2025-02-192024/25:MJU7 · p.14MJUEnvironment & agriculture

Seal hunting

Seal hunting and seal damage to fisheries

What's at stake: Growing seal populations damage fish stocks and make commercial fishing less profitable, while EU rules banning the sale of seal skin and meat make licensed hunting costly for individual hunters; how the issue is handled affects both the conditions for the fishing industry and the conservation of seal populations.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether parliament should call for further measures to facilitate and expand seal hunting and enable the sale of seal products, or whether ongoing work on management plans and international cooperation is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes the government's approach to introducing general seal hunting and shares the view that seal management should be part of ecosystem-based marine management, with Sweden working within Helcom and the EU for greater acceptance of population-regulating measures. The committee notes that work is under way to revise the management plans for grey seal, harbour seal and ringed seal, and that compensation for culled seals is already available through the maritime, fisheries and aquaculture programme, and therefore considers that the motions can be left without further action.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 19 (C)

C holds that the government should take measures to make licensed seal hunting less time-consuming and costly for the individual hunter, including by making it possible to sell seal skin and meat despite EU rules that currently prevent this.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 19 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 19/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SYesYes 89/0/1/16follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPYesAbstain 0/1/12/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 57/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoAbstain 0/0/63/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

SMorgan Johansson (S, Skåne läns södra)Abstain — party line: Yes
MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun)No — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1040 by Roland Utbult (KD), 2024/25:1304 by Runar Filper (SD), 2024/25:1369 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) demands 21 and 23, 2024/25:1396 by Mattias Eriksson Falk et al. (SD) demands 17 and 18, 2024/25:2333 by Mattias Ottosson et al. (S) demand 2, 2024/25:2486 by Stina Larsson et al. (C) demand 15 in this part, 2024/25:2978 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) demand 2 and 2024/25:3037 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) demand 95.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1040 av Roland Utbult (KD), 2024/25:1304 av Runar Filper (SD), 2024/25:1369 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 21 och 23, 2024/25:1396 av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 17 och 18, 2024/25:2333 av Mattias Ottosson m.fl. (S) yrkande 2, 2024/25:2486 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 15 i denna del, 2024/25:2978 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkande 2 och 2024/25:3037 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 95.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 130 proposals concerning hunting and wildlife management in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals deal with, for example, a review of hunting legislation and hunting seasons, a wildlife authority, elk management, wild boar management, cormorant management, lead ammunition, hunting and wildlife management tasks, seal hunting and hunting of predators. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to work already underway within the areas covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The documents say nothing about seal hunting for sale.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The documents say nothing about seal hunting for sale. The closest principle is comprehensive work for rich ecosystems and strict environmental legislation, as well as the warning against overuse of natural resources. Making licensed seal hunting easier and allowing sales of skins and meat would build up a commercial interest in hunting a protected species, which runs in the opposite direction.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten säger inget om säljakt. Den närmast liggande principen är ett heltäckande arbete för rika ekosystem och skarp miljölagstiftning, samt varningen för överutnyttjande av naturens resurser. Att göra licensjakt på säl enklare och tillåta försäljning av skinn och kött skulle bygga upp ett kommersiellt intresse av jakt på en skyddad art, vilket ligger i motsatt riktning.

  • protection of ecosystemsdecisive»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem, bland annat genom att återställa« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems, among other things by restoring”
  • protect biological diversity»Ett ständigt överutnyttjande av naturens resurser leder till kraftig utarmning av den biologiska mångfalden och växthusgasutsläpp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Constant overuse of natural resources leads to severe depletion of biological diversity and greenhouse gas emissions.”
  • ambitious environmental targets»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental targets that are followed up with strict legislation and practical work.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address seal hunting or trade in seal products.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address seal hunting or trade in seal products. The closest principles are protection of biological diversity and that agriculture and fishing policy should be based on environmental considerations and ethical animal husbandry, which do not support making licensed seal hunting easier and allowing sale of hides and meat. The position is therefore derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte säljakt eller handel med sälprodukter. De närmast liggande principerna är skyddet av den biologiska mångfalden och att jordbruks- och fiskeripolitiken ska utgå från miljöhänsyn och etisk djurhållning, vilket inte ger stöd för att göra licensjakt på säl enklare och tillåta försäljning av skinn och kött. Ställningstagandet är därför härlett och osäkert.

  • protect biological diversitydecisive»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
  • threatened biological diversity»Samtidigt accelererar artdöden och den biologiska mångfalden hotas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, species extinction is accelerating and biological diversity is threatened.”
  • ethical animal husbandry»och etisk djurhållning är grundprinciper.« (party programme ↗)“and ethical animal husbandry are fundamental principles.”
MPMiljöpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's starting point is that all animals have an intrinsic value regardless of utility to humans, that nature conservation interests take precedence in hunting and that hunting methods that subject animals to unnecessary suffering shall not be allowed.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's starting point is that all animals have an intrinsic value regardless of utility to humans, that nature conservation interests take precedence in hunting and that hunting methods that subject animals to unnecessary suffering shall not be allowed. Making license hunting of seals less costly and opening for sale of seal skins and seal meat creates commercial incentives for increased hunting. The plan instead wants the ocean's ecosystem to set the limits for the take.

Original (Swedish)

Planens utgångspunkt är att alla djur har ett egenvärde oavsett nyttan för människan, att naturvårdsintressen får företräde vid jakt och att jaktformer som utsätter djur för onödigt lidande inte ska tillåtas. Att göra licensjakt på säl mindre kostsam och öppna för försäljning av sälskinn och sälkött skapar kommersiella drivkrafter för utökad jakt. Planen vill i stället att havens ekosystem sätter gränserna för uttaget.

  • animals' intrinsic valuedecisive»Alla djur har ett egenvärde oavsett deras nyttighet« (party programme ↗)“All animals have an intrinsic value regardless of their utility”
  • nature conservation interests in hunting»fokus vid jakt och att naturvårdsintressen får« (party programme ↗)“focus in hunting and that nature conservation interests take”
  • no unnecessary animal suffering»Jaktformer som utsätter djur för onödigt lidande« (party programme ↗)“Hunting methods that subject animals to unnecessary suffering”
  • ecosystem-based marine management»låt ekosystemen i haven sätta gränserna för hur mycket fisk som får fångas, inför en ekosystembaserad havsförvaltning och gå över till skonsamma fiskemetoder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“let the ecosystems in the oceans set the limits for how much fish can be caught, introduce ecosystem-based marine management and move to gentle fishing methods.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan protects small-scale fishing and sport fishing from damage and states that agriculture, fishing and hunting should lead in sustainable food production, while active wildlife management is advocated.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan protects small-scale fishing and sport fishing from damage and states that agriculture, fishing and hunting should lead in sustainable food production, while active wildlife management is advocated. Making licensed seal hunting less costly and allowing hides and meat to be sold is in line with both this and the requirement to streamline complex rules. However, the plan does not address seal management itself.

Original (Swedish)

Planen värnar det småskaliga fisket och sportfisket mot skador och slår fast att jordbruk, fiske och jakt ska ta ledningen i den hållbara livsmedelsproduktionen, samtidigt som en aktiv viltförvaltning förordas. Att göra licensjakt på säl mindre kostsam och tillåta att skinn och kött säljs ligger i linje med både detta och kravet på att rensa krångliga regler. Planen behandlar dock inte sälförvaltningen i sig.

  • protect small-scale fishingdecisive»Skadlig bottentrålning ska inte få förstöra för varken havsmiljön, den småskaliga fiskenäringen eller sportfisket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Harmful bottom trawling must not be allowed to damage either the marine environment, the small-scale fishing industry or sport fishing.”
  • active wildlife management»ska kombineras med en aktiv förvaltning av rovdjur och klövvilt« (party programme ↗)“should be combined with active management of predators and hoofed wildlife”
  • agriculture, fishing and hunting»Svenskt jordbruk, fiske och jakt ska ta ledningen« (party programme ↗)“Swedish agriculture, fishing and hunting should lead”
  • streamline complex rules»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complex and innovation-hindering rules lie like a wet blanket over parts of rural Sweden. We should clean up unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

Seal hunting and trade in seal products are not addressed in the documents.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

Seal hunting and trade in seal products are not addressed in the documents. Closest is that the ruleset should favour small-scale and coastal fishing and stewardship thinking about responsible use of nature's resources, which suggests that culled seals should be utilized rather than discarded. That the state shall seek cooperation with landowners and local populations in wildlife management points in the same direction, but the evidence is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Säljakt och handel med sälprodukter behandlas inte i dokumenten. Närmast ligger att regelverket ska gynna småskaligt och kustnära fiske samt förvaltarskapstanken om ett ansvarsfullt nyttjande av naturens resurser, vilket talar för att fällda sälar får komma till användning i stället för att kastas bort. Att staten ska söka samverkan med markägare och lokalbefolkning i viltförvaltningen pekar i samma riktning, men underlaget är svagt.

  • favour coastal fishingdecisive»Regelverket ska gynna småskaligt och kustnära fiske« (party programme ↗)“The ruleset should favour small-scale and coastal fishing”
  • responsible resource use»ett ansvarsfullt nyttjande av naturens resurser.« (party programme ↗)“responsible use of nature's resources.”
  • cooperation in wildlife management»markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvård och viltförvaltning.« (party programme ↗)“landowners and local populations in nature conservation and wildlife management.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme sees hunting and wildlife management as applied stewardship and establishes that stewardship is not passive preservation but responsible use and enhancement of resources.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme sees hunting and wildlife management as applied stewardship and establishes that stewardship is not passive preservation but responsible use and enhancement of resources. To allow sale of seal skin and seal meat and make license hunting less costly is exactly such use, and it additionally strengthens a viable fishing industry that the plan values. However the seal question is not explicitly mentioned.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet ser jakt och viltvård som tillämpat förvaltarskap och slår fast att förvaltarskapet inte är passivt bevarande utan ansvarsfullt brukande och förädlande av tillgångarna. Att tillåta försäljning av sälskinn och sälkött och göra licensjakten mindre kostsam är just ett sådant brukande, och det stärker dessutom en livskraftig fiskerinäring som planen värnar. Sälfrågan nämns dock inte uttryckligen.

  • use, not passive preservationdecisive»Förvaltarskapsprincipen innebär inget passivt bevarande, utan ett ansvarsfullt brukande och förädlande av tillgångarna.« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle means nothing passive preservation, but responsible use and enhancement of resources”
  • hunting as stewardship»dessutom ett tydligt exempel på tillämpat förvaltarskap« (party programme ↗)“moreover a clear example of applied stewardship”
  • viable fishing industry»Den svenska fiskerinäringen måste ges förutsättningar att även i framtiden vara livskraftig« (party programme ↗)“Swedish fishing industry must be given preconditions to also in future be viable”
  • wildlife management and diversity»Jakt, fiske och viltvård är en del i bevarandet av den« (party programme ↗)“Hunting, fishing and wildlife management are a part in the preservation of”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan explicitly wants to let hunters sell wild boar meat directly to consumers and that hunting shall not be made more difficult for the individual hunter.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly wants to let hunters sell wild boar meat directly to consumers and that hunting shall not be made more difficult for the individual hunter. The same principle carries the counter-proposal's requirement that seal skin and seal meat be allowed to be sold and that hunting licence for seals becomes less costly. The plan moreover wants to protect the fishing industry against reduced stocks, which speaks for population-regulating seal hunting.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill uttryckligen låta jägare sälja vildsvinskött direkt till konsumenter och att jakten inte ska försvåras för den enskilde jägaren. Samma princip bär motförslagets krav på att sälskinn och sälkött ska få säljas och att licensjakten på säl blir mindre kostsam. Planen vill dessutom värna fiskerinäringen mot minskade bestånd, vilket talar för beståndsreglerande säljakt.

  • sale of game meat alloweddecisive»Låta jägare sälja vildsvinskött direkt till konsumenter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Let hunters sell wild boar meat directly to consumers”
  • hunters' conditions simplified»Vi ska stoppa jakten på jägarna och rädda fiskerinäringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall stop hunting pressure on hunters and save the fishing industry”
  • protect the fishing industry»Fiskerinäringen har drabbats hårt av minskade bestånd på senare år« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fishing industry has been hard hit by reduced stocks in recent years”
  • less administration for hunters»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for shortened processing times for firearm licenses”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires incentives to increase hunting, among other things by making it easier for hunters to sell meat directly to restaurants and other customers, and wants to simplify meat sales.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires incentives to increase hunting, among other things by making it easier for hunters to sell meat directly to restaurants and other customers, and wants to simplify meat sales. The same stewardship principle of balance between humans and animals and between different animal species applies to the seal population. The counter-proposal's demand to enable sales of seal skin and seal meat and make licensed hunting less costly is therefore supported, albeit derived from the hunting section.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver incitament för att öka jakten, bland annat genom att underlätta för jägarna att sälja kött direkt till restauranger och andra kunder, och vill förenkla köttförsäljningen. Samma förvaltarskapsprincip om balans mellan människor och djur och mellan olika djurarter träffar sälbeståndet. Motförslagets krav på att möjliggöra försäljning av sälskinn och sälkött och göra licensjakten mindre kostsam stöds därför, om än härlett från jaktavsnittet.

  • incentives to increase huntingdecisive»Det behövs incitament för att öka jakten, bland annat genom att underlätta för jägarna att sälja vildsvinskött direkt till restauranger och andra kunder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Incentives are needed to increase hunting, among other things by making it easier for hunters to sell wild boar meat directly to restaurants and other customers.”
  • simplified meat sales»Förenkla försäljningen av vildsvinskött« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify the sales of wild boar meat”
  • management for balance»Det finns behov av att långsiktigt förvalta bestånden av vilt för att uppnå en god balans mellan människor och djur – liksom mellan olika djurarter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a need to long-term manage wildlife populations to achieve a good balance between humans and animals – as well as between different animal species.”
  • facilitate hunting at high populations»Underlätta jakt i områden med mycket vilt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate hunting in areas with abundant wildlife”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament