2024-06-122023/24:SkU11 · p.4SkUTaxation

Home Service Deductions (RUT and ROT deductions)

Household tax deduction (RUT and ROT)

What's at stake: The decision affects how large a tax deduction households can get for renovations and household services, and whether the deduction is steered toward energy-saving measures or continues to benefit a broader range of ROT and RUT work, which in turn affects employment in the construction sector.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the ROT deduction should be reformed so that energy-saving measures receive a higher tax reduction, with a correspondingly lower cap for other ROT work, or whether the current design of the RUT and ROT deductions - including the temporarily raised and separate cap for the ROT deduction - should be kept.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that the ROT cap is temporarily raised and that the RUT and ROT deductions get separate caps during 2024 in order to stimulate demand for ROT work as demand for other construction work declines, which can help sustain production and employment in the construction sector. The committee sees no reason to otherwise change the scope of the household deduction and rejects the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 6 (S)

The reservation wants the ROT deduction reformed so that those who carry out energy-saving measures receive a higher subsidy, while the subsidy rate for other ROT work is adjusted down so the measure is fiscally neutral, in order to steer labor and investment toward socially necessary refurbishment and renovation as part of the green transition. It also opposes a sharply raised cap for both the RUT and ROT deductions, which it calls a new kind of “luxury ROT”.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/19/5departs from the planconfidence: highderived
Sown reservationNoNo 1/90/0/15follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesAbstain 1/0/20/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
LYesYes 12/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 58/0/1/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 62/0/1/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Broke with the party line

SMikael Dahlqvist (S, Värmlands län)Yes — party line: No
CAlireza Akhondi (C, Stockholms län)Yes — party line: Abstain
MAnn-Sofie Alm (M, Västra Götalands läns norra)Abstain — party line: Yes
SDRobert Stenkvist (SD, Stockholms län)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:409 by Mikael Eskilandersson and others (SD) demands 6 and 9, 2023/24:519 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:901 by Katarina Luhr and others (MP) demand 38, 2023/24:1631 by Daniel Bäckström and Mikael Larsson (both C), 2023/24:1656 by Per Söderlund and others (SD) demands 8 and 9, 2023/24:1658 by Per Söderlund and others (SD) demand 6, 2023/24:2219 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:2236 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:2321 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau and others (V) demands 9 and 10, 2023/24:2394 by Ingemar Kihlström (KD), 2023/24:2458 by Muharrem Demirok and others (C) demand 16, 2023/24:2470 by Catarina Deremar and Anne-Li Sjölund (both C) demand 1, 2023/24:2493 by Christofer Bergenblock and others (C) demand 27, and 2023/24:2645 by Niklas Karlsson and others (S) demand 12.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:409 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 6 och 9, 2023/24:519 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:901 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 38, 2023/24:1631 av Daniel Bäckström och Mikael Larsson (båda C), 2023/24:1656 av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 8 och 9, 2023/24:1658 av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD) yrkande 6, 2023/24:2219 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:2236 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:2321 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkandena 9 och 10, 2023/24:2394 av Ingemar Kihlström (KD), 2023/24:2458 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 16, 2023/24:2470 av Catarina Deremar och Anne-Li Sjölund (båda C) yrkande 1, 2023/24:2493 av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C) yrkande 27 och 2023/24:2645 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 12.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 120 proposals in motions on income tax from the general motion period 2023. The motions concern, for example, earned income tax credits, tax reductions for sick leave and activity compensation, and home service deductions and renovation deductions. The Riksdag cites, among other things, existing regulations and ongoing work.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to steer building resources towards climate-smart renovations and energy efficiency of housing, and rejects tax subsidies that benefit a few.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to steer building resources towards climate-smart renovations and energy efficiency of housing, and rejects tax subsidies that benefit a few. The counter-proposal demands precisely a reorganization of the renovation tax deduction so that energy-saving measures are subsidized higher, fiscally neutral, and strongly opposes raising ceilings for household services and repairs tax deductions. That matches the plan's prioritization of the green transition over broad tax deductions.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill styra byggresurser mot klimatsmarta renoveringar och energieffektivisering av bostäder, och avvisar skattesubventioner som gynnar ett fåtal. Motförslaget kräver just en omläggning av rotavdraget så att energibesparande åtgärder subventioneras högre, offentligfinansiellt neutralt, och motsätter sig kraftigt höjda tak för rut och rot. Det motsvarar planens prioritering av den gröna omställningen framför breda avdrag.

  • climate-smart renovations prioritizeddecisive»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is about a policy for massive housing construction, climate-smart renovations and lower rents that go hand in hand with the green transition.”
  • rejects household services tax deductions»Istället för rut-bidrag till städning hos fullt friska personer så kan vi använda skattekronorna till att förbättra hemtjänsten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of household services tax deductions for cleaning for fully healthy people, we can use taxpayers' money to improve home care services.”
  • energy efficiency of housing»investeringarna i byggande, upprustning och energieffektivisering av« (party programme ↗)“investments in construction, renovation and energy efficiency of”
  • not tax cuts for a few»Vänsterpartiet tycker att det är viktigare med en arbetstidsförkortning som kommer alla till del än sänkta skatter för ett fåtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party thinks it is more important with a shorter working week that benefits everyone than tax cuts for a few.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto wants the deduction for repairs and alterations to be used to a greater degree for energy efficiency and for green investments to increase, which is exactly the redirection the counter-proposal proposes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants the deduction for repairs and alterations to be used to a greater degree for energy efficiency and for green investments to increase, which is exactly the redirection the counter-proposal proposes. Instead, raising the ceiling sharply would mainly benefit high-income households and conflicts with the principle that taxes are levied according to ability to pay. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill att rot-avdraget i högre grad används för energieffektivisering och att gröna investeringar ökar, vilket är precis den omstyrning motförslaget föreslår. Att i stället kraftigt höja taket gynnar främst hushåll med höga inkomster och strider mot principen att skatt tas ut efter bärkraft. Planen talar därför för motförslagets krav.

  • deduction for repairs and alterations for energy efficiencydecisive»Takten behöver därför öka och kunskapen om hur rot-avdraget kan användas för energieffektivisering behöver breddas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The pace therefore needs to increase and knowledge about how the deduction for repairs and alterations can be used for energy efficiency needs to be broadened.”
  • green investments prioritized»Öka de gröna statliga investeringarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase green public investments.”
  • tax according to ability to pay»Skatterna ska vara progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be progressive and levied according to ability to pay”
  • energy-saving in multi-family dwellings»Vi vill underlätta för fastighetsägare att vidta åtgärder för att spara energi i flerfamiljshus.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to facilitate property owners' ability to take measures to save energy in multi-family dwellings.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto wants to introduce powerful support for energy efficiency to households and industries and direct renovation support towards sustainable renovation, while the party programme establishes that what is good for the environment shall be cheap and what is bad shall be expensive.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to introduce powerful support for energy efficiency to households and industries and direct renovation support towards sustainable renovation, while the party programme establishes that what is good for the environment shall be cheap and what is bad shall be expensive. The counter-proposal's restructuring of the renovation tax deduction towards energy-saving measures, with lower subsidy for other renovation work and no to substantially raised ceilings, is precisely that steering.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill införa ett kraftfullt stöd för energieffektivisering till hushåll och industrier och rikta renoveringsstödet mot hållbar renovering, medan partiprogrammet slår fast att det som är bra för miljön ska vara billigt och det dåliga dyrt. Motförslagets omläggning av rotavdraget mot energibesparande åtgärder, med lägre subvention för övrigt rotarbete och nej till kraftigt höjda tak, är precis den styrningen.

  • support for energy efficiencydecisive»införa ett kraftfullt stöd för energieffektivisering till både hushåll och industrier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce powerful support for energy efficiency to both households and industries.”
  • steering by environmental benefit»Det som är bra för människor och miljö ska vara billigt, det som är dåligt ska vara dyrt« (party programme ↗)“What is good for people and environment shall be cheap, what is bad shall be expensive”
  • targeted support for sustainable renovation»införa ett rot-stöd för hyresrätter och stimulera hållbar renovering genom statligt långsiktigt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a renovation support for rental housing and stimulate sustainable renovation through long-term state support.”
  • progressive distribution profile»att de med mest pengar, som också orsakar större utsläpp, ska bidra mer till omställningen och välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those with most money, who also cause larger emissions, shall contribute more to the transition and welfare through progressive taxation of capital”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The counter-proposal finances the increased green subsidy by reducing the subsidy rate for other renovation work, which in practice increases costs for renovations and affects the construction companies the plan wants to protect.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal finances the increased green subsidy by reducing the subsidy rate for other renovation work, which in practice increases costs for renovations and affects the construction companies the plan wants to protect. The manifesto explicitly promises not to participate in tax increases that damage jobs or make housing more expensive, and wants to lower taxes for small businesses. That the party at the same time wants to scale up the green deduction justifies a green direction, but not through an increased tax burden on other renovation work.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget finansierar den höjda gröna subventionen genom att sänka subventionsgraden för övrigt rotarbete, vilket i praktiken fördyrar renovering och drabbar de byggföretag planen vill värna. Manifestet lovar uttryckligen att inte medverka till skattehöjningar som skadar jobben eller gör det dyrare att bo, och vill sänka skatten för småföretag. Att partiet samtidigt vill skala upp det gröna avdraget motiverar en grön inriktning, men inte genom en höjd skattebörda på annat rotarbete.

  • no tax increases on housingdecisive»Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will not participate in any tax increases that damage jobs, personal savings or make housing more expensive.”
  • lower taxes for small businesses»Sänk skatten på jobb och företagande, särskilt för småföretag och egenföretagare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower taxes on jobs and business, especially for small businesses and self-employed.”
  • green deduction for energy efficiency»Det kan vi lösa genom att bredda och skala upp det gröna avdraget och göra det enklare att installera solpaneler på flerfamiljshus.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We can solve this by broadening and scaling up the green deduction and making it easier to install solar panels on multi-family homes.”
  • reduced total tax burden»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must go down next term.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to facilitate the emergence of labour-intensive services through expanded deduction rights and highlights the household service deduction as a value in itself for the elderly and for gender equality, which argues against the counter-proposal's demand for reduced subsidy levels for ordinary renovation work and against objecting to a raised ceiling.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to facilitate the emergence of labour-intensive services through expanded deduction rights and highlights the household service deduction as a value in itself for the elderly and for gender equality, which argues against the counter-proposal's demand for reduced subsidy levels for ordinary renovation work and against objecting to a raised ceiling. The plan also explicitly rejects that climate policy becomes a competition in subsidies and favours real climate taxes ahead of targeted subsidies. Redirecting the renovation deduction to energy-saving measures is therefore not in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill underlätta framväxten av arbetsintensiva tjänster genom utökad avdragsrätt och lyfter hushållsavdraget som ett värde i sig för äldre och för jämställdheten, vilket talar mot motförslagets krav på sänkt subventionsgrad för vanliga rotarbeten och mot att motsätta sig ett höjt tak. Planen avvisar dessutom uttryckligen att klimatpolitiken görs till en tävling i bidrag och förordar riktiga klimatskatter framför riktade subventioner. Att styra om rotavdraget till energibesparande åtgärder ligger därför inte i linje med planen.

  • expanded deduction rights for servicesdecisive»exempel genom utökad avdragsrätt och sänkt skatt för arbetsintensiva verksamheter eller genom« (party programme ↗)“for example through expanded deduction rights and reduced tax for labour-intensive activities or through”
  • climate taxes ahead of subsidies»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy a competition in the most subsidies and the most symbolic taxes.”
  • household service deduction gives choice»Avdragsrätten för hushållstjänster skapar ytterligare alternativ för äldre människor.« (party programme ↗)“Deduction rights for household services create additional alternatives for elderly people.”
  • household services and gender equality»Möjligheten att köpa hushållstjänster underlättar för både kvinnor och män att förena arbete med« (party programme ↗)“The ability to buy household services makes it easier for both women and men to combine work with”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants a tax system that stimulates work and enterprise with rules as simple as possible, and the election manifesto chooses broad relief for everyone ahead of steering household choices.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants a tax system that stimulates work and enterprise with rules as simple as possible, and the election manifesto chooses broad relief for everyone ahead of steering household choices. The counter-proposal wants to differentiate the subsidy rate within the rot deduction and opposes raised ceilings. The plan sees new jobs as the most important distribution issue. Therefore the requirement is rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ett skattesystem som stimulerar arbete och företagande med så enkla regler som möjligt, och valmanifestet väljer breda lättnader för alla framför styrning av hushållens val. Motförslaget vill differentiera subventionsgraden inom rotavdraget och motsätter sig höjda tak. Planen ser nya jobb som den viktigaste fördelningsfrågan. Därför avvisas kravet.

  • taxes shall stimulate workdecisive»Det bör också utformas så att det stimulerar arbete, hederlighet, sparande och företagande.« (party programme ↗)“It should also be designed so that it stimulates work, integrity, saving and enterprise”
  • broad relief for all»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices significantly for all, primarily through reduced admixture of expensive biofuel”
  • simple tax rules»viktigt att skattereglerna utformas så enkelt som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“important that tax rules are designed as simply as possible”
  • new jobs foremost distribution policy»Därför är tillkomsten av nya jobb den i särklass viktigaste fördelningspolitiska frågan.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore the creation of new jobs is by far the most important distribution policy issue”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan promises lower taxes for households and a tax increase freeze, not a fiscally neutral redistribution within the deduction for home repairs where other repairs work receives lowered subsidy level.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan promises lower taxes for households and a tax increase freeze, not a fiscally neutral redistribution within the deduction for home repairs where other repairs work receives lowered subsidy level. The counter-proposal demands precisely such a downward adjustment and opposes raised ceilings. The plan's line on lower tax burden and maintained deductions therefore argues against the requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen lovar sänkta skatter för hushållen och ett skattehöjarstopp, inte en offentligfinansiellt neutral omfördelning inom rotavdraget där andra rotarbeten får sänkt subventionsgrad. Motförslaget kräver just en sådan nedjustering och motsätter sig höjda tak. Planens linje om lägre skattetryck och bibehållna avdrag talar därför emot kravet.

  • tax increase freezedecisive»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax increase freeze during the coming term that means the combined taxes are not raised”
  • reduced tax burden(2022 manifesto)
  • green deduction without redistribution»Göra det billigare för privatpersoner att minska sin elkonsumtion genom att förstärka och utvidga det gröna skatteavdraget« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it cheaper for private persons to reduce their electricity consumption by strengthening and expanding the green tax deduction”
  • stop for tax increases»Under de senaste åtta åren har regeringen höjt 46 skatter, som krånglar till och fördyrar vardagen för både företagare och konsumenter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Over the past eight years, the government has raised 46 taxes, which complicates and increases costs for both entrepreneurs and consumers.”

flags: citat_ej_verifierat

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The counter-proposal wishes to redirect the tax deduction for home renovations towards energy-saving measures and lower the subsidy for other home renovation work, and opposes a sharply raised cap.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal wishes to redirect the tax deduction for home renovations towards energy-saving measures and lower the subsidy for other home renovation work, and opposes a sharply raised cap. The platform instead wishes to brake housing costs, increase house-building and stop symbol politics that hampers business. The plan's climate line is that evidence and competitiveness shall guide, not steering work towards the green transition.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget vill styra om rotavdraget mot energibesparande åtgärder och sänka subventionen för annat rotarbete, samt motsätter sig ett kraftigt höjt tak. Valplattformen vill tvärtom bromsa boendekostnaderna, öka bostadsbyggandet och stoppa symbolpolitik som hämmar näringsverksamhet. Planens klimatlinje är att evidens och konkurrenskraft ska styra, inte en styrning av arbetskraft mot den gröna omställningen.

  • lower housing costsdecisive»Åtgärder behöver också vidtas för att bromsa de skenande boendekostnaderna så att fler har råd till ett hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Measures must also be taken to brake soaring housing costs so that more have means for a home.”
  • climate goals after competitiveness»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness must guide the implementation of climate goals to a higher degree than politicians' wish to go first and furthest.”
  • increased house-building»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase house-building”
  • stop symbol politics»Stoppa symbolpolitik som går ut över möjligheten att bedriva industri och näring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop symbol politics that damages the capacity to conduct industry and business”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament