2026-04-152025/26:AU11 · p.2AULabour market
Gender-equal economy
Economic equality between women and men
What's at stake: The question concerns women's and men's opportunities for paid work, career advancement, and economic independence throughout life. The decision affects how quickly pay gaps and other labour-market obstacles are addressed and how much responsibility the state takes for counteracting economic inequality between the sexes.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should make specific statements to strengthen economic equality between women and men, including on pay gaps and women's position in the labour market, or whether ongoing work on pay surveys, the EU's pay transparency directive, and other measures is already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the motions' basic position on the importance of strengthening women's empowerment and increasing economic equality, but points out that employers' pay surveys, the EU's pay transparency directive, and the Mediation Institute's mandate are already important tools against the pay gap and unjustified pay differences. The committee therefore rejects the motions because the work is already under way.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S)
The reservation (S) calls for continued vigorous work for women's economic freedom and self-determination, with measures for women's career opportunities and a strong, well-developed welfare system - including childcare and elderly care - that enables women to participate in the labour market. The reasoning is that women today have significantly lower lifetime incomes than men and bear a greater share of unpaid domestic work, and that inadequate state grants to municipalities and regions risk weakening the welfare system and thereby equality.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, MPMiljöpartiet, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 183–91Nej 81–193
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 1/90/0/15 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 56/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| SAnnika Strandhäll (S, Stockholms kommun) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:1504 by Jamal El-Haj (-) provision 2, 2025/26:1506 by Jamal El-Haj (-) provision 2, 2025/26:2293 by Linnéa Wickman et al. (S), 2025/26:2834 by Helena Vilhelmsson et al. (C) provision 50, 2025/26:3591 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) provisions 1-3 and 5 and 2025/26:3619 by Lina Nordquist et al. (L).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1504 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 2, 2025/26:1506 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkande 2, 2025/26:2293 av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S), 2025/26:2834 av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 50, 2025/26:3591 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1-3 och 5 samt 2025/26:3619 av Lina Nordquist m.fl. (L).
Riksdag decision: Parliament voted no on 38 proposals in motions on gender equality and anti-discrimination measures from the general motion period 2025. The proposals deal with, among other things, initiatives to promote economic gender equality, measures to counter discrimination based on the various grounds for discrimination and the Equality Ombudsman's activities. Parliament refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway on many of the issues that the proposals deal with.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure that gender equality analyses are conducted for all budget and legislative work. (S) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan directly links women's economic independence to a well-developed welfare system: functioning childcare and elder care are prerequisites for women to be able to work for wages, and cuts hit particularly hard against women-dominated occupations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan directly links women's economic independence to a well-developed welfare system: functioning childcare and elder care are prerequisites for women to be able to work for wages, and cuts hit particularly hard against women-dominated occupations. The counter-proposal's demand for continued work for women's economic freedom with a strong welfare system as the foundation is exactly this commitment. The position thus follows directly from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kopplar direkt ihop kvinnors ekonomiska självständighet med en väl utbyggd välfärd: en fungerande förskola och äldreomsorg är en förutsättning för att kvinnor ska kunna lönearbeta, och nedskärningar slår särskilt hårt mot kvinnodominerade yrken. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt arbete för kvinnors ekonomiska frihet med en stark välfärd som grund är just detta åtagande. Ställningstagandet följer alltså direkt av planen.
- welfare enables women's workdecisive»En fungerande välfärd, så som bra förskola och trygg äldreomsorg, är också en förutsättning för att många kvinnor ska kunna lönearbeta istället för att göra traditionellt hemarbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A functioning welfare system, such as good childcare and secure elder care, is also a prerequisite for many women to be able to work for wages instead of doing traditional household work.”
- care enables economic independence»Att barn- och äldreomsorgen fungerar bra är« (party programme ↗)“That childcare and elder care work well is”
- cuts harm women»Eftersom välfärdsyrkena är kvinnodominerade så slår neddragningarna särskilt hårt mot kvinnors arbetsvillkor och möjlighet till makt och inflytande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Because welfare occupations are female-dominated, cuts hit particularly hard against women's working conditions and opportunity for power and influence.”
- economic independence»Starkare ekonomisk självständighet gör att var och en kan organisera« (party programme ↗)“Stronger economic independence makes it possible for each person to organize”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires equal pay for equivalent work and wants to abolish the patriarchal order, and particularly points out that expanded child and elder care is what has made women's work and independence possible.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires equal pay for equivalent work and wants to abolish the patriarchal order, and particularly points out that expanded child and elder care is what has made women's work and independence possible. It explicitly rejects proposals that confine women to the home. The counter-proposal's demand for continued work on women's economic freedom with strong welfare is thus the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver lika lön för likvärdigt arbete och vill avskaffa könsmaktsordningen, och pekar särskilt ut att en utbyggd barn- och äldreomsorg är det som gjort kvinnors arbete och självständighet möjlig. Den avvisar uttryckligen förslag som låser fast kvinnor i hemmet. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt arbete för kvinnors ekonomiska frihet med en stark välfärd är därmed planens egen linje.
- equal pay for equivalent workdecisive»Lika lön för likvärdigt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“Equal pay for equivalent work.”
- welfare enables women's work»I Sverige har viktiga jämställdhetsreformer som förskola och föräldraförsäkring möjliggjort kvinnors självständighet och frihet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In Sweden, important gender equality reforms such as pre-school and parental insurance have made women's independence and freedom possible.”
- women in work, not at home»Fler insatser krävs för att utlandsfödda kvinnor ska komma i arbete och vi säger nej till alla förslag om vårdnadsbidrag eller barnomsorgspeng, som låser fast utlandsfödda kvinnor i hemmet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More efforts are needed so that foreign-born women get into work and we say no to all proposals for child allowances or childcare allowances, which confine foreign-born women to the home.”
- abolished patriarchal order»Avskaffad könsmaktsordning.« (party programme ↗)“Abolished patriarchal order.”
The plan explicitly demands higher wages in female-dominated professions, a revaluation of these professions and that women's lifetime earnings match men's.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands higher wages in female-dominated professions, a revaluation of these professions and that women's lifetime earnings match men's. It also links equality to strong shared welfare and women's establishment in the labor market. The counter-proposal's demand for continued vigorous work for women's economic freedom and a well-developed welfare is thus the plan's own line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen höjda löner i kvinnodominerade yrken, en uppvärdering av dessa yrken och att kvinnors livsinkomster ska matcha männens. Den kopplar också jämställdheten till en stark gemensam välfärd och till kvinnors etablering på arbetsmarknaden. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt kraftfullt arbete för kvinnors ekonomiska frihet och en väl utbyggd välfärd är därmed planens egen linje.
- raised women's wagesdecisive»höja lönerna i kvinnodominerade yrken till samma nivåer som i mansdominerade yrken med motsvarande ansvar och utbildningskrav.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise wages in female-dominated professions to the same levels as in male-dominated professions with corresponding responsibility and educational requirements.”
- equal lifetime earnings»I vårt nya gröna folkhem kan kvinnor leva gott på ålderns höst när livsinkomsterna matchar männens.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In our new green people's home, women can live well in old age when lifetime earnings match men's.”
- unequal economy must go»Lönegap, höga sjukskrivningstal inom kvinnodominerade yrken och ett ofta orättvist« (party programme ↗)“Wage gap, high sick leave rates in female-dominated professions and often unjust”
- women's establishment»stärk utrikesfödda kvinnors etablering genom SFI kombinerad med praktik och yrkesutbildning och jämställda insatser från arbetsförmedlingen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen foreign-born women's establishment through Swedish for immigrants combined with internship and vocational training and equal efforts from the employment service.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises to lead Sweden toward greater economic equality, raise the status of female-dominated professions and improve working conditions in the public sector.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to lead Sweden toward greater economic equality, raise the status of female-dominated professions and improve working conditions in the public sector. It also wants to make preschool and after-school activities accessible to all precisely to strengthen equality and get more women into work. The counter-proposal's requirement for continued strong work for women's economic freedom with well-functioning childcare and elderly care is the same commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att leda Sverige till större ekonomisk jämställdhet, uppvärdera kvinnodominerade yrken och förbättra arbetsvillkoren i offentlig sektor. Det vill dessutom göra förskola och fritidsverksamhet tillgänglig för alla just för att stärka jämställdheten och få fler kvinnor i arbete. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt kraftfullt arbete för kvinnors ekonomiska frihet med en välfungerande barn- och äldreomsorg är samma åtagande.
- economic equalitydecisive»Vi ska dessutom leda Sverige till större ekonomisk jämställdhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall furthermore lead Sweden toward greater economic equality.”
- raise the status of female professions»Vi vill uppvärdera statusen för kvinnodominerande yrken och förbättra arbetsvillkoren inom offentlig sektor, bland annat genom karriärtjänster och rätt till kompetensutveckling.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to raise the status of female-dominated professions and improve working conditions within the public sector, including through career paths and the right to skills development.”
- accessible childcare»Vi vill göra förskola och fritidsverksamhet tillgänglig för alla, utan att dessa kostnader drabbar kommunerna, för att underlätta integrationen, stärka jämställdheten och ge varje barn en chans att utvecklas tillsammans med pedagoger och andra barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to make preschool and after-school activities accessible to all, without these costs falling on the municipalities, to facilitate integration, strengthen equality and give every child a chance to develop together with educators and other children.”
- more women in the workforce»Vi vill modernisera föräldraförsäkringen så att fler kvinnor kan komma i arbete och göra karriär« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to modernise the parental insurance system so that more women can enter the workforce and make a career”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that the difference in economic power between women and men is a central equality question and that child and elderly care of high quality are central to both women and men being able to work for pay.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that the difference in economic power between women and men is a central equality question and that child and elderly care of high quality are central to both women and men being able to work for pay. The election manifesto wishes to increase pressure on employers to offer equal wages and terms. The counter-proposal's requirement for continued vigorous work for women's economic freedom and well-developed care thus follows the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att skillnaden i ekonomisk makt mellan kvinnor och män är en central jämställdhetsfråga och att barn- och äldreomsorg av hög kvalitet är centrala för att både kvinnor och män ska kunna förvärvsarbeta. Valmanifestet vill öka trycket på arbetsgivare att erbjuda jämställda löner och villkor. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt kraftfullt arbete för kvinnors ekonomiska frihet och en väl utbyggd omsorg följer därmed planen.
- economic equalitydecisive»Skillnaden i ekonomisk makt mellan kvinnor och män är en central jämställdhetsfråga.« (party programme ↗)“The difference in economic power between women and men is a central equality question.”
- care enables employment»Välfärdstjänster som barn- och äldreomsorg av hög kvalitet är centrala för att både kvinnor och män ska kunna förvärvsarbeta.« (party programme ↗)“Welfare services such as child and elderly care of high quality are central to both women and men being able to work for pay.”
- equal wages and terms»Vi vill öka trycket på arbetsgivare att erbjuda jämställda löner och villkor, och sänka skatten på sparande så att fler kan bygga upp en buffert.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase pressure on employers to offer equal wages and terms, and lower the tax on savings so that more can build up a buffer.”
- women's wage careers»Arbetsgivare i offentligt finansierad verksamhet ska vara förebilder i att motverka ofrivillig deltid, något som särskilt drabbar kvinnor, och förbättra möjligheterna till lönekarriär i kvalificerade kvinnodominerade yrken som lärare, sjuksköterska och socialsekreterare.« (party programme ↗)“Employers in publicly funded activities shall be models in counteracting involuntary part-time work, something that especially affects women, and improve opportunities for wage careers in qualified female-dominated professions such as teacher, nurse and social worker.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan defines equality as people regardless of gender having power to shape their lives and requires that the principle of equal pay for equivalent work is upheld and that female-dominated professions are valued equally highly.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defines equality as people regardless of gender having power to shape their lives and requires that the principle of equal pay for equivalent work is upheld and that female-dominated professions are valued equally highly. The counter-proposal's demands for continued work for women's economic freedom and for a well-developed child and elderly care align with this. The plan emphasizes at the same time that support for families with children should make it possible to prioritize time with children, which is a limit to how the goal may be achieved.
Original (Swedish)
Planen definierar jämställdhet som att människor oavsett kön har makt att forma sitt liv och kräver att principen om lika lön för likvärdigt arbete upprätthålls och att kvinnodominerade yrken värderas lika högt. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt arbete för kvinnors ekonomiska frihet och på en väl utbyggd barn- och äldreomsorg ligger i linje med detta. Planen betonar samtidigt att stödet till barnfamiljer ska göra det möjligt att prioritera tid med barnen, vilket är en gräns för hur målet får uppnås.
- power to shape one's own lifedecisive»Jämställdhet är att människor, oavsett kön, har makt att« (party programme ↗)“Equality is that people, regardless of gender, have power to”
- equal pay for equivalent work»Principen om lika lön för likvärdigt arbete är grundläggande och ska« (party programme ↗)“The principle of equal pay for equivalent work is fundamental and shall”
- upgrade female-dominated professions»yrkesområden som vård, omsorg och undervisning ska värderas lika högt som traditionellt« (party programme ↗)“professional areas such as care, social services and education shall be valued equally highly as traditionally”
- choice for families with children»Det offentligas stöd till barnfamiljer ska vara så utformat att det blir ekonomiskt möjligt för« (party programme ↗)“Public support for families with children shall be designed so that it becomes financially possible for”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan has its own section on increased economic equality and states that increased self-sufficiency gives increased empowerment, with concrete commitments to reduce involuntary part-time work, fewer split shifts and more flexible parental leave.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan has its own section on increased economic equality and states that increased self-sufficiency gives increased empowerment, with concrete commitments to reduce involuntary part-time work, fewer split shifts and more flexible parental leave. It is precisely women's career opportunities and participation in the labour market that the counter-proposal wants to strengthen. The plan however does not share the premise that expanded welfare in itself is the answer.
Original (Swedish)
Planen har ett eget avsnitt om ökad ekonomisk jämställdhet och slår fast att ökad självförsörjning ger ökad egenmakt, med konkreta åtaganden om minskat ofrivilligt deltidsarbete, färre delade turer och flexiblare föräldraförsäkring. Det är just kvinnors karriärmöjligheter och deltagande på arbetsmarknaden som motförslaget vill stärka. Planen delar däremot inte premissen att en utbyggd välfärd i sig är svaret.
- self-sufficiency gives empowermentdecisive»Ökad självförsörjning ger ökad egenmakt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased self-sufficiency gives increased empowerment.”
- reduced involuntary part-time work»Minska det ofrivilliga deltidsarbetet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce involuntary part-time work”
- more flexible parental leave»Öka flexibiliteten i föräldraförsäkringen och göra fler dagar till dubbeldagar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase flexibility in parental leave insurance and make more days double days”
- women's labour market participation»Kvinnor i Sverige förvärvsarbetar fortfarande i lägre utsträckning än män och är sjukskrivna i högre utsträckning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women in Sweden are still in the labour force to a lesser extent than men and are on sick leave to a greater extent.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that both cultural norms and benefit systems that tend to lock women into the home should be combated, and wants to improve status and working conditions in female-dominated professions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that both cultural norms and benefit systems that tend to lock women into the home should be combated, and wants to improve status and working conditions in female-dominated professions. This is in substance what the counter-proposal demands for women's economic self-determination and labour market participation. The plan however rejects measures aimed at the same outcome at group level, which limits the support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att både kulturella normer och bidragssystem som tenderar att låsa kvinnor till hemmet ska motverkas, och vill förbättra status och arbetsvillkor i de kvinnodominerade yrkena. Det är i sak vad motförslaget efterfrågar för kvinnors ekonomiska självbestämmande och arbetsmarknadsdeltagande. Planen avvisar däremot åtgärder som syftar till samma utfall på gruppnivå, vilket begränsar stödet.
- women's labour market participationdecisive»Både kulturella normer och bidragssystem som tenderar att låsa kvinnor till hemmet ska motverkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Both cultural norms and benefit systems that tend to lock women into the home should be combated.”
- better conditions in female professions»Förbättra status, arbetsvillkor samt öka företagshälsovård i kvinnodominerade yrken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve status, working conditions and increase workplace health and safety in female-dominated professions”
- no to outcome steering»Riktig jämställdhet nås inte genom att vidta politiska åtgärder för att på gruppnivå skapa samma utfall mellan män och kvinnor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“True equality is not achieved by taking political measures to create the same outcome at group level between men and women”
- no to EU-governed wage formation»Men den svenska modellen hotas för närvarande av förslag från EU om gemensamma regler för lönebildning, arbetslöshetsersättning och det sociala skyddsnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But the Swedish model is currently threatened by proposals from the EU on common rules for wage formation, unemployment insurance and the social safety net.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:AU11)
- Committee report full text (HD01AU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1027 — Islamofobi och antisemitism av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1028 — Ett land i förändring av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1057 — Stärkt religionsfrihet av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:13 — Nedläggning av Jämställdhetsmyndigheten av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1504 — Stärkt skydd för arbetstagares integritet av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1505 — Hbtqi-personers utsatthet i Sverige och världen av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1506 — Jämställt Sverige - mot mäns våld och ekonomisk ojämlikhet av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1618 — Politik för sverigefinnar av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:171 — Politik för äldres rättigheter och välmående av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1790 — Åtgärder mot ålderism i arbetslivet av Marie Nicholson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2293 — Rätt till heltidsarbete och tryggare anställningar för kvinnor av Linnéa Wickman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2306 — Metoder för att motverka etnisk diskriminering i arbetslivet av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2651 — Ålderism inom arbetslivet av Anders Ekegren (L)
- Motion 2025/26:2778 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2786 — En politik för de nationella minoriteterna och minoritetsspråken av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2788 — Rättsväsendet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2830 — Mot åldersdiskriminering i rekrytering av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2834 — Ett jämställt samhälle av Helena Vilhelmsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2864 — Översyn av oskäliga påföljder i diskrimineringslagstiftningen av Jan Ericson och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:3188 — Familjerätt, socialtjänst, hbtqi-frågor och funktionsrätt av Martina Johansson m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament