2024-04-102023/24:JuU13 · p.1JuUJustice

Government's legislative proposal

The government's bill on security zones and police search powers

What's at stake: The proposal would allow police to search people and vehicles for weapons within designated zones without requiring suspicion against any specific individual, which could affect residents and visitors in the areas concerned, while critics warn that more innocent people, including children, risk being subjected to coercive measures without any actual reduction in crime.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should adopt the government's proposal to give police the ability to establish security zones with expanded powers to search for weapons and other dangerous objects, or whether the proposal should be rejected because existing police powers are considered sufficient and the risks to individuals' privacy are seen as outweighing the benefits.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee shares the government's assessment that there is a clear need for expanded police powers to search for weapons and dangerous objects, that security zones can be an effective measure against shootings and bombings, that the positive effects outweigh the risks, and that the proposal is compatible with fundamental rights and freedoms and lacks a less intrusive alternative; the committee therefore supports the bill, which also includes a right to appeal a security-zone decision to an administrative court.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S, V, C, MP)

The reservation argues that police already have extensive powers today to conduct body searches and search vehicles for weapons when there is reason to believe a crime can be prevented, that security zones risk being misdirected since shootings and bombings can occur anywhere, that several consultation bodies are critical of the lack of evidence that the zones would actually be effective, and that the proposal risks subjecting more innocent people, including children with no connection to criminality, to coercive measures without it being shown to be necessary.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, C, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highderived
Sown reservationYesNo 0/92/0/14departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/13/0/5follows the planconfidence: highderived
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
KDYesYes 14/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

The Riksdag adopts the Government's proposal for a law amending the Police Act (1984:387). Thereby the Riksdag approves proposition 2023/24:84 and rejects the motions 2023/24:2829 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) motion 1, 2023/24:2831 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) motion 1, 2023/24:2832 by Rasmus Ling et al. (MP) motion 1 and 2023/24:2833 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till lag om ändring i polislagen (1984:387). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2023/24:84 och avslår motionerna 2023/24:2829 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkande 1, 2023/24:2831 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2023/24:2832 av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1 och 2023/24:2833 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C).

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved amendments to the Police Act. The amendments mean that the police gain expanded powers to conduct body searches on persons and search vehicles to look for weapons and other dangerous objects within a specific area. According to the proposal, the National Police Board shall be able to establish the security zones and the purpose is to counter shootings and explosions in conflicts within the criminal environment more effectively.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme establishes that growing surveillance and registration shall be countered and that everyone has the right to a broad private sphere, and that the presumption of innocence is decisive.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that growing surveillance and registration shall be countered and that everyone has the right to a broad private sphere, and that the presumption of innocence is decisive. The election manifesto explicitly warns that young people with foreign backgrounds in poor areas are subjected to police violence and rejects repression as the main approach. The counter-proposal's objection to security zones, which expose innocent people to coercive measures without demonstrated necessity, therefore follows from the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att växande övervakning och registrering ska motverkas och att alla har rätt till en bred privat sfär, samt att oskuldspresumtionen är avgörande. Valplattformen varnar uttryckligen för att unga med utländsk bakgrund i fattiga områden utsätts för övervåld från polisen och avvisar repression som huvudspår. Motförslagets invändning mot säkerhetszoner, som utsätter oskyldiga för tvångsåtgärder utan visad nödvändighet, följer därför av planen.

  • counter increased surveillancedecisive»Växande övervakning och registrering ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Growing surveillance and registration shall be countered.”
  • police violence against young people»Många unga, särskilt med utländsk bakgrund, som bor i fattiga områden, utsätts även för rasism och övervåld från polisen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many young people, especially with foreign backgrounds, who live in poor areas, are also subjected to racism and police violence”
  • innocent until proven guilty»anses oskyldiga tills motsatsen är bevisad måste lyftas fram som« (party programme ↗)“are presumed innocent until the opposite is proven must be highlighted as”
  • repression does not solve crime»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Too often repression and harsher measures are put forward as solutions instead of tackling problems seriously.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesNodeparts from the planderived

The plan is explicit that the police need more tools and that the fight against crime must be uncompromising, with society's full force mobilized against shootings and weapons.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan is explicit that the police need more tools and that the fight against crime must be uncompromising, with society's full force mobilized against shootings and weapons. The counter-proposal wants to stop precisely such a new authority with the argument that current tools suffice. This goes against the plan's line on expanded police powers and strengthened fight against weapons. The plan therefore rejects the counter-proposal's demand.

Original (Swedish)

Planen är uttrycklig med att polisen behöver fler verktyg och att kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös, med samhällets fulla kraft mobiliserad mot skjutningar och vapen. Motförslaget vill stoppa just en sådan ny befogenhet med hänvisning till att nuvarande verktyg räcker. Det går emot planens linje om utökade polisiära befogenheter och stärkt kamp mot vapen. Planen avvisar därför motförslagets krav.

  • more tools for the policedecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house searches.”
  • uncompromising crime prevention»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös. Samhällets fulla kraft ska mobiliseras för att trycka tillbaka de kriminella« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime must be uncompromising. Society's full force shall be mobilized to push back the criminals”
  • action against weapons and narcotics»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take action against the import of weapons and narcotics, among other things through strengthened border control.”
  • clear response to crime»Samhället måste reagera tydligt mot brott och regelöverträdelser.« (party programme ↗)“Society must respond clearly to crime and violations of rules.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The party programme states that the party opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate interference with privacy and that crime prevention must not occur at the expense of human rights.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that the party opposes all laws that constitute disproportionate interference with privacy and that crime prevention must not occur at the expense of human rights. Security zones involve coercive measures against persons without criminal suspicion and also affect innocent people and children. The plan's position is instead that preventive work is the foundation for a safe society, which supports the counter-proposal's rejection.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att partiet motsätter sig alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten och att brottsbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter. Säkerhetszoner innebär tvångsåtgärder mot personer utan brottsmisstanke och träffar även oskyldiga och barn. Planens linje är i stället att förebyggande arbete är grunden för ett tryggt samhälle, vilket stöder motförslagets avslag.

  • no to disproportionate privacy intrusionsdecisive»Vi motsätter oss alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“We oppose all laws that constitute disproportionate interference with privacy.”
  • rights before coercive measures»Brotts- och terrorbekämpning är viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Crime and counter-terrorism are important but must not occur at the expense of human rights.”
  • preventive work as foundation»Det brottsförebyggande arbetet är grunden för ett tryggt samhälle med låg kriminalitet.« (party programme ↗)“Preventive crime work is the foundation for a safe society with low crime.”
  • prevention in vulnerable areas»storsatsa på det förebyggande arbetet i socioekonomiskt eftersatta områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest heavily in preventive work in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly says no to stop and search zones and states that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly says no to stop and search zones and states that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. The counter-proposal opposes exactly such zones, with the argument that innocent people are subjected to coercive measures without demonstrated necessity. The party programme also requires that all legislation be tested against its impact on integrity and that restrictions are proportionate to purpose, which is exactly the balance the committee makes.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till visitationszoner och slår fast att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Motförslaget vänder sig mot just sådana zoner, med argumentet att oskyldiga utsätts för tvångsåtgärder utan att nödvändigheten är visad. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom att all lagstiftning prövas mot sin integritetspåverkan och att inskränkningen står i proportion till syftet, vilket är exakt den avvägning utskottet gör.

  • no to stop and search zonesdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to stop and search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive surveillance and restrictions on religious freedom.”
  • integrity test for legislationweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal integrity.”
  • proportionality for restrictions»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the purpose of the laws.”
  • protect fundamental rights»Våra grundläggande rättigheter får inte tas för givna. Vi vill stärka bland annat äganderätten, diskrimineringsförbudet, minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning, och grundlagsskydda rätten till abort och reproduktiv hälsa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our fundamental rights must not be taken for granted. We want to strengthen, among other things, property rights, the prohibition on discrimination, minority protection and the status of minority languages, and provide constitutional protection for the right to abortion and reproductive health.”

flags: citat_svagt

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly requires that police shall be able to use coercive measures against organized gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime, and that police shall get the tools to everywhere uphold law and order.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly requires that police shall be able to use coercive measures against organized gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime, and that police shall get the tools to everywhere uphold law and order. The counter-proposal's objection is precisely that powers without concrete suspicion are unnecessary and risky. The plan's integrity principle qualifies the requirement for proportionality but does not overturn the explicit commitment in the election manifesto, which carries most weight.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att polisen ska kunna använda tvångsmedel mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke, och att polisen ska få verktygen att överallt upprätthålla lag och ordning. Motförslagets invändning är just att befogenheter utan konkret misstanke är onödiga och riskabla. Planens integritetsprincip kvalificerar kravet på proportionalitet men upphäver inte det uttryckliga åtagandet i valmanifestet, som väger tyngst.

  • coercive measures without concrete suspiciondecisive»Avlyssning och andra hemliga tvångsmedel ska kunna användas både vid misstanke om fler brott än i dag och efter domstolsbeslut mot organiserade gängmedlemmar även utan konkret brottsmisstanke.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wiretapping and other secret coercive measures shall be able to be used both in suspicion of more crimes than today and following court order against organized gang members even without concrete suspicion of crime.”
  • police shall get more tools»Nu måste polisen få verktygen att överallt upprätthålla lag och ordning, så att alla kan känna sig trygga i sina kvarter var de än bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Now police must get the tools to everywhere uphold law and order, so everyone can feel safe in their neighbourhoods wherever they live.”
  • more effective police methods»För att stoppa upplopp och kravaller ska polisen kunna använda mer effektiv och modern utrustning så att fler kan gripas och lagföras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To stop riots and disturbances, police should be able to use more effective and modern equipment so that more can be arrested and prosecuted.”
  • proportionality in integrity infringements»negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är« (party programme ↗)“negative is only justified if an opposing interest weighs clearly heavier and the measure is”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto describes the situation as extreme and demands that safety on streets and squares be restored, and it is prepared to introduce drastic tools such as anonymous witnesses when they are effective against gang crime.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto describes the situation as extreme and demands that safety on streets and squares be restored, and it is prepared to introduce drastic tools such as anonymous witnesses when they are effective against gang crime. The counter-proposal, conversely, wants to refrain from expanded authority to search for weapons. The programme's protection of personal privacy qualifies the balance but does not outweigh the plan's requirement for effective crime prevention.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet beskriver läget som extremt och kräver att tryggheten på gator och torg återupprättas, och det är berett att införa ingripande verktyg som anonyma vittnen när de ger effekt mot gängbrottsligheten. Motförslaget vill tvärtom avstå från utökade befogenheter att söka efter vapen. Programmets skydd för den personliga integriteten kvalificerar avvägningen men väger inte över planens krav på effektiv brottsbekämpning.

  • restore safetydecisive»Tryggheten på gator och torg måste återupprättas, brottsförebyggande arbetet måste stärkas, brottslingar dömas och brottsoffer få upprättelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Safety on streets and squares must be restored, crime prevention work must be strengthened, criminals convicted and crime victims receive restitution.”
  • new tools against gang crime»Inför anonyma vittnen. Det finns i flera andra länder och har bidragit till fler fällande domar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce anonymous witnesses. It exists in several other countries and has contributed to more convictions.”
  • stricter approach to weapons crime»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten penalties for weapons crimes to minimum five years imprisonment.”
  • protection of personal privacy»Intrång i den fredade sfär som varje person bör vara garanterad innebär att den personliga integriteten kränks.« (party programme ↗)“Intrusion into the protected sphere that every person should be guaranteed means that personal privacy is violated.”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan contains an explicit commitment to introduce search zones so that police have better opportunities to search for weapons.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan contains an explicit commitment to introduce search zones so that police have better opportunities to search for weapons. The counter-proposal instead wants to stop the security zones citing that existing powers are sufficient. This stands in direct conflict with the plan's line that legislation must be adapted to gang violence so that more weapons are found and disappear from the street.

Original (Swedish)

Planen innehåller ett uttryckligt åtagande om att införa visitationszoner så att polisen får bättre möjligheter att leta efter vapen. Motförslaget vill i stället stoppa säkerhetszonerna med hänvisning till att befintliga befogenheter räcker. Det står i direkt strid med planens linje att lagstiftningen ska anpassas efter gängvåldet så att fler vapen hittas och fler försvinner från gatan.

  • search zonesdecisive»Införa visitationszoner så att Polisen får bättre möjligheter att leta efter vapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce search zones so that police have better opportunities to search for weapons”
  • adapted legislation against gangs»Gängen är Sveriges inhemska terrorister – och lagstiftningen måste anpassas därefter så att fler ställs till svars och försvinner från gatan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Gangs are Sweden's domestic terrorists – and legislation must be adapted accordingly so that more are held accountable and disappear from the street.”
  • harsher weapons crime sentences»Skärpa minimistraffen för grova vapenbrott från dagens 2 års fängelse till 6 års fängelse« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten minimum sentences for serious weapons offences from today's 2 years imprisonment to 6 years imprisonment”
  • strengthened police tools»Satsa på polisens utrustning, exempelvis kroppskameror men också vattenkanoner att använda vid exempelvis upplopp« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in police equipment, for example body cameras but also water cannons to use in for example riots”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan states that few political measures are far-reaching enough to push back criminal gangs and that law enforcement above all needs more effective tools, and that procedural obstacles to increased prosecution must be removed.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that few political measures are far-reaching enough to push back criminal gangs and that law enforcement above all needs more effective tools, and that procedural obstacles to increased prosecution must be removed. The counter-proposal instead wants to stop expanded powers to search for weapons in security zones. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående för att pressa tillbaka de kriminella gängen och att rättsväsendet framför allt behöver mer effektiva verktyg, samt att processuella hinder för ökad lagföring ska undanröjas. Motförslaget vill i stället stoppa utökade befogenheter att söka efter vapen i säkerhetszoner. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • no measures too far-reachingdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna anser att få politiska åtgärder är för långtgående när det kommer till att pressa tillbaka både de kriminella gängen och den kultur som gör att de får fäste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sverigedemokraterna believes that few political measures are far-reaching when it comes to pushing back both criminal gangs and the culture that allows them to take hold.”
  • more effective tools against gang crime»Framförallt behöver rättsväsendet få mer effektiva verktyg för att bekämpa gängbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Above all, law enforcement needs more effective tools to combat gang crime.”
  • remove procedural obstacles»Processuella hinder för att möjliggöra en ökad lagföring måste också undanröjas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procedural obstacles to enabling increased prosecution must also be removed.”
  • resources against gangs»Ge rättsväsendet resurser och verktyg för att bekämpa gängen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give law enforcement the resources and tools to combat gangs”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament