2025-06-042024/25:UbU21 · p.1UbUEducation

The bill regarding investigation of bags and other items and reporting to the Police Authority when a crime is suspected

Schools' authority to search bags and duty to report crimes to the police

What's at stake: The bill gives school heads and specially appointed staff the authority to search pupils' bags to prevent violence, crime and safety risks in the school environment, and introduces a broad duty to report suspected crimes to the police with no age limit. The question is whether this task should rest with school staff or the police, and whether a broad reporting duty risks discrimination or leads to minor incidents being reported to the police unnecessarily.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The reservation wanted to reject the parts of the government's bill that give school staff the authority to search bags and other belongings and the requirement to report suspected crimes to the police without an age limit or exceptions for minor incidents, while the committee held that the government's proposal was well-balanced and should be adopted.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes the government's proposed amendments to the Education Act and shares the assessment that school preparedness for serious violent situations has been inadequate. The committee considers the government's reasoning on letting the school head or specially appointed staff search bags, and on a duty to report to the police with no age limit, to be well-balanced, and therefore supports the bill in these respects.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V)

The reservation (V) agrees that school security needs reviewing but argues that bag searches should be carried out by the police rather than school staff, who are not trained to handle weapons or drugs, and that a broad reporting duty with no exception for minor incidents, such as a shove in the schoolyard, is disproportionate and risks discrimination; it favours instead more resources for schools and social services and closer cooperation with local police.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: highderived
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoYes 14/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: highderived
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 61/0/0/7follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag a) adopts the government's proposal for a law amending the School Act (2010:800) in the parts it concerns 6 a ch. 5–11 §§, b) approves what the committee states about the government's proposal for a law amending the School Act (2010:800). Thus the Riksdag grants proposition 2024/25:160 points 1 in this part and 3.1 and rejects motion 2024/25:3422 by Daniel Riazat et al. (V) points 1-3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen a) antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i skollagen (2010:800) i de delar det avser 6 a kap. 5–11 §§, b) godtar det som utskottet anför om regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i skollagen (2010:800). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2024/25:160 punkterna 1 i denna del och 3.1 samt avslår motion 2024/25:3422 av Daniel Riazat m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-3.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal on crime prevention security work in schools being introduced as a new chapter in the School Act. The proposal means, among other things, that at each pre-school and school unit there shall be a contingency plan and ongoing security work to handle a serious violence situation or threat of such. Measures shall also be taken so that unauthorized persons are not given access to the pre-school or school unit's area during the time the activities are taking place. The proposal also means that confidentiality shall apply to information relating to schools' contingency plans and ongoing contingency work for serious violence and threat situations. The proposal also means that headmasters shall be able to decide that bags and other items that students bring to school, or to a school activity outside the school area, may be searched. If a suspected crime has been committed by a student in connection with the school's activities, the headmaster shall make a police report, if there are no overriding reasons not to do so. The legal amendments come into force on 1 July 2025.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan warns against repression and tougher approaches being put forward instead of addressing problems seriously, and instead demands better resources for schools, youth activities and social services.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan warns against repression and tougher approaches being put forward instead of addressing problems seriously, and instead demands better resources for schools, youth activities and social services. That body-cavity searches should not be imposed on school staff and that an absolute duty to report is rejected as disproportionate follows from the plan's requirement to protect personal integrity and its warning that young people in poor areas are subjected to discriminatory treatment.

Original (Swedish)

Planen varnar för att repression och hårdare tag lyfts fram i stället för att problemen tas på allvar och kräver i stället bättre resurser till skola, fritidsverksamhet och socialtjänst. Att väskundersökningar inte läggs på skolpersonal och att en undantagslös anmälningsplikt avvisas som oproportionerlig följer av planens krav på skydd för den personliga integriteten och dess varning för att unga i fattiga områden utsätts för diskriminerande behandling.

  • rejects repression as a solutiondecisive»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All too often repression and tougher approaches are put forward as solutions instead of addressing problems seriously.”
  • resources for schools and social services»Skola och fritidsverksamheter behöver ges bättre resurser, likaså socialtjänsten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Schools and youth activities need better resources, as does social services.”
  • protection of personal integrity»har rätt till skydd av sin personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“have the right to protection of their personal integrity.”
  • risk of discrimination»Många unga, särskilt med utländsk bakgrund, som bor i fattiga områden, utsätts även för rasism och övervåld från polisen, vilket blev tydligt i diskussionen kring Black Lives Matter-rörelsen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many young people, especially those with foreign backgrounds, who live in poor areas, are also subjected to racism and police brutality, which became clear in the discussion around the Black Lives Matter movement.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto grants the police compulsory powers such as house search and requires more cooperation between police, student health services, social services and school, and that at least as much is spent on preventive work as on more police.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto grants the police compulsory powers such as house search and requires more cooperation between police, student health services, social services and school, and that at least as much is spent on preventive work as on more police. This supports the counter-proposal's line that strip searches should be carried out by police and that school and social services should be strengthened instead. The party programme's requirement for criminal policy built on evidence and the rule of law also supports the objection to an unconditional duty to report.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet lägger tvångsbefogenheter som husrannsakan hos polisen och kräver mer samarbete mellan polis, elevhälsa, socialtjänst och skola samt att minst lika mycket satsas på förebyggande arbete som på fler poliser. Det talar för motförslagets linje att väskundersökningar bör utföras av polis och att skolan och socialtjänsten i stället ska förstärkas. Partiprogrammets krav på en kriminalpolitik byggd på evidens och rättssäkerhet stödjer också invändningen mot en undantagslös anmälningsplikt.

  • compulsory powers with policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house search.”
  • cooperation between school and police»Det behövs mer samarbete mellan polis, elevhälsa, socialtjänst och skola.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There needs to be more cooperation between police, student health services, social services and school.”
  • preventive work prioritised»För varje krona som läggs på fler poliser, ska minst en krona läggas på det förebyggande arbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For every pound spent on more police, at least one pound shall be spent on preventive work.”
  • rule-of-law criminal policy»Kriminalpolitik byggd på evidens, effektivitet och rättssäkerhet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy built on evidence, efficiency and the rule of law.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme opposes laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions into privacy and states that the most important crime prevention work happens through reduced marginalization, and that structural discrimination shall end.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme opposes laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions into privacy and states that the most important crime prevention work happens through reduced marginalization, and that structural discrimination shall end. The election manifesto wants to strengthen cooperation between police, school and social services. The counter-proposal's demand on police as executor, proportionate reporting obligation and more resources follows from this.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet motsätter sig lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten och slår fast att det viktigaste brottsförebyggande arbetet sker genom minskad marginalisering, samt att strukturell diskriminering ska upphöra. Valmanifestet vill stärka samverkan mellan polis, skola och socialtjänst. Motförslagets krav på polisen som utförare, proportionerlig anmälningsplikt och mer resurser följer av detta.

  • proportionality in privacy intrusionsdecisive»Vi motsätter oss alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose all laws that constitute disproportionate intrusions into privacy.”
  • prevention before control»Det viktigaste brottsförebyggande arbetet sker genom att minska marginaliseringen och utsattheten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“The most important crime prevention work happens through reducing marginalization and exposure in society.”
  • cooperation school and police»lätta på sekretessen mellan områdespoliser, skola, socialtjänst och stärka samarbetet med civilsamhälle så att inga barn faller mellan stolarna i det förebyggande arbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“ease secrecy between local police, school, social services and strengthen cooperation with civil society so that no children fall through the cracks in preventive work.”
  • counter discrimination»Strukturell diskriminering och rasism ska upphöra.« (party programme ↗)“Structural discrimination and racism shall end.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto explicitly rejects stop-and-search zones and other general search powers, and the party programme requires proportionality between a law's interference with privacy and its purpose.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly rejects stop-and-search zones and other general search powers, and the party programme requires proportionality between a law's interference with privacy and its purpose. Placing bag searches on school staff and introducing blanket reporting requirements runs counter to that line. The plan's answer is instead more police present in everyday life, preventive measures and a safe school with better student health support.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till visitationszoner och andra generella genomsökningsbefogenheter, och partiprogrammet kräver proportionalitet mellan en lags integritetsingrepp och dess syfte. Att lägga väskundersökningar på skolpersonal och införa en undantagslös anmälningsplikt går emot den linjen. Planens svar är i stället fler poliser närvarande i vardagen, förebyggande insatser och en trygg skola med bättre elevhälsa.

  • no to stop-and-search powersdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to stop-and-search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive surveillance and restrictions on religious freedom.”
  • proportionality and privacy»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' privacy and the laws' purpose.”
  • police close to daily life»Fler poliser ska finnas närvarande i vardagen, både i utsatta områden och på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police shall be present in everyday life, both in vulnerable areas and in the countryside.”
  • safe school and student support»Skolan ska vara en trygg plats — fri från rasism, homofobi och trakasserier grundade på kön — där barn kan växa och utvecklas. En bättre elevhälsa är en förutsättning för det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School shall be a safe place—free from racism, homophobia and harassment based on gender—where children can grow and develop. Better student health support is a prerequisite for that.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly requires that the main rule becomes that the school always makes police reports and concern reports and when suspected crime, and that teachers' authority over students who cause disruption increases.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly requires that the main rule becomes that the school always makes police reports and concern reports and when suspected crime, and that teachers' authority over students who cause disruption increases. The party programme wishes that all reported crimes are investigated even when the suspected person is under 15 years. The counter-proposal's requirement for exceptions to the reporting obligation and that only police may examine bags thus contradicts the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att huvudregeln blir att skolan alltid gör polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet, och att lärarnas befogenheter mot elever som förstör ökar. Partiprogrammet vill att alla anmälda brott utreds även när den misstänkte är under 15 år. Motförslagets krav på undantag från anmälningsplikten och att endast polis får undersöka väskor strider därför mot planen.

  • school shall always make police reportsdecisive»För att polis och socialtjänst alltid ska få kännedom om barn som är på fel väg i livet ska huvudregeln bli att skolan alltid gör polisanmälan och orosanmälan vid misstänkt brottslighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In order for police and social services always to learn of children who are on a wrong path in life, the main rule shall be that the school always makes police reports and concern reports when suspected crime.”
  • increased authority for the school»Vi vill ge lärare ökad rätt att agera mot elever som förstör för klasskompisar och sig själv och tydliggöra i skollaget att det är läraren – inte eleverna – som ska bestämma över undervisningens upplägg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to give teachers increased right to act against students who cause disruption to classmates and themselves and clarify in the school law that it is the teacher – not the students – who shall determine the organisation of teaching.”
  • crimes investigated regardless of age»Huvudregeln ska vara att alla brott som anmäls till polis och där den misstänkte är under 15 år ska« (party programme ↗)“The main rule shall be that all crimes reported to police and where the suspected person is under 15 years shall”
  • violence prevention in schools»Alla skolor ska stärka sitt våldspreventiva arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All schools shall strengthen their violence-prevention work.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan requires that all crimes are effectively and without exception prosecuted, also those that can be dismissed as minor offences, which argues against exempting minor incidents from the duty to report.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that all crimes are effectively and without exception prosecuted, also those that can be dismissed as minor offences, which argues against exempting minor incidents from the duty to report. It also wants the police's mandate to be clarified towards crime-fighting rather than the police taking over the school's order tasks. That the school's working environment should be permeated by security and good order points in the same direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att alla brott effektivt och utan undantag beivras, också sådana som kan avfärdas som smärre förseelser, vilket talar emot att undanta mindre händelser från anmälningsplikten. Den vill också att polisens uppdrag renodlas mot brottsbekämpning snarare än att polisen tar över skolans ordningsuppgifter. Att skolans arbetsmiljö ska genomsyras av trygghet och god ordning pekar åt samma håll.

  • all crimes shall be prosecuteddecisive»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras, också sådana som kan avfärdas som smärre brott och förseelser.« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted, also those that can be dismissed as minor crimes and offences.”
  • clarified police mandate»Renodla polisens uppdrag. Polisen fokuserar idag alldeles för mycket på annat än brottsbekämpning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clarify the police mandate. The police today focus far too much on things other than crime-fighting.”
  • rapid response and detection risk»En snabb reaktion på begångna brott och en ökad upptäcktsrisk för förövarna är viktigt.« (party programme ↗)“A rapid response to crimes committed and an increased detection risk for perpetrators is important.”
  • security and order in school»Det är viktigt att skolans arbetsmiljö genomsyras av trygghet, arbetsro och god ordning.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the school's working environment is permeated by security, work peace and good order.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to intervene in disruptive situations and to enshrine order and educational environment in the school's principal statute, thus giving the school its own powers.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to intervene in disruptive situations and to enshrine order and educational environment in the school's principal statute, thus giving the school its own powers. It simultaneously wants to refocus the police's task to detecting, investigating and clearing up crime, which speaks against the police handling bag checks in schools. The plan also wants to remove all confidentiality barriers so information reaches the police, which goes against the objection to a broad reporting duty.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att ingripa i stökiga situationer och skriva in ordning och studiero i skollagens portalparagraf, alltså ge skolan egna befogenheter. Den vill samtidigt renodla polisens uppdrag till att upptäcka, utreda och klara upp brott, vilket talar emot att polisen ska sköta väskkontroller i skolan. Planen vill dessutom undanröja alla sekretesshinder så att uppgifter når polisen, vilket går emot invändningen mot en bred anmälningsplikt.

  • headmaster's authority to intervenedecisive»Stärka lärares och rektorers auktoritet att kunna ingripa i stökiga situationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen teachers' and headmasters' authority to be able to intervene in disruptive situations”
  • focused police task»Renodla Polisens uppdrag med fokus på att upptäcka, utreda och klara upp brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Refocus the Police's task with focus on detecting, investigating and clearing up crime”
  • information must reach the police»Undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all confidentiality barriers between social services and the police”
  • order and educational environment in school»Skriva in ordning och studiero i skollagens portalparagraf och införa ordningsomdömen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Enshrine order and educational environment in the school's principal statute and introduce conduct assessments”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto wants to give social services, schools and the justice system the opportunity to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage, give teachers increased powers and introduce zero tolerance so that even minor crimes are investigated and prosecuted.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to give social services, schools and the justice system the opportunity to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage, give teachers increased powers and introduce zero tolerance so that even minor crimes are investigated and prosecuted. The counter-proposal instead wants to transfer preliminary investigations to the police and exempt minor incidents from the duty to report. This goes against the plan's line on sharp powers in schools.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede, ge lärare ökade befogenheter och införa nolltolerans så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs. Motförslaget vill i stället flytta väskundersökningarna till polisen och undanta mindre händelser från anmälningsplikten. Det går emot planens linje om skarpa befogenheter i skolan.

  • early interventions in schoolsdecisive»Ge socialtjänst, skola och rättsväsende möjlighet att ingripa med tuffare tag i ett tidigt skede« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give social services, schools and the justice system the opportunity to intervene with tougher measures at an early stage”
  • increased powers for schools»Ge lärare ökade befogenheter och bättre ställning i sin yrkesroll« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give teachers increased powers and better standing in their professional role”
  • zero tolerance in schools»Nolltolerans ska råda mot hot och våld i skolan och möjligheten att ingripa med skarpa åtgärder mot elever som skapar en dålig arbetsmiljö för andra ska ses över.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Zero tolerance shall prevail against threats and violence in school and the possibility to intervene with sharp measures against students who create a poor working environment for others should be reviewed.”
  • even minor crimes prosecuted»Införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce zero tolerance for crime so that even minor crimes are investigated and prosecuted”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament