2023-05-242022/23:SkU12 · p.7SkUTaxation
Residential taxation, etc.
Property tax and tax rules for renting out housing
What's at stake: At stake is whether tax rules should change to make it more attractive to renovate and move into unused housing and to sublet part of one's home — potentially increasing housing supply in rural areas and regions with seasonal work — or whether current rules should stand while ongoing reviews continue.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The reservation wanted to lower the threshold for bringing empty rural houses back into use and make it more worthwhile to sublet part of one's home, while the committee held that ongoing reviews of housing taxation should be awaited and that the current property tax and tax rules should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing among other things to the fact that the Housing Taxation Committee's report on, among other things, private individuals letting out their own homes is still being processed within the Government Offices, and that it sees no reason to pre-empt that process or change the current property tax.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (C)
The reserving party (C) wants an inquiry into scrapping the property tax for the first five years for someone who takes over and permanently moves into a previously empty building, plus more favourable tax rules for subletting, in order to increase the housing supply in rural areas and meet the need for housing near new jobs or study places.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 192–20Ja 181–31
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/18/6 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/14 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 13/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 1/20/0/3 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/63/9 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| CRickard Nordin (C, Göteborgs kommun) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:498 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) proposals 1-4, 2022/23:909 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) proposal 31, 2022/23:910 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) proposal 8, 2022/23:1006 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) proposal 9, 2022/23:1022 by Per Söderlund et al. (SD) proposals 20-23, 2022/23:1124 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) proposal 10 and 2022/23:1249 by Malcolm Momodou Jallow et al. (V) proposal 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:498 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkandena 1-4, 2022/23:909 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 31, 2022/23:910 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkande 8, 2022/23:1006 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 9, 2022/23:1022 av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 20-23, 2022/23:1124 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 10 och 2022/23:1249 av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V) yrkande 7.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag directed a notification to the government to clarify the law on investment savings accounts. An investment savings account is a savings form that is taxed on a standardized basis, which means that the tax is not based on the actual return but on an annual tax calculated on the value of the assets in the account. The Riksdag considers that there are currently limited opportunities for savers to deposit shares subscribed in connection with an initial public offering or a new share issue directly into an investment savings account. According to current regulations, one must have one's investment savings account with the issuing institution that handles the initial public offering in order to deposit one's shares directly. If one has one's investment savings account with another party, the shares must go through a securities account into the investment savings account. With such a transfer, the shares are thus considered sold for tax purposes, meaning that any capital gains must be reported and capital losses deducted. The clarification means that holders of investment savings accounts are to be treated equally and thus be able to participate in more share issues. The notification came in connection with the Riksdag's treatment of motions submitted during the general motion period 2022. The Riksdag said no to other motions regarding enterprise, capital and property. The Riksdag considers that work is already underway in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to review lowering taxes on rural employment and business. (C) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to tax properties progressively so that luxury properties are taxed higher, and solves the housing shortage with a state-owned building company, investment support and active land policy instead of with tax cuts.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to tax properties progressively so that luxury properties are taxed higher, and solves the housing shortage with a state-owned building company, investment support and active land policy instead of with tax cuts. The counter-proposal's demand for abolished property tax and more favourable rules for subletting is a market solution that undermines the tax base for welfare. The plan's support for more homes in rural areas is not enough to carry precisely this demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill beskatta fastigheter progressivt så att lyxfastigheter taxeras högre, och löser bostadsbristen med statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd och aktiv markpolitik i stället för med skattelättnader. Motförslagets krav på slopad fastighetsavgift och förmånligare regler för andrahandsuthyrning är en marknadslösning som urholkar skattebasen för välfärden. Planens stöd för fler bostäder på landsbygden räcker inte för att bära just detta krav.
- progressive property taxdecisive»Med en progressiv fastighetsskatt skulle lyxfastigheter taxeras högre medan majoriteten av husägarna inte skulle få högre skatt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With a progressive property tax, luxury properties would be taxed higher while the majority of homeowners would not get higher taxes.”
- public housing construction»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state-owned building company, investment support for increased housing construction and an active land policy.”
- public financing support»Det behövs statligt generellt finansieringsstöd och byggande,« (party programme ↗)“Public general financing support and construction are needed,”
- homes in rural areas»Ett ökat bostadsbyggande måste också ske på landsbygden, med hyresrätter med rimliga hyror och småhus.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“An increased housing construction must also take place in rural areas, with rental apartments with reasonable rents and single-family homes.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's tax principles are broad tax bases, uniform taxation and that tax primarily shall finance welfare, which speaks against new targeted exemptions from property fees and special allowances for subletting.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's tax principles are broad tax bases, uniform taxation and that tax primarily shall finance welfare, which speaks against new targeted exemptions from property fees and special allowances for subletting. The plan's answer to housing shortage is instead social responsibility for housing supply and continued building of rental apartments ordinary people can afford. The plan is against a property tax but says nothing about abolishing the fee for individual groups. Overall the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's demands, though weakly.
Original (Swedish)
Planens skatteprinciper är breda skattebaser, likformig beskattning och att skatten främst ska finansiera välfärden, vilket talar mot nya riktade undantag från fastighetsavgift och särskilda lättnader för andrahandsuthyrning. Planens svar på bostadsbrist är i stället samhälleligt ansvar för bostadsförsörjningen och fortsatt byggande av hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med. Planen är emot en fastighetsskatt men säger inget om att avskaffa avgiften för enskilda grupper. Sammantaget talar planen mot motförslagets krav, om än svagt.
- broad tax bases, few exceptionsdecisive»breda skattebaser och att alla förvärvsinkomster och ersättningar« (party programme ↗)“broad tax bases and that all earned income and remuneration”
- housing a social right»socialdemokrater ser bostaden som en social rättighet och bostadspolitiken som en del av« (party programme ↗)“social democrats see housing as a social right and housing policy as part of”
- build cheap rental apartments»Vi ska fortsätta att bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd att bo i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall continue to build rental apartments that ordinary people can afford to live in.”
- no to property tax»Vi är emot införandet av en fastighetsskatt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are against the introduction of a property tax.”
The plan wants to make better use of the existing housing stock by facilitating move chains and creating a safer secondary rental market, which the counter-proposal's more favourable regulations for secondary letting come close to.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make better use of the existing housing stock by facilitating move chains and creating a safer secondary rental market, which the counter-proposal's more favourable regulations for secondary letting come close to. The right to housing and the demand for jobs and services across the country also support that empty buildings in rural areas are taken into permanent use. The tax technique is not stated in the plan, hence the uncertainty.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill utnyttja det befintliga bostadsbeståndet bättre genom att underlätta flyttkedjor och skapa en tryggare andrahandsmarknad, vilket motförslagets förmånligare regler för andrahandsuthyrning ligger nära. Rätten till bostad och kravet på jobb och service i hela landet stöder också att tomma byggnader på landsbygden tas i permanent bruk. Skattetekniken är inte uttalad i planen, därav osäkerheten.
- safer secondary rental marketdecisive»flyttkedjor och skapar en tryggare andrahandsmarknad.« (party programme ↗)“move chains and creates a safer secondary rental market.”
- the right to housing»Rätten till bostad är grundläggande i vårt land.« (party programme ↗)“The right to housing is fundamental in our country.”
- housing and jobs across the country»Ett fungerande samhälle bygger på välfärd, utveckling och högkvalificerade jobb i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A functioning society is built on welfare, development and highly qualified jobs across the country.”
- increased housing supply»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental housing with reasonable rents, develop and expand the investment support that made it cheaper to build and ensure that more can own their home.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the total tax burden must come down and that the party will not contribute to tax increases that make it more expensive to live, and wants to make it easier to build and live in the countryside through rule simplifications and tax reductions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the total tax burden must come down and that the party will not contribute to tax increases that make it more expensive to live, and wants to make it easier to build and live in the countryside through rule simplifications and tax reductions. Investigating eliminated property tax for one permanently taking over an empty building and more favourable rules for subtenancy increase housing supply throughout the country in that direction. The exact measures are not mentioned, so support is derived from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det totala skattetrycket ska ner och att partiet inte medverkar till skattehöjningar som gör det dyrare att bo, samt vill göra det enklare att bygga och bo på landsbygden genom regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar. Att utreda slopad fastighetsavgift för den som permanent tar över en tom byggnad och förmånligare regler för andrahandsuthyrning ökar bostadsutbudet i hela landet i den riktningen. De exakta åtgärderna nämns inte, så stödet härleds ur dessa åtaganden.
- reduced tax burden on housingdecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod. Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must come down in the next mandate period. We will not contribute to any tax increases that harm jobs, personal savings or make it more expensive to live.”
- easier to live in the countryside»Strandskyddet ska reformeras så att det blir lättare att bygga och bo på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The shoreline protection shall be reformed so that it becomes easier to build and live in the countryside.”
- rule simplification for countryside»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-hampering regulations lie like a wet blanket over parts of the countryside.”
- equivalent conditions throughout the country»Alla delar av landet ska ges likvärdiga förutsättningar för utveckling och tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“All parts of the country shall be given equivalent conditions for development and growth.”
The plan explicitly says that tax conditions for second-hand renting shall be improved, which is precisely what the counter-proposal asks for.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly says that tax conditions for second-hand renting shall be improved, which is precisely what the counter-proposal asks for. The plan furthermore wants more housing and lower thresholds into the housing market through simplified rules and incentives, which supports the aim of increasing the housing supply in rural areas. Abolished property tax for the person taking over an empty building is not identified in the plan but lies in line with the goal that more people shall own their home.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att skattevillkoren vid andrahandsuthyrning ska förbättras, vilket är precis vad motförslaget begär. Planen vill dessutom fler bostäder och lägre trösklar in på bostadsmarknaden genom förenklade regler och stimulanser, vilket stödjer syftet att öka bostadsutbudet på landsbygden. Slopad fastighetsavgift för den som tar över en tom byggnad är inte utpekad i planen men ligger i linje med målet att fler ska kunna äga sitt boende.
- better tax on second-hand rentingdecisive»Skattevillkoren vid andrahandsuthyrning ska förbättras.« (party programme ↗)“Tax conditions for second-hand renting shall be improved.”
- more housing and lower thresholds»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce an incentive to save towards the first down payment, abolish the heightened amortization requirement, shorten appeal processes and continue simplifying building rules.”
- power over own home»Att ha makt över det egna boendet är viktigt för den enskildes frihetskänsla.« (party programme ↗)“Having power over one's own home is important for the individual's sense of freedom.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan states that single-family homes and owner-occupied apartments are not primarily a capital investment and should not be taxed as if they generate running returns, and that property taxation must not conflict with the right of ownership.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that single-family homes and owner-occupied apartments are not primarily a capital investment and should not be taxed as if they generate running returns, and that property taxation must not conflict with the right of ownership. It furthermore prioritizes more homes and that it shall be possible to live and work outside the major cities. To investigate abolished property fee for one who permanently settles in an empty building and more favourable rules for secondary rental follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att småhus och bostadsrätter inte i första hand är en kapitalplacering och inte ska beskattas som om de ger löpande avkastning, och att fastighetsbeskattning inte får stå i konflikt med äganderätten. Den prioriterar dessutom fler bostäder och att det ska gå att bo och verka utanför storstäderna. Att utreda slopad fastighetsavgift för den som permanent bosätter sig i en tom byggnad och förmånligare regler för andrahandsuthyrning följer av dessa åtaganden.
- low taxation of one's own homedecisive»Småhus och bostadsrätter är i första hand inte en kapitalplacering, och ska därför inte beskattas som om huset eller bostadsrätten genererar en löpande beskattningsbar avkastning.« (party programme ↗)“Single-family homes and owner-occupied apartments are not primarily a capital investment, and should therefore not be taxed as if the house or apartment generates a running taxable return.”
- property tax shall respect ownership rights»Beskattningen av fastigheter får inte stå i konflikt« (party programme ↗)“Taxation of property must not conflict”
- increased housing supply»FLER BOSTÄDER« (2022 manifesto ↗)“MORE HOMES”
- living throughout the country»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All of Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work also outside the major cities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to lower housing taxation for those who bring an empty house into use and make second-hand letting more tax-favourable to increase housing supply.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to lower housing taxation for those who bring an empty house into use and make second-hand letting more tax-favourable to increase housing supply. The plan stands for lower tax on housing, stopped property tax and a tax increase freeze, and points to housing shortages in 207 municipalities as a growth obstacle. The measures are in line with the plan's direction, even though the property charge specifically and rental regulations are not mentioned explicitly.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill sänka boendebeskattningen för den som tar ett tomt hus i bruk och göra andrahandsuthyrning skattemässigt förmånligare för att öka bostadsutbudet. Planen står för lägre skatt på boende, stoppad fastighetsskatt och ett skattehöjarstopp, och pekar samtidigt på bostadsbrist i 207 kommuner som ett tillväxthinder. Åtgärderna ligger i linje med planens riktning, även om just fastighetsavgiften och uthyrningsreglerna inte nämns uttryckligen.
- lower housing taxationdecisive»Stoppa återinförandet av fastighetsskatten och sänkta ränteavdrag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the reintroduction of property tax and lower interest deductions”
- more housing needed»I 207 av landets 290 kommuner råder det idag bostadsbrist. En fungerande bostadsmarknad är en förutsättning för ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In 207 of the country's 290 municipalities there is today a housing shortage. A functioning housing market is a prerequisite for increased growth.”
- tax increase freeze»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax increase freeze during the coming parliamentary term that means total taxes are not raised”
- better rental terms»Möjliggöra mer rättvisa hyror genom att potentiella hyresgästers värdering av boendet ges större vikt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Enable fairer rents by giving potential tenants' valuation of the housing greater weight”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to stop plans for a reintroduced property tax, increase housing construction and facilitate financing of housing in rural areas.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to stop plans for a reintroduced property tax, increase housing construction and facilitate financing of housing in rural areas. The counter-proposal's demand to investigate abolishing property fees for someone who settles permanently in a previously vacant building and more favourable rules for subletting aligns with that direction and with the principle that policy should be conducted for all of Sweden. However, the plan does not address these specific tax rules, which is why the support is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, öka bostadsbyggandet och underlätta finansieringen av bostäder på landsbygden. Motförslagets krav på att utreda slopad fastighetsavgift för den som bosätter sig permanent i en tidigare tom byggnad och förmånligare regler för andrahandsuthyrning ligger i linje med den inriktningen och med principen att politik ska bedrivas för hela Sverige. Planen behandlar dock inte just dessa skatteregler, varför stödet är härlett.
- opposition to property taxdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill stoppa planerna på återinförd fastighetsskatt, sänka elpriserna och möjliggöra fler finansieringsformer för unga och förstagångsköpare av bostäder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to stop plans for a reintroduced property tax, lower electricity prices and enable more financing forms for young people and first-time home buyers.”
- facilitate rural living»Finansiering av bostäder på landsbygden bör underlättas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Financing of housing in rural areas should be facilitated.”
- increased housing supply»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase housing construction”
- the whole country shall thrive»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct policy for all of Sweden”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:SkU12)
- Committee report full text (HA01SkU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1006 — Långsiktigt planerande och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1015 — En konkurrenskraftig svensk sjöfart av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1022 — Sverigevänlig skatte- och indrivningspolitik för välfärd, trygghet och företagande av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1029 — Bättre villkor för buffert- och pensionssparande och en stärkt arbetslinje för äldre av Johan Hultberg (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1124 — En hållbar besöksnäring av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1245 — Ordning och reda på arbetsmarknaden av Ciczie Weidby m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1249 — Hyresrätt och allmännytta av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1364 — Näringslivets sponsring av kultur av Roland Utbult (KD)
- Motion 2022/23:1544 — Beredskapsskatt av Linus Sköld (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1643 — En hållbar digitalisering av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1672 — En levande landsbygd för Sveriges bästa av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1702 — Generationsskifte i bostadsbeståndet av Malin Danielsson (L)
- Motion 2022/23:1705 — Beredskapsskatt av Annika Strandhäll (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1709 — Politiska uppdrag i 3:12-reglerna av Peter Ollén (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1738 — Konkurrensneutralitet mellan medieföretag verksamma i Sverige av Laila Naraghi (S)
- Motion 2022/23:190 — Möjlighet till lägre reavinstskatt vid försäljning av privatbostad av Jörgen Grubb (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:2138 — Skattepolitik av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2170 — För en stark grön näringslivsutveckling av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2176 — Paket för att stärka den fria konsten av Amanda Lind (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament