2025-04-022024/25:CU14 · p.1CUCivil law & housing
Review of the Planning and Building Act
Review of the Planning and Building Act
What's at stake: The outcome affects the pace of continued simplification work in the planning and building area and thus how quickly red tape for housing construction can be reduced, while also touching on parliament's role relative to ongoing government work.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should be instructed to prioritize continued simplification work under the Planning and Building Act, or whether the legislative changes and ongoing inquiry and preparatory work already under way are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers that parliament should not pre-empt the government's announced bill and the ongoing preparatory work on simplified building rules, and therefore rejects the motions calling for a formal instruction on further simplification.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation wants the government instructed to prioritize simplification work under the Planning and Building Act, using already-appointed inquiries as a starting point, and stresses that the housing shortage requires more measures than simplification alone.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 208–94Nej 133–169
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1383 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) claim 12 and 2024/25:3075 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) claim 32.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1383 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 12 och 2024/25:3075 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 32.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 170 proposals concerning planning and construction in motions from the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work and applicable rules within the areas covered by the proposals. The proposals deal, among other things, with the planning system, sustainability and climate adaptation measures, as well as matters concerning building and demolition permits.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to prioritize work on regulatory simplifications within planning and building law. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The counter-proposal requires that work on planning and building legislation be prioritized but emphasizes that housing shortage requires more than regulatory simplifications.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires that work on planning and building legislation be prioritized but emphasizes that housing shortage requires more than regulatory simplifications. The plan sees the housing shortage as a brake and places main responsibility on the state through building companies, investment support and massive housing construction, that is, that more measures than simplifications are needed. The plan does not oppose the regulatory framework being reviewed.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver att arbetet med plan- och bygglagstiftningen prioriteras men understryker att bostadsbristen kräver mer än regelförenklingar. Planen ser bostadsbristen som en bromskloss och lägger huvudansvaret på staten genom byggbolag, investeringsstöd och massivt bostadsbyggande, alltså just att fler åtgärder än förenklingar behövs. Planen motsätter sig inte att regelverket ses över.
- massive housing constructiondecisive»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is about a policy for massive housing construction, climate-smart renovations and reduced rents that go hand in hand with the green transition.”
- state main responsibility for construction»Staten behöver ta huvudansvaret för att stärka investeringarna i byggande, upprustning och energieffektivisering av hyresbostäder.« (party programme ↗)“The state needs to take main responsibility for strengthening investments in construction, renovation and energy efficiency of rental housing.”
- housing shortage must be solved»Bostadsbristen är en bromskloss både för lokalsamhällen, arbetstagare och arbetsgivare som vill vara delaktiga i att ställa om Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The housing shortage is a brake both for local communities, workers and employers who want to be part of transitioning Sweden.”
- state-owned building company»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state-owned building company, investment support for increased housing construction and active land policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's principal commitment in the housing area is to combat overcrowding and continue building rental apartments that ordinary people can afford, and the party programme sees housing supply as a societal responsibility because low building drives up costs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's principal commitment in the housing area is to combat overcrowding and continue building rental apartments that ordinary people can afford, and the party programme sees housing supply as a societal responsibility because low building drives up costs. The counter-proposal requires prioritized regulatory simplification work with already appointed investigations as the basis and at the same time emphasizes that housing shortage requires more than simplifications, which aligns closely with the plan's line. However, the plan does not address the planning and building act as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande på bostadsområdet är att bekämpa trångboddheten och fortsätta bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med, och partiprogrammet ser bostadsförsörjningen som ett samhälleligt ansvar eftersom lågt byggande driver upp kostnaderna. Motförslaget kräver prioriterat regelförenklingsarbete med redan tillsatta utredningar som grund och understryker samtidigt att bostadsbristen kräver mer än förenklingar, vilket ligger nära planens linje. Planen talar dock inte om plan- och bygglagen som sådan.
- more rental apartments against housing shortagedecisive»Trångboddheten ska bekämpas. Vi ska fortsätta att bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd att bo i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Overcrowding shall be combated. We shall continue to build rental apartments that ordinary people can afford to live in.”
- low building raises costs»Lågt bostadsbyggandet driver upp bostadskostnaderna« (party programme ↗)“Low housing construction drives up housing costs”
- housing a social right»ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“sees housing as a social right and housing policy as a part of”
- faster permission processes»Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Slow permission processes shall be speeded up.”
The plan wishes to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy through active rule simplification work and at the same time to build more rental housing with reasonable rents, which responds to the counter-proposal's both legs: prioritised rule simplification and that housing shortage demands more than simplifications.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy through active rule simplification work and at the same time to build more rental housing with reasonable rents, which responds to the counter-proposal's both legs: prioritised rule simplification and that housing shortage demands more than simplifications. The Planning and Building Act is not mentioned, so this is derived. Uncertainty is large since the plan does not take position on priority order in legislative work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill undvika onödig byråkrati genom aktivt regelförenklingsarbete och samtidigt bygga fler hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, vilket svarar mot motförslagets båda led: prioriterad regelförenkling och att bostadsbristen kräver mer än förenklingar. Plan- och bygglagen nämns inte, så ställningstagandet är härlett. Osäkerheten är stor eftersom planen inte tar ställning till prioritetsordningen i lagstiftningsarbetet.
- active rule simplificationdecisive»Onödig byråkrati ska undvikas genom ett aktivt« (party programme ↗)“Unnecessary bureaucracy shall be avoided through active”
- more rental housing built»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental housing with reasonable rents, develop and expand investment support that made it cheaper to build and see to it that more can own their homes.”
- competition in construction sector»byggsektorn genom att ge små och medelstora« (party programme ↗)“construction sector by giving small and medium-sized”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to clearing away unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy and that regulatory simplification shall make it easier to build and live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to clearing away unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy and that regulatory simplification shall make it easier to build and live. The counter-proposal requires precisely that regulatory simplification work within planning and building legislation be prioritized and that the housing shortage be met with more measures. This is in line with the plan's principle that simple regulations and strong incentives are needed for construction to increase throughout the country. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati och att regelförenklingar ska göra det enklare att bygga och bo. Motförslaget kräver just att regelförenklingsarbetet inom plan- och bygglagstiftningen prioriteras och att bostadsbristen möts med fler åtgärder. Det stämmer med planens princip att enkla regler och starka drivkrafter behövs för att byggandet ska öka i hela landet. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- clear away unnecessary regulationsdecisive»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clear away unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy.”
- more housing throughout the country»En förutsättning för utveckling är att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for development is that there is sufficient housing throughout the country.”
- easier to build and live»genom regelförenklingar göra det enklare att bygga och bo på landsbygden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“through regulatory simplification make it easier to build and live in rural areas”
- shorter permit processes»Det är dags att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar och reformera miljöbalken så att ett projekts klimatnytta ges större vikt i miljöprövningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is time to halve the time it takes to obtain permits for green investments and reform the Environmental Code so that a project's climate benefits are given greater weight in environmental assessment.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan notes that too few homes are being built and requires that building regulations at both state and municipal levels be simplified, that appeals processes be shortened and that builders be allowed to develop detail plans.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan notes that too few homes are being built and requires that building regulations at both state and municipal levels be simplified, that appeals processes be shortened and that builders be allowed to develop detail plans. The counter-proposal's demand to prioritize regulatory simplification in planning and building legislation thereby aligns with the plan, as does the point that the housing shortage requires more than regulatory simplifications.
Original (Swedish)
Planen konstaterar att det byggs för få bostäder och kräver att byggreglerna på både statlig och kommunal nivå förenklas, att överklagandeprocesserna kortas och att byggherrar får utarbeta detaljplaner. Motförslagets krav på att prioritera regelförenklingen i plan- och bygglagstiftningen ligger därmed i linje med planen, liksom påpekandet att bostadsbristen kräver mer än regelförenklingar.
- more homes through simpler regulationsdecisive»Det byggs för få bostäder. För att öka byggandet i Sverige bör konkurrensen öka och reglerna« (party programme ↗)“Too few homes are being built. To increase construction in Sweden, competition should increase and regulations”
- shorter processes, simpler regulations»korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“shorten appeals processes and continue to simplify building regulations”
- builder-driven detail plans»Byggherrar ska ges rätten att utarbeta detaljplaner som sedan prövas av kommunen.« (party programme ↗)“Builders shall be given the right to develop detail plans which are then reviewed by the municipality.”
- more measures than regulatory simplification»ett nytt system med behovsbostäder ska införas för grupper med särskilt stora bostadsbehov« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a new system with need-based housing shall be introduced for groups with particularly large housing needs”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan is clear that bureaucracy and unnecessary regulations must not hinder building and that the planning process must be characterized by efficiency and good service towards those who want to build.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is clear that bureaucracy and unnecessary regulations must not hinder building and that the planning process must be characterized by efficiency and good service towards those who want to build. To prioritize regulatory simplification in planning and building legislation is exactly this. Housing is according to the plan a fundamental need that the state and municipalities must ensure, which also supports that more measures than regulatory simplifications are needed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är tydlig med att krångel och onödiga regler inte får hindra byggande och att planprocessen ska präglas av effektivitet och god serviceanda mot dem som vill bygga. Att prioritera regelförenkling i plan- och bygglagstiftningen är precis detta. Bostaden är enligt planen ett grundläggande behov som stat och kommun ska trygga, vilket också stöder att fler åtgärder än regelförenklingar behövs.
- regulatory bureaucracy hinders buildingdecisive»och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun« (party programme ↗)“and unnecessary regulations must not stand in the way of a municipality”
- efficient planning process»Men planprocessen måste också präglas av effektivitet och god serviceanda« (party programme ↗)“But the planning process must also be characterized by efficiency and good customer service”
- housing a fundamental need»Att ha någonstans att bo är ett grundläggande behov« (party programme ↗)“Having somewhere to live is a fundamental need”
- more housing»FLER BOSTÄDER« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE HOUSING”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal requires that simplification work in planning and building legislation be prioritized and that the housing shortage be addressed with more measures.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires that simplification work in planning and building legislation be prioritized and that the housing shortage be addressed with more measures. The plan assumes that there is a housing shortage in 207 of 290 municipalities and commits to replacing complex detailed plans with simpler building plans and removing a third of red tape. Reforms that increase building are an explicit goal. The plan therefore supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver att regelförenklingsarbetet inom plan- och bygglagstiftningen prioriteras och att bostadsbristen möts med fler åtgärder. Planen utgår från att bostadsbrist råder i 207 av 290 kommuner och åtar sig att ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner samt att ta bort en tredjedel av regelkrånglet. Reformer som ökar byggandet är ett uttalat mål. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- simplified planning and building legislationdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace complex detailed plans with simpler building plans”
- the housing shortage as a problem»Det är bostadsbrist i 207 av landets 290 kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a housing shortage in 207 of the country's 290 municipalities.”
- increased housing construction»Vi vill genomföra reformer som ökar byggandet av såväl hyressom bostadsrätter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to implement reforms that increase the building of both rental and owner-occupied housing.”
- reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to facilitate residential construction by simplifying and speeding up decision-making processes and reviewing the regulations and requirements that govern construction, and increasing residential construction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to facilitate residential construction by simplifying and speeding up decision-making processes and reviewing the regulations and requirements that govern construction, and increasing residential construction. The counter-proposal's demand that the government prioritizes simplification work within planning and building legislation is the same thing in substance. The plan also points to the need to review building standards and increase competition in the construction market, which means housing shortage requires more than simplifications.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesserna och se över de regelverk och krav som styr byggandet, samt öka bostadsbyggandet. Motförslagets krav att regeringen prioriterar regelförenklingsarbetet inom plan- och bygglagstiftningen är samma sak i sak. Planen pekar också på behovet av att se över byggnormer och öka konkurrensen på byggmarknaden, vilket svarar mot att bostadsbristen kräver mer än förenklingar.
- simplified building processdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesser och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to facilitate residential construction by simplifying and speeding up decision-making processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements that govern residential construction.”
- simplification in PBL»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”
- increased residential construction»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase residential construction”
- review of building standards»Nybyggnation kan underlättas genom att se över byggnormer och öka konkurrensen på byggmarknaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“New construction can be facilitated by reviewing building standards and increasing competition in the construction market.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:CU14)
- Committee report full text (HC01CU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1011 — Tydliggörande att avvikelse enligt PBL prövas generöst av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1058 — Möjliggör att ställa krav på återbruk i samband med rivningslov av Christofer Bergenblock (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1088 — Möjliggör energieffektiviseringar på beslutade detaljplaner av Alexandra Anstrell (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1113 — Klagande grannar som flyttat intill en skjutbana av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1184 — Gör Sveriges städer roligare av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1224 — Låt bostadsintresset övertrumfa riksintressen av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1225 — Avgift för att överklaga planbeslut av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1287 — Retroaktiva säkerhetskrav på hissar i bostäder av Carita Boulwén (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1315 — Stärkande av naturen i våra stadsmiljöer av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1318 — Ett va-system för nutid och framtid av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1347 — Arkitekturfrågor av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1383 — Planering och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1386 — Inriktning för bostadspolitiken av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1532 — Sportskytte och jakt av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1564 — CE-märkning av virke av Daniel Bäckström och Helena Lindahl (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1604 — Tidsgräns för domstolars handläggning av överklagande av detaljplaner m.m. av Ulrika Heie (C)
- Motion 2024/25:161 — Undantag från kravet på ett ladduttag för elbilar av Ingemar Kihlström (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1617 — Turismöversiktplan av Martina Johansson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1753 — Rivning och återbruk inom byggsektorn av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:181 — Mer byggande på gamla detaljplaner av Catarina Deremar (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament