2024-04-242023/24:JuU20 · p.2JuUJustice
Violation of personal integrity crimes
Higher penalties and new offence categories for repeat-abuse (fridskränkning) offences
What's at stake: The outcome affects how seriously repeated abuse and controlling behaviour in close relationships is treated under criminal law, with particular significance for women and children subjected to violence.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the sentencing ranges for aggravated violation of integrity and aggravated violation of a woman's integrity should be raised and new offence categories introduced, or whether current rules and ongoing inquiry work should be awaited.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee rejects the motions. It notes that an inquiry into contact-ban legislation, which has also addressed tougher penalties for these offences, has recently submitted its report, and that the Sentencing Reform Inquiry has been tasked with reviewing the sentencing ranges, and therefore considers it premature to legislate further at this time.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation (C) calls for raising the minimum sentence for aggravated violation of integrity and aggravated violation of a woman's integrity from one to two years' imprisonment and the maximum from six to ten years, and for introducing the offence categories of especially aggravated violation of integrity and especially aggravated violation of a woman's integrity. The reasoning is that the sentencing range should match the severity of the offences, and that without this, the most serious cases risk being classified as ordinary violent crimes rather than integrity-violation offences.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 176–23Nej 33–166
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 1/0/91/14 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/1/15/2 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/22/0/2 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| SMagdalena Andersson (S, Stockholms län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
| MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun) | No — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:500 by Lina Nordquist (L), 2023/24:2484 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) requests 37 and 38, 2023/24:2640 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) request 67, 2023/24:2664 by Janine Alm Ericson et al. (MP) request 109 and 2023/24:2669 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) request 74.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:500 av Lina Nordquist (L), 2023/24:2484 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkandena 37 och 38, 2023/24:2640 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 67, 2023/24:2664 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP) yrkande 109 och 2023/24:2669 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 74.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 140 proposals in motions on criminal law matters that were submitted during the ordinary motion period in 2023. The motions dealt with, among other things, crimes against liberty and personal integrity, sexual crimes and strengthened protection for service animals. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work in the area.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to raise the penalty scale for serious assault crimes and introduce new categories for exceptionally serious assault crimes. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that certain penalties may need to be increased and demands penalties that ensure crimes against women and children are prioritized by law enforcement authorities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that certain penalties may need to be increased and demands penalties that ensure crimes against women and children are prioritized by law enforcement authorities. Increased minimum penalties and new serious categories for offences against bodily integrity are precisely such a marking of the seriousness of these crimes. The plan also supports the law on violence against women. The demand therefore lies in the direction of the plan, even though the emphasis otherwise lies on preventive work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger att vissa straff kan behöva höjas och kräver straff som gör att brott mot kvinnor och barn prioriteras av rättsvårdande instanser. Höjda minimistraff och nya grova rubriceringar för fridskränkningsbrotten är just en sådan markering av brottens allvar. Planen står också bakom lagen om kvinnofridskränkning. Kravet ligger därför i planens riktning, även om tyngdpunkten i övrigt ligger på förebyggande arbete.
- penalties that prioritize violence against women offencesdecisive»För det behövs det fler poliser, ökad kunskap inom rättsväsendet om samtycke och om våld mot kvinnor och barn, och straff som gör att brotten prioriteras av rättsvårdande instanser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For that, more police is needed, increased knowledge within the justice system about consent and about violence against women and children, and penalties that ensure crimes are prioritized by law enforcement authorities.”
- certain penalties can be increased»Vissa straff kan behöva höjas men mycket mer fokus måste riktas mot att förhindra rekryteringen av nya barn till gängkriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Certain penalties may need to be increased but much more focus must be directed at preventing the recruitment of new children into gang crime.”
- defends the legislation on violence against women»Vi står bakom och försvarar lagen som förbjuder köp av sexuella tjänster och lagen om kvinnofridskränkning.« (party programme ↗)“We support and defend the law prohibiting the purchase of sexual services and the law on violence against women.”
- violence is structural»Mäns våld mot kvinnor är ett strukturellt samhällsproblem.« (party programme ↗)“Men's violence against women is a structural societal problem.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises to continue the direction that has increased penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships, and to increase penalties generally for serious crimes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to continue the direction that has increased penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships, and to increase penalties generally for serious crimes. Increased minimum and maximum penalties for serious violation of personal peace and serious violation of women's personal peace, as well as new aggravated criminal classifications, are precisely such an increase. Strong action against male violence against women points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att fortsätta den riktning som skärpt straffen för våld och andra kränkningar i nära relationer, och att skärpa straffen generellt för allvarlig brottslighet. Höjda minimi- och maximistraff för grov fridskränkning och grov kvinnofridskränkning samt nya synnerligen grova brottsrubriceringar är precis en sådan skärpning. Krafttagen mot mäns våld mot kvinnor pekar åt samma håll.
- increased penalties in intimate relationshipsdecisive»Vi vill fort sätta den politiska riktning som skärpt straffen för våld och andra kränkningar i nära relationer, och som ökat resurserna till kvinno- och tjejjourernas viktiga arbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue the political direction that has increased penalties for violence and other violations in intimate relationships, and that has increased resources for women's and girls' support centers' important work.”
- increased penalties»Skärpa straffen för att hålla de kriminella borta från gatorna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase penalties to keep criminals off the streets.”
- strong action against male violence»Krafttag för att stoppa hedersrelaterat våld, sexualbrott och mäns våld mot kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strong action to stop honor-related violence, sexual crimes, and male violence against women.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that it is the perpetrator's freedom that should be limited and wants to provide stronger protection for women subjected to violence and electronically monitor more perpetrators of violence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that it is the perpetrator's freedom that should be limited and wants to provide stronger protection for women subjected to violence and electronically monitor more perpetrators of violence. The plan does not state a position on sentence lengths, but its line of placing the victim's vulnerability at the center and limiting the perpetrator points toward tougher sentences for gross assault of women. The party programme's emphasis on the deterrent purpose of penalties pulls in the other direction, which is why the confidence is low.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att det är förövarens frihet som ska begränsas och vill ge våldsutsatta kvinnor starkare skydd och fler våldsutövare fotboja. Planen uttalar sig inte om straffskalor, men dess linje att sätta brottsoffrets utsatthet i centrum och begränsa förövaren pekar mot skärpta straff för grov kvinnofridskränkning. Partiprogrammets betoning av påföljdens förebyggande syfte drar åt andra hållet, varför säkerheten är låg.
- the perpetrator's freedom should be limiteddecisive»Ingen ska begränsas av hedersförtryck och våld, det är förövarens frihet som ska begränsas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No one should be limited by honour-based oppression and violence; it is the perpetrator's freedom that should be limited.”
- toughened measures against perpetrators of violence»att våldsutsatta kvinnor som tvingas gömma sig ska få starkare skydd och att fler som utövar våld ska få fotboja.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that women subjected to violence who are forced to hide shall receive stronger protection and that more perpetrators of violence shall receive electronic monitoring.”
- the crime victim at the center»brottsoffret och dennes utsatthet i centrum.« (party programme ↗)“the victim of crime and their vulnerability at the center.”
- the deterrent purpose of penalties»Brottspåföljder har både ett brottsförebyggande« (party programme ↗)“Criminal sanctions have both a crime-preventative”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly demands increased sentences for serious violation of personal safety and serious violation of women's safety, based on the premise that men who beat women should not escape.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands increased sentences for serious violation of personal safety and serious violation of women's safety, based on the premise that men who beat women should not escape. The counter-proposal's increased minimum and maximum sentences and new, more serious crime classifications are precisely the sentence enhancement the plan promises. The plan links this to the goal of leading Sweden towards an end to men's violence against women and to a strengthened victim-of-crime perspective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen höjda straff för grov fridskränkning och grov kvinnofridskränkning, med utgångspunkten att män som slår inte ska komma undan. Motförslagets höjda minimi- och maximistraff och nya, grövre brottsrubriceringar är just den straffskärpning planen utlovar. Planen kopplar det till målet att leda Sverige mot ett slut på mäns våld mot kvinnor och till ett stärkt brottsofferperspektiv.
- increased sentences for violation of personal safetydecisive»Män som slår ska inte komma undan. Vi vill höja straffen för sexualbrott, grov fridskränkning och grov kvinnofridskränkning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Men who beat women should not escape. We want to increase sentences for sexual offences, serious violation of personal safety, and serious violation of women's safety.”
- end to men's violence against women»Vi ska leda Sverige mot ett slut på mäns våld mot kvinnor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall lead Sweden towards an end to men's violence against women.”
- strengthened victim-of-crime perspective»Brottsofferperspektivet måste stärkas. Den som utsatts för brott ska få upprättelse och bättre stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The victim-of-crime perspective must be strengthened. Those who have been subjected to crime shall receive redress and better support.”
The party programme requires that the penalty system be changed so that repeated crime results in stricter sentences and opens for toughened sentencing to mark the seriousness of the violation, which is the very construction behind invasion-of-privacy offences.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that the penalty system be changed so that repeated crime results in stricter sentences and opens for toughened sentencing to mark the seriousness of the violation, which is the very construction behind invasion-of-privacy offences. The election manifesto also wants higher sentences for violence against women and toughened sentences for serious crimes generally. The counter-proposal's increased sentence scales and new most serious category follow from this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att påföljdssystemet ändras så att upprepad brottslighet ger strängare straff och öppnar för skärpta straffsatser för att markera allvaret i kränkningen, vilket är själva konstruktionen bakom fridskränkningsbrotten. Valmanifestet vill dessutom ha högre straff för våld mot kvinnor och skärpta straff för grova brott generellt. Motförslagets höjda straffskalor och nya svåraste grad följer av detta.
- stricter sentences for repeated crimedecisive»Påföljdssystemet ska förändras så att återfall och upprepad brottslighet ger strängare straff, liksom« (party programme ↗)“The penalty system shall be changed so that repeat offences and repeated crime result in stricter sentences, as well as”
- higher sentences for violence against women»Vi vill se en ökad handlingskraft mot sexuellt våld och våld mot kvinnor genom bland annat högre straff för sexualbrott och ett bättre skydd och stöd för offren.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see increased forceful action against sexual violence and violence against women through, among other things, higher sentences for sexual offences and better protection and support for victims.”
- mark the seriousness of the offence»befogat att skärpa straffsatserna för att underlätta rehabilitering eller markera allvaret i den« (party programme ↗)“it is justified to increase sentencing to facilitate rehabilitation or mark the seriousness of the”
- toughened sentences for serious crimes»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to abolish today's quantity discount on crimes, abolish the near-automatic release from prison sentences and toughen sentences for, among other things, weapons crimes, rape and extortion.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto consistently drives through hefty sentence increases and specifies concrete minimum sentences, including at least five years imprisonment for weapon crime.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto consistently drives through hefty sentence increases and specifies concrete minimum sentences, including at least five years imprisonment for weapon crime. The party programme establishes that violence from a close person can never be accepted and that legislation must mark violence against women as a serious crime. Increased minimum sentences and new, graver criminal offences for violation of integrity directly address that.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet driver genomgående kraftiga straffskärpningar och anger konkreta minimistraff, bland annat lägst fem års fängelse för vapenbrott. Partiprogrammet slår fast att våld från en närstående aldrig kan accepteras och att lagstiftningen måste markera våld mot kvinnor som ett allvarligt brott. Höjda minimistraff och nya, grövre brottsrubriceringar för fridskränkning svarar direkt mot det.
- hefty sentence increasesdecisive»Skärp straffen för sexualbrott kraftigt. 25 års fängelse för grov våldtäkt, kemisk kastrering som villkor för villkorlig frigivning och livstids fängelse för grov våldtäkt mot barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten sentences for sexual crime dramatically. 25 years imprisonment for severe rape, chemical castration as condition for conditional release and life imprisonment for severe rape of child.”
- mark close-person violence's seriousness»våld från en närstående eller för annan form av övergrepp och våld« (party programme ↗)“violence from a close person or for other forms of assault and violence”
- increased minimum sentences»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten sentence for weapon crime to at least five years imprisonment.”
- general prevention through punishment»Ett effektivt tillrättaförande av brottsförövare bör dessutom ha inslag av såväl allmänprevention som individualprevention.« (party programme ↗)“Effective sanctioning of offenders should moreover have elements of both general and individual prevention.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto names serious violence against women and promises to increase penalties for precisely this crime as well as to make it easier to detain the offender.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto names serious violence against women and promises to increase penalties for precisely this crime as well as to make it easier to detain the offender. That is exactly what the counter-proposal requires: increased minimum and maximum sentences and new, more serious crime classifications. The plan moreover promises generally increased penalties for violent crimes and a new penal code with a focus on crime victims. The plan therefore supports the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet nämner grov kvinnofridskränkning vid namn och lovar att skärpa straffen för just detta brott samt att göra det lättare att häkta våldsutövaren. Det är precis vad motförslaget kräver: höjda minimi- och maximistraff och nya, grövre brottsrubriceringar. Planen lovar dessutom generellt skärpta straff för våldsbrott och en ny brottsbalk med brottsofferfokus. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- increased penalties for violence against womendecisive»Moderaterna vill skärpa straffen för detta brott och göra det lättare att häkta våldsutövaren så att en våldsam partner omedelbart kan sättas bakom lås och bom i avvaktan på att brottet utreds.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to increase penalties for this crime and make it easier to detain the perpetrator of violence so that a violent partner can be immediately locked up pending investigation of the crime.”
- increased penalties for violent crimes»Skärpa straffen för vålds- och sexualbrott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase penalties for violent and sexual crimes”
- easier detention in intimate partner violence»Sänka gränsen för obligatorisk häktning så att den gäller misstänkta för brott med ett straffvärde på minst ett års fängelse, inte två års fängelse som idag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the threshold for mandatory detention so it applies to suspected perpetrators of crimes with a penalty value of at least one year's imprisonment, not two years as today”
- new penal code focusing on crime victims»Införa en ny brottsbalk för att skifta fokus från gärningsmannen till brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a new penal code to shift focus from the perpetrator to the crime victim”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires significantly increased penalties for serious crimes against the person and that penalties should be proportional and provide restitution for the victim.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires significantly increased penalties for serious crimes against the person and that penalties should be proportional and provide restitution for the victim. The counter-proposal's requirement for increased minimum and maximum penalties for serious personal assault and serious assault on women as well as a new categorization for the most serious cases is precisely the increase the plan requires. The plan also shows that it is prepared to introduce new crime categorizations.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver kraftigt höjda straff vid allvarliga brott mot person och att straffen ska vara proportionerliga och ge brottsoffret upprättelse. Motförslagets krav på höjda minimi- och maximistraff för grov fridskränkning och grov kvinnofridskränkning samt en ny rubricering för de allvarligaste fallen är precis den skärpning planen kräver. Planen visar också att den är beredd att införa nya brottsrubriceringar.
- significantly increased penaltiesdecisive»Kraftigt höja straffen samt avskaffa mängdrabatten vid allvarliga brott mot person« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase penalties and abolish the quantity discount for serious crimes against the person”
- proportional penalties and incapacitation»Straff ska inte bara ses som en rehabiliterande åtgärd, utan genom att stå i proportion till gärningen ge upprättelse åt brottsoffer och genom inkapacitering hindra att farliga kriminella kan begå nya brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Punishment should not only be seen as a rehabilitative measure, but by standing in proportion to the crime provide restitution to victims and through incapacitation prevent dangerous criminals from committing new crimes.”
- proportional penalties»Införa straff som är proportionerliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce penalties that are proportional”
- new crime categorizations»Införa ett särskilt hedersbrott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a specific honor crime”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:JuU20)
- Committee report full text (HB01JuU20)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1013 — Psykisk misshandel som ny brottsrubricering av Aylin Nouri (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1060 — Kriminalisering av sexköp utomlands av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1134 — Översyn av lagen om hets mot folkgrupp av Jan Ericson och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1162 — Automatiskt livstidsstraff för dråp och mord på polis av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1185 — Sexualbrottslagen till skydd för barnet av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1196 — Slopad preskriptionstid för våldsbrott mot barn av Ola Möller (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1212 — Barnens rätt av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1278 — Skydd för barn mot kriminella gäng av Noria Manouchi (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1329 — Koranbränning av Jamal El-Haj (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1333 — Möjligheter att förbjuda bränning av religiösa skrifter utan att inskränka på yttrandefriheten av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1405 — Strängare straff för gromning av Katarina Tolgfors och Marie Nicholson (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1413 — Rättsstatus för djur i tjänst av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1420 — Översyn av straffskalan för upprepad brottslighet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1428 — Juridiskt skydd av förtroendevalda för att säkra demokratin av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1450 — Stärkt skydd för polisen av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1463 — Proportionella bötesbelopp av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1464 — Civilkuragelag av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1465 — Hot mot och ansvar som förtroendevalda av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:154 — Stärkt skydd mot sexuell exploatering av unga av Erik Hellsborn (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1544 — Mängdrabatt av Mattias Ottosson m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament