Protected personal data

The election manifesto explicitly states that the child perspective must be strengthened in custody disputes and that it must not be possible for perpetrators of violence to retain joint custody, which is the heart of the counter-proposal. The plan also demands that work against male violence against women be prioritised in line with the extent of the crimes and that everyone has the right to protection of their personal integrity, which carries the demands for risk mapping and damages for disclosed information.

• no joint custody in cases of violencedecisive»Barnperspektivet måste stärkas i vårdnadstvister och det ska inte vara möjligt för våldsutövare att behålla gemensam vårdnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The child perspective must be strengthened in custody disputes and it must not be possible for perpetrators of violence to retain joint custody.”
• prioritise work against male violence»våld mot kvinnor behöver börja prioriteras på ett sätt som motsvarar« (party programme ↗)“violence against women needs to start being prioritised in a way that corresponds to”
• protection of personal data»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
• support against violence in close relationships»Socialtjänsten måste garanteras ett varaktigt och stabilt stöd för arbetet mot våld i nära relationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Social services must be guaranteed sustainable and stable support for work against violence in close relationships.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The plan commits to vigorous combating of men's violence against women and violence in intimate relationships and support for victims, and especially support for children witnessing violence. The counter-proposal's requirement for risk assessment after a relationship ends, that contact is not granted when violence has occurred and for compensation when information is disclosed are measures for precisely that group. The programme also explicitly protects personal integrity.

• support for abuse victimsdecisive»Kraftfullt bekämpande av mäns våld mot kvinnor, våld i nära relationer samt stöd till« (party programme ↗)“Vigorous combating of men's violence against women, violence in intimate relationships and support for”
• protection for children witnessing violence»Kraftfullt bekämpande av våld mot barn och stöd till barn som bevittnar våld.« (party programme ↗)“Vigorous combating of violence against children and support for children witnessing violence.”
• strong measures against men's violence»Krafttag för att stoppa hedersrelaterat våld, sexualbrott och mäns våld mot kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strong measures to stop honour-related violence, sexual crimes and men's violence against women.”
• protection of personal data»Skydd för den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of personal integrity.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The election manifesto promises that abused women who are forced to hide shall receive stronger protection and that children shall be protected from being forced into contact with a violent parent. The plan also establishes that children's right to security weighs heavier than violent parents' right to their children. The counter-proposal's demands for risk mapping, limited contact in case of violence and tested liability for damages when information is disclosed are the same commitment in practice.

• stronger protection for abuse victimsdecisive»att våldsutsatta kvinnor som tvingas gömma sig ska få starkare skydd och att fler som utövar våld ska få fotboja.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that abused women who are forced to hide shall receive stronger protection and that more who commit violence shall receive electronic monitoring.”
• no contact with violent parent»skydda barn från att tvingas till umgänge med en våldsam förälder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect children from being forced into contact with a violent parent.”
• child's security weighs most»I vårt Sverige väger barns rätt till trygghet tyngre än våldsamma föräldrars rätt till sina barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In our Sweden children's right to security weighs heavier than violent parents' right to their children.”
• strengthened violence protection»Miljöpartiet vill stärka skyddet för dem som utsätts för våld – genom fler skyddade« (party programme ↗)“The Greens want to strengthen protection for those subjected to violence – through more protected”

The plan explicitly requires that the victim perspective be strengthened, that post-separation violence ceases and that protection for families with protected identity is improved. The counter-proposal's requirements for mapping of violence risk after a relationship ends, that contact and shared custody are not given when violence has occurred and for an investigation about damages when information is revealed are precisely such post-separation violence measures. The plan's line that men who hit shall not get away bears the stance.

• combat post-separation violencedecisive»Brottsofferperspektivet måste stärkas och eftervåldet upphöra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The victim perspective must be strengthened and post-separation violence must cease.”
• protection for protected identity»Vi vill bland annat att elektronisk fotboja används oftare och stärka skyddet för familjer med skyddad identitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want, among other things, that electronic monitoring is used more often and strengthen protection for families with protected identity.”
• strengthened protection for violence survivors»Kvinnor med skyddad identitet ska enklare kunna byta efternamn på sina barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women with protected identity shall more easily be able to change their children's surname.”
• stop men's violence against women»Vi ska leda Sverige mot ett slut på mäns våld mot kvinnor. Män som slår ska inte komma undan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall lead Sweden towards an end to men's violence against women. Men who hit shall not get away.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The plan explicitly establishes that children shall not be forced into contact with a parent who has subjected the child to abuse and that the person convicted of gross violence against the other parent should lose custody rights. It also requires that the right to compensation for mistakes by authorities be improved, which hits revealed personal data. The counter-proposal's requirement for protection for violence victims with protected personal data therefore follows directly from the plan.

• no contact in cases of abusedecisive»Barn ska inte tvingas till umgänge med en förälder som utsatt barnet för övergrepp, psykisk eller fysisk misshandel.« (party programme ↗)“Children shall not be forced into contact with a parent who has subjected the child to abuse, psychological or physical assault.”
• damages for government error»Rätten till kompensation eller skadestånd vid myndigheters misstag eller övergrepp behöver förbättras.« (party programme ↗)“The right to compensation or damages for mistakes or violations by authorities needs to be improved.”
• loss of custody for gross violence»Den förälder som döms för att ha utsatt den andra föräldern för grovt eller dödligt våld bör automatiskt förlora umgängesrätt med barnet.« (party programme ↗)“The parent convicted of subjecting the other parent to gross or fatal violence should automatically lose custody rights with the child.”
• better protection for crime victims»Vi vill se en ökad handlingskraft mot sexuellt våld och våld mot kvinnor genom bland annat högre straff för sexualbrott och ett bättre skydd och stöd för offren.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see increased action against sexual violence and violence against women through, among other things, higher penalties for sexual crimes and better protection and support for victims.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The party programme explicitly requires that women, men and children subjected to violence in a close relationship be given adequate support and protection, and describes men's violence against women as the ultimate expression of lack of gender equality. It also demands great care in authorities' handling of personal data and that the child's best interest come first. The counter-proposal's demands for risk assessment, limited visitation rights in cases of violence and damages for disclosed information follow from this.

• support and protection for victims of violencedecisive»Kvinnor, män och barn som utsatts för våld i en nära relation ska ges adekvat stöd och skydd.« (party programme ↗)“Women, men and children subjected to violence in a close relationship shall be given adequate support and protection.”
• men's violence against women»Mäns våld mot kvinnor är det yttersta uttrycket för brist på jämställdhet. Det är helt« (party programme ↗)“Men's violence against women is the ultimate expression of lack of gender equality. It is completely”
• integrity protection regarding personal data»Den personliga integriteten ska ha ett starkt grundlagsskydd och det« (party programme ↗)“Personal integrity shall have strong constitutional protection and”
• the child's best interest first»barnkonvention stadgar att barnets bästa ska komma i främsta rummet.« (party programme ↗)“convention stipulates that the child's best interest shall come first.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The counter-proposal wants to strengthen protection for violence victims with protected personal data, including through risk assessment after a relationship ends, restricted contact where violence has occurred, and investigation of damages when information is disclosed. The plan puts the crime victim at the center, promises strengthened protection for crime victims and witnesses, residence bans after violence in close relationships, and doubled damages. The counter-proposal's demands are in line with these commitments.

• strengthened crime victim protectiondecisive»Stärka skyddet för vittnen och brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen protection for witnesses and crime victims”
• protection against perpetrators»Införa vistelseförbud för personer som dömts för våld i nära relation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce residence bans for persons convicted of violence in close relationships”
• higher damages to crime victims»Dubbla skadestånden till brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Double damages to crime victims”
• crime victim at center»Rättssamhället måste alltid stå på brottsoffrets sida.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law society must always stand on the crime victim's side.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan establishes that policy shall be designed from the perspective of the crime victim's best interests and wishes to establish an action plan for those subjected to violence in close relations and improve contact bans. The counter-proposal's demand for risk assessment of violence after a relationship ends, restraint on contact when violence has occurred and investigation of damages when information is disclosed follow that line. The plan also wishes to raise damages to crime victims, which directly supports the damages component.

• crime victim perspectivedecisive»Utformningen av politiken måste ske utifrån brottsoffrets bästa, inte gärningsmannen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy design must take place from the perspective of the crime victim's best interests, not the perpetrator's.”
• violence in close relations»Upprätta en handlingsplan för den som utsätts för våld i nära relation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an action plan for those subjected to violence in close relations”
• increased damages»Höja skadestånden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Raise damages”
• stronger contact bans»Förbättra möjligheterna till kontaktförbud« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve opportunities for contact bans”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.