2026-01-282025/26:MJU6 · p.5MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Rules for Logging
Consultation requirements and protection of natural values in forest felling
What's at stake: Forests with high natural values, so-called core habitats, are in short supply for many threatened plant and animal species, while forestry is also an important industry and source of income. How quickly and how strictly the consultation and notification rules are designed affects both how well these forests are protected and forest owners' room to operate.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the rules on consultation and notification ahead of forest felling should be tightened now - partly to better protect forests with high natural values - or whether this should wait until the ongoing processing of the forestry inquiry's proposals is complete.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions. The committee does not want to pre-empt the outcome of the ongoing processing of the forestry inquiry's reports, which cover, among other things, the forms of consultation under the Environmental Code and the area threshold for when a felling must be reported to the Forest Agency.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (V)
The reservation (V) calls for the government to urgently produce legislation to stop the felling of forests with high natural values. The reasoning is that such forests are being felled today despite a severe shortage of these habitats for threatened species, that the state has neither taken sufficient action nor allocated sufficient funds for formal protection, and that the current arrangement one-sidedly favours the forestry industry's interests at the expense of smaller forest owners, biodiversity and the climate.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 276–21Ja 260–37
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/6 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:515 by Anders Alftberg and Robert Stenkvist (both SD), 2025/26:657 by Kristoffer Lindberg et al. (S) item 3 and 2025/26:2784 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) items 13 and 18.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:515 av Anders Alftberg och Robert Stenkvist (båda SD), 2025/26:657 av Kristoffer Lindberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:2784 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkandena 13 och 18.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 90 proposals in motions on forest policy. The motions were submitted during the general motion period 2025 and concern, among other things, ownership, use and protection of forest, compensation for restrictions on forest owners' ownership and use rights, and climate adaptation in forestry. Parliament refers primarily to the fact that work is already underway in the areas that the proposals address.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants legislation to be introduced to stop logging of forests with high natural values and for forests with high recreational and outdoor values to be protected through permit requirements. (V) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme demands strong protection of forests with rich ecosystems and regulation of forestry based on holistic thinking rather than one-sided profit interests, which directly carries the demand for legislation against felling of forests with high natural values.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands strong protection of forests with rich ecosystems and regulation of forestry based on holistic thinking rather than one-sided profit interests, which directly carries the demand for legislation against felling of forests with high natural values. The election manifesto states that protection of forest areas is crucial for biodiversity and that clear-cutting forestry shall be phased out. The plan furthermore wants to see ambitious environmental targets followed up with sharp legislation.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver ett starkt skydd av skog med rika ekosystem och en reglering av skogsbruket som utgår från helhetssyn snarare än ensidiga vinstintressen, vilket direkt bär kravet på lagstiftning mot avverkning av skogar med höga naturvärden. Valplattformen slår fast att skyddet av skogsområden är avgörande för den biologiska mångfalden och att kalhyggesbruket ska fasas ut. Planen vill dessutom se ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning.
- strong protection of valuable forestdecisive»behövs ett starkt skydd av skog med rika ekosystem och en genom« (party programme ↗)“there is a need for strong protection of forest with rich ecosystems and through”
- protection for biodiversity»Skyddet av skogs- och strandområden är en viktig del för att värna den svenska allemansrätten och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protection of forest and coastal areas is an important part of safeguarding the Swedish right of public access and biodiversity.”
- forest as carbon sink»därför behöver kalhyggesbruket fasas ut« (2022 manifesto ↗)“therefore clear-cutting forestry needs to be phased out”
- sharp environmental legislation»Vi vill se ambitiösa« (party programme ↗)“We want to see ambitious”
The plan requires protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and warns that species extinction is accelerating.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and warns that species extinction is accelerating. That forests with high conservation value are being felled despite the scarcity of such habitats contradicts that commitment, and the plan requires climate perspective in all decisions. The requirement for swift legislation is therefore supported on the merits, even though the plan simultaneously wants to see active forestry.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och varnar för att artdöden accelererar. Att skogar med höga naturvärden avverkas trots bristen på sådana livsmiljöer strider mot det åtagandet, och planen kräver klimatperspektiv i alla beslut. Kravet på skyndsam lagstiftning stöds därför i sak, även om planen samtidigt vill se ett aktivt skogsbruk.
- protected biological diversitydecisive»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
- threatened species richness»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”
- climate perspective in all decisions»Klimatperspektiv på alla nivåer av beslut och beslutsfattande.« (party programme ↗)“Climate perspective at all levels of decision-making.”
- sustainable forestry»Aktivt och hållbart skogsbruk som bidrar till svensk tillväxt och som samtidigt värnar« (party programme ↗)“Active and sustainable forestry that contributes to Swedish growth and that simultaneously protects”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands that at least 30 per cent of forests be protected for high nature values, carbon sinks and threatened species, and that the mountain forests be preserved.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands that at least 30 per cent of forests be protected for high nature values, carbon sinks and threatened species, and that the mountain forests be preserved. It simultaneously describes that intensive forestry has created shortage of habitats for many species. Legislation that stops felling of forests with high nature values is thus directly in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att minst 30 procent av skogarna skyddas för höga naturvärden, kolsänkor och hotade arter, och att de fjällnära naturskogarna bevaras. Den beskriver samtidigt att det intensiva skogsbruket skapat brist på livsmiljöer för många arter. Lagstiftning som stoppar avverkning av skogar med höga naturvärden är därmed direkt i linje med planen.
- protect forest with high nature valuesdecisive»Minst 30 procent av skogarna måste skyddas – både för höga naturvärden och för att bevara kolsänkor och hotade arter, samt för att värna rekreation, kulturvärden och renskötsel.« (party programme ↗)“At least 30 per cent of forests must be protected – both for high nature values and to preserve carbon sinks and threatened species, as well as to protect recreation, cultural values and reindeer herding.”
- protection of forests of conservation value»skydda 30 procent av Sveriges natur, bland annat våra unika sammanhängande fjällskogar och skyddsvärda skogar i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect 30 per cent of Sweden's nature, amongst other things our unique contiguous mountain forests and forests of conservation value throughout the country.”
- preserve mountain forests»De fjällnära naturskogarna är en oersättlig naturskatt som ska bevaras.« (party programme ↗)“The mountain forests are an irreplaceable natural treasure that shall be preserved.”
- felling threatens habitats»Det intensiva skogsbruket har blivit så heltäckande i stora delar av Sverige att det skapat en brist på livsmiljöer för många arter.« (party programme ↗)“Intensive forestry has become so comprehensive in large parts of Sweden that it has created a shortage of habitats for many species.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto makes voluntariness and property rights the foundation for better nature conservation and establishes that sustainable forestry requires active use with good conditions for forestry.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes voluntariness and property rights the foundation for better nature conservation and establishes that sustainable forestry requires active use with good conditions for forestry. The counter-proposal instead wants to quickly legislate a felling ban for forests with high nature values, that is mandatory interventions in the landowner's use. That contradicts the plan's explicit choice of the voluntariness line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör frivillighet och äganderätt till grunden för en bättre naturvård och slår fast att ett hållbart skogsbruk förutsätter ett aktivt brukande med goda förutsättningar för skogsbruket. Motförslaget vill i stället skyndsamt lagstifta fram ett avverkningsstopp för skogar med höga naturvärden, alltså tvingande ingrepp i markägarens brukande. Det strider mot planens uttryckliga val av frivillighetslinjen.
- voluntariness before compulsion in nature conservationdecisive»Mer måste göras för att restaurera våtmarker, bekämpa invasiva arter och underlätta för markägare att bidra, då frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must be done to restore wetlands, combat invasive species and facilitate for landowners to contribute, as voluntariness and property rights are the foundation for better nature conservation.”
- active forestry»Ett hållbart skogsbruk förutsätter ett aktivt brukande av skogen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sustainable forestry requires active use of the forest.”
- strong property rights»Äganderätten är central för ett samhälle där människor kan förverkliga sig själva och sina drömmar.« (party programme ↗)“Property rights are central for a society where people can realize themselves and their dreams.”
- biological diversity shall be protected»Att skydda den biologiska mångfalden är nödvändigt för att ekosystemen ska kunna fortleva.« (party programme ↗)“Protecting biological diversity is necessary for ecosystems to continue.”
The plan requires that remaining old-growth forests are given stronger protection and that threatened species are protected through protection orders and habitat protection, while environmental consideration in forestry must increase.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that remaining old-growth forests are given stronger protection and that threatened species are protected through protection orders and habitat protection, while environmental consideration in forestry must increase. That through legislation stop felling of forests with high nature values is in line with that commitment. The plan's requirement for good cooperation with landowners sets the form, but not the barrier for protection.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att de återstående gammelskogarna ges starkare skydd och att hotade arter skyddas genom fridlysning och biotopskydd, samtidigt som miljöhänsynen i skogsbruket måste öka. Att lagstiftningsvägen stoppa avverkning av skogar med höga naturvärden ligger i linje med det åtagandet. Planens krav på god samverkan med markägare sätter formen, men inte hindret för skyddet.
- stronger protection for old-growth forestdecisive»De återstående gammelskogarna ska ges starkare skydd.« (party programme ↗)“Remaining old-growth forests shall be given stronger protection.”
- protection of threatened species»Hotade växter och djur ska skyddas genom fridlysning, information och biotopskydd.« (party programme ↗)“Threatened plants and animals shall be protected through protection orders, information and habitat protection.”
- increased environmental consideration in forestry»Miljöhänsynen inom skogsbruket måste öka.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental consideration in forestry must increase.”
- cooperation with landowners»Staten ska sträva efter god samverkan med markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvård och viltförvaltning.« (party programme ↗)“The State shall strive for good cooperation with landowners and local populations in nature conservation and wildlife management.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto identifies the threat to the right to own forest as a problem to be corrected, and the plan establishes that the right to property is a human right and that production and environmental goals shall have equal dignity.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto identifies the threat to the right to own forest as a problem to be corrected, and the plan establishes that the right to property is a human right and that production and environmental goals shall have equal dignity. A hastily legislated logging ban places one-sided weight on one goal and restricts the landowner's right. The plan's demand for sufficient reserve protection points in another direction, but does not support a general ban.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet pekar ut hotet mot äganderätten över skogen som ett problem som ska rättas till, och planen slår fast att rätten till egendom är en mänsklig rättighet och att produktions- och miljömålen ska ha samma dignitet. Ett skyndsamt lagstiftat avverkningsstopp lägger ensidigt vikt vid det ena målet och inskränker markägarens rätt. Planens krav på tillräckligt reservatsskydd talar åt andra hållet, men bär inte ett generellt förbud.
- protect the right to own forestdecisive»äganderätten över skogen hotas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“the right to own forest is threatened”
- property rights as a right»Rätten till egendom är en mänsklig rättighet« (party programme ↗)“The right to property is a human right”
- equal production and environmental goals»Det är angeläget att dessa mål har samma prioritet och dignitet vid utformandet av« (party programme ↗)“It is important that these goals have equal priority and dignity in the design of”
- sufficient reserve protection»Våtmarker behöver bevaras och vid behov återställas, skog behöver reservatsskyddas i« (party programme ↗)“Wetlands need to be preserved and if necessary restored, forest needs reserve protection in”
The plan wants to reduce the area of forest that is exempt from forestry and establishes that formal protection shall be achieved through voluntary action by the landowner.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce the area of forest that is exempt from forestry and establishes that formal protection shall be achieved through voluntary action by the landowner. Rapid legislation that stops felling of forests with high natural values goes directly against both of these commitments. The plan's starting point is that too much forest is already taken out of production and that more forest shall be managed, not less.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska ytan skog som är undantagen från skogsbruk och slår fast att formellt skydd ska ske genom frivillighet från markägaren. En skyndsam lagstiftning som stoppar avverkning av skogar med höga naturvärden går rakt emot båda dessa åtaganden. Planens utgångspunkt är att för mycket skog redan är tagen ur produktion och att mer skog ska brukas, inte mindre.
- less forest exemptdecisive»Minska ytan av skog som är undantagen från skogsbruk« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the area of forest that is exempt from forestry”
- voluntary formal protection»Stärka skogsägarnas äganderätt genom att formellt skydd av skog ska ske genom frivillighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen forest owners' ownership rights through formal protection of forests being achieved through voluntary action”
- too much forest out of production»Idag är närmare 30 procent av skogsmarken tagen ur produktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today nearly 30 percent of forest land is taken out of production.”
- ownership right protected»Människors rätt att äga ska värnas så att skogen kan brukas långsiktigt och hållbart till nytta för klimatet och miljön.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“People's right to own shall be protected so that forests can be managed long-term and sustainably to benefit climate and environment.”
The plan establishes that forest owners' right to manage their forests shall be protected, that ownership shall be strengthened and that setting aside forest shall occur voluntarily and with good compensation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that forest owners' right to manage their forests shall be protected, that ownership shall be strengthened and that setting aside forest shall occur voluntarily and with good compensation. The counter-proposal's demand for swift legislation that stops felling of forests with high natural values means mandatory restrictions on precisely that usage right. The plan moreover prioritizes adapted forest management over reserve designation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att skogsägarnas rätt att bruka sina skogar ska värnas, att äganderätten ska stärkas och att avsättning av skog ska ske frivilligt och med god ersättning. Motförslagets krav på skyndsam lagstiftning som stoppar avverkning av skogar med höga naturvärden innebär tvingande inskränkningar i just den brukanderätten. Planen prioriterar dessutom anpassad skogsskötsel före reservatsavsättning.
- right to manage own forestdecisive»Värna skogsägarnas rätt att bruka sina skogar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect forest owners' right to manage their forests”
- voluntariness in protection»Avsättning av skog till reservat ska ske på frivillighetens grund och med god ersättning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Setting aside forest for reserves shall occur on a voluntary basis and with good compensation.”
- voluntariness under responsibility»Erfarenheten visar att frivillighet under ansvar fungerar bäst för att skapa miljövärden, stöttat med kompetent och hjälpande rådgivning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Experience shows that voluntariness under responsibility works best for creating environmental values, supported by competent and helpful advice.”
- management over reserves»Att anpassad skogsskötsel prioriteras före reservatsavsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That adapted forest management is prioritized over reserve designation”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:MJU6)
- Committee report full text (HD01MJU6)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1900 — Skogens roll för klimat, biologisk mångfald och hållbar utveckling av Matilda Ernkrans m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2098 — Ökad möjlighet till kemisk bekämpning av granbarkborren av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2263 — EUDR av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2266 — Bekämpning av granbarkborren även i reservaten av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2308 — Mer koldioxidlagring i skogen och ökad förädlingsgrad i skogsprodukter av Markus Selin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2340 — Ökad skogsproduktion för att klara miljömålen av Sten Bergheden och Johanna Rantsi (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2453 — Art- och habitatdirektivet av Mats Green (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2514 — Skogsnäringen i Skåne av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2784 — Biologisk mångfald av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2817 — En aktiv industri- och landsbygdspolitik av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2833 — Jord, skog, jakt av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2984 — Avgiftslättnader vid extraordinära skadegörarutbrott av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3129 — Sekretessbeläggning av avverkningsanmälningar av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3259 — Stärk skogsnäringen och äganderätten - trygg framtid för Blekinges och Sveriges skogsbruk av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3421 — Klimatanpassning av Sverige 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3427 — Sverige behöver klimatanpassas för extremväder av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3428 — Ett motståndskraftigt och hållbart svenskt lantbruk av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3548 — Cirkulär ekonomi av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3582 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament