2026-03-192025/26:MJU13 · p.8MJUEnvironment & agriculture

National parks and nature reserves

What's at stake: The issue concerns the resources for managing and protecting national parks and nature reserves, affecting threatened species and ecosystems, climate adaptation, and opportunities for outdoor recreation.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

Parliament decides whether the current nature-conservation budget and management of national parks and nature reserves is adequate, or whether funding cuts threaten protection of valuable nature and outdoor recreation.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions and points to the newly presented national strategy and action plan for biodiversity, along with the EU and global numerical targets to protect 30 percent of land and sea areas by 2030, and welcomes the budget investments made for biodiversity.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 9 (S)

Reservation (the Social Democrats): the government's drastic cuts to the environmental budget threaten the management and protection of valuable natural areas — the Swedish National Audit Office has warned of neglected upkeep — risking species, ecosystems, climate adaptation, and outdoor recreation.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/17/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/13/5departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 61/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:200 by Per-Arne Håkansson and Ewa Pihl Krabbe (both S), 2025/26:553 by Caroline Helmersson Olsson et al. (S), 2025/26:775 by Lena Bäckelin and Anna-Caren Sätherberg (both S), 2025/26:881 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:3732 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) amendment 80 and 2025/26:3776 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) amendment 16.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:200 av Per-Arne Håkansson och Ewa Pihl Krabbe (båda S), 2025/26:553 av Caroline Helmersson Olsson m.fl. (S), 2025/26:775 av Lena Bäckelin och Anna-Caren Sätherberg (båda S), 2025/26:881 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:3732 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 80 och 2025/26:3776 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 16.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal to tighten regulations for invasive alien species. The bill means, among other things, that those who intentionally or with gross negligence introduce an invasive alien species into Sweden from another EU country may be sentenced to fines or imprisonment for at most two years. The proposal also means that those who introduce invasive alien species from another EU country shall be obliged to report the species to the Customs Authority. The Customs Authority shall also receive authority to check the import of alien species at the internal land border and, if necessary, seize such species. By invasive alien species is meant species of animals, plants, fungi or microorganisms that are introduced and spread in the environment and cause problems for, for example, native plants and animals, human health and society. The legislative changes enter into force on 1 May 2026. The Riksdag also said no to approximately 200 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025, primarily by referring to already taken measures. The proposals deal, among other things, with invasive alien species, area protection, species protection, remediation and beach protection.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to strengthen protection of forest and coastal areas for the right to roam and biological diversity and demands conscious work for conditions supporting rich ecosystems.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to strengthen protection of forest and coastal areas for the right to roam and biological diversity and demands conscious work for conditions supporting rich ecosystems. It warns that overexploitation of nature depletes diversity and wants environmental goals followed up with practical work. Pointing out cuts to the environmental budget as a threat to management and protection of valuable natural areas is therefore in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill stärka skyddet av skogs- och strandområden för allemansrätten och den biologiska mångfalden och kräver ett medvetet arbete för goda villkor för rika ekosystem. Den varnar för att överutnyttjande av naturen utarmar mångfalden och vill ha miljömål som följs upp med praktiskt arbete. Att peka ut nedskärningar i miljöbudgeten som ett hot mot skötsel och skydd av värdefulla naturområden ligger därför i linje med planen.

  • protection of valuable naturedecisive»Skyddet av skogs- och strandområden är en viktig del för att värna den svenska allemansrätten och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protection of forest and coastal areas is an important part of safeguarding the Swedish right to roam and biological diversity.”
  • rich ecosystems»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa« (party programme ↗)“create conditions for rich ecosystems, amongst other things through restoration of”
  • against depleted diversity»Ett ständigt överutnyttjande av naturens resurser leder till kraftig utarmning av den biologiska mångfalden och växthusgasutsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Constant overexploitation of nature's resources leads to severe depletion of biological diversity and greenhouse gas emissions.”
  • environmental goals with resources»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals followed up with strict legislation and practical work.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The plan requires protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature, as well as equitable access to outdoor recreation throughout the country, which supports the counter-proposal's warning that cuts threaten the management and protection of nature areas.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature, as well as equitable access to outdoor recreation throughout the country, which supports the counter-proposal's warning that cuts threaten the management and protection of nature areas. The plan consistently prioritizes increased shared resources over tax cuts. Budget levels for the environmental area are not specified, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver värn av biologisk mångfald och av Sveriges värdefulla natur, samt jämlik tillgång till friluftsliv i hela landet, vilket bär motförslagets varning för att nedskärningar hotar skötseln och skyddet av naturområden. Planen prioriterar genomgående ökade gemensamma resurser framför skattesänkningar. Budgetnivåerna för miljöområdet anges inte, så ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • protection of valuable naturedecisive»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
  • resources before tax cuts»En avgörande fråga i höstens val är om vi ska fortsätta öka resurserna till välfärden, eller om stora skattesänkningar ska gå före.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A decisive question in this autumn's election is whether we shall continue to increase resources for welfare, or whether large tax cuts shall come first.”
  • access to outdoor recreation»Jämlik och jämställd tillgång till idrotts- och friluftsliv i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Equitable and equal access to sports and outdoor recreation throughout the country.”
  • threatened biological diversity»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, species death accelerates and biological diversity is threatened.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan requires that at least thirty per cent of nature is protected and that nature and biodiversity are protected, strengthened and restored — which requires means for management and protection of natural areas.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that at least thirty per cent of nature is protected and that nature and biodiversity are protected, strengthened and restored — which requires means for management and protection of natural areas. The warning that cuts threaten this therefore lies in the plan's line. The plan moreover wants to give more money to outdoor recreation organisations so that more can enjoy nature.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att minst 30 procent av naturen skyddas och att naturen och den biologiska mångfalden skyddas, stärks och återställs — vilket förutsätter medel till skötsel och skydd av naturområden. Varningen för att nedskärningar hotar detta ligger därför i planens linje. Planen vill dessutom ge mer pengar till friluftsorganisationerna så att fler kan njuta av naturen.

  • protect thirty per cent of naturedecisive»skydda 30 procent av Sveriges natur« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect thirty per cent of Sweden's nature”
  • protect and restore nature»Naturen och den biologiska mångfalden behöver skyddas, stärkas och återställas.« (party programme ↗)“Nature and biodiversity need to be protected, strengthened and restored.”
  • support for outdoor recreation»ge mer pengar till friluftsorganisationerna så att fler kan njuta av svensk natur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“give more money to outdoor recreation organisations so that more can enjoy Swedish nature.”
  • climate adaptation»investera i klimatanpassning för att möta effekterna av klimatförändringarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in climate adaptation to meet the effects of climate change.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that Swedish nature shall be tended and biological diversity developed, and the party programme makes the protection of diversity a prerequisite for ecosystems to survive and nature's values something everyone shall be able to take part in.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that Swedish nature shall be tended and biological diversity developed, and the party programme makes the protection of diversity a prerequisite for ecosystems to survive and nature's values something everyone shall be able to take part in. If cuts undermine the management of protected areas, this is threatened. The plan therefore gives support to the warning in the counter-proposal.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att Sveriges natur ska vårdas och den biologiska mångfalden utvecklas, och partiprogrammet gör skyddet av mångfalden till en förutsättning för att ekosystemen ska fortleva och naturens värden till något alla ska kunna ta del av. Om nedskärningar urholkar skötseln av skyddade områden hotas just detta. Planen ger därför stöd åt varningen i motförslaget.

  • tend naturedecisive»Sveriges natur ska vårdas och den biologiska mångfalden utvecklas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish nature shall be tended and biological diversity developed.”
  • protect biological diversity»Att skydda den biologiska mångfalden är nödvändigt för att ekosystemen ska kunna fortleva.« (party programme ↗)“Protecting biological diversity is necessary for ecosystems to be able to survive.”
  • nature's values for everyone»Naturen har unika värden som alla måste kunna ta del av.« (party programme ↗)“Nature has unique values that everyone must be able to take part in.”
  • accessible nature and outdoor life»Vi vill se fler grönområden nära där människor bor, renare vatten och mer biologisk mångfald.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more green spaces near where people live, cleaner water and more biological diversity.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that nature conservation undergoes a renaissance, that work to protect valuable nature and biological diversity continues and that more coherent areas are protected.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that nature conservation undergoes a renaissance, that work to protect valuable nature and biological diversity continues and that more coherent areas are protected. Management and protection of national parks and nature reserves is precisely that work, and depleted funding undermines it. The plan also values public access to forests and land.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att naturvården får en renässans, att arbetet med att skydda värdefull natur och biologisk mångfald fortsätter och att fler sammanhängande områden skyddas. Skötsel och skydd av nationalparker och naturreservat är just det arbetet, och en urholkad finansiering underminerar det. Planen värnar också allmänhetens tillgång till skog och mark.

  • strengthened nature conservationdecisive»Naturvården måste få en renässans.« (party programme ↗)“Nature conservation must undergo a renaissance.”
  • protect valuable nature»Då behöver vi fortsätta arbetet med att skydda både värdefull natur och den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We need to continue work to protect both valuable nature and biological diversity.”
  • more protected areas»form av olika naturtyper och arter behövs ökade restaureringsinsatser och fler skyddade« (party programme ↗)“form of different nature types and species increased restoration efforts and more protected”
  • recreation and public land rights»Allmänhetens tillgång till skog, mark och stränder ska värnas.« (party programme ↗)“Public access to forests, land and shores shall be protected.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that national parks are important for preserving the national natural heritage for future generations and that the preservation of biological diversity requires reserve protection in various forms.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that national parks are important for preserving the national natural heritage for future generations and that the preservation of biological diversity requires reserve protection in various forms. It moreover emphasizes near-city natural areas of high quality and that wetlands should be restored as needed, which requires funds for management. The counter-proposal's warning that budget cuts threaten the management and protection of valuable natural areas therefore aligns with the plan's stewardship responsibility.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att nationalparkerna är viktiga för att bevara det nationella naturarvet åt kommande generationer och att bevarandet av den biologiska mångfalden kräver reservatsskydd i olika former. Den framhåller också stadsnära naturområden av hög kvalitet och att våtmarker vid behov ska återställas, vilket förutsätter medel till skötsel. Motförslagets varning för att nedskärningar hotar skötseln och skyddet av värdefulla naturområden ligger därför i linje med planens förvaltarskapsansvar.

  • preserve national natural heritagedecisive»Nationalparkerna är viktiga för att bevara vårt nationella naturarv åt kommande« (party programme ↗)“National parks are important for preserving our national natural heritage for future”
  • reserve protection for diversity»Bevarande av den biologiska mångfalden kräver både reservatsskydd i olika former och stor« (party programme ↗)“Preservation of biological diversity requires both reserve protection in various forms and large”
  • near-city nature and outdoor recreation»det är också viktigt att det finns stadsnära naturområden av hög kvalitet« (party programme ↗)“it is also important that there are near-city natural areas of high quality”
  • management and restoration»Våtmarker behöver bevaras och vid behov återställas« (party programme ↗)“Wetlands need to be preserved and, if needed, restored”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan explicitly states that more state resources are needed to maintain and manage valuable nature and upgrade trails in national parks and nature reserves.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly states that more state resources are needed to maintain and manage valuable nature and upgrade trails in national parks and nature reserves. The warning that insufficient resources threaten maintenance, species and outdoor recreation thus hits the same commitment. The plan also emphasizes that already protected nature shall be better cared for.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår uttryckligen fast att det behövs mer statliga resurser för att sköta och förvalta värdefull natur samt rusta upp leder i nationalparker och naturreservat. Varningen för att bristande resurser hotar skötsel, arter och friluftsliv träffar därmed samma åtagande. Planen betonar också att redan skyddad natur ska vårdas bättre.

  • more resources for nature conservationdecisive»Det behövs mer statliga resurser för att sköta och förvalta områden med värdefull natur, samt för att rusta upp befintliga och vid behov skapa nya leder i nationalparker och statliga naturreservat.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More state resources are needed to maintain and manage areas of valuable nature, and to upgrade existing and if necessary create new trails in national parks and state nature reserves.”
  • care for protected nature»Vårda redan skyddad skog bättre för att stärka den biologiska mångfalden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Care for already protected forest better to strengthen biodiversity”
  • accessible outdoor recreation»Göra naturupplevelser och friluftsliv i statliga naturreservat och nationalparker tillgängliga för fler genom satsningar på leder och friluftsanordningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make nature experiences and outdoor recreation in state nature reserves and national parks accessible to more through investments in trails and outdoor facilities”
  • protected and accessible nature»Sveriges fantastiska natur ska skyddas och vara tillgänglig så att var och en kan njuta av den.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's fantastic nature shall be protected and be accessible so that everyone can enjoy it.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal warns that cuts in environmental budgets threaten protection and management of natural areas and thus wishes to protect appropriations for protected nature.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal warns that cuts in environmental budgets threaten protection and management of natural areas and thus wishes to protect appropriations for protected nature. The plan establishes that goals can be achieved without costly and extensive expansion of reserves, that adapted forestry management should be prioritized over reserve designation and that public spending should be reviewed and redirected to welfare and the justice system. The requirement for increased appropriations for reserve protection therefore does not follow from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget varnar för att nedskärningar i miljöbudgeten hotar skydd och skötsel av naturområden och vill därmed värna anslagen till skyddad natur. Planen slår fast att målen kan nås utan kostsam och omfattande utbyggnad av reservaten, att anpassad skogsskötsel ska prioriteras före reservatsavsättning och att offentliga utgifter ska ses över och riktas om till välfärd och rättsväsende. Kravet på höjda anslag till reservatsskydd följer därför inte av planen.

  • management before reservedecisive»Att anpassad skogsskötsel prioriteras före reservatsavsättning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That adapted forestry management is prioritized over reserve designation”
  • diversity without expensive reserves»Biologisk mångfald går hand i hand med ett aktivt och produktivt skogsbruk där man genom ny teknik och smarta metoder kan uppnå målen utan kostsam och omfattande utbyggnad av reservaten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Biological diversity goes hand in hand with active and productive forestry where through new technology and smart methods one can achieve goals without costly and extensive expansion of reserves.”
  • redirected public spending»Se över offentliga utgifter och rikta om medel till välfärden och rättsväsendet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Review public spending and redirect funds to welfare and the justice system”
  • most environment per crown»Sträva efter miljöeffektivitet och hitta de åtgärder som ger mest miljö per krona« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strive for environmental efficiency and find the measures that give the most environment per crown”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament