2026-06-092025/26:UbU25 · p.3UbUEducation
Economic consequences
Funding for the reform regulating teaching time
What's at stake: How the reform is funded determines whether municipalities across the country, including those with a weak economy or in rural areas, can implement the regulated teaching time without being forced to cut other school activities, which could otherwise worsen the teacher shortage.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should call on the government to ensure sufficient and fairly distributed funding for the reform regulating teaching time, or whether the motions on this should be rejected.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government intends to allocate as much funding as the inquiry has calculated the reform will cost: around SEK 1.3 billion in 2027 and around SEK 2.6 billion annually from 2028, distributed to municipalities through the municipal equalisation system. The committee therefore rejects the motions calling for the government to secure additional funding.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (S, V, C, MP)
The reservation (S, V, C, MP) is concerned that the government is underfunding the reform and demands that it be implemented responsibly without cuts to other school funding, since otherwise it risks increasing the teacher shortage and worsening both teaching quality and the working environment. The reservation's authors want the government to ensure that municipalities of varying size, not least those with a weak economy or in rural areas, can actually implement the reform.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by S, V, C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 172–171Nej 154–189
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/1 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | No 0/106/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/18/0/0 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/23/0/1 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 16/0/0/0 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 18/0/0/1 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 65/0/0/1 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 68/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:4023 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) item 1, 2025/26:4033 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) item 1 and 2025/26:4066 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) item 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:4023 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2025/26:4033 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:4066 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal on how teachers and preschool teachers should be given the conditions to focus on their main assignment, namely teaching. The proposal includes among other things a legislative change that clarifies that teachers' and preschool teachers' teaching assignment also includes planning and follow-up. The duration of time for the various parts should also be able to be regulated through regulations. The Government also proposes that information to guardians should be given at times determined by school staff and that development talks should take place at least once per year, instead of once per term. It is also clarified that all staff shall be obliged to actively observe and counteract bullying, harassment and sexual harassment and ensure that such incidents are handled. The legislative changes on bullying enter into force on 1 August 2026 and the changes on the teaching assignment on 1 July 2027. Other changes enter into force on 1 July 2028.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to collaborate with labor market parties in formulating the reform for teachers' working conditions. (S, V, C, MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that schools need more resources after decades of cuts and that the right to equivalent education applies everywhere in the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that schools need more resources after decades of cuts and that the right to equivalent education applies everywhere in the country. That bears the counter-proposal's demands that the reform is not underfunded and that also municipalities with weak finances or in rural areas can actually implement it. The plan also requires increased redistribution to municipalities and regions that cannot make their finances work, which directly addresses the committee's assessment that allocated funds are sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att skolan behöver mer resurser efter decennier av nedskärningar och att rätten till likvärdig utbildning gäller överallt i landet. Det bär motförslagets krav på att reformen inte underfinansieras och att även kommuner med svag ekonomi eller på landsbygden faktiskt kan genomföra den. Planen kräver också ökad omfördelning till kommuner och regioner som inte får ihop ekonomin, vilket direkt bemöter utskottets bedömning att avsatta medel räcker.
- more resources for schoolsdecisive»Skolan måste också tillföras mer resurser, det är bara så vi kan skapa en skola som kan möta barn utifrån deras olikheter och skiftande behov.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools must also be given more resources, that is the only way we can create a school that can meet children based on their differences and varying needs.”
- increased redistribution to municipalities»Omfördelningen från stat till region och kommun måste öka och särskild hänsyn ska tas till de många kommuner och regioner som idag inte får ihop sin ekonomi samtidigt som de redan har bland landets högsta skatter totalt sett.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Redistribution from state to region and municipality must increase and particular attention shall be paid to the many municipalities and regions that today cannot make their finances work while already having among the country's highest total taxes.”
- equivalent school nationwide»Det ska inte spela någon roll om du bor i ett miljonprogramsområde eller på landsbygden, rätten till likvärdig utbildning och bildning är grundläggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall not matter whether you live in a million programme area or in the countryside, the right to equivalent education and learning is fundamental.”
- underfunded welfare»De massiva skattesänkningar som genomförts av högerpartier och socialdemokrater under många år har resulterat i att det nu finns 350 miljarder mindre per år till välfärden än 1990.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The massive tax cuts implemented by right-wing parties and social democrats over many years have resulted in there now being 350 billion less per year to welfare than in 1990.”
The plan wants to continue increasing state contributions to municipalities and regions and review the equalization system so that high-quality public services are guaranteed throughout the country, even in small municipalities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to continue increasing state contributions to municipalities and regions and review the equalization system so that high-quality public services are guaranteed throughout the country, even in small municipalities. The requirement that the reform be implemented without cuts to other school appropriations and that even weak municipalities can afford it follows directly from this. The state is bound by equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill fortsätta öka statens bidrag till kommuner och regioner och se över utjämningssystemet så att offentlig service av hög kvalitet garanteras i hela landet, även i små kommuner. Kravet på att reformen genomförs utan nedskärningar på andra skolanslag och att också svaga kommuner klarar den följer direkt av detta. Planen binder staten vid likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.
- equalization for small municipalitiesdecisive»För att säkra välfärden i hela landet behöver vi se över skatteutjämningssystemet, så att det garanterar offentlig service av hög kvalitet i hela landet, även i små kommuner som kämpar med sitt befolkningsunderlag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To secure welfare throughout the country, we need to review the tax equalization system, so that it guarantees high-quality public services throughout the country, even in small municipalities struggling with their population base.”
- increased state contributions»Vi vill fortsätta öka statens bidrag till kommuner och regioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue increasing state contributions to municipalities and regions.”
- municipal equalization»Kommunalt utjämningssystem för nationell likvärdighet.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal equalization system for national equivalence.”
- equivalence throughout the country»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.”
The plan establishes that the state shall be responsible for every school having sufficient funding and that education shall be good and equivalent throughout the country and in all types of residential areas.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the state shall be responsible for every school having sufficient funding and that education shall be good and equivalent throughout the country and in all types of residential areas. The counter-proposal requires precisely that the reform is not underfunded and that even municipalities with weak finances or in rural areas can actually implement it. It is the same commitment in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att staten ska ansvara för att varje skola har tillräcklig finansiering och att utbildningen ska vara god och likvärdig i hela landet och i alla typer av bostadsområden. Motförslaget kräver just att reformen inte underfinansieras och att även kommuner med svag ekonomi eller på landsbygden faktiskt kan genomföra den. Det är samma åtagande i sak.
- state funding responsibilitydecisive»Staten ska ansvara för att varje skola har tillräcklig finansiering för att säkra att alla barn får de bästa möjligheterna till lärande och utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“The state shall be responsible for every school having sufficient funding to ensure that all children get the best possible opportunities for learning and development.”
- equivalent education throughout the country»En god och likvärdig utbildning, tillgänglig i hela landet och i alla typer av bostadsområden, är en grundbult i ett demokratiskt, fritt och hållbart samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“Good and equivalent education, accessible throughout the country and in all types of residential areas, is a cornerstone of a democratic, free and sustainable society.”
- reduce geographic disparities»Vi vill minska de geografiska klyftorna och ge hela landet goda förutsättningar att utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“We want to reduce geographic disparities and give the whole country good conditions to develop.”
- teacher supply and working environment»göra det attraktivt att vara lärare genom att säkra höjda löner och en god arbetsmiljö i skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“make it attractive to be a teacher by ensuring raised wages and a good working environment in schools.”
The election manifesto requires that school funding is adjusted according to the responsibility of local authorities and students' conditions and needs, and that small rural schools are given the conditions to continue their operations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that school funding is adjusted according to the responsibility of local authorities and students' conditions and needs, and that small rural schools are given the conditions to continue their operations. An underfunded reform hits hardest precisely in municipalities with weak finances and sparsely populated areas. The requirement for responsible implementation without cuts to other school appropriations therefore follows from the plan's commitment to equal education.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att skolpengen anpassas efter huvudmännens ansvar och elevernas förutsättningar och behov och att små skolor på landsbygden ges förutsättningar att fortsätta sin verksamhet. En underfinansierad reform slår hårdast mot just kommuner med svag ekonomi och glesbygd. Kravet på ett ansvarsfullt genomförande utan nedskärningar på andra skolanslag följer därför av planens likvärdighetsåtagande.
- school funding according to conditionsdecisive»Skolpengen ska anpassas efter huvudmännens ansvar och elevernas förutsättningar och behov.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School funding shall be adjusted according to the responsibility of local authorities and students' conditions and needs.”
- rural schools»Det fria skolvalet ska värnas och små skolor och förskolor på landsbygden ges förutsättningar att fortsätta sin verksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Free school choice shall be protected and small schools and preschools in rural areas given the conditions to continue their operations.”
- equal school nationwide»Skolan ska bli bättre och mer likvärdig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School shall become better and more equal throughout the country.”
- prioritize welfare core»Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More money should be spent on the core of welfare, less on benefits.”
The plan requires that every pupil has equal prerequisites regardless of where the pupil lives and wants to move financial responsibility for schools to the state precisely so that the different economic capacity of municipalities shall not determine school quality.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that every pupil has equal prerequisites regardless of where the pupil lives and wants to move financial responsibility for schools to the state precisely so that the different economic capacity of municipalities shall not determine school quality. A reform that risks being under-financed and forced to make cuts in other school grants runs counter to that commitment. The counter-proposal's requirement that all municipalities shall actually be able to implement the reform thus lies in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att varje elev har likvärdiga förutsättningar oavsett var eleven bor och vill flytta finansieringsansvaret för skolan till staten just för att kommunernas olika ekonomiska förmåga inte ska avgöra skolans kvalitet. En reform som riskerar att underfinansieras och tvinga fram nedskärningar på andra skolanslag strider mot det åtagandet. Motförslagets krav på att alla kommuner faktiskt ska kunna genomföra reformen ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- state financing of schoolsdecisive»Vi vill skapa mer likvärdiga villkor och skatter genom att flytta finansieringsansvaret för bland annat skolan och LSS till staten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create more equal conditions and taxes by moving financial responsibility for among other things schools and LSS to the state.”
- equal schools regardless of location»Varje elev har rätt till likvärdiga förutsättningar, oavsett var eleven bor.« (party programme ↗)“Every pupil has the right to equal prerequisites, regardless of where the pupil lives.”
- equalization between municipalities»De ekonomiska villkoren för kommuner och regioner behöver därför utjämnas med avseende på faktorer som inte går att påverka.« (party programme ↗)“Financial conditions for municipalities and regions therefore need to be equalized with respect to factors that cannot be influenced.”
- state-run schools»Vi vill att staten tar över ansvaret från skolan från kommunerna så att alla elever får gå i bra skolor – inte bara de som råkar bo på rätt ställe.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want the state to take over responsibility from schools from municipalities so that all pupils get to go to good schools – not just those who happen to live in the right place.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly establishes that the financing principle must be respected when the state imposes new tasks on municipalities, and that the state should support municipalities without sufficient tax base.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that the financing principle must be respected when the state imposes new tasks on municipalities, and that the state should support municipalities without sufficient tax base. A regulated teaching time is precisely such a new task, and the counter-proposal's requirement that municipalities of different sizes can actually implement the reform follows directly from these commitments. The equalization system should, according to the plan, balance differences in tax revenue and geography.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att finansieringsprincipen måste respekteras när staten ålägger kommunerna nya uppgifter, och att staten ska stödja kommuner utan tillräckligt skatteunderlag. En reglerad undervisningstid är just en sådan ny uppgift, och motförslagets krav på att kommuner av olika storlek faktiskt kan genomföra reformen följer direkt av dessa åtaganden. Utjämningssystemet ska enligt planen väga upp skillnader i skattekraft och geografi.
- the financing principledecisive»Finansieringsprincipen måste respekteras när staten ålägger kommunerna nya uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“The financing principle must be respected when the state imposes new tasks on municipalities.”
- support for weak municipalities»Det är en statlig uppgift att stödja kommuner som inte har ett tillräckligt skatteunderlag för att klara sina lagstadgade skyldigheter mot kommunens invånare.« (party programme ↗)“It is a state task to support municipalities that do not have sufficient tax base to fulfill their statutory obligations to the municipality's residents.”
- municipal equalization»Systemet för kommunal utjämning ska vara statligt och så utformat att konsekvenserna av skillnader i skattekraft, befolkningsstruktur, geografiska avstånd, klimat och sociala omständigheter utjämnas.« (party programme ↗)“The system for municipal equalization shall be state-run and designed so that the consequences of differences in tax revenue, population structure, geographical distance, climate and social circumstances are equalized.”
- all of the country shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All of Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work even outside the major cities.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that all new promises and reforms need to be financed or fit within the surplus target and that tough times require order in the economy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that all new promises and reforms need to be financed or fit within the surplus target and that tough times require order in the economy. The counter-proposal's demands that the reform be implemented responsibly and without cuts to other school funding follow from that principle. The plan also emphasizes that the whole of Sweden must function, which supports the demand that even weak municipalities shall be able to implement the reform.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla nya löften och reformer behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet och att tuffa tider kräver ordning och reda i ekonomin. Motförslagets krav på att reformen genomförs ansvarsfullt och utan nedskärningar på andra skolanslag följer av den principen. Planen betonar också att hela Sverige måste fungera, vilket stöder kravet att även svaga kommuner ska kunna genomföra reformen.
- reforms shall be financeddecisive»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- order in the economy»I tuffa ekonomiska tider krävs ordning och reda i ekonomin.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In tough economic times, order in the economy is required.”
- clear priorities required»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The large needs in the justice system, defense and welfare place major demands on prioritization in the years to come.”
- the whole country shall function»Men ska det gå att bo och verka i hela Sverige måste också hela Sverige fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But if it is to be possible to live and work in the whole of Sweden, the whole of Sweden must also function.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes the municipal financing principle: the state should never decide on new cost-driving commitments for municipalities without fully compensating them.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes the municipal financing principle: the state should never decide on new cost-driving commitments for municipalities without fully compensating them. The counter-proposal's requirement that the reform not be underfunded and that even small and rural municipalities can actually implement it thereby aligns with the plan. The plan furthermore wants to strengthen teachers' working conditions and conduct policy for all of Sweden.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast den kommunala finansieringsprincipen: staten ska aldrig besluta om nya kostnadsdrivande åtaganden för kommunerna utan att fullt ut kompensera dem. Motförslagets krav på att reformen inte underfinansieras och att även små kommuner och landsbygdskommuner faktiskt kan genomföra den ligger därmed i linje med planen. Planen vill dessutom stärka läraryrkets villkor och bedriva politik för hela Sverige.
- municipal financing principledecisive»Staten bör aldrig fatta beslut om nya kostnadsdrivande åtaganden för kommunerna utan att fullt ut kompensera dem för kostnaderna.« (party programme ↗)“The state should never make decisions on new cost-driving commitments for municipalities without fully compensating them for the costs.”
- full cost coverage»Den kommunala finansieringsprincipen är grundläggande för de ekonomiska relationerna mellan staten och kommunsektorn.« (party programme ↗)“The municipal financing principle is fundamental to economic relations between the state and the municipal sector.”
- strengthened teaching profession»Läraryrket ska stärkas med ändamålsenliga pedagogiska verktyg, avlastning och bättre villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The teaching profession shall be strengthened with appropriate pedagogical tools, relief and better conditions.”
- policy for the entire country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct policy for all of Sweden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UbU25)
- Committee report full text (HD01UbU25)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4023 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:196 Tid för undervisningsuppdraget av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4033 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:196 Tid för undervisningsuppdraget av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:4066 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:196 Tid för undervisningsuppdraget av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2025/26:196 — Tid för undervisningsuppdraget
Source: The Swedish Parliament