2023-04-272022/23:AU9 · p.5AULabour market

Labor market policy programs and measures

Start-up jobs and transparency around subsidised employment

What's at stake: The decision affects how well the state can monitor whether subsidised jobs provide fair conditions and actually lead on to the regular labour market, as well as the public's and journalists' ability to scrutinise which companies receive state wage subsidies.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should tighten the rules for subsidised employment such as start-up jobs - including through requirements for employer certificates, public disclosure of which companies receive support, and a mapping of conditions - or whether current measures and the direction of labour-market policy are already sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee considers that labour-market policy needs access to a range of measures adapted to jobseekers, of which start-up jobs are an important part, and recalls that during the autumn budget process it already backed the government's proposal in this area. The committee therefore sees no reason for a statement to the government regarding the motions calling for further regulation and scrutiny of subsidised employment.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 7 (V)

The reservation (V) wants to tighten the rules for subsidised employment, which have long been affected by risks and problems. The government should require employers who hire with a subsidy to issue an employment certificate when the job ends, enable authorities and journalists to scrutinise which companies receive state wage subsidies, carry out a mapping of working hours, pay and conditions broken down by sector, gender and foreign background, and set up an inquiry into the regulatory framework to counter misuse of labour-market measures.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 7 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoAbstain 0/0/94/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoYes 16/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CYesAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lowderived
SDNoYes 63/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:852 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demand 5, 2022/23:961 by Magnus Persson et al. (SD) demand 16, 2022/23:1228 by Ida Gabrielsson et al. (V) demand 10, 2022/23:1245 by Ciczie Weidby et al. (V) demands 25-32, 2022/23:1362 by Mikael Dahlqvist et al. (S), 2022/23:1379 by Joakim Sandell (S), 2022/23:1479 by Annette Rydell and Heléne Björklund (both S) demand 2, 2022/23:1711 by Johan Andersson et al. (S), 2022/23:1805 by Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2022/23:2019 by Dzenan Cisija et al. (S) and 2022/23:2052 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) demands 2, 6, 7 and 13.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:852 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 5, 2022/23:961 av Magnus Persson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 16, 2022/23:1228 av Ida Gabrielsson m.fl. (V) yrkande 10, 2022/23:1245 av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V) yrkandena 25-32, 2022/23:1362 av Mikael Dahlqvist m.fl. (S), 2022/23:1379 av Joakim Sandell (S), 2022/23:1479 av Annette Rydell och Heléne Björklund (båda S) yrkande 2, 2022/23:1711 av Johan Andersson m.fl. (S), 2022/23:1805 av Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2022/23:2019 av Dzenan Cisija m.fl. (S) och 2022/23:2052 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkandena 2, 6, 7 och 13.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 80 proposals on labor market policy issues. The motions concern, among other things, the Swedish Public Employment Service, labor market policy measures and unemployment insurance. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period of 2022. The Riksdag rejects the motions and refers, among other things, to ongoing investigation work in the area.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan points out wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation as central threats and demands that tax funds only go to employers who follow collective agreements.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan points out wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation as central threats and demands that tax funds only go to employers who follow collective agreements. It wants Swedish agreement terms to apply fully to everyone on the labour market and counteract insecure employment. Tighter rules, transparency in which companies receive wage subsidies and mapping of conditions by sector, gender and background follow directly from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen pekar ut lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande som centrala hot och kräver att skattemedel bara går till arbetsgivare som följer kollektivavtal. Den vill att svenska avtalsvillkor fullt ut ska gälla alla på arbetsmarknaden och motverka otrygga anställningar. Skärpta regler, insyn i vilka företag som får lönesubventioner och kartläggning av villkor efter bransch, kön och bakgrund följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.

  • counteract exploitation of wage earnersdecisive»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
  • conditions for public funds»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party demands collective agreements in public procurement.”
  • agreement terms for all employees»Svenska kollektivavtal ska fullt ut gälla för alla på svensk arbetsmarknad.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish collective agreements shall apply in full for everyone on the Swedish labour market.”
  • insecure employment shall end»Otryggheten skapas genom tillfälliga anställningar, sms-jobb, gig-jobb, deltidsjobb och bemanningsjobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Insecurity is created through temporary employment, SMS jobs, gig jobs, part-time work and temporary staffing.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto requires tough action against employment crime and that public employers and purchasers set an example for fair competition, and that welfare fraud is stopped.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires tough action against employment crime and that public employers and purchasers set an example for fair competition, and that welfare fraud is stopped. Stricter rules, employer certificates, auditability and an investigation into misuse of subsidized employment are measures in that direction. The party programme requires transparency and scrutiny of private actors who live off tax money. Subsidized employment is not treated explicitly.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver krafttag mot arbetslivskriminalitet och att offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare är föredömen för sund konkurrens, samt att välfärdsbrottslighet stoppas. Skärpta regler, arbetsgivarintyg, granskningsbarhet och en utredning mot missbruk av subventionerade anställningar är åtgärder i just den riktningen. Partiprogrammet kräver öppenhet och insyn hos privata aktörer som lever av skattemedel. Subventionerade anställningar behandlas inte uttryckligen.

  • tough action against employment crimedecisive»Krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten. Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tough action against employment crime. Employment crime must not exist in the Swedish labour market and public employers and purchasers must set an example in promoting fair competition.”
  • stop welfare fraud»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax fraud, welfare crime and money laundering must be stopped.”
  • transparency in tax-financed activities»krav på öppenhet och insyn ska ställas på de privata aktörer som verkar inom den« (party programme ↗)“requirements for transparency and scrutiny must be placed on the private actors that operate within”
  • no competitive advantages from poor conditions»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must never be profitable to commit crimes or gain competitive advantages by neglecting employees' right to a secure working environment.”

flags: citat_migrerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan sees structural discrimination in all areas of working life and wants to produce systematic statistics that illuminate it, which corresponds to the counter-proposal's requirement for mapping broken down by sector, gender and background.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees structural discrimination in all areas of working life and wants to produce systematic statistics that illuminate it, which corresponds to the counter-proposal's requirement for mapping broken down by sector, gender and background. It also gives the state responsibility to ensure healthy conditions through legislation and oversight, and wants transparency and public access to apply to tax-funded activities. Sharpened rules and scrutiny of wage subsidies follow from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser strukturell diskriminering på arbetslivets alla områden och vill ta fram systematisk statistik som belyser den, vilket motsvarar motförslagets krav på kartläggning uppdelad på bransch, kön och bakgrund. Den ger också staten ansvar att genom lagstiftning och övervakning se till att sunda villkor råder, och vill att insyn och offentlighet ska gälla skattefinansierad verksamhet. Skärpta regler och granskning av lönesubventioner följer av dessa åtaganden.

  • state oversight of sound conditionsdecisive»Staten ska genom lagstiftning och övervakning se« (party programme ↗)“The state shall through legislation and oversight ensure”
  • structural discrimination in working life»diskrimineringen finns på alla områden i arbetslivet, när det gäller lön, anställningsformer och« (party programme ↗)“discrimination exists in all areas of working life, when it comes to wages, forms of employment and”
  • systematic mapping»ta fram systematisk statistik för att belysa diskriminering och rasism i samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“produce systematic statistics to illuminate discrimination and racism in society.”
  • transparency in tax-funded activities»Meddelarfrihet och offentlighetsprincipen ska gälla« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of expression and the principle of public access shall apply”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to simplify and strengthen new-starter jobs, broaden establishment jobs and make it cheaper and easier to employ those far from the labour market.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to simplify and strengthen new-starter jobs, broaden establishment jobs and make it cheaper and easier to employ those far from the labour market. New certification obligations, surveys and stricter regulation of subsidised employment pull in the opposite direction from the commitment to clean up the rules. The plan's transparency requirements concern corruption and public power, not increased regulatory burden for employing companies.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill förenkla och förstärka nystartsjobben, bredda etableringsjobben och göra det billigare och lättare att anställa dem som står långt från arbetsmarknaden. Nya intygsskyldigheter, kartläggningar och skärpt reglering av subventionerade anställningar drar i motsatt riktning mot åtagandet att rensa i regelträsket. Planens transparenskrav gäller korruption och offentlig makt, inte ökad regelbörda för anställande företag.

  • simplify subsidised jobsdecisive»Skapa fler dörrar in till arbetsmarknaden genom fler enkla jobb, det vill säga jobb som inte kräver kvalificerad utbildning. Förenkla och förstärk nystartsjobben och bredda de så kallade etableringsjobben.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create more doors into the labour market through more simple jobs, that is, jobs that do not require qualified education. Simplify and strengthen new-starter jobs and broaden the so-called establishment jobs.”
  • easier to employ»Det måste bli billigare och lättare att anställa, särskilt personer som står långt från arbetsmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must become cheaper and easier to employ, especially persons far from the labour market.”
  • reduced regulatory red tape»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the regulatory tangle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
  • transparency against abuse of power»Sverige ska bli ännu mer transparent.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become even more transparent.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan provides no rules for subsidised employment, but it establishes the importance of the public access principle for oversight and that public funds shall be used cost-effectively with equal treatment.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan provides no rules for subsidised employment, but it establishes the importance of the public access principle for oversight and that public funds shall be used cost-effectively with equal treatment. Requirements for employer certificate, transparency in which companies receive wage subsidies and an investigation against misuse follow from these principles. The plan simultaneously wants to keep thresholds to the labour market low, which makes the support derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ger inga regler för subventionerade anställningar, men den slår fast offentlighetsprincipens betydelse för granskning och att offentliga medel ska användas kostnadseffektivt med likabehandling. Krav på arbetsgivarintyg, insyn i vilka företag som får lönesubventioner och en utredning mot missbruk följer av dessa principer. Planen vill samtidigt hålla trösklarna till arbetsmarknaden låga, vilket gör stödet härlett.

  • transparency in public fundsdecisive»Offentlighetsprincipen har en grundläggande betydelse för att förankra och fördjupa folkstyret« (party programme ↗)“The public access principle has a fundamental importance for anchoring and deepening popular rule”
  • responsible use of tax funds»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader,« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall take place in ways that give taxpayers low costs,”
  • low thresholds to jobs»Framväxten av jobb som inte kräver formella kunskaper eller erfarenheter ska underlättas« (party programme ↗)“Growth in jobs that do not require formal education or experience shall be facilitated”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan rejects direct company subsidies and requires that labor market policy measures are supportive without damaging the ordinary labor market.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan rejects direct company subsidies and requires that labor market policy measures are supportive without damaging the ordinary labor market. Tightened rules, employer certificates and insight into which companies receive wage subsidies are therefore logical, as is the plan's requirement for evaluation and cost monitoring as a political task. Honesty is highlighted as a foundation in the economy, which speaks to measures against abuse.

Original (Swedish)

Planen avvisar direkta företagssubventioner och kräver att arbetsmarknadspolitikens insatser är stödjande utan att skada den ordinarie arbetsmarknaden. Skärpta regler, arbetsgivarintyg och insyn i vilka företag som får lönesubventioner är därför följdriktigt, liksom planens krav på utvärdering och kostnadsuppföljning som politisk uppgift. Hederlighet lyfts fram som ett fundament i ekonomin, vilket talar för åtgärder mot missbruk.

  • subsidies to companies are rejecteddecisive»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct company subsidies are rejected.”
  • measures must not damage the labor market»stödjande när så krävs, dock utan att skada ordinarie« (party programme ↗)“supportive when so required, but without damaging ordinary”
  • monitoring and control»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political”
  • honesty in the economy»Hederlighet och personligt ansvarstagande är« (party programme ↗)“Honesty and personal responsibility are”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's instruments for getting the long-term unemployed and newly arrived into work are greatly reduced employment costs, combined with one-third of companies' administrative costs and regulatory red tape being removed.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's instruments for getting the long-term unemployed and newly arrived into work are greatly reduced employment costs, combined with one-third of companies' administrative costs and regulatory red tape being removed. The counter-proposal's demands for new attestation obligations, mappings and tightened regulation of subsidized employment go in the opposite direction and risk making the instrument less used. The plan's will to combat fraud with tax money does however pull partly toward the counter-proposal.

Original (Swedish)

Planens instrument för att få långtidsarbetslösa och nyanlända i jobb är kraftigt sänkta anställningskostnader, kombinerat med att en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och regelkrångel ska bort. Motförslagets krav på nya intygsskyldigheter, kartläggningar och skärpt reglering av subventionerade anställningar går i motsatt riktning och riskerar att göra instrumentet mindre använt. Planens vilja att komma åt fusk med skattemedel drar visserligen delvis mot motförslaget.

  • cheaper to hiredecisive»Kraftigt sänka anställningskostnaderna för den som anställer nyanlända och långtidsarbetslösa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly lower employment costs for those who hire newly arrived and long-term unemployed”
  • reduced administrative burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory red tape”
  • stop fraud with tax money»Skärpa straffen för bidragsbrott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten penalties for benefit fraud”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to abolish ineffective labor market and integration programs and stop public funding for fake jobs, with explicit criticism of subsidized employment forms such as new-start jobs and introduction jobs.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to abolish ineffective labor market and integration programs and stop public funding for fake jobs, with explicit criticism of subsidized employment forms such as new-start jobs and introduction jobs. Tightened rules, employer certificates, audits and an investigation of the regulations for subsidized employment move in the same direction as this commitment. The plan also requires clear results for each public initiative.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram och stoppa offentliga medel till låtsasjobb, med uttrycklig kritik mot subventionerade anställningsformer som nystartsjobb och introduktionsjobb. Skärpta regler, arbetsgivarintyg, granskning och en utredning av regelverket för subventionerade anställningar går i samma riktning som detta åtagande. Planen kräver också tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning.

  • criticism of subsidized jobsdecisive»Istället för ineffektiva arbetsmarknadspolitiska konstruktioner som nystartsjobb, etableringsanställningar och introduktionsjobb, bör politiken verka för att skapa en större efterfrågan på riktiga jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of ineffective labor market policy constructs such as new-start jobs, establishment employment and introduction jobs, policy should work to create greater demand for real jobs.”
  • abolish ineffective programs»Avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram som är skapade för att dölja arbetslöshet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish ineffective labor market and integration programs created to hide unemployment”
  • no fake jobs»Stoppa användandet av offentliga medel till låtsasjobb« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the use of public funds for fake jobs”
  • requirements and audits»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Request clear results for each public initiative”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament