2023-06-202022/23:TU13 · p.15TUTransport & infrastructure

Certain issues regarding driving license categories

Weight limits and other license-category issues for category B licenses

What's at stake: The outcome affects which vehicles drivers holding a standard category B license may operate, which matters increasingly as electric and biogas vehicles become more common and heavier than traditional petrol and diesel cars.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the current weight limits and category rules for category B licenses should remain unchanged pending a new EU driving license directive, or whether Sweden should already review and raise the weight limits to reflect that electric and biogas vehicles weigh more.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The Committee notes that the European Commission has recently presented a proposal for a new driving license directive that would, among other things, allow holders of a category B license for two years to drive alternative-fuel vehicles up to 4,250 kg, and that the Transport Agency has assessed that a national exemption is not possible without also adopting the directive's conditions. The Committee therefore currently sees no reason to act, and also maintains its earlier position against extending category B to light motorcycles or introducing a driver's certificate and age limit for certain motor vehicles.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 20 (C, MP)

The reservation (C, MP) calls for a review and adjustment of the weight limits for category B and B96 licenses, since electric and biogas-powered vehicles have a higher curb weight than traditional petrol and diesel cars, and it should therefore be made permissible to drive heavier vehicles under these license categories.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 20 by C, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoYes 94/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoYes 62/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:456 by Kjell Jansson (M), 2022/23:797 by Björn Söder (SD), 2022/23:834 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) demand 57, 2022/23:1173 by Monica Haider (S), 2022/23:1272 by Jörgen Grubb (SD), 2022/23:2142 by Markus Wiechel and Lars Andersson (both SD) demand 3 and 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) demand 112.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:456 av Kjell Jansson (M), 2022/23:797 av Björn Söder (SD), 2022/23:834 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 57, 2022/23:1173 av Monica Haider (S), 2022/23:1272 av Jörgen Grubb (SD), 2022/23:2142 av Markus Wiechel och Lars Andersson (båda SD) yrkande 3 och 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 112.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to 110 proposals in motions about traffic safety from the ordinary motion session of 2022. The reason is mainly that measures are already planned or have been taken. Parliament also stated that traffic safety work has an effect but that further work is required. The motion proposals concern, among other things: speed limits and speed monitoring measures against alcohol and drugs in traffic traffic safety for mopeds and A-tractors driver training and driver testing.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about weight limits for driving licenses, but establishes that it is politics's and not the individual's responsibility to make climate-smart alternatives simple and that transport shall be electrified and powered by other sustainable fuels.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about weight limits for driving licenses, but establishes that it is politics's and not the individual's responsibility to make climate-smart alternatives simple and that transport shall be electrified and powered by other sustainable fuels. Adjusting weight limits so that heavier electric and biogas vehicles can be driven removes an obstacle for precisely that transition. The traffic safety consideration is not affected by the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om viktgränser för körkortsbehörigheter, men slår fast att det är politikens och inte individens ansvar att göra klimatsmarta alternativ enkla och att transporterna ska elektrifieras och kunna drivas med andra hållbara drivmedel. Att justera viktgränserna så att tyngre el- och biogasfordon får framföras undanröjer ett hinder för just den omställningen. Trafiksäkerhetsavvägningen berörs inte av planen.

  • facilitate climate-smart choicesdecisive»Det är politikens, och inte individens, ansvar att skapa möjligheter för människor att välja enkla och billiga klimatsmarta alternativ.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is politics's, and not the individual's, responsibility to create opportunities for people to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives.”
  • electrified transport»För att göra såväl person- som godstransporter hållbara behöver vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For both person and freight transport to be sustainable, the road network needs to be both electrified and supplemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels.”
  • sustainable alternatives shall exist»För de flesta av oss sker en stor del av konsumtionen och resandet för att hållbara alternativ saknas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For most of us, a large part of consumption and travel happens because sustainable alternatives are lacking.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to make it possible to live and travel climate-friendly and facilitate concretely for those with electric cars, including by doubling charging stations, and points out that Sweden now builds electric cars.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to make it possible to live and travel climate-friendly and facilitate concretely for those with electric cars, including by doubling charging stations, and points out that Sweden now builds electric cars. That e-cars and biogas cars' higher curb weight makes today's weight limits for B and B96 driving licenses a barrier follows from the same logic. The counter-proposal's demand for raised limits is therefore supported in substance.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill göra det möjligt att leva och resa klimatvänligt och underlätta konkret för den som har elbil, bland annat genom dubblerade laddstolpar, och pekar på att Sverige nu bygger elbilar. Att el- och biogasbilars högre egenvikt gör dagens viktgränser för B- och B96-behörighet till ett hinder följer av samma logik. Motförslagets krav på höjda gränsvärden stöds därför i sak.

  • facilitate climate-smart traveldecisive»Gör det möjligt att leva och resa klimatvänligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it possible to live and travel climate-friendly.”
  • facilitate electric cars»Vi vill dubbla antalet laddstolpar till 2030 för att underlätta för den som har elbil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the number of charging stations by 2030 to facilitate for those with electric cars.”
  • electrification of vehicle fleet»Nu tillverkar vi fossilfritt stål i Sverige, vi bygger elbilar och vi ser hur nedlagda industrier blir till batterifabriker.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Now we are manufacturing fossil-free steel in Sweden, we are building electric cars and we are seeing how closed-down industries become battery factories.”
  • alternative fuels»på att utveckla bränslesnåla motorer, alternativa drivmedel och bättre reningsteknik.« (party programme ↗)“on developing fuel-efficient engines, alternative fuels and better purification technology.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants only fossil-free cars to be sold from 2025 and that those who need a car can afford a climate-smart alternative, and establishes that necessary car transport shall occur with renewable fuels.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants only fossil-free cars to be sold from 2025 and that those who need a car can afford a climate-smart alternative, and establishes that necessary car transport shall occur with renewable fuels. That weight limits for category B and B96 driving licenses are adjusted for electric and biogas vehicles' higher tare weight removes an obstacle for precisely that transition, especially in rural areas where the car remains the main alternative. The requirement for high traffic safety qualifies but does not negate the conclusion.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att bara fossilfria bilar säljs från 2025 och att den som behöver bil ska ha råd med ett klimatsmart alternativ, och den slår fast att nödvändiga biltransporter ska ske med förnybara bränslen. Att viktgränserna för B- och B96-behörighet justeras för el- och biogasbilars högre egenvikt undanröjer ett hinder för just den omställningen, särskilt på landsbygden där bilen förblir huvudalternativet. Kravet på hög trafiksäkerhet kvalificerar men upphäver inte slutsatsen.

  • fossil-free cars from 2025decisive»att den som behöver bil ska ha råd med ett klimatsmart alternativ, och att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those who need a car can afford a climate-smart alternative, and that only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025.”
  • renewable-powered transport»biltransporter ska ske med förnybara bränslen.« (party programme ↗)“car transport shall occur with renewable fuels.”
  • the car is needed in rural areas»fortfarande att vara huvudalternativet för lokala« (party programme ↗)“still be the main alternative for local”
  • traffic safety shall be maintained»och trafiksäkerhet upprätthålls.« (party programme ↗)“and traffic safety is maintained.”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to promote electric cars and biogas and make it easy to do the right thing in everyday life, while unnecessary rules should be cleaned up.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to promote electric cars and biogas and make it easy to do the right thing in everyday life, while unnecessary rules should be cleaned up. Raising the weight limits for B and B96 driving licences so that heavier electric and biogas vehicles can be driven removes a regulatory obstacle to precisely the transition the plan seeks. The plan does not mention driving licence requirements, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill främja elbilar och biogas och göra det lätt att göra rätt i vardagen, samtidigt som överflödiga regler ska rensas bort. Att höja viktgränserna för B- och B96-behörighet så att tyngre el- och biogasfordon får framföras undanröjer ett regelhinder mot just den omställning planen efterfrågar. Planen nämner inte körkortsbehörigheter, varför slutsatsen härleds.

  • promote electric carsdecisive»Elbilarna ska främjas med hjälp av fler laddplatser, differentierade trängselskatter som gynnar miljöbilar och bättre parkeringsmöjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electric cars should be promoted through more charging stations, differentiated congestion charges that favour environmental vehicles and better parking opportunities.”
  • easy to do the right thing»Det ska vara lätt att göra rätt i vardagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should be easy to do the right thing in everyday life.”
  • regulatory simplification»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We should clean up unnecessary rules and bureaucracy.”
  • biogas as fuel»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying the production of biofuels and biogas.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to accelerate the electrification of the transport sector and for more to choose the electric car, and makes it the task of policy to quickly remove obstacles so that people and companies can take advantage of the new technology's opportunities.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to accelerate the electrification of the transport sector and for more to choose the electric car, and makes it the task of policy to quickly remove obstacles so that people and companies can take advantage of the new technology's opportunities. That weight limits in driving licence categories do not keep up when electric and biogas vehicles weigh more is just such an obstacle. Driving licence regulations are not addressed in the plan, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill påskynda elektrifieringen av transportsektorn och att fler väljer elbilen, och gör det till politikens uppgift att snabbt undanröja hinder så att människor och företag kan ta vara på den nya teknikens möjligheter. Att viktgränserna i körkortsbehörigheterna inte hänger med när el- och biogasfordon väger mer är just ett sådant hinder. Körkortsregler behandlas inte i planen, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • accelerated electrificationdecisive»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“The electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”
  • remove technical obstacles»Politikens uppgift måste vara att snabbt undanröja hinder för att underlätta för företag och människor att ta« (party programme ↗)“The task of policy must be to quickly remove obstacles to make it easier for companies and people to take”
  • more electric cars and biogas»Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More shall choose the electric car and an inclusion of fossil-free fuels shall continue.”
  • the car's role for mobility»Transportpolitiken måste erkänna bilens roll på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Transport policy must recognize the car's role in the countryside.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that access to a car for many is a prerequisite for being able to live and work regardless of where in the country one lives and that policy should support the use of energy-efficient vehicles and non-fossil fuels.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that access to a car for many is a prerequisite for being able to live and work regardless of where in the country one lives and that policy should support the use of energy-efficient vehicles and non-fossil fuels. To raise weight limits so that heavier electric and biogas vehicles may be driven removes an obstacle for precisely such vehicles. The zero vision however sets limits to how far it can go.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att tillgång till bil för många är en förutsättning för att kunna leva och verka oavsett var i landet man bor och att politiken bör understödja användningen av energieffektiva fordon och icke-fossila drivmedel. Att höja viktgränserna så att tyngre el- och biogasbilar får framföras undanröjer ett hinder för just sådana fordon. Nollvisionen sätter dock gränser för hur långt det kan gå.

  • the car's importancedecisive»Tillgång till bil är för många en förutsättning för att« (party programme ↗)“Access to a car is for many a prerequisite for”
  • non-fossil vehicles»användning av energieffektiva fordon och icke-fossila« (party programme ↗)“use of energy-efficient vehicles and non-fossil”
  • reduced road traffic emissions»För att minska vägtrafikens utsläpp bör politiken nationellt och på EU-nivå« (party programme ↗)“In order to reduce road traffic emissions, policy should at national and EU level”
  • zero vision in traffic»Det är viktigt med en nollvision för dödsfall och svåra« (party programme ↗)“It is important with a zero vision for deaths and serious”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan bases transport policy on electrification and on the car being usable regardless of whether it runs on petrol or electricity, and wants important road corridors to handle heavier vehicles.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan bases transport policy on electrification and on the car being usable regardless of whether it runs on petrol or electricity, and wants important road corridors to handle heavier vehicles. Raising weight limits for B and B96 driving licences so that heavier electric and biogas cars can be driven removes an obstacle precisely to that transformation and is in line with the plan's regulatory simplification approach. The plan therefore supports the demand in substance.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger transportpolitiken på elektrifiering och på att bilen ska vara användbar oavsett om den går på bensin eller el, samt vill att viktiga vägstråk klarar tyngre fordon. Att höja viktgränserna för B- och B96-behörighet så att tyngre el- och biogasbilar kan framföras undanröjer ett hinder mot just den omställningen och ligger i linje med planens regelförenklingslinje. Planen stöder därför kravet i sak.

  • electrification of transportdecisive»Vår politik syftar därför till att ställa om transportsektorn genom elektrifiering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our policy therefore aims to transform the transport sector through electrification.”
  • technology-neutral car use»Där du som behöver åka en bit för att skjutsa dina barn till fotbollsträningen eller musikskolan har råd att ta bilen, oavsett om den går på bensin eller el.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where you as someone who needs to drive a bit to take your children to football practice or music lessons can afford a car, regardless of whether it runs on petrol or electricity.”
  • adaptation to heavier vehicles»Dessutom behöver viktiga vägstråk stärkas så att de klarar tyngre lastbilar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moreover, important road corridors need to be strengthened to handle heavier lorries.”
  • regulatory simplification»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of bureaucratic red tape”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wants to make it easier and cheaper to get around by car and sees electrification as the future of motoring, but on market terms.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to make it easier and cheaper to get around by car and sees electrification as the future of motoring, but on market terms. Raising weight limits for B and B96 driving licences removes a regulatory obstacle that arises precisely because electric and biogas vehicles weigh more. This aligns with the plan's demand for rule simplification and better conditions for car commuting.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill göra det lättare och billigare att ta sig fram med bilen och ser elektrifieringen som framtiden för bilismen, men på marknadens villkor. Att höja viktgränserna för B- och B96-behörighet undanröjer ett regelhinder som uppstår just av att el- och biogasfordon väger mer. Det ligger i linje med planens krav på regelförenkling och bättre villkor för bilpendling.

  • easier motoringdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill göra det lättare och billigare att ta sig fram med bilen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to make it easier and cheaper to get around by car.”
  • electrification of motoring»Elektrifiering är framtiden för bilismen, men elektrifiering kräver å sin sida god tillgång på pålitlig, billig och miljövänlig el genom kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electrification is the future of motoring, but electrification requires in turn good access to reliable, cheap and environmentally friendly electricity through nuclear power.”
  • rule simplification»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for rule simplification and alleviate small businesses' administrative burden”
  • better conditions for car commuting»Förbättra förutsättningarna för bilpendling, framförallt på landsbygden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve conditions for car commuting, particularly in rural areas”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament