2026-03-112025/26:FöU9 · p.4FöUDefence

Rescue service tasks and capacity

The tasks and capacity of the rescue services

What's at stake: The capacity of the rescue services currently varies between cities and rural areas, and the decision affects how quickly help can reach those affected, how the rescue services are equipped for crisis and war, and how much is invested in recruitment, training, and new technology such as drones.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether responsibility for the rescue services should be changed, including a clearer proximity principle and more resources for municipalities, or whether the current division of responsibility and efforts through MCF should remain unchanged.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee sees no reason to change the statutory division of responsibility for the rescue services, emphasizes that municipal rescue services should be equally effective, efficient, and safe throughout the country, and points to MCF's work and the government's reorganization as support for this, and therefore rejects the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 6 (C)

The reservation wants a proximity principle, rather than administrative borders, to determine which rescue service is dispatched, wants the government to take greater responsibility for giving municipalities the tools and more trained firefighters they need, especially in rural areas, and wants the bureaucracy around the rescue services' use of drones reduced.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/18/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SNoAbstain 0/0/89/17departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 56/0/0/12departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoYes 62/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:614 by Marie Olsson and Lena Bäckelin (both S), 2025/26:2822 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) amendments 36, 39, 40 and 58, 2025/26:3185 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) amendment 43, 2025/26:3405 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) amendments 58 and 59 as well as 2025/26:3556 by Peter Hultqvist et al. (S) amendment 86.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:614 av Marie Olsson och Lena Bäckelin (båda S), 2025/26:2822 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 36, 39, 40 och 58, 2025/26:3185 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 43, 2025/26:3405 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 58 och 59 samt 2025/26:3556 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 86.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 73 proposals in motions from the ordinary motion period 2025. The proposals address, among other things, emergency preparedness, the rescue service, water supply, climate adaptation as well as information and cyber security. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to already taken measures and ongoing work.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's core commitment is that welfare and public services shall function everywhere and that the state must take greater responsibility for the building in less densely populated parts of the country.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's core commitment is that welfare and public services shall function everywhere and that the state must take greater responsibility for the building in less densely populated parts of the country. The counter-proposal's demands for a proximity principle, more firefighters in rural areas and greater state responsibility follow from this. The plan says nothing about the legally regulated distribution of responsibility as such.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande är att välfärd och samhällsservice ska fungera överallt och att staten måste ta ett större ansvar för uppbyggnaden i glesare delar av landet. Motförslagets krav på närhetsprincip, fler brandmän på landsbygden och större statligt ansvar följer av det. Planen säger inget om den lagreglerade ansvarsfördelningen som sådan.

  • welfare throughout the countrydecisive»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be there for everyone and exist everywhere.”
  • equitable services everywhere»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, care and other services need to function everywhere.”
  • state responsibility in rural areas»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fibre is going far too slowly, the state needs to step in and take greater responsibility for the expansion.”
  • robust crisis preparedness»Vi vill se ett robust samhälle som är byggt för att klara olika« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a robust society that is built to handle different”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan requires greater state responsibility for equal conditions and good public services throughout the country, and the election manifesto binds the party to continuing to strengthen civil defence and crisis preparedness.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires greater state responsibility for equal conditions and good public services throughout the country, and the election manifesto binds the party to continuing to strengthen civil defence and crisis preparedness. The counter-proposal's requirements for the proximity principle, state support for municipalities' tools and more firefighters in rural areas align with this. The plan provides no support that the current delimitation in itself is sufficient.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver ett större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar och god samhällsservice i hela landet, och valmanifestet binder partiet vid att fortsätta förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen. Motförslagets krav på närhetsprincip, statligt stöd till kommunernas verktyg och fler brandmän på landsbygden ligger i linje med detta. Planen ger inget stöd för att den nuvarande gränsdragningen i sig är tillräcklig.

  • state responsibility for equalitydecisive»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equal conditions in all of Sweden.”
  • strengthened civil defence»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work to strengthen civil defence and crisis preparedness must continue”
  • public services throughout the country»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to public services throughout the country.”
  • state presence throughout the country»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto wants to allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence and increase allocations to crisis preparedness, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for greater state responsibility and more trained firefighters in rural areas.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence and increase allocations to crisis preparedness, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement for greater state responsibility and more trained firefighters in rural areas. The party programme moreover requires that public service shall exist in all areas regardless of where one lives. The fire service's organization is not explicitly addressed, so the position is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret och öka anslagen till krisberedskap, vilket bär motförslagets krav på större statligt ansvar och fler utbildade brandmän på landsbygden. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom att samhällsservice ska finnas i alla områden oavsett var man bor. Räddningstjänstens organisation berörs inte uttryckligen, så ställningstagandet är härlett.

  • strengthened civil defencedecisive»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence, and increase allocations to crisis preparedness”
  • public service throughout the country»samhället ska säkerställa att samhällsservice ska finnas« (party programme ↗)“society shall ensure that public service shall exist”
  • preparedness for extreme weather»investera i klimatanpassning för att möta effekterna av klimatförändringarna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in climate adaptation to meet the effects of climate change”
  • equivalent security throughout the country»du bor ska du kunna lita på att samhället finns där, med service, trygghet och« (party programme ↗)“you live shall you be able to trust that society is there, with service, security and”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The election manifesto promises that public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country and that civil defence and society's preparedness shall be strengthened.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto promises that public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country and that civil defence and society's preparedness shall be strengthened. The party simultaneously wants to clear away redundant regulations and bureaucracy in the countryside and make decisions as close to those affected as possible. A proximity principle ahead of administrative boundaries, more trained firefighters in the countryside and less drone bureaucracy follow directly from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet lovar att offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet och att civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap ska rustas. Partiet vill samtidigt rensa bort överflödiga regler och byråkrati på landsbygden och fatta beslut så nära de berörda som möjligt. En närhetsprincip framför administrativa gränser, fler utbildade brandmän på landsbygden och mindre drönarbyråkrati följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.

  • close public service throughout the countrydecisive»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public service shall be close and reliable throughout the country.”
  • reduced regulatory red tape in the countryside»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We will clear away redundant regulations and bureaucracy.”
  • strengthened civil preparedness»Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
  • decisions near those affected»beslut i första hand ska fattas av människor själva, eller så nära den enskilda människan som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“decisions should primarily be made by people themselves, or as close to the individual as possible”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not directly address rescue services' organization, but requires that civil defence is strengthened at the same pace as the military and that state presence and service shall exist in all parts of the country.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not directly address rescue services' organization, but requires that civil defence is strengthened at the same pace as the military and that state presence and service shall exist in all parts of the country. The counter-proposal's demands on nearness principle, state responsibility for tools and more firefighters in rural areas follow that line. The conclusion is derived from nearby principles and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte räddningstjänstens organisation direkt, men kräver att det civila försvaret stärks i samma takt som det militära och att statlig närvaro och service ska finnas i alla delar av landet. Motförslagets krav på närhetsprincip, statligt ansvar för verktygen och fler brandmän på landsbygden följer den linjen. Slutsatsen är härledd ur närliggande principer och osäker.

  • strengthened civil defencedecisive»det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära« (2022 manifesto ↗)“civil defence is strengthened at the same pace as the military”
  • state presence across the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state authorities shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
  • state service everywhere»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state service shall be secured across the country.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's core commitment is that the whole country should function and that state services should be available throughout the country, with security and social services close to those living outside the major cities.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's core commitment is that the whole country should function and that state services should be available throughout the country, with security and social services close to those living outside the major cities. The subsidiarity principle is also a support principle: when the municipal level is not sufficient, the higher level should take responsibility. A proximity principle in alarm handling and greater state responsibility for municipalities' tools align with this.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande är att hela Sverige ska fungera och att statlig service ska vara tillgänglig i hela landet, med trygghet och samhällsservice nära den som bor utanför storstäderna. Subsidiaritetsprincipen är också en stödprincip: när den kommunala nivån inte räcker till ska den högre nivån ta ansvar. En närhetsprincip vid utlarmning och ett större statligt ansvar för kommunernas verktyg ligger i linje med detta.

  • the whole country should functiondecisive»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The whole country should function and it should be possible to live and work also outside the major cities.”
  • state services across the country»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, the state is responsible for state services being available throughout Sweden.”
  • subsidiarity as support principle»är subsidiaritetsprincipen också en stödprincip« (party programme ↗)“is the subsidiarity principle also a support principle”
  • readiness for disasters»delta i hanteringen av katastrofer och andra svåra påfrestningar i samhället« (party programme ↗)“participate in managing disasters and other serious strains on society”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that civil defence is crucial also in peacetime crises and commits to long-term planning and strengthened personnel provision.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that civil defence is crucial also in peacetime crises and commits to long-term planning and strengthened personnel provision. The counter-proposal's requirement for more trained firefighters, better state support for municipalities' tools and less bureaucracy around drones is consistent with this and with the requirement that public services must function regardless of where you live. The subsidiarity principle as such is not addressed, which is why the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det civila försvaret är avgörande också i fredstida kris och åtar sig långsiktig planering och förstärkt personalförsörjning. Motförslagets krav på fler utbildade brandmän, bättre statligt stöd till kommunernas verktyg och mindre byråkrati kring drönare ligger i linje med detta och med kravet att samhällsservicen ska fungera oavsett var man bor. Närhetsprincipen som sådan berörs inte, varför slutsatsen härleds.

  • civil defence crucialdecisive»Fungerar inte det civila försvaret så kan inte heller det militära försvaret lösa sina uppgifter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If civil defence does not function, neither can military defence perform its tasks.”
  • strengthened personnel provision»• Förstärka det civila försvarets personalförsörjning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Strengthen civil defence's personnel provision”
  • long-term preparedness planning»• Säkra en långsiktig planering för det civila försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Secure long-term planning for civil defence”
  • public services throughout the country»Mobiltäckning överallt ska vara en självklarhet, liksom vetskapen om att polisen kommer när du ringer oavsett var du bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mobile coverage everywhere must be taken for granted, as must the knowledge that the police come when you call regardless of where you live.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's central commitment is strengthened operational crisis-management capability in authorities, regions and municipalities and increased allocations to civil defence and preparedness, which is precisely what the counter-proposal calls for in the form of greater state responsibility and more firefighters in rural areas.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's central commitment is strengthened operational crisis-management capability in authorities, regions and municipalities and increased allocations to civil defence and preparedness, which is precisely what the counter-proposal calls for in the form of greater state responsibility and more firefighters in rural areas. The plan also wants society's services to function across the whole country and bureaucracy to be minimised, which supports both the proximity principle and simpler rules for drones. The plan does not however address the rescue service's division of responsibility in detail.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande är en stärkt operativ krisledningsförmåga i myndigheter, regioner och kommuner och ökade anslag till civilförsvar och beredskap, vilket är just vad motförslaget efterfrågar i form av större statligt ansvar och fler brandmän på landsbygden. Planen vill dessutom att samhällsservicen ska fungera i hela landet och att byråkratin minimeras, vilket stöder både närhetsprincipen och enklare regler för drönare. Planen behandlar dock inte räddningstjänstens ansvarsfördelning i detalj.

  • strengthened crisis-management capabilitydecisive»Den operativa krisledningsförmågan behöver stärkas på Regeringskansliet och vid landets myndigheter, regioner och kommuner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Operational crisis-management capability needs to be strengthened at the Government Offices and at the country's authorities, regions and municipalities.”
  • increased preparedness allocations»Anslagen till de myndigheter som har övergripande ansvar för civilförsvar, krisledning och beredskap bör öka« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Allocations to the authorities that have overarching responsibility for civil defence, crisis management and preparedness should increase”
  • public services across the whole country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for the whole of Sweden”
  • minimised bureaucracy»minimum av byråkrati skall genomsyra all offentlig verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“minimum of bureaucracy shall permeate all public activities”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament