2026-03-262025/26:FiU28 · p.3FiUEconomy & finance
Follow-up of labour law conditions
Monitoring compliance with labor-law conditions in public procurement
What's at stake: Weak follow-up of labor-law conditions risks favoring unscrupulous suppliers that compete on low wages and poor working conditions, harming employees of contracted firms and subcontractors and undermining the use of public funds.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should give the Swedish National Agency for Public Procurement a specific mandate to strengthen and centralize the follow-up of labor-law conditions in public procurement, or whether ongoing efforts are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers that ongoing efforts - strengthened procurement support, digitalization, the public procurement roadmap and the Swedish Competition Authority's proposals - are sufficient, and therefore rejects the motions calling for a dedicated follow-up initiative.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (V)
The reservation wants the government to give the Agency for Public Procurement a specific mandate to review its support for monitoring labor-law conditions and to promptly return to parliament with proposals for centralizing that follow-up, since requirements without follow-up risk becoming meaningless and letting unscrupulous actors, including criminal networks, win contracts by undercutting wages and conditions.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/16/0/6 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/91/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 17/0/0/7 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 57/0/0/13 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:3896 by Mikael Damberg et al. (S) claim 3 and 2025/26:3898 by Andrea Andersson Tay et al. (V) claims 1 and 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:3896 av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:3898 av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 2.
Riksdag decision: Parliament laid the government's statement concerning the National Audit Office's report on labour law conditions in public procurement on the record, which means that the matter was concluded. The National Audit Office's overall conclusion in the report is that the work of setting labour law requirements in public procurement does not function effectively. The consequence could be that the authorities contribute to wage dumping and otherwise poor working conditions among their suppliers. The National Audit Office submits several recommendations in its report to the government as well as to the Public Procurement Agency and the Competition Authority. Parliament agrees with the National Audit Office's assessment that there are opportunities to make the authorities' procurement more efficient. In the statement, the government reports the measures that have been taken and that the government intends to implement following the National Audit Office's observations. Parliament notes the measures that the government is considering within the areas covered by the National Audit Office's recommendations and welcomes them.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure effective implementation and follow-up of labor law requirements in public procurement. (V) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires collective agreements in public procurement and identifies wage dumping and exploitation as central threats.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires collective agreements in public procurement and identifies wage dumping and exploitation as central threats. It wants to give union organizations better opportunities to ensure that laws and agreements are complied with and demands regulations that secure fair conditions even where short-term profit is prioritized. A mandate to strengthen and centralize monitoring of labour law conditions follows directly from the fact that demands without follow-up become ineffective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar och pekar ut lönedumpning och utnyttjande som centrala hot. Den vill ge fackliga organisationer bättre möjligheter att säkerställa att lagar och avtal efterlevs och kräver regelverk som säkrar seriösa villkor också där kortsiktig vinst prioriteras. Ett uppdrag att stärka och centralisera uppföljningen av arbetsrättsliga villkor följer direkt av att krav utan uppföljning blir verkningslösa.
- collective agreements in procurementdecisive»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party requires collective agreements in public procurement.”
- ensure agreements are complied with»till exempel bättre möjligheter att säkerställa att lagar och avtal efter« (party programme ↗)“for instance better opportunities to ensure that laws and agreements”
- stop wage dumping»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
- regulations against unscrupulous actors»Det behövs regelverk och strukturer som säkrar ett seriöst« (party programme ↗)“Regulations and structures are needed that secure fair”
The election manifesto states that public employers and procurers should be leaders in working for sound competition and that workplace crime should not exist on the Swedish labour market.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that public employers and procurers should be leaders in working for sound competition and that workplace crime should not exist on the Swedish labour market. Requirements without follow-up give precisely the opportunity to win contracts through dumped wages which the plan wants to stop. A commission to strengthen and centralise follow-up of labour-law conditions is therefore supported by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens och att arbetslivskriminalitet inte ska finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad. Krav utan uppföljning ger just den möjlighet att vinna upphandlingar genom dumpade löner som planen vill stoppa. Ett uppdrag att stärka och centralisera uppföljningen av arbetsrättsliga villkor stöds därför av planen.
- procurers as leadersdecisive»Arbetslivs kriminalitet ska inte finnas på svensk arbetsmarknad och offentliga arbetsgivare och upphandlare ska vara föredömen i att verka för en sund konkurrens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Workplace crime should not exist on the Swedish labour market and public employers and procurers should be leaders in working for sound competition.”
- no competition through dumped conditions»Det ska aldrig löna sig att begå brott eller skaffa sig konkurrensfördelar genom att försumma de anställdas rätt till en trygg arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should never pay to commit crimes or gain competitive advantages by neglecting employees' right to a safe working environment.”
- combat workplace crime»Bekämpande av kriminalitet på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Fighting criminality on the labour market.”
- strong labour law»Stark arbetsrättslig lagstiftning.« (party programme ↗)“Strong labour-law legislation.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan demands strong action against employers that do not respect labour law or collective agreements and emphasizes that oversight is needed so that no one gains competitive advantages through rule-breaking.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands strong action against employers that do not respect labour law or collective agreements and emphasizes that oversight is needed so that no one gains competitive advantages through rule-breaking. Requirements in procurement without follow-up give precisely such advantages to disreputable actors, so centralized and strengthened follow-up is in the plan's direction. The plan does not express itself on the organization of follow-up, so the position is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver krafttag mot arbetsgivare som inte respekterar arbetsrätten eller kollektivavtalen och betonar att tillsyn behövs för att ingen ska vinna konkurrensfördelar genom regelbrott. Krav i upphandling utan uppföljning ger just sådana fördelar åt oseriösa aktörer, varför en centraliserad och förstärkt uppföljning ligger i planens riktning. Planen uttalar sig inte om uppföljningens organisation, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- stop wage dumpingdecisive»Det krävs krafttag mot arbetsgivare som exploaterar utländsk arbetskraft och inte respekterar svensk arbetsrätt eller gällande kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“Strong action is required against employers that exploit foreign workers and do not respect Swedish labour law or applicable collective agreements.”
- oversight provides fair competition»Tillsynen är också viktig för att skapa rättvisa mellan olika företag – ingen ska få ett övertag i konkurrensen genom att bryta mot miljöregler.« (party programme ↗)“Oversight is also important to create fairness between different enterprises – no one shall gain an advantage in competition by breaking environmental rules.”
- requirements in public procurement»Vid offentlig upphandling ska det ställas tydligare hållbarhetskrav.« (party programme ↗)“In public procurement, clearer sustainability requirements shall be placed.”
- against labour crime»Vi vill också stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin.« (party programme ↗)“We also wish to strengthen work against criminal economy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan demands action against crimes that harm businesses and that the economy has given, foreseeable and competition-neutral rules.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands action against crimes that harm businesses and that the economy has given, foreseeable and competition-neutral rules. Following up on labour rights conditions so that unserious actors do not win contracts by dumping wages protects precisely this healthy competition. However, the plan's strong decentralization principle speaks against centralization as such, so certainty is low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver krafttag mot brott som drabbar företag och att ekonomin har givna, förutsägbara och konkurrensneutrala spelregler. Att följa upp arbetsrättsliga villkor så att oseriösa aktörer inte vinner upphandlingar genom att dumpa löner värnar just den sunda konkurrensen. Planens starka decentraliseringsprincip talar dock emot centralisering som sådan, varför säkerheten är låg.
- foreseeable rulesdecisive»Ekonomin ska ha givna och förutsägbara spelregler« (party programme ↗)“The economy should have given and foreseeable rules.”
- action against crimes against businesses»satsningar på forskning och utveckling och krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“efforts on research and development and action against crimes against businesses”
- competition-neutral regulation»Viktigt är också att näringslivet får konkurrensneutrala regelverk« (party programme ↗)“Important is also that business gets competition-neutral regulation.”
- decentralization»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should be able to decide more for themselves, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme stipulates that market economy requires rules to maintain sound competition and wants to establish an independent labour market inspectorate.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme stipulates that market economy requires rules to maintain sound competition and wants to establish an independent labour market inspectorate. Requirements in procurement that are not followed up do the opposite: dishonest actors win through undercut terms and equal treatment in procurement is undermined. The counter-proposal's demand for a task of centralized monitoring thus follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för att upprätthålla en sund konkurrens och vill inrätta en fristående arbetsmarknadsinspektion. Krav i upphandling som inte följs upp gör det motsatta: oseriösa aktörer vinner på dumpade villkor och likabehandlingen i upphandlingen urholkas. Motförslagets krav på ett uppdrag om centraliserad uppföljning följer därför av planen.
- rules for sound competitiondecisive»Marknadsekonomin kräver spelregler för att upprätthålla en sund konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Market economy requires rules to maintain sound competition.”
- independent labour market inspectorate»En fristående arbetsmarknadsinspektion bör inrättas.« (party programme ↗)“An independent labour market inspectorate should be established.”
- equal treatment in procurement»Offentlig upphandling ska ske på sätt som ger skattebetalarna låga kostnader, hög kvalitet, säkrar likabehandling och stimulerar konkurrens.« (party programme ↗)“Public procurement shall be conducted in ways that give taxpayers low costs, high quality, ensure equal treatment and stimulate competition.”
- easy to do the right thing»Vi vill ha spelregler som gör det lätt att göra rätt och säkerställer konkurrens på rättvisa villkor även i digitaliseringens och delningsekonomins tid.« (party programme ↗)“We want rules that make it easy to do the right thing and ensure competition on fair terms even in the age of digitalization and sharing economy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes monitoring and cost control important political tasks and requires the state to work through advice, support and control for good working conditions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes monitoring and cost control important political tasks and requires the state to work through advice, support and control for good working conditions. Requirements without monitoring allow disreputable actors to win procurement contracts through wage dumping, which the plan sees as unfair competition and crime that should be prosecuted. Centralized monitoring is not explicitly addressed in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör uppföljning och kostnadskontroll till viktiga politiska uppgifter och ålägger staten att genom rådgivning, stöd och kontroll verka för goda arbetsvillkor. Krav utan uppföljning låter oseriösa aktörer vinna upphandlingar genom lönedumpning, vilket planen ser som illojal konkurrens och brottslighet som ska beivras. En centraliserad uppföljning berörs inte uttryckligen i dokumenten.
- monitoring is a political taskdecisive»kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska uppgifter« (party programme ↗)“cost tracking and quality control are therefore important political tasks”
- state control of working conditions»genom rådgivning, stöd och kontroll aktivt verka för en förbättrad« (party programme ↗)“through advice, support and control actively work for an improved”
- counter unfair competition»konkurrenspolitik motverkar oligopol, monopol och illojal konkurrens« (party programme ↗)“competition policy counters oligopoly, monopoly and unfair competition”
- no exceptions from prosecution»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be prosecuted effectively and without exception”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to fighting disreputable actors and fraud and to stopping the waste of tax money, which argues for demands placed in public contracts also being followed up.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to fighting disreputable actors and fraud and to stopping the waste of tax money, which argues for demands placed in public contracts also being followed up. The counter-proposal requires no new regulation but better monitoring of already existing conditions. The plan's simultaneous demands for reduced administrative burden pulls in another direction, so the assessment is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att bekämpa oseriösa aktörer och fusk och att stoppa slöseriet med skattepengar, vilket talar för att krav som ställs i offentliga affärer också ska följas upp. Motförslaget kräver ingen ny reglering utan bättre uppföljning av redan gällande villkor. Planens samtidiga krav på minskad administrativ börda drar åt andra hållet, varför bedömningen är osäker.
- fight disreputable actorsdecisive»Därför måste vi också bekämpa oseriösa aktörer och fusk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we must also fight disreputable actors and fraud.”
- order in tax money»Statens utgifter ska minska – vi ska stoppa slöseriet med skattepengar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state's spending shall decrease – we shall stop the waste of tax money”
- avoid increased administrative burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that fraud and systems that encourage fraud be prevented and that crime affecting serious business owners be combated; a follow-up that prevents unserious actors from winning contracts through wage dumping is in line with this.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that fraud and systems that encourage fraud be prevented and that crime affecting serious business owners be combated; a follow-up that prevents unserious actors from winning contracts through wage dumping is in line with this. The plan also opposes the import of cheap labour for unskilled jobs. Making demands without following them up conflicts with the plan's requirement for results from public funds.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att fusk och system som lockar till fusk motverkas och att brottslighet som drabbar seriösa företagare bekämpas; en uppföljning som hindrar oseriösa aktörer från att vinna upphandlingar genom lönedumpning ligger i den linjen. Planen vänder sig också mot att billig arbetskraft importeras till okvalificerade jobb. Att ställa krav utan att följa upp dem strider mot planens krav på resultat för offentliga medel.
- prevent frauddecisive»Både fusk och sådana system som tenderar att locka till fusk och korruption ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both fraud and systems that tend to encourage fraud and corruption should be prevented.”
- protect serious businesses»Bekämpa brottslighet som drabbar företagare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat crime affecting business owners”
- against wage dumping»Stoppa arbetskraftsinvandring till yrken som kan tillgodoses av inhemsk arbetskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop labour immigration to occupations that can be filled by domestic workers”
- follow-up of public funds»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results from every public investment”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:FiU28)
- Committee report full text (HD01FiU28)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:3896 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling av Mikael Damberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:3898 — med anledning av skr. 2025/26:89 Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling av Andrea Andersson Tay m.fl. (V)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2025/26:89 — Riksrevisionens rapport om arbetsrättsliga villkor i offentlig upphandling
Source: The Swedish Parliament