2025-02-132024/25:SoU13 · p.8SoUHealth & social services
Narcotics Policy
Drug policy goals and direction pending review of the drug policy inquiry
What's at stake: An earlier shift toward harm reduction could affect how quickly people with harmful substance use and addiction gain access to care and support instead of criminal-justice measures, whereas a wait-and-see approach means the matter is settled alongside the broader processing of the inquiry's proposals.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should already now push for a clearer harm-reduction direction and a review of the narcotics penal law, or whether to wait for the government drug policy inquiry's proposals to be fully processed within the Government Offices.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee opposes the motions and considers that the Riksdag should not take any action, pointing out that the drug policy inquiry's report on an evidence-based drug policy focused on harm reduction is already being processed within the Government Offices.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (SD)
The reservation calls for the government to carry out a fundamental review of drug policy based on the latest research, with a focus on harm reduction rather than political stances, and urges the government to act now on the drug policy inquiry's proposals on preventive work, harm reduction and coordination.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 189–63Ja 177–75
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 87/0/0/19 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/4 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 54/0/0/14 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | No 0/62/0/10 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:1356 by Carina Ståhl Herrstedt et al. (SD) demand 7, 2024/25:1477 by Anna Starbrink (L) demand 2 and 2024/25:1905 by Karin Rågsjö et al. (V) demands 1 and 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1356 av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD) yrkande 7, 2024/25:1477 av Anna Starbrink (L) yrkande 2 och 2024/25:1905 av Karin Rågsjö m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 3.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 150 proposals in motions on, among other things, alcohol, narcotics and tobacco from the general motion period 2024. Primarily with reference to ongoing work. The motions dealt with, among other things, alcohol legislation, narcotics policy and tobacco and tobacco-free nicotine products.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants drug policy to be shaped according to the latest research with a focus on harm reduction. (SD) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme establishes that people trapped in addiction should have access to care and be treated with respect, and that work against drugs is needed at all levels from prevention to police work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that people trapped in addiction should have access to care and be treated with respect, and that work against drugs is needed at all levels from prevention to police work. The election manifesto rejects repression and harsh measures as the main solution and demands that problems be tackled seriously with preventive measures. A research-based review with focus on harm reduction and preventive action thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att människor som fastnat i missbruk ska ha tillgång till vård och behandlas med respekt, och att arbetet mot narkotika behövs i alla led från det förebyggande till polisarbetet. Valmanifestet avvisar repression och hårdare tag som huvudlösning och kräver att problemen angrips på allvar med förebyggande insatser. En forskningsbaserad översyn med fokus på skademinimering och åtgärder för förebyggande arbete ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- care and respect in addictiondecisive»Människor som fastnat i missbruk ska ha tillgång till den vård« (party programme ↗)“People trapped in addiction should have access to the care”
- prevention before repression»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Too often repression and harsh measures are lifted up as solutions instead of tackling the problems seriously.”
- coordinated drug work»mot narkotika i alla led, från det förebyggande till polisarbetet.« (party programme ↗)“against drugs at all levels, from prevention to police work.”
- drugs as a social problem»Droganvändningen är jämt fördelad över alla samhällsklasser men det är de mest utsatta i samhället som drabbas hårdast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Drug use is evenly distributed across all social classes but it is the most vulnerable in society who are hardest hit.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto states that both crimes and the causes of crime shall be combated, and that at least one krona shall be spent on preventive work for every krona spent on more police.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that both crimes and the causes of crime shall be combated, and that at least one krona shall be spent on preventive work for every krona spent on more police. The party programme sees the best long-term crime prevention in reduced social inequality. This supports the counter-proposal's demand for a research-based review with preventive and harm-reduction measures, although the plan at the same time requires action against drug trafficking.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att både brotten och brottens orsaker ska bekämpas, och att minst en krona ska läggas på förebyggande arbete för varje krona till fler poliser. Partiprogrammet ser den långsiktigt bästa brottsbekämpningen i minskade sociala klyftor. Det bär motförslagets krav på forskningsbaserad översyn med förebyggande och skadebegränsande åtgärder, även om planen samtidigt kräver krafttag mot införsel av narkotika.
- crimes and their causesdecisive»Bekämpa både brotten och brottens orsaker.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat both crimes and the causes of crime.”
- equal spending on prevention»För varje krona som läggs på fler poliser, ska minst en krona läggas på det förebyggande arbetet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For every krona spent on more police, at least one krona shall be spent on preventive work.”
- social causes central»Men den långsiktigt bästa brottsbekämpningen är att bygga ett samhälle där de sociala« (party programme ↗)“But the best long-term crime prevention is to build a society where social”
- stop drug smuggling»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take action against the smuggling of weapons and drugs, among other things through strengthened border control.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that addiction is a disease and that focus must shift from punishment to treatment, and that drug policy must be based on methods research has shown to be most effective in reducing the harms of addiction.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that addiction is a disease and that focus must shift from punishment to treatment, and that drug policy must be based on methods research has shown to be most effective in reducing the harms of addiction. That is exactly the counter-proposal's demand for a fundamental review based on the latest research with a focus on harm reduction and on measures now. The plan simultaneously maintains a drug-free society as a long-term goal, which does not prevent harm reduction measures.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att missbruk är en sjukdom och att fokus ska flyttas från straff till vård, och att narkotikapolitiken ska bygga på de metoder forskningen visat vara mest effektiva för att lindra skadeverkningarna. Det är precis motförslagets krav på en grundläggande översyn utifrån senaste forskning med fokus på skademinimering och på åtgärder redan nu. Planen håller samtidigt fast vid ett narkotikafritt samhälle som långsiktigt mål, vilket inte hindrar skadelindrande insatser.
- care over punishmentdecisive»Den enskildas missbruk är en sjukdom och vi vill se ett ändrat fokus från straff till vård.« (party programme ↗)“An individual's addiction is a disease and we want to see a shift in focus from punishment to treatment.”
- research-based harm reduction»Missbrukspolitiken bör utgå från de metoder som forskningen visat vara mest effektiva för att lindra skadeverkningarna av missbruk och beroende, både för samhället och för individen« (party programme ↗)“Drug policy should be based on methods that research has shown to be most effective in reducing the harms of addiction and dependency, both for society and the individual”
- needle exchange and medication»Personer som lider av missbruksproblematik ska erbjudas bästa möjliga hjälp och stöd, att komma ur sitt beroende och att få ett värdigt liv genom sådant som sprututbytesprogram och medicinering.« (party programme ↗)“People suffering from addiction problems must be offered the best possible help and support to overcome their addiction and achieve a dignified life through such things as needle exchange programmes and medication.”
- drug-free society as goal»Målet är ett narkotikafritt samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“The goal is a drug-free society.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires that people with substance abuse problems have influence over their own lives and receive the support they need, that care is based on science and established practice and that a preventive approach is a prerequisite for sustainable welfare.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that people with substance abuse problems have influence over their own lives and receive the support they need, that care is based on science and established practice and that a preventive approach is a prerequisite for sustainable welfare. The counter-proposal's requirement for a research-based review with focus on harm reduction and on preventive measures follows from this. The plan does not specify a goal for narcotics policy.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att personer med missbruksproblem har inflytande över sitt liv och får det stöd som behövs, att vården baseras på vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet och att ett förebyggande förhållningssätt är en förutsättning för hållbar välfärd. Motförslagets krav på en forskningsbaserad översyn med fokus på skademinimering och på förebyggande insatser följer av detta. Planen anger inget mål för narkotikapolitiken.
- stöd vid missbrukdecisive»psykisk ohälsa eller missbruksproblem måste ha inflytande över sitt liv och få det stöd som behövs.« (party programme ↗)“psychological ill-health or substance abuse problems must have influence over their lives and receive the support they need.”
- vetenskapsbaserad vård»God vård och omsorg i hela landet, baserad på vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet, är viktigt för den enskilda« (party programme ↗)“Good care and welfare throughout the country, based on science and established practice, is important for the individual”
- förebyggande arbete»En förutsättning för en hållbar välfärd är ett förebyggande förhållningssätt.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for sustainable welfare is a preventive approach.”
- vägen ur brottslighet»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy shall therefore both prevent and deter from crime, support crime victims and encourage those who have committed illegal actions to a new life situation without crime.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly establishes that Swedish drug policy shall be investigated in its entirety, with reference to Sweden's high drug-related mortality, and that policy shall be based on a harm-reduction principle.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that Swedish drug policy shall be investigated in its entirety, with reference to Sweden's high drug-related mortality, and that policy shall be based on a harm-reduction principle. The counter-proposal's demand for a fundamental review with focus on harm reduction is thus precisely the plan's line, as is the demand for scientifically-based measures. The plan's zero tolerance towards drugs in the handling chain does not stand in the way of this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att den svenska narkotikapolitiken ska utredas i sin helhet, med hänvisning till Sveriges höga narkotikadödlighet, och att politiken ska utgå från en skadelindringsprincip. Motförslagets krav på en grundläggande översyn med fokus på skademinimering är därmed just planens linje, liksom kravet på vetenskapligt grundade insatser. Planens nolltolerans mot narkotika i hanteringsleden står inte i vägen för detta.
- comprehensive review of drug policydecisive»den svenska narkotikapolitiken utreds i sin helhet.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish drug policy is investigated in its entirety.”
- the harm-reduction principle»Politiken ska utgå från en skadelindringsprincip.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall be based on a harm-reduction principle.”
- scientifically-based dependency care»Missbruks- och beroendevården ska vara vetenskapligt grundad.« (party programme ↗)“Addiction and dependency care shall be scientifically-based.”
- zero tolerance towards drugs»Nolltolerans ska råda mot narkotika i alla led av hanteringen.« (party programme ↗)“Zero tolerance shall prevail against drugs in all steps of handling.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly states that the goal for drug policy should be a drug-free society and that all non-medical possession and use of drugs should be prohibited.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that the goal for drug policy should be a drug-free society and that all non-medical possession and use of drugs should be prohibited. Substance abuse treatment should aim at breaking addiction and providing a drug-free lifestyle, and drug-free environments should be promoted. A fundamental reorientation of drug policy toward harm reduction therefore conflicts with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen anger uttryckligen att målet för narkotikapolitiken ska vara ett narkotikafritt samhälle och att allt icke-medicinskt innehav och bruk av narkotika ska vara förbjudet. Missbrukarvården ska inriktas på att bryta beroendet och ge en drogfri livsstil, och drogfria miljöer ska främjas. En grundläggande omorientering av narkotikapolitiken mot skademinimering strider därför mot planen.
- drug-free society as goaldecisive»Målet med narkotikapolitiken ska vara ett narkotika« (party programme ↗)“The goal of drug policy should be a drugs”
- prohibition on non-medical use»fritt samhälle. Allt ickemedicinskt innehav och bruk av« (party programme ↗)“free society. All non-medical possession and use of”
- treatment should break addiction»Missbrukarvård ska inriktas på att bryta beroendet och ge förutsättningar för en« (party programme ↗)“Substance abuse treatment should aim at breaking addiction and provide conditions for a”
- drug-free environments»drogfria miljöer ska främjas.« (party programme ↗)“drug-free environments should be promoted.”
The plan's drug policy is repressive in its core: the specialised drug police shall be restored and customs strengthened with powerful powers against smuggling.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's drug policy is repressive in its core: the specialised drug police shall be restored and customs strengthened with powerful powers against smuggling. The counter-proposal instead wants to shift policy with harm reduction as the guiding focus, which shifts the weight away from that line. That the plan at the same time wants to strengthen addiction care is not enough to carry a shift with harm reduction as the starting point.
Original (Swedish)
Planens narkotikapolitik är repressiv i sin kärna: de specialiserade narkotikapoliserna ska återinföras och tullen stärkas med kraftfulla befogenheter mot smuggling. Motförslaget vill i stället lägga om politiken med skademinimering som styrande fokus, vilket förskjuter tyngdpunkten bort från den linjen. Att planen samtidigt vill stärka missbruksvården räcker inte för att bära ett omtag med skademinimering som utgångspunkt.
- police drug enforcementdecisive»Återinföra de specialiserade narkotikapoliserna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Restore the specialised drug police”
- stop smuggling»Stärka tullen med mer resurser och kraftfulla befogenheter för att stoppa stöldligor och vapensmugglare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen customs with more resources and powerful powers to stop theft gangs and weapons smugglers”
- strengthened addiction care»Det handlar om över 50 reformer för att stärka socialtjänst, skola och missbruksvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is about over 50 reforms to strengthen social services, school and addiction care.”
The election manifesto wants to shift criminal policy to zero tolerance and incapacitation and introduce zero tolerance to crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to shift criminal policy to zero tolerance and incapacitation and introduce zero tolerance to crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted. A fundamental shift in drug policy with a focus on harm reduction goes in the opposite direction to this line. The plan also wants to break the attractiveness of a criminal lifestyle, not soften society's markers against drugs.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill lägga om kriminalpolitiken till nolltolerans och inkapacitering och införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs. En grundläggande omläggning av narkotikapolitiken med fokus på skademinimering går i motsatt riktning mot den linjen. Planen vill dessutom bryta attraktiviteten i en kriminell livsstil, inte mildra samhällets markeringar mot narkotika.
- zero tolerance and incapacitationdecisive»Sveriges kriminalpolitik behöver helt läggas om för att bygga på nolltolerans och inkapacitering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's criminal policy needs to be fundamentally reorganized to be based on zero tolerance and incapacitation.”
- zero tolerance to crime»Införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce zero tolerance to crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted”
- all crimes should be investigated»Utgångspunkten bör vara att alla brott, även sådana som inte skapar rubriker, ska utredas och att polisen ska finnas nära i hela Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The starting point should be that all crimes, even those that do not make headlines, should be investigated and that police should be present near in all of Sweden.”
- make criminal lifestyle unattractive»Bryta attraktiveten av en kriminell livsstil« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Break the attractiveness of a criminal lifestyle”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SoU13)
- Committee report full text (HC01SoU13)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1084 — Försäljning av lågalkoholhaltiga drycker i livsmedelsbutiker av Joanna Lewerentz och Carl Nordblom (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1191 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1195 — Sänkt ålder för inköp på Systembolaget av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1197 — Ett systembolag för vuxna av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1203 — Bevakning av grannländers narkotikapolitik av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1205 — Utvärdering av den svenska missbrukspolitiken av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1290 — Flexiblare pausservering av Camilla Rinaldo Miller och Larry Söder (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1356 — ANDTS och missbruks- och beroendevård av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1364 — Folkhälsan i fokus av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1450 — Turism och besöksnäring av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1463 — Export av snus av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1477 — En modern evidensbaserad beroendevård för skademinimering av Anna Starbrink (L)
- Motion 2024/25:1616 — Gränsöverskridande alkoholtillstånd av Martina Johansson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1759 — Skärpta regler för försäljning av lustgas av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1780 — Slopat matkrav för alkoholservering av Carl Nordblom och Kristina Axén Olin (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:1837 — Möjliggör champagnefrukost genom ändring i alkohollagen av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1838 — Stockholm som testkommun för mer tillgängliga systembolag av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1839 — Avskaffat förbud mot att servera förblandade drinkar av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:185 — En tobaksfri uppväxt av Catarina Deremar (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1855 — Geografiska alkoholtillstånd av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament