2025-03-262024/25:SkU9 · p.20SkUTaxation

Special profit share

Taxation of special profit shares (carried interest)

What's at stake: The outcome affects how private-equity managers and others with income from special profit shares are taxed relative to ordinary wage earners, and whether the issue is handled in isolation or as part of a broader fairness debate about taxing high incomes.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether taxation of special profit shares, for example for private-equity managers, should be set through dedicated tax rules following an already-completed government review, or whether parliament should instead call for a broader review of how high incomes and assets are taxed.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that the government has already commissioned a review of how special profit shares are taxed and that proposals for predictable taxation rules have been drawn up in line with the review's remit, and therefore sees no reason to direct further requests to the government on this issue.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 28 (S, V)

The reservation (S, V) wants parliament to call on the government for a longer-term review of how people with the highest incomes and assets — including private-equity managers earning income from special profit shares — should contribute more to welfare funding, since the proposed rules would otherwise risk taxing them more lightly than, for example, nurses or construction workers.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 28 by S, V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
Sown reservationNoNo 1/92/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 17/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SDYesYes 62/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Broke with the party line

SMikael Dahlqvist (S, Värmlands län)Yes — party line: No

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motion 2024/25:3190 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) demand 14.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3190 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 14.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 140 proposals on income tax for natural persons submitted in motions during the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag primarily refers to previous positions, ongoing legislative work and current legislation in the field. The motions deal, among other things, with income taxation regarding the work tax deduction, tax reduction for sick leave and activity allowance, RUT and ROT deductions and various tax reforms.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan requires that tax levels increase above all on large fortunes and high incomes and that the richest again begin to pay their share of welfare.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that tax levels increase above all on large fortunes and high incomes and that the richest again begin to pay their share of welfare. The counter-proposal's demand for a long-term review of how those with the highest incomes and assets contribute, when capital income can be taxed lower than a nurse's salary, is the same thing in substance.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att skattenivåerna ökar framför allt på stora förmögenheter och höga inkomster och att de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del av välfärden. Motförslagets krav på en långsiktig översyn av hur de med de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna bidrar, när vinstandelsinkomster kan beskattas lägre än en sjuksköterskas lön, är samma sak i sak.

  • the richest pay their sharedecisive»skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del.« (party programme ↗)“tax system where the richest again begin to pay their share.”
  • higher tax on wealth»att behöva öka igen, framför allt på stora förmögenheter, fastigheter,« (party programme ↗)“need to increase again, above all on large fortunes, property,”
  • capital contributes more to welfare»Vänsterpartiet har en skattepolitik som ser till vilka behov som finns och där de med stora kapitaltillgångar eller höga löner får bidra mer till välfärden än de gör idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party has a tax policy that looks at what needs exist and where those with large capital assets or high salaries contribute more to welfare than they do today.”
  • tax capital gains»Vi vill inte höja skatten för vanliga löntagare utan på mångmiljonarv, lyxvillor och stora aktievinster som man inte ens behöver jobba för.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We do not want to raise taxes for ordinary wage earners but on multimillionaires, luxury villas and large share gains that you do not even have to work for.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan's commitment is that the very richest shall contribute more and that taxes shall be progressive and levied according to ability to pay, with equal taxation of all employment incomes and compensation as a fundamental principle.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's commitment is that the very richest shall contribute more and that taxes shall be progressive and levied according to ability to pay, with equal taxation of all employment incomes and compensation as a fundamental principle. A long-term review of how the highest incomes and assets contribute to welfare follows directly from that, when share-based income can be taxed lower than a nurse's salary. Specifically, special dividend income is not mentioned in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planens åtagande är att de allra rikaste ska bidra mer och att skatterna ska vara progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft, med likformig beskattning av alla förvärvsinkomster och ersättningar som grundprincip. En långsiktig översyn av hur de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna bidrar till välfärden följer direkt av det, när vinstandelsinkomster kan beskattas lägre än en sjuksköterskas lön. Just särskild vinstandel nämns inte i planen.

  • the richest shall contribute moredecisive»Vi vill införa en beredskapsskatt för de allra rikaste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce a readiness tax for the very richest.”
  • progressive taxation»Skatterna ska vara progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft och« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be progressive and levied according to ability to pay and”
  • uniform income taxation»tydlighet i regelverket, breda skattebaser och att alla förvärvsinkomster och ersättningar« (party programme ↗)“clarity in the regulations, broad tax bases and that all employment incomes and compensation”
  • taxes finance welfare»Skattesystemets viktigaste uppgift är att finansiera vår välfärd och nödvändiga« (party programme ↗)“The tax system's most important task is to finance our welfare and necessary”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto requires that those with the most money contribute more to welfare through progressive taxation of capital, and the party programme that those who are well-off contribute more to the common good and that inequalities shall decrease.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that those with the most money contribute more to welfare through progressive taxation of capital, and the party programme that those who are well-off contribute more to the common good and that inequalities shall decrease. That income from special profit sharing is taxed lower than nurses' wages goes against this, which is why a long-term review is supported.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att de med mest pengar bidrar mer till välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital, och partiprogrammet att den som har det gott ställt bidrar mer till det gemensamma och att klyftorna ska minska. Att inkomster via särskild vinstandel beskattas lägre än sjuksköterskors löner strider mot detta, varför en långsiktig översyn stöds.

  • progressive capital taxationdecisive»att de med mest pengar, som också orsakar större utsläpp, ska bidra mer till omställningen och välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those with the most money, who also cause greater emissions, shall contribute more to the transition and welfare through progressive taxation of capital.”
  • the richest contribute more»Det är rimligt att den som har det gott ställt ekonomiskt bidrar mer till det gemensamma trygghetssystemet än den som har ett mindre ekonomiskt utrymme.« (party programme ↗)“It is reasonable that those who are economically well-off contribute more to the common security system than those with a smaller economic margin.”
  • reduced inequalities»De ekonomiska klyftorna ska minska.« (party programme ↗)“Economic inequalities shall decrease.”
  • stopped tax evasion»Företags skatteflykt ska stoppas.« (party programme ↗)“Corporate tax evasion shall be stopped.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto establishes that the total tax burden should decrease and that the party does not participate in tax increases that damage jobs or personal savings.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that the total tax burden should decrease and that the party does not participate in tax increases that damage jobs or personal savings. A review whose purpose is for people with the highest incomes and assets to contribute more points toward higher taxes on work, ownership and savings. The party programme also wants to make the tax scale less steep and keep the tax burden on job-creating activity as low as possible.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att det totala skattetrycket ska ner och att partiet inte medverkar till skattehöjningar som skadar jobben eller det egna sparandet. En översyn vars syfte är att personer med de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna ska bidra mer pekar mot höjd skatt på arbete, ägande och sparande. Partiprogrammet vill dessutom göra skatteskalan mindre brant och hålla skattebördan på jobbskapande så låg som möjligt.

  • no harmful tax increasesdecisive»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will not participate in any tax increases that damage jobs, personal savings or make it more expensive to live.”
  • less steep tax scale»Därför måste skatteskalan göras mindre brant« (party programme ↗)“Therefore the tax scale must be made less steep”
  • low tax on job-creation»Skattebördan på jobbskapande i företag ska göras så liten som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“The tax burden on job-creating activity in businesses must be kept as small as possible.”
  • tax limits self-determination»Beskattning begränsar dock människors självbestämmande« (party programme ↗)“Taxation does, however, limit people's self-determination”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that economic policy aims to combat poverty, not wealth, and that taxes can play only a limited redistributive role.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that economic policy aims to combat poverty, not wealth, and that taxes can play only a limited redistributive role. A review aimed at higher incomes and assets contributing more to welfare therefore goes against the plan, which instead wants to lower capital and marginal taxes. The plan does, however, want to increase uniformity in capital income taxation.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att den ekonomiska politiken syftar till att bekämpa fattigdom, inte rikedom, och att skatter bara kan spela en begränsad omfördelande roll. En översyn med syftet att de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna ska bidra mer till välfärden går därför emot planen, som i stället vill sänka kapital- och marginalskatterna. Planen vill dock öka enhetligheten i kapitalinkomstbeskattningen.

  • combat poverty not wealthdecisive»Den socialliberala ekonomiska politiken syftar till att bekämpa fattigdom, inte rikedom.« (party programme ↗)“Social liberal economic policy aims to combat poverty, not wealth.”
  • limited redistribution through tax»Därutöver kan skatter spela en viss – men begränsad – omfördelande roll.« (party programme ↗)“Beyond that, taxes can play a certain – but limited – redistributive role.”
  • lower top marginal tax»De högsta marginalskatterna bör närma sig snittet i OECD.« (party programme ↗)“The highest marginal tax rates should approach the OECD average.”
  • uniform capital taxation»enhetligheten i kapitalinkomstbeskattningen öka.« (party programme ↗)“uniformity in capital income taxation increase.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that capital taxes must be competitive, that taxation must not undermine the right to property and that individuals as far as possible must be able to retain their own income.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that capital taxes must be competitive, that taxation must not undermine the right to property and that individuals as far as possible must be able to retain their own income. A review aimed at the highest incomes and assets contributing more points in the opposite direction, even though the plan also mentions tax according to ability to pay.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att kapitalskatterna måste vara konkurrenskraftiga, att beskattning inte får urholka äganderätten och att den enskilde i största möjliga utsträckning ska få behålla sin egen inkomst. En översyn som syftar till att de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna ska bidra mer pekar i motsatt riktning, även om planen också nämner skatt efter bärkraft.

  • competitive capital taxesdecisive»Kapitalskatterna måste därför vara konkurrenskraftiga.« (party programme ↗)“Capital taxes must therefore be competitive.”
  • taxation must not undermine the right to property»får inte urholka äganderätten« (party programme ↗)“must not undermine the right to property”
  • retain their own income»Skattesystemet ska vara utformat så att den enskilde i största möjliga utsträckning får behålla sin egen« (party programme ↗)“The tax system must be designed so that individuals as far as possible retain their own”
  • tax according to ability to pay»skatt efter bärkraft och likabehandling« (party programme ↗)“tax according to ability to pay and equal treatment”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan introduces a tax ceiling and requires competitive corporate and capital taxes that encourage investments in Sweden, while tax on savings is reduced.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan introduces a tax ceiling and requires competitive corporate and capital taxes that encourage investments in Sweden, while tax on savings is reduced. A review of how the highest incomes and assets should contribute more is aimed in substance at higher capital taxation. It contradicts the plan's commitments and the principle that risk-taking should be rewarded.

Original (Swedish)

Planen inför ett skattehöjarstopp och kräver konkurrenskraftiga bolags- och kapitalskatter som uppmuntrar investeringar i Sverige, samtidigt som skatten på sparande sänks. En översyn av hur de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna ska bidra mer syftar i sak till högre kapitalbeskattning. Det strider mot planens åtaganden och mot principen att risktagande ska belönas.

  • tax ceilingdecisive»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax ceiling for the coming mandate period which means that the total taxes are not raised”
  • competitive capital taxes»Ska det ske måste skattesystemet bli enklare, och bolags-, kunskaps- och kapitalskatter vara konkurrenskraftiga och uppmuntra till investeringar i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If it happens, the tax system must become simpler, and corporate, knowledge and capital taxes must be competitive and encourage investments in Sweden.”
  • lower tax on savings»Sänka skatten på investeringssparkonton (ISK) – så att du lättare kan spara till en bostad eller till pensionen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the tax on investment savings accounts (ISK) – so that you can more easily save for a home or for retirement”
  • risk-taking should be rewarded»Risktagande ska därför belönas.« (party programme ↗)“Risk-taking should therefore be rewarded.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's tax line is competitive taxes that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world and that risk-taking and work should pay.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's tax line is competitive taxes that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world and that risk-taking and work should pay. A review whose stated purpose is that the highest incomes and assets should contribute more points toward increased capital and income taxation and thus lies aside from the plan's direction. The fact that the plan simultaneously wants large prosperity to be shared with more makes the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planens skattelinje är konkurrenskraftiga skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden och att risktagande och arbete ska löna sig. En översyn vars uttalade syfte är att de högsta inkomsterna och tillgångarna ska bidra mer pekar mot höjd kapital- och inkomstbeskattning och ligger därmed vid sidan av planens riktning. Att planen samtidigt vill att stora välstånd ska komma fler till del gör slutsatsen osäker.

  • competitive taxesdecisive»Skattepolitiken måste därför syfta till konkurrenskraftiga skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden, framförallt de skatter som läggs på företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax policy must therefore aim for competitive taxes that do not deviate too much from the rest of the world, especially taxes on businesses.”
  • risk-taking shall pay»måste det löna sig att utbilda sig, arbeta och ta risker« (party programme ↗)“it must pay to educate oneself, work and take risks”
  • taxes that do not hamper business»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish businesses in international competition”
  • prosperity shared with more»stora välstånd som skapas måste komma fler till del« (2022 manifesto ↗)“large prosperity that is created must be shared with more”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament