2026-02-042025/26:UbU11 · p.9UbUEducation
Swedish language education for immigrants
Quality and governance of Swedish tuition for immigrants (sfi)
What's at stake: Sfi is often the first step towards work and social participation for newly arrived adults. How the training is designed, for example group size, teacher density and the ability to combine studies with work, affects how many people complete the training and how quickly they establish themselves in Sweden.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether further measures are needed now to raise quality and strengthen governance of sfi, or whether ongoing legislative changes, inquiries and assignments to the National Agency for Education should be allowed to take effect before new requirements are imposed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee recommends rejecting the motions on sfi. The reason is that the Riksdag has recently decided on legislative changes expected to make sfi more coherent and effective, that the government has commissioned an inquiry into clearer responsibility and higher quality in komvux including sfi, and that the National Agency for Education has been tasked with developing new, better-adapted sfi courses. The committee does not want to pre-empt this ongoing work.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) calls for investment in quality, individualisation and greater scope for combining sfi with work, rather than strict time limits, including through smaller groups, higher teacher density, licensed teachers, better employment conditions, and more extensive subject studies in Swedish as a second language for sfi teachers. The reasoning is that sfi needs to open up to more people, not least those who have been in Sweden a long time without learning the language, so that they can take part in society and working life.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna
Ja 150–34Ja 122–62
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/91/15 | differs | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/12/0/6 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1563 by Lili André (KD), 2025/26:3039 by Cecilia Gustafsson (M), 2025/26:3190 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demands 29 and 30, 2025/26:3365 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) demand 3 and 2025/26:3810 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) demands 72, 79 and 80.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1563 av Lili André (KD), 2025/26:3039 av Cecilia Gustafsson (M), 2025/26:3190 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkandena 29 och 30, 2025/26:3365 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:3810 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkandena 72, 79 och 80.
Riksdag decision: The Parliament voted no on approximately 50 proposals on adult education. The proposals were submitted during the general motioning period 2025 and concern, among other things, the supply and need for adult education, the development of higher vocational education and education in Swedish for immigrants. The Parliament refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen vocational education in reuse, recycling, resource efficiency, and circular economy to support the transition to a circular economy. (V, MP) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to invest in the entire education system with more teachers and better access to learning throughout life, and establishes that adult education centres are needed throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to invest in the entire education system with more teachers and better access to learning throughout life, and establishes that adult education centres are needed throughout the country. Quality, individualization and qualified teachers in adult Swedish-language education are the same requirements applied to adult education, while strict time limits have no support in the plan. The party programme also demands good opportunities for learning in a changing working life.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill satsa på hela utbildningssystemet med fler lärare och bättre tillgång till lärande genom hela livet, och slår fast att Komvux behövs i hela landet. Kvalitet, individanpassning och legitimerade lärare i sfi är samma krav tillämpat på vuxenutbildningen, medan strikta tidsgränser inte har stöd i planen. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom goda möjligheter till lärande i ett föränderligt arbetsliv.
- more teachers and lifelong learningdecisive»Vänsterpartiet vill se fler lärare, tidigare insatser för barn som har det kämpigt och förbättrad tillgång till lärande genom hela livet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see more teachers, earlier interventions for children who are struggling and improved access to learning throughout life.”
- adult education throughout the country»Folkhögskolor och Komvux behövs i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Community colleges and adult education centres are needed throughout the country.”
- education according to people's needs»siktiga behov i ett föränderligt arbetsliv, med breda kunskaper under« (party programme ↗)“ate needs in a changing working life, with broad knowledge under”
- investments in the entire education system»Vänsterpartiet vill satsa på hela utbildningssystemet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to invest in the entire education system.”
The plan wants more foreign-born people to learn Swedish and achieve self-sufficiency and explicitly emphasizes the possibility of learning a trade while studying Swedish.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants more foreign-born people to learn Swedish and achieve self-sufficiency and explicitly emphasizes the possibility of learning a trade while studying Swedish. The counter-proposal's demands for quality, individual adaptation and combining Swedish for immigrants with work respond to this, as do the demands for qualified teachers and good conditions for education staff. The plan simultaneously places demands on the individual, which the counter-proposal does not alter.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att fler utlandsfödda ska lära sig svenska och nå självförsörjning och lyfter uttryckligen möjligheten att lära sig ett yrke parallellt med studier i svenska. Motförslagets krav på kvalitet, individanpassning och kombination av sfi med jobb svarar mot det, liksom kraven på behöriga lärare och goda villkor för utbildningens personal. Planen ställer samtidigt krav på den enskilde, vilket motförslaget inte rubbar.
- Swedish combined with vocational trainingdecisive»Att kunna lära sig ett yrke parallellt med studier i svenska är ytterligare ett sätt att öka chansen att få jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Being able to learn a trade while studying Swedish is another way to increase the chances of getting a job.”
- better opportunities to learn Swedish»Bättre möjligheter för utlandsfödda att lära sig svenska och nå självförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Better opportunities for foreign-born people to learn Swedish and achieve self-sufficiency.”
- better support and higher demands»Bättre stöd och högre krav för att alla i Sverige ska lära sig svenska och få god« (party programme ↗)“Better support and higher demands so that everyone in Sweden learns Swedish and gets good”
- good conditions for teachers»Goda villkor för anställda i förskola och skola.« (party programme ↗)“Good conditions for staff in preschool and school.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan sees the Swedish language as the key to social community and wishes to strengthen integration of foreign-born residents through Swedish for immigrants combined with practical work and vocational training rather than through time limits.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sees the Swedish language as the key to social community and wishes to strengthen integration of foreign-born residents through Swedish for immigrants combined with practical work and vocational training rather than through time limits. It also wishes to make teaching an attractive profession with better conditions and to expand adult education. The demands for quality, individual adaptation, qualified teachers and the opportunity to combine Swedish for immigrants with work therefore follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ser svenska språket som nyckeln till samhällsgemenskapen och vill stärka etableringen genom sfi kombinerad med praktik och yrkesutbildning snarare än genom tidsgränser. Den vill också göra läraryrket attraktivt med bättre villkor och bygga ut vuxenutbildningen. Kraven på kvalitet, individanpassning, legitimerade lärare och möjlighet att kombinera sfi med jobb följer därför av planen.
- Swedish for immigrants combined with practical experiencedecisive»stärk utrikesfödda kvinnors etablering genom SFI kombinerad med praktik och yrkesutbildning och jämställda insatser från arbetsförmedlingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen integration of foreign-born women through Swedish for immigrants combined with practical work and vocational training and equal efforts from the employment service.”
- language as key»Svenska språket är en nyckel för att bli en del av samhällsgemenskapen« (party programme ↗)“The Swedish language is a key to becoming part of the social community”
- better teacher conditions»göra det attraktivt att vara lärare genom att säkra höjda löner och en god arbetsmiljö i skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“make it attractive to be a teacher by securing higher wages and a good working environment in schools.”
- expanded adult education»Folkhögskolans breda kursutbud, yrkeshögskolan och andra vuxenutbildningar ska värnas och byggas ut för att möta både individens drömmar och samhällets behov.« (party programme ↗)“Folk high schools' broad course offerings, vocational higher education and other adult education shall be valued and expanded to meet both the individual's dreams and society's needs.”
The election manifesto wants those who receive a residence permit to be quickly integrated through intensive language studies, internships and placement, explicitly including the opportunity to learn Swedish on the job.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants those who receive a residence permit to be quickly integrated through intensive language studies, internships and placement, explicitly including the opportunity to learn Swedish on the job. That is precisely the combination of quality, individual adaptation and work that the counter-proposal demands. The plan simultaneously emphasizes hard work and high expectations, which tempers but does not negate the support.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill att den som får uppehållstillstånd snabbt integreras genom intensiva språkstudier, praktik och matchning, uttryckligen inklusive möjligheten att lära sig svenska på jobbet. Det är just den kombination av kvalitet, individanpassning och arbete som motförslaget efterfrågar. Planen betonar samtidigt hårt arbete och höga förväntningar, vilket tempererar men inte upphäver stödet.
- Swedish on the jobdecisive»Det kräver intensiva språkstudier, praktik, en effektiv matchning och jobb — inklusive möjligheten att lära sig svenska på jobbet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It requires intensive language studies, internships, effective placement and employment — including the opportunity to learn Swedish on the job.”
- intensive language education»Integrationen ska präglas av intensiv praktik och språkutbildning, med hårt arbete och höga förväntningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Integration shall be characterized by intensive internships and language education, with hard work and high expectations.”
- language as a path into society»Fler utrikes födda kvinnor måste få en chans att jobba, lära sig svenska och till fullo komma in i det svenska samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More foreign-born women must have the opportunity to work, learn Swedish and fully enter Swedish society.”
- education based on labour market needs»Utbildningssystemet behöver i betydligt större utsträckning utgå från arbetsmarknadens behov.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The education system needs to a much greater extent be based on labour market needs.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly wants to increase demands and quality in SFI and offer more flexible teaching forms, and the party programme emphasizes teacher credentials as a guarantee of quality.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly wants to increase demands and quality in SFI and offer more flexible teaching forms, and the party programme emphasizes teacher credentials as a guarantee of quality. The counter-proposal's demands for quality, individual adaptation, credentialed teachers and the possibility of combining SFI with work are in line with that. The plan does not, however, share the counter-proposal's rejecting stance toward clear demands on the individual.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen öka kraven och kvaliteten i sfi och erbjuda fler flexibla undervisningsformer, och partiprogrammet betonar lärarlegitimationen som garant för kvalitet. Motförslagets krav på kvalitet, individanpassning, legitimerade lärare och möjlighet att kombinera sfi med jobb ligger i den linjen. Planen delar dock inte motförslagets avvisande hållning till tydliga krav på den enskilde.
- quality and flexibility in SFIdecisive»öka kraven och kvaliteten i SFI och erbjuda fler flexibla former för undervisning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increase demands and quality in SFI and offer more flexible forms of teaching”
- SFI linked to self-support»Det är av största vikt att svenskundervisningen kombineras med drivkrafter till egen försörjning och når män och kvinnor i samma utsträckning.« (party programme ↗)“It is of the utmost importance that Swedish language teaching is combined with incentives for self-support and reaches men and women equally.”
- credentialed teachers»Läraryrkets ställning och kvalitet upprätthålls med hjälp av lärarlegitimationen.« (party programme ↗)“The status and quality of the teaching profession is maintained through teacher credentials.”
- right and responsibility to learn Swedish»Den som är nyanländ har både ansvar och rättighet att skaffa sig kunskaper i svenska.« (party programme ↗)“A newly arrived person has both responsibility and the right to acquire knowledge of Swedish.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme speaks directly about Swedish language instruction for immigrants: it shall be guaranteed, be individualized and combined with practical training at workplaces.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme speaks directly about Swedish language instruction for immigrants: it shall be guaranteed, be individualized and combined with practical training at workplaces. The counter-proposal's line on quality, individualization and the possibility to combine Swedish for immigrants with work instead of strict time limits is the same commitment. That adult education shall be well developed also supports that more, even those who have been long in the country, shall be able to participate. The requirement is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet uttalar sig direkt om svenskundervisning för invandrare: den ska garanteras, vara individanpassad och kombineras med praktik på arbetsplatser. Motförslagets linje om kvalitet, individanpassning och möjlighet att kombinera sfi med jobb i stället för strikta tidsgränser är samma åtagande. Att vuxenutbildningen ska vara väl utbyggd stödjer också att fler, även de som varit länge i landet, ska kunna delta. Kravet stöds.
- individualized Swedish for immigrants with practical trainingdecisive»Studierna bör vara individanpassade och kombineras med praktik på arbetsplatser för att öka möjligheten till integration i samhällsgemenskapen.« (party programme ↗)“Studies should be individualized and combined with practical training at workplaces to increase the possibility for integration in society.”
- guaranteed Swedish language instruction»Invandrare ska garanteras goda möjligheter till undervisning i svenska språket och om det svenska samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Immigrants shall be guaranteed good opportunities for instruction in the Swedish language and about Swedish society.”
- well developed adult education»Det innebär att vuxenutbildningen ska vara väl utbyggd.« (party programme ↗)“That means adult education shall be well developed.”
- language and work as keys to integration»Jobb, kunskap i svenska språket och det civila samhället är viktiga nycklar till integration.« (party programme ↗)“Work, knowledge of the Swedish language and civil society are important keys to integration.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's line for SFI (Swedish for immigrants) is demands and consequences: individual learning targets with the possibility to reduce allowances when targets are not met, and language requirements for residence permits and citizenship.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line for SFI (Swedish for immigrants) is demands and consequences: individual learning targets with the possibility to reduce allowances when targets are not met, and language requirements for residence permits and citizenship. The counter-proposal wants instead to trade off time limits for resources in the form of smaller groups, higher teacher density and better employment conditions. It is the low expectations policy that the plan explicitly turns against, which is why the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje för sfi är krav och konsekvenser: individuella kunskapsmål med möjlighet att minska bidragen när målen inte nås, samt språkkrav för uppehållstillstånd och medborgarskap. Motförslaget vill i stället växla ut tidsgränser mot resurser i form av mindre grupper, högre lärartäthet och bättre anställningsvillkor. Det är den låga förväntningarnas politik som planen uttryckligen vänder sig mot, varför planen talar emot motförslagets krav.
- demands and consequences in SFIdecisive»Ställa högre krav på den som deltar i SFIundervisning – om individuella kunskapsmål inte uppnås ska bidragen kunna minska« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set higher demands on those who participate in SFI teaching - if individual learning targets are not achieved, allowances can be reduced”
- end to low expectations»Det måste bli ett slut på de låga förväntningarnas politik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There must be an end to the policy of low expectations.”
- individual performance plan»Moderaterna vill därför göra SFI effektivare. Varje person som läser SFI ska få en individuell prestationsplan med kunskapsmål« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates therefore want to make SFI more efficient. Every person studying SFI shall receive an individual performance plan with learning targets”
- language requirements for residence permits»Kräva grundläggande kunskaper i svenska för permanent uppehållstillstånd och medborgarskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Require basic knowledge of Swedish for permanent residence permit and citizenship”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan's overarching commitment is an integration-policy outer limit: the person who does not learn Swedish shall be helped to return, and rights shall be given in step with language learning and work.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's overarching commitment is an integration-policy outer limit: the person who does not learn Swedish shall be helped to return, and rights shall be given in step with language learning and work. The counter-proposal instead wants to open Swedish for immigrants (SFI) for more people without strict time limits and expand education with smaller groups and higher teacher density. The plan also wants to phase out integration programmes that do not produce results and place the adaptation responsibility on the individual. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande åtagande är en integrationspolitisk bortre gräns: den som inte lär sig svenska ska hjälpas att återvända, och rättigheter ska ges i takt med språkinlärning och arbete. Motförslaget vill tvärtom öppna sfi för fler utan strikta tidsgränser och bygga ut utbildningen med mindre grupper och högre lärartäthet. Planen vill dessutom avveckla integrationsprogram som inte ger resultat och lägga anpassningsansvaret på den enskilde. Därför talar planen emot motförslagets krav.
- integration-policy outer limitdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna strävar också efter en integrationspolitisk bortre gräns, som innebär att personer som inte lär sig svenska, inte vill arbeta och inte vill anpassa sig till våra normer och värderingar ska hjälpas att återvända hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats also strive for an integration-policy outer limit, which means that persons who do not learn Swedish, do not want to work and do not want to adapt to our norms and values shall be helped to return home.”
- demands before rights»Utforma en kravbaserad integrationspolitik som ger rättigheter till välfärden i takt med språkinlärning, arbete och slutligen medborgarskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Design a demand-based integration policy that gives welfare rights in step with language learning, work and ultimately citizenship”
- phase out ineffective programmes»Avskaffa ineffektiva arbetsmarknads- och integrationsprogram som är skapade för att dölja arbetslöshet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish ineffective labour market and integration programmes created to hide unemployment”
- demands on the non-integrated»Öka kraven på icke integrerade att göra sig anställningsbara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase demands on non-integrated to make themselves employable”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UbU11)
- Committee report full text (HD01UbU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1196 — Stärkt kompetensförsörjning inom taxibranschen av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1563 — Branschspecifika sfi-program med koppling till arbetsmarknaden av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1982 — Snabbare etablering av yrkesutbildningar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2027 — Yrkesutbildning för fler och stärkt studie- och yrkesvägledning av Johanna Rantsi och Sten Bergheden (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2119 — Bristyrken i fokus för utbildningssatsning av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2179 — Valideringsutbildningar för stärkt kompetens inom bristyrken av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2303 — Säkring av kompetensen att bygga och serva högspänningsledningar av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2791 — En jämlik förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning för alla av Isabell Mixter m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2798 — Svensk flyktingpolitik av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2822 — Militärt och civilt försvar samt samhällets krisberedskap av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3039 — Krav på progression och närvaro i sfi-undervisningen av Cecilia Gustafsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3185 — Livskraft och framtidstro på Sveriges landsbygder av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3189 — En högre utbildning för en stärkt kompetensnation av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3190 — Migration och integration av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:3245 — Satsning på folkhögskoleutbildningar för ökad behörighet till YH och universitet av Camilla Brunsberg och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:3249 — En yrkeshögskola som möter framtidens behov av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3282 — Ett grönt och konkurrenskraftigt näringsliv under omställning av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3365 — Livslångt lärande och forskning för ett hållbart samhälle av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3422 — En grön klimathandlingsplan 2026 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3548 — Cirkulär ekonomi av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament