Swedish interests in foreign policydecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill att inriktningen av utrikespolitiken i högre utsträckning än idag ska värna svenskarnas intressen på det globala planet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Swedish Democrats want the direction of foreign policy to to a greater extent than today preserve Swedes' interests on the global stage.”
  • reduced and more efficient aid»Överlag måste det internationella biståndet kraftigt minska och insatserna effektiviseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Overall, international aid must be greatly reduced and efforts made more efficient.”
  • Swedish interests internationally»Värna svenska intressen i internationella sammanhang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Preserve Swedish interests in international contexts”
  • national self-determination»Stärka det nationella självbestämmandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen national self-determination”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament