2024-04-032023/24:KU13 · p.5KUConstitution
Religious communities' security and safety work
Support for faith communities' security work
What's at stake: Faith communities exposed to threats and violence, not least Jewish congregations, spend a large share of their budgets on security; how the support is designed determines whether they can hire security staff and make long-term investments or are limited to short-term, one-off measures.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether state support for faith communities' security measures should be reformed to allow long-term, recurring investment instead of one-off grants, or whether the results of measures already taken — increased funding and targeted support for communities at risk — should be awaited before further changes are made.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee takes the threats against faith communities seriously but notes that the government has already raised the grant for security measures, given targeted extra support to Jewish congregations and changed the allocation so that the most exposed organisations can receive support, and considers that the results of these measures should be awaited before new ones are proposed.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (C, MP)
The reservation (C, MP) wants to reform support for faith communities' security measures to allow long-term, recurring investment — for example in staff — instead of one-off grants, citing a government agency review showing that current grants do not sufficiently benefit the groups that need them most.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna
Ja 266–35Ja 206–95
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:267 by Magnus Berntsson (KD), 2023/24:1524 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) request 16 and 2023/24:2490 by Malin Björk et al. (C) request 25.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:267 av Magnus Berntsson (KD), 2023/24:1524 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkande 16 och 2023/24:2490 av Malin Björk m.fl. (C) yrkande 25.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to about forty proposals in motions on freedoms and rights from the general motion period 2023. The Riksdag refers mainly to ongoing work. The motions deal with, among other things, constitutional protection of abortion rights, revocation of citizenship, discrimination, protection of property rights, religious communities' security and safety work, a worldview-neutral state and freedom of association.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to expand the constitutional anti-discrimination clause to include gender identity or expression, disability, and age. (C, MP) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan guarantees freedom of religion and lifts Sweden's commitment to protect and strengthen, among others, Jews' and Roma people's rights to identity and religion, and describes how excluding racism takes expression in assault, persecution and harassment.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan guarantees freedom of religion and lifts Sweden's commitment to protect and strengthen, among others, Jews' and Roma people's rights to identity and religion, and describes how excluding racism takes expression in assault, persecution and harassment. Long-term and ongoing security support instead of one-time grants follows from that protection of vulnerable faith communities shall be lasting. The plan does not however address grant forms, so the assessment is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen garanterar religionsfriheten och lyfter fram Sveriges åtagande att skydda och stärka bland andra judars och romers rättigheter till identitet och religion, samt beskriver hur den exkluderande rasismen tar sig uttryck i misshandel, förföljelser och trakasserier. Ett långsiktigt och löpande säkerhetsstöd i stället för engångsbidrag följer av att skyddet av utsatta trossamfund ska vara varaktigt. Planen behandlar dock inte bidragsformer, varför bedömningen är härledd.
- protection against hate crimedecisive»I Sverige yttrar sig den exkluderande rasismen dels i misshandel, förföljelser och trakasserier« (party programme ↗)“In Sweden excluding racism expresses itself both in assault, persecution and harassment”
- protect minorities' rights»och stärka samers, tornedalingars, sverigefinnars, romers och judars« (party programme ↗)“and strengthen Sámi, Tornedalians, Sweden Finns, Roma and Jews'”
- guaranteed freedom of religion»Religionsfriheten ska garanteras.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of religion shall be guaranteed.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not mention faith communities' security support, but establishes that it is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and prevent hate speech against groups of people and threats of violence.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not mention faith communities' security support, but establishes that it is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and prevent hate speech against groups of people and threats of violence. As an anti-racist party, the plan opposes groups being limited by hate and threats. The plan also establishes that democracy is undermined when hate groups frighten people into silence. A reformed, long-term support that reaches the most vulnerable congregations follows from that principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planen nämner inte trossamfundens säkerhetsstöd, men slår fast att det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och hindra hets mot folkgrupp och hot om våld. Som antirasistiskt parti vänder sig planen mot att grupper begränsas av hat och hot. Planen slår också fast att demokratin undergrävs när hatgrupper skrämmer människor till tystnad. Ett omlagt, långsiktigt stöd som når de mest utsatta församlingarna följer av den principen.
- society's duty to protectdecisive»Det är samhällets absoluta skyldighet att skydda friheten och den personliga integriteten« (party programme ↗)“It is society's absolute duty to protect freedom and personal integrity”
- anti-racist party»Socialdemokraterna är ett antirasistiskt parti« (party programme ↗)“The Social Democrats are an anti-racist party”
- hate undermines democracy»Demokratin undergrävs när rasistiska och andra ickedemokratiska grupper sprider sitt hat« (party programme ↗)“Democracy is undermined when racist and other undemocratic groups spread their hate”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that no one shall be subject to racism or discrimination on grounds of faith, and the party programme warns especially against increasing discrimination against Jews, Muslims and Roma.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that no one shall be subject to racism or discrimination on grounds of faith, and the party programme warns especially against increasing discrimination against Jews, Muslims and Roma. The plan also wants politics to support civil society's efforts. A reorganised, long-term security support reaching the most vulnerable congregations follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att ingen ska utsättas för rasism eller diskriminering på grund av tro, och partiprogrammet varnar särskilt för tilltagande diskriminering mot judar, muslimer och romer. Planen vill dessutom att politiken stödjer civilsamhällets insatser. Ett omlagt, långsiktigt säkerhetsstöd som når de mest utsatta församlingarna följer av dessa åtaganden.
- protection against religious discriminationdecisive»För Miljöpartiet är alla människors lika värde en självklarhet. I vårt Sverige ska ingen utsättas för rasism eller diskriminering på grund av till exempel tro, sexuell läggning eller funktionsvariation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For the Greens all people's equal worth is self-evident. In our Sweden no one shall be subject to racism or discrimination on grounds of for example faith, sexual orientation or functional variation.”
- vulnerable religious minorities»minoriteter inom EU, inte minst mot judar, muslimer och romer.« (party programme ↗)“minorities within the EU, not least against Jews, Muslims and Roma.”
- support for civil society»Politiken bör på olika vis synliggöra, stödja och« (party programme ↗)“Politics should in various ways make visible, support and”
- protection against hate crimes»Ingen ska utsättas för hatbrott eller hatpropaganda.« (party programme ↗)“No one shall be subject to hate crimes or hate propaganda.”
The election manifesto explicitly commits to strengthening protection for persons active in, among others, religious congregations and that threats and violence against democracy-bearing institutions shall cease.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly commits to strengthening protection for persons active in, among others, religious congregations and that threats and violence against democracy-bearing institutions shall cease. Support that enables long-term, ongoing security investments instead of one-off grants is what makes that commitment real. The plan advocates elsewhere precisely long-term financing for vulnerable civil society actors.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig uttryckligen att stärka skyddet för personer verksamma i bland annat religiösa samfund och att hot och våld mot demokratibärande institutioner ska upphöra. Ett stöd som möjliggör långsiktiga, löpande säkerhetsinvesteringar i stället för engångsbidrag är det som gör det åtagandet verkligt. Planen förordar på andra håll just långsiktig finansiering till utsatta civilsamhällesaktörer.
- strengthened protection for religious congregationsdecisive»Hat, hot, trakasserier och våld riktade mot demokratibärande institutioner måste upphöra. Vi ska stärka skyddet för personer verksamma bland annat i media, religiösa samfund och offentlig förvaltning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Hatred, threats, harassment and violence directed at democracy-bearing institutions must cease. We shall strengthen protection for persons active in, among others, media, religious congregations and public administration.”
- long-term financing over one-off grants»Organisationer som jobbar med flickor och pojkar, förövare och utsatta, ska ha den långsiktiga finansiering de behöver.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Organisations working with girls and boys, perpetrators and victims, shall have the long-term financing they need.”
- support for civil society infrastructure»Politiken kan stödja civilsamhället genom att involvera det i fler processer« (party programme ↗)“Politics can support civil society by involving it in more processes”
- freedom of religion»Yttrandefrihet, religionsfrihet och föreningsfrihet är därför orubbliga« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of association are therefore inviolable”
The plan wants to improve civil society's financing among other things through long-term government grants, which is precisely the transition from one-off grants to ongoing support that the counter-proposal requires.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to improve civil society's financing among other things through long-term government grants, which is precisely the transition from one-off grants to ongoing support that the counter-proposal requires. Faith communities are counted in the plan as part of civil society's core and the state has a responsibility to ensure freedom of religion. The plan simultaneously requires strengthened follow-up of grant allocation, which is a condition rather than an obstacle for the reform.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering bland annat genom långsiktiga statsbidrag, vilket är precis den övergången från engångsbidrag till löpande stöd som motförslaget kräver. Trossamfunden räknas i planen till civilsamhällets kärna och staten har ett ansvar att säkra fri religionsutövning. Planen kräver samtidigt stärkt uppföljning av bidragsgivningen, vilket är ett villkor snarare än ett hinder för reformen.
- long-term government grantsdecisive»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue improving civil society's financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term government grants.”
- faith communities in civil society»Trossamfunden är en central del av det civila samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Faith communities are a central part of civil society.”
- protection for freedom of religion»Staten har ett ansvar för att säkra en fri« (party programme ↗)“The state has a responsibility for ensuring freedom”
- follow-up of grant allocation»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to strengthen the follow-up of grant allocation and stop hidden financing of faith communities so that they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Religious freedom is according to the party programme a self-evident human right and a vital civil society with religious associations should be promoted by state and municipality.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
Religious freedom is according to the party programme a self-evident human right and a vital civil society with religious associations should be promoted by state and municipality. The election manifesto notes that Islamist extremists have decisive influence in certain areas, which makes associations' security a real issue. Support that enables long-term security investments instead of one-time grants follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Religionsfriheten är enligt partiprogrammet en självklar mänsklig rättighet och ett vitalt civilt samhälle med religiösa samfund ska främjas av stat och kommun. Valmanifestet konstaterar att islamistiska extremister har avgörande påverkan i vissa områden, vilket gör samfundens säkerhet till en reell fråga. Ett stöd som möjliggör långsiktiga säkerhetsinvesteringar i stället för engångsbidrag följer av dessa åtaganden.
- religious freedom as a rightdecisive»Eftersom människan är en fri, tänkande varelse med eget samvete är religionsfrihet en självklar mänsklig rättighet« (party programme ↗)“Because the person is a free, thinking being with their own conscience, religious freedom is a self-evident human right”
- promote associations and societies»Ett vitalt civilt samhälle är av största vikt för en levande demokrati och ett mänskligt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A vital civil society is of greatest importance for a living democracy and a human society.”
- extremism threatens security»Det finns också områden där islamistiska extremister har en avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are also areas where Islamist extremists have decisive influence on community life.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly commits to guarding the security of faith communities so that everyone can practice their faith without feeling threatened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly commits to guarding the security of faith communities so that everyone can practice their faith without feeling threatened. Support that only provides one-off grants and does not reach the most vulnerable does not fulfill that commitment, so the counter-proposal's demands for reformed and long-term support align with the plan. The plan also wants to strengthen the Security Police's protective capacity and stop tax money going to extremists.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig uttryckligen att slå vakt om trossamfundens säkerhet så att alla kan utöva sin tro utan att känna sig hotade. Ett stöd som bara ger engångsbidrag och inte når de mest utsatta uppfyller inte det åtagandet, varför motförslagets krav på ett reformerat och långsiktigt stöd ligger i linje med planen. Planen vill också stärka Säkerhetspolisens skyddsförmåga och stoppa skattemedel till extremister.
- security of faith communitiesdecisive»Slå vakt om trossamfundens säkerhet för alla ska kunna utöva sin tro utan att känna sig hotade« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Guard the security of faith communities so that everyone can practice their faith without feeling threatened”
- strengthened protective capacity»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their capacity to protect liberal democracy and the country's all citizens”
- no tax money to extremists»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop disbursements of tax money to extremists”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's stated line on public support for faith communities is restrictive: mosques and other communities that work for extremism should not receive subsidies, and state support to segregating organizations should be stopped.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's stated line on public support for faith communities is restrictive: mosques and other communities that work for extremism should not receive subsidies, and state support to segregating organizations should be stopped. The plan furthermore requires clear results for each public initiative and conditions support to civil society. A reformed, long-term ongoing subsidy flow to faith communities goes against the restrictive and conditioned stance.
Original (Swedish)
Planens uttalade linje om offentligt stöd till trossamfund är restriktiv: moskéer och andra samfund som verkar för extremism ska inte få bidrag, och statligt stöd till segregerande organisationer ska stoppas. Planen kräver dessutom tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning och villkorar stöd till civilsamhället. Ett reformerat, långsiktigt löpande bidragsflöde till trossamfunden går emot den restriktiva och villkorade hållningen.
- no subsidies to extremist communitiesdecisive»Moskéer och andra trossamfund eller organisationer som verkar för extremism ska vare sig få bidrag från det offentliga eller utländska regimer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mosques and other faith communities or organizations that work for extremism should receive neither subsidies from the public nor foreign regimes.”
- stop segregating subsidies»Stoppa statligt stöd till extremistiska organisationer och andra grupper som verkar segregerande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop state support to extremist organizations and other groups that work segregating”
- results requirements on public support»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Request clear results for each public initiative”
- conditioned public support»En förutsättning för att kunna erhålla stöd från det offentliga skall dock givetvis vara att den verksamhet som bedrivs är förenlig med demokratiska värderingar och en konstruktiv samhällsutveckling.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for receiving support from the public shall of course be that the activities conducted are compatible with democratic values and constructive social development.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KU13)
- Committee report full text (HB01KU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1055 — Införande av ett tredje juridiskt kön av Daniel Vencu Velasquez Castro och Anna Wallentheim (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1182 — Stärkt föreningsfrihet av Ola Möller (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1524 — Politik för de nationella minoriteterna av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1732 — En livssynsöppen stat av Jakob Olofsgård (L)
- Motion 2023/24:1881 — En ny könstillhörighetslag, ett tredje juridiskt kön och könsmarkören X i pass av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1892 — Sveriges kristna kulturarv av Julia Kronlid och Aron Emilsson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2251 — Stärkt äganderätt av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2291 — Slöjförbud i den svenska för- och grundskolan av Richard Jomshof (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2413 — Kampen mot separatismen av Mauricio Rojas m.fl. (L)
- Motion 2023/24:2435 — Dubbelt medborgarskap av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2481 — Familjerätt, hbtqi-frågor och funktionsrätt av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2490 — Demokrati och konstitution av Malin Björk m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2528 — Religionsfrihet av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2617 — Utgiftsområde 9 Hälsovård, sjukvård och social omsorg av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2664 — Jämställdhetspolitisk motion av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2669 — Rättspolitik av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:267 — Säkerheten runt verksamheter med judisk profil av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:268 — Nationellt förbud mot böneutrop från religiösa byggnader av Hans Eklind (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2685 — Utgiftsområde 1 Rikets styrelse av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:366 — En förskola i världsklass av Patrick Reslow m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament