2025-04-242024/25:SkU15 · p.2SkUTaxation
Tax on fuel
Fuel tax: petrol, diesel, agricultural diesel and biofuels
What's at stake: The decision affects the pump price of petrol and diesel for drivers and hauliers and the cost of agricultural diesel for farmers, and determines how competitive Swedish biofuels remain against fossil alternatives and how long producers can rely on the tax exemption lasting.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether fuel tax should be cut further and fundamentally restructured, and whether the tax exemption for high-blend biofuels should be made permanent, or whether the recently decided cuts and the exemption already granted are sufficient for now.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, noting that the tax on petrol and diesel has already been cut and will be cut further to offset an announced increase in the reduction obligation, making a new general tax cut or an entirely new taxation model unnecessary for now. On agricultural diesel, an expanded reduction has recently been decided, and a permanent agricultural deduction that would replace the current arrangement is already being prepared within the Government Offices and should not be pre-empted. On biofuels, the committee notes that the European Commission has approved continued tax exemption for pure and high-blend fuels for several more years.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (C)
The reservation (C) calls for a "fill up Swedish" policy that makes the tax exemption for high-blend biofuels permanent and aims for large volumes of fuel produced from Swedish raw materials at low cost to consumers, together with taxing alternative fuels by energy content rather than volume in the coming review of the EU energy tax directive, and introducing climate bonuses to convert agricultural and forestry machinery to biofuel, electricity or gas. The reasoning is that the green industries already account for a quarter of Sweden's energy use and that continued tax exemption is essential for pure biofuels to compete with fossil alternatives.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 4/0/87/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SArdalan Shekarabi (S, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SGustaf Lantz (S, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SInga-Lill Sjöblom (S, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| SSanne Lennström (S, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:28 by Magnus Jacobsson and Camilla Rinaldo Miller (both KD), 2024/25:2005 by John E Weinerhall (M) claim 2, 2024/25:2468 by Anders Ådahl et al. (C) claim 13, 2024/25:2613 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) claim 139, 2024/25:2855 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2947 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) claim 86, 2024/25:2954 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) claims 2.1 and 22, 2024/25:3071 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) claim 11, 2024/25:3109 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) claim 28, 2024/25:3126 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) claim 81 and 2024/25:3169 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) claims 55, 58 and 66.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:28 av Magnus Jacobsson och Camilla Rinaldo Miller (båda KD), 2024/25:2005 av John E Weinerhall (M) yrkande 2, 2024/25:2468 av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 13, 2024/25:2613 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 139, 2024/25:2855 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2024/25:2947 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 86, 2024/25:2954 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkandena 2.1 och 22, 2024/25:3071 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 11, 2024/25:3109 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 28, 2024/25:3126 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 81 och 2024/25:3169 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 55, 58 och 66.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 80 proposals in motions on excise taxes. The majority of the proposals were submitted during the general motion period in 2024. However, two proposals are contained in follow-up motions raised in response to the bill 'The path to reliable transport infrastructure – for all of Sweden to function'. The Riksdag refers primarily to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals and to earlier policy positions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to abolish the energy tax on biofuels for heating and review the possibility of abolishing taxes on electric public transport. (C) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto states that only residual products shall be used for biofuel and the party programme that biomass is a limited resource that must be prioritized wisely, which argues against permanently securing competitiveness for high-blend biofuels with domestic raw material as the main track.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that only residual products shall be used for biofuel and the party programme that biomass is a limited resource that must be prioritized wisely, which argues against permanently securing competitiveness for high-blend biofuels with domestic raw material as the main track. The plan's transport strategy is based instead on electrification, railways and public transport, and on costs for emissions increasing long-term rather than on lasting tax exemptions. Parts of the counter-proposal, such as climate bonuses to switch machinery, lie closer to the plan, but the main demand does not.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att endast restprodukter ska användas till biobränsle och partiprogrammet att biomassan är en begränsad resurs som måste prioriteras klokt, vilket talar emot att permanent säkra konkurrenskraften för höginblandade biodrivmedel med inhemsk råvara som huvudspår. Planens transportstrategi bygger i stället på elektrifiering, järnväg och kollektivtrafik, och på att kostnaderna för utsläpp ska öka långsiktigt snarare än på varaktiga skattebefrielser. Delar av motförslaget, som klimatbonusar för att ställa om maskiner, ligger närmare planen, men huvudkravet gör det inte.
- biofuel only from residual productsdecisive»Den skog som avverkas måste användas klokt där endast restprodukter ska användas till biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The forest that is felled must be used wisely where only residual products shall be used for biofuel.”
- limited biomass»Biomassan är en begränsad resurs, särskilt i« (party programme ↗)“Biomass is a limited resource, especially in”
- electrification as main track»en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna« (party programme ↗)“a coherent strategy for electrification of transport”
- rising cost for emissions»Kostnaderna för utsläpp behöver öka långsiktigt« (party programme ↗)“Costs for emissions need to increase long-term”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels so that it becomes easier to refuel fossil-free, and commits Sweden to net-zero emissions 2045.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels so that it becomes easier to refuel fossil-free, and commits Sweden to net-zero emissions 2045. Permanent tax exemption for high-blend biofuels with domestic feedstocks at low cost to consumers, and support for converting agricultural and forestry machinery, are directly in line with this and with the plan's stance that the transition must not place the burden on those who must use vehicles.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt, och binder Sverige vid nettonollutsläpp 2045. En permanent skattebefrielse för höginblandade biodrivmedel med inhemska råvaror till låg kostnad för konsumenterna, och stöd för att ställa om jord- och skogsbruksmaskiner, ligger direkt i linje med detta och med planens hållning att omställningen inte får skuldbelägga dem som måste använda fordon.
- more renewable fuelsdecisive»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so that it becomes easier to refuel fossil-free in Sweden”
- net-zero emissions 2045»År 2045 ska Sverige inte ha några nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser till atmosfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By 2045, Sweden shall have no net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere”
- investment in alternative fuels»bränslesnåla motorer, alternativa drivmedel och bättre reningsteknik« (party programme ↗)“fuel-efficient engines, alternative fuels and better purification technology”
- transition without burdening ordinary people»Klimatkrisen kan aldrig lösas med att skuldbelägga människor som behöver ta bilen till affären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate crisis can never be solved by placing the burden on people who need to drive to the shops”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly commits to phasing out fossil subsidies, and the party programme wants internationally to work for a moratorium against all new fossil fuel exploitation and to prohibit oil and gas drilling.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly commits to phasing out fossil subsidies, and the party programme wants internationally to work for a moratorium against all new fossil fuel exploitation and to prohibit oil and gas drilling. Sweden should also have a driving role in international climate negotiations. The counter-proposal's demands for stricter requirements against fossil exploitation in the Arctic and an international ban on fossil subsidies are thus the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att stödja övergången till ett jordbruk med fossiloberoende arbetsmaskiner, och partiprogrammet vill att Sverige är en viktig producent av biobränsle och att styrmedlen gör miljövänliga alternativ billigare och miljöskadliga dyrare. Permanent skattebefrielse för höginblandade biodrivmedel och klimatbonusar för omställning av arbetsmaskiner följer av detta. Planen vill dock samtidigt fasa ut fossila subventioner.
- moratorium against new fossil exploitationdecisive»stärka det svenska jordbruket för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel, och stödja övergången till ett ekologiskt och hållbart jordbruk med fossiloberoende arbetsmaskiner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“moratorium against all new fossil fuel exploitation.”
- phased out fossil subsidies»viktig producent av biobränsle, både för uppvärmning och för att framställa drivmedel till fordon.« (party programme ↗)“phase out fossil subsidies”
- ban on oil and gas drilling»miljövänliga alternativ billigare och de miljöskadliga dyrare att använda.« (party programme ↗)“Gas and oil drilling as well as uranium mining shall be prohibited in Sweden.”
- driving climate diplomacy»fasa ut fossila subventioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a driving role in international”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly promises maximum lowered tax on biofuel and a biofuel premium for agriculture, which is precisely what the counter-proposal requires: permanently secured tax relief for high-blended biofuels at low cost to consumers.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises maximum lowered tax on biofuel and a biofuel premium for agriculture, which is precisely what the counter-proposal requires: permanently secured tax relief for high-blended biofuels at low cost to consumers. The plan moreover wants to multiply domestic production of biofuels and biogas, which supports the line about domestic raw materials. The requirement for climate bonuses to convert agriculture and forestry machinery lies in line with the commitment that agriculture shall be able to convert to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen maximalt sänkt skatt på biodrivmedel och en biodrivmedelspremie för lantbruket, vilket är precis det motförslaget kräver: varaktigt säkrad skattelättnad för höginblandade biodrivmedel till låg kostnad för konsumenterna. Planen vill dessutom mångdubbla den inhemska produktionen av biobränslen och biogas, vilket stöder linjen om inhemska råvaror. Kravet på klimatbonusar för att ställa om jordbruks- och skogsbruksmaskiner ligger i linje med åtagandet att jordbruket ska kunna ställa om till förnybara drivmedel med stärkt konkurrenskraft.
- maximum lowered biofuel taxdecisive»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax maximally on biofuels mixed into petrol and diesel.”
- biofuel premium for agriculture»en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a biofuel premium that makes sustainable farming more profitable”
- domestic biofuel production»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying production of biofuels and biogas.”
- conversion of agriculture's fuels»Mer behöver göras för att flyget, sjöfarten och jordbruket ska kunna ställa om till förnybara drivmedel med stärkt konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More needs to be done so that aviation, shipping and agriculture can convert to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness.”
The election manifesto wants real climate taxes instead of subsidies and symbolic taxes, and the party programme establishes that the state to the greatest possible extent shall be neutral between energy sources that meet environmental and security requirements.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants real climate taxes instead of subsidies and symbolic taxes, and the party programme establishes that the state to the greatest possible extent shall be neutral between energy sources that meet environmental and security requirements. The counter-proposal's climate bonuses and prioritization of domestic raw materials run counter to that line. That the involvement of fossil-free fuels shall continue speaks somewhat the other way, but the plan's main track is technology-neutral steering tools and electrification.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill ha riktiga klimatskatter i stället för bidrag och symbolskatter, och partiprogrammet slår fast att staten i största möjliga mån ska vara neutral mellan energislag som uppfyller miljö- och säkerhetskraven. Motförslagets klimatbonusar och prioritering av inhemska råvaror strider mot den linjen. Att inblandningen av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta talar delvis åt andra hållet, men planens huvudspår är teknikneutrala styrmedel och elektrifiering.
- real climate taxes, not subsidiesdecisive»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy into a competition for highest subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”
- technology neutrality between energy sources»vara neutral mellan energislag som uppfyller miljö- och säkerhetskraven« (party programme ↗)“be neutral between energy sources that meet environmental and security requirements”
- electrified transport»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”
- continued involvement of biofuels»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort. Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector must go. More shall choose the electric car and involvement of fossil-free fuels shall continue.”
The plan demands a long-term energy policy with fixed rules where domestic renewable fuels form an expanding base and where domestic production is stimulated.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands a long-term energy policy with fixed rules where domestic renewable fuels form an expanding base and where domestic production is stimulated. A permanent tax exemption for high-blended biofuels from domestic raw materials, at low cost for consumers, is precisely the long-term approach the plan seeks and lies in line with the election manifesto's demand for lower fuel prices. However, the demand for special climate bonuses contradicts the plan's rejection of direct business subsidies, which lowers the certainty.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en långsiktig energipolitik med fasta spelregler där inhemska förnybara bränslen utgör en växande bas och där inhemsk produktion stimuleras. En permanent skattebefrielse för höginblandade biodrivmedel av inhemska råvaror, till låg kostnad för konsumenterna, är precis den långsiktighet planen efterlyser och ligger i linje med valmanifestets krav på lägre drivmedelspriser. Kravet på särskilda klimatbonusar går dock emot planens avvisande av direkta företagssubventioner, vilket drar ned säkerheten.
- long-term rules, domestic renewable fuelsdecisive»Sveriges energiförsörjning ska tryggas genom en långsiktig energipolitik med fasta spelregler, där inhemska förnybara energikällor och bränslen utgör en växande bas.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's energy supply shall be secured through a long-term energy policy with fixed rules, where domestic renewable energy sources and fuels form an expanding base.”
- stimulate domestic fuel production»Inhemsk produktion ska stimuleras.« (party programme ↗)“Domestic production shall be stimulated.”
- low fuel prices for households»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly lower petrol and diesel prices for everyone, primarily by reducing expensive biofuel blending.”
- no to direct subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct business subsidies are rejected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to investing in biodiesel production and lowering the price of petrol and diesel so that households can manage their everyday finances.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to investing in biodiesel production and lowering the price of petrol and diesel so that households can manage their everyday finances. The counter-proposal's demand for permanent tax exemption for high-blend biodiesels and a line that prioritizes domestic raw materials at low cost for consumers follows both of these commitments. The plan moreover wants to lower taxes for agriculture and increase self-sufficiency.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel och att sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att hushållen klarar sin vardagsekonomi. Motförslagets krav på permanent skattebefrielse för höginblandade biodrivmedel och en linje som prioriterar inhemska råvaror till låg kostnad för konsumenterna följer båda dessa åtaganden. Planen vill dessutom sänka skatterna för lantbruket och öka självförsörjningsgraden.
- domestic biodiesel productiondecisive»Satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in biodiesel production”
- lower fuel costs»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so that you can manage your everyday finances”
- lowered taxes for agriculture»Moderaterna vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna, vilket vi redan börjat göra på drivmedel, och minska regelkrånglet så att kostnaderna för administration går ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to improve the conditions for running agriculture by lowering taxes, which we have already started doing on fuel, and reduce regulatory complexity so that administration costs go down.”
- increased self-sufficiency»Det nya säkerhetsläget i Europa gör att vi som land måste minska vår sårbarhet och öka vår självförsörjningsgrad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The new security situation in Europe means that we as a nation must reduce our vulnerability and increase our self-sufficiency.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wishes to promote Swedish biofuel production and reduce the use of expensive, environmentally harmful biofuels from abroad, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for domestic raw materials and secured competitiveness for high-blend biofuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wishes to promote Swedish biofuel production and reduce the use of expensive, environmentally harmful biofuels from abroad, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for domestic raw materials and secured competitiveness for high-blend biofuels. The plan also wishes to lower fuel tax so that the pump price decreases, which addresses the demand for low consumer cost, and lower diesel tax for agriculture and forestry. The plan takes no position on taxation based on energy content, but nothing in it speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill främja svensk biobränsleproduktion och minska användningen av dyra, miljöskadliga biodrivmedel från utlandet, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav på inhemska råvaror och säkrad konkurrenskraft för höginblandade biodrivmedel. Planen vill dessutom sänka bränsleskatten så att priset vid pump minskar, vilket svarar mot kravet på låg kostnad för konsumenterna, och sänka dieselskatten för jord- och skogsbruket. Planen tar inte ställning till beskattning efter energiinnehåll, men inget i den talar emot motförslagets krav.
- promote Swedish biofuel productiondecisive»Främja svensk biobränsleproduktion« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Promote Swedish biofuel production”
- away with imported biofuels»Minska användningen av miljöskadliga och dyra biodrivmedel från utlandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the use of expensive and environmentally harmful biofuels from abroad”
- lower pump tax»Sänka bensin- och dieselpriset genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices through reduced fuel tax and reduced blending obligation.”
- cheaper agricultural diesel»Sänka skatten på diesel för jord- och skogsbruket och den allmänna löneavgiften« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower tax on diesel for agriculture and forestry and the general wage tax”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SkU15)
- Committee report full text (HC01SkU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1028 — Införande av en ny Lidingöregel av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1045 — Vägavgifter av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1112 — Kemikalieskattens effekter av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1123 — Utvärdering av miljönyttan av dagens elektronikskatt av Lars Püss (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1165 — Vägavgift för utländska lastbilar på svenska vägar av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1191 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1351 — Punktskatt av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1394 — Kemikaliepolitik av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:14 — Avskaffande av kemikalieskatten av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1454 — Regional utveckling - för ett levande Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1472 — Kemikalieskatten av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1547 — Beskattning av snus av Jörgen Grubb och Patrik Jönsson (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1557 — Väsentlig lättnad av den statliga skatte- och regelbördan för svenskt jordbruk av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1744 — Utredning om avgift eller skatt på jungfruliga råvaror av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1771 — Flyget i en ohållbar tid av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1772 — Ett utsläppsfritt och transporteffektivt samhälle av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1773 — Decentralisering av trängselskatten av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1779 — Sänkt skatt på spel för en ökad kanalisering av Carl Nordblom (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1859 — Differentierade trängselskatter av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1921 — Ett rättvist skattesystem m.m. av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament