2026-02-252025/26:TU9 · p.2TUTransport & infrastructure
Access to Fossil-Free Refueling
Access to fossil-free refuelling and charging
What's at stake: The decision affects how quickly the infrastructure for renewable fuels and charging is built out across the country, which determines how easy it becomes to shift the vehicle fleet to fossil-free options, not least outside the major cities.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether today's requirements under the fuel-pump law and the EU rules on alternative fuels are enough to secure access to fossil-free refuelling across the country, or whether the Riksdag should demand a national plan for building out refuelling stations for, for example, biogas.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee recalls the fuel-pump law's requirement to provide renewable fuels and the EU's AFIR regulation, and notes that Sweden already covers 97 percent of the TEN-T road network with charging stations. The committee stresses that future measures should deliver climate benefits and that a broader analysis of requirements for renewable and fossil-free fuels is already under way, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (MP)
The reservation (MP) calls for drawing up a national plan for refuelling stations for fuels such as biogas, and for building out the infrastructure for renewable fuels alongside charging infrastructure, in order to speed up the replacement of the fossil-fuelled vehicle fleet.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 246–17Ja 154–109
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:2780 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) claim 15, 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) claim 125 and 2025/26:3728 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) claims 85 in this part, 92 and 93.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:2780 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 15, 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 125 och 2025/26:3728 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 85 i denna del, 92 och 93.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 120 proposals on road traffic and vehicle issues from the regular motion period 2025. The proposals address, among other things, work for a fossil-free vehicle fleet, access to fossil-free refueling, charging infrastructure for electric vehicles, and the organization of road maintenance and winter road maintenance. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to planned or already taken measures and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to establish an end date for fossil fuel vehicle sales and introduce incentives for transitioning to fossil-free transport. (MP) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that the road network both needs to be electrified and supplemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels for passenger and freight transport to become sustainable.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the road network both needs to be electrified and supplemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels for passenger and freight transport to become sustainable. A national plan for refueling stations for, for example, biogas parallel to charging infrastructure is precisely that requirement. The plan also places responsibility for cheap climate-smart alternatives on policy, and wants the state to increase its control over transition infrastructure.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att vägnätet både behöver elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel för att person- och godstransporter ska bli hållbara. En nationell plan för tankställen för exempelvis biogas parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen är precis det kravet. Planen lägger dessutom ansvaret för att billiga klimatsmarta alternativ finns på politiken och vill att staten ökar sin kontroll över omställningens infrastruktur.
- infrastructure for sustainable fuelsdecisive»För att göra såväl person- som godstransporter hållbara behöver vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To make both passenger and freight transport sustainable, the road network must both be electrified and supplemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels.”
- state responsibility for infrastructure»Staten måste öka sin kontroll över infrastruktur och resurser som behövs för att genomföra klimatomställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state must increase its control over infrastructure and resources needed to carry out the climate transition.”
- policy's responsibility for alternatives»Det är politikens, och inte individens, ansvar att skapa möjligheter för människor att välja enkla och billiga klimatsmarta alternativ.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the responsibility of policy, not the individual, to create opportunities for people to choose easy and cheap climate-smart alternatives.”
- coherent transport strategy»en sammanhållen strategi för elektrifiering av transporterna, där stadsplanering, kollektivtrafik och elfordon alla har viktiga roller att spela.« (party programme ↗)“a coherent strategy for electrification of transport, where urban planning, public transport, and electric vehicles all have important roles to play.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto promises to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels so it becomes easier to fuel up fossil-free, and the party programme requires an end to dependence on fossil fuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels so it becomes easier to fuel up fossil-free, and the party programme requires an end to dependence on fossil fuels. The counter-proposal's requirement for a national plan for filling stations and for infrastructure for renewable fuels to be built out in parallel with charging infrastructure is precisely that commitment translated into action. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt, och partiprogrammet kräver ett stopp för beroendet av fossila bränslen. Motförslagets krav på en nationell plan för tankställen och på att infrastrukturen för förnybara drivmedel byggs ut parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen är precis det åtagandet omsatt i handling. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- renewable fuelsdecisive»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so it becomes easier to fuel up fossil-free in Sweden.”
- break fossil dependence»Stopp för svenskt beroende av fossila bränslen från andra länder.« (party programme ↗)“End to Swedish dependence on fossil fuels from other countries.”
- expanded charging infrastructure»Vi vill dubbla antalet laddstolpar till 2030 för att underlätta för den som har elbil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the number of charging stations by 2030 to make it easier for electric car owners.”
- transport transition»Skyndsam och rättvis klimatomställning för att göra produktion, transporter och« (party programme ↗)“Swift and just climate transition to make production, transport and”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan asserts that the state shall take responsibility for refuelling and charging throughout the country where the market does not suffice, and that biofuels play an important role in reducing emissions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan asserts that the state shall take responsibility for refuelling and charging throughout the country where the market does not suffice, and that biofuels play an important role in reducing emissions. A national plan for refuelling for, among other things, biogas in parallel with charging infrastructure is precisely this state responsibility put into action. The goal of a fossil-free vehicle fleet requires that both infrastructures exist throughout the country.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att staten ska ta ansvar för tankning och laddning i hela landet där marknaden inte räcker till, och att biodrivmedel spelar en viktig roll för att minska utsläppen. En nationell plan för tankställen för bland annat biogas parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen är just detta statliga ansvar omsatt i handling. Målet att fordonsflottan blir fossilfri kräver att båda infrastrukturerna finns i hela landet.
- state responsibility for fuel infrastructuredecisive»investera i laddning i hela landet — staten ska ta ansvar där marknaden inte räcker till« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in charging throughout the country — the state shall take responsibility where the market does not suffice”
- biofuels needed in the transition»Samtidigt kommer biodrivmedel att spela en viktig roll för att minska utsläppen.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, biofuels will play an important role in reducing emissions.”
- expanded infrastructure throughout the country»riktat stöd och en utbyggd laddinfrastruktur i hela landet« (party programme ↗)“targeted support and expanded charging infrastructure throughout the country”
- fossil-free vehicle fleet»att den som behöver bil ska ha råd med ett klimatsmart alternativ, och att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those who need a car shall be able to afford a climate-smart alternative, and that only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025.”
The election manifesto promises to multiply biofuel and biogas production, and the party programme states that the transition requires investment in infrastructure for functioning access to various renewable fuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises to multiply biofuel and biogas production, and the party programme states that the transition requires investment in infrastructure for functioning access to various renewable fuels. The counter-proposal's national plan for refuelling stations for, among other things, biogas, parallel with charging infrastructure, is precisely this commitment. The plan also requires plenty of charging points throughout the country, so both tracks at the same time.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas, och partiprogrammet slår fast att omställningen kräver investeringar i infrastruktur för en fungerande tillgång till olika förnybara drivmedel. Motförslagets nationella plan för tankställen för bland annat biogas, parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen, är precis detta åtagande. Planen kräver dessutom gott om laddplatser i hela landet, alltså båda spåren samtidigt.
- multiplied biogas productiondecisive»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying biofuel and biogas production.”
- infrastructure for renewable fuels»Det innebär också ett behov av investeringar i infrastruktur för en fungerande tillgång till olika förnybara« (party programme ↗)“This also requires investment in infrastructure for functioning access to various renewable”
- expanded charging infrastructure»Det ska finnas gott om laddplatser längs våra vägar och på våra parkeringar i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There should be plenty of charging points along our roads and in our car parks throughout the country.”
- promote biofuels»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cut tax to the maximum on biofuels blended into petrol and diesel.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that the content of fossil-free fuels shall continue and that we need charging stations where we live, work and travel, and the party programme counts biogas among the renewable energy sources that have large expansion potential.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that the content of fossil-free fuels shall continue and that we need charging stations where we live, work and travel, and the party programme counts biogas among the renewable energy sources that have large expansion potential. That speaks for building out tank infrastructure for renewable fuels in parallel with charging infrastructure. The plan prioritizes electrification and technology-neutral policy instruments before targeted plans, which makes the support weak.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att inblandningen av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta och att det behövs laddstolpar där vi bor, arbetar och reser, och partiprogrammet räknar biogas till de förnybara energislag som har stor utbyggnadspotential. Det talar för att tankinfrastruktur för förnybara drivmedel byggs ut parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen. Planen prioriterar dock elektrifiering och teknikneutrala styrmedel framför riktade planer, vilket gör stödet svagt.
- expanded tank and charging infrastructuredecisive»Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta. Det behövs laddstolpar där vi bor, arbetar och reser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More shall choose electric cars and a content of fossil-free fuels shall continue. There are needed charging stations where we live, work and travel.”
- biogas as renewable energy source»Det finns en stor potential att fortsätta bygga ut förnybara energislag, bland annat vindkraft, solenergi, biogas och vågkraft.« (party programme ↗)“There is large potential to continue building out renewable energy sources, including wind power, solar energy, biogas and wave power.”
- accelerated electrification»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”
- technology-neutral policy instruments»Generella och teknikneutrala ekonomiska styrmedel, såsom koldioxidskatt och breda system för handel med utsläppsrätter, är det mest effektiva redskapet.« (party programme ↗)“General and technology-neutral economic policy instruments, such as carbon tax and broad systems for emissions trading, are the most effective tool.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme requires that fossil fuels be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors and that policy supports and accelerates the use of non-fossil fuels, with domestic production to be stimulated.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that fossil fuels be phased out from both the energy and transport sectors and that policy supports and accelerates the use of non-fossil fuels, with domestic production to be stimulated. A national plan for refueling stations for, for example, biogas, built in parallel with charging infrastructure, is just such an accelerating measure, and the state has according to the plan responsibility for the investment level in infrastructure. The counter-proposal's demand is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att fossilbränslena fasas ut från både energi- och transportsektorn och att politiken understödjer och påskyndar användningen av icke-fossila drivmedel, med inhemsk produktion som ska stimuleras. En nationell plan för tankställen för till exempel biogas, byggd parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen, är just en sådan påskyndande åtgärd, och staten har enligt planen ansvar för infrastrukturens investeringsnivå. Motförslagets krav stöds.
- phase-out of fossil fuelsdecisive»Fossilbränslena måste fasas ut från såväl energi- som transportsektorn.« (party programme ↗)“Fossil fuels must be phased out from both energy and transport sectors.”
- accelerate non-fossil fuels»För att minska vägtrafikens utsläpp bör politiken nationellt och på EU--nivå understödja och påskynda utveckling, produktion och användning av energieffektiva fordon och icke-fossila drivmedel, genom stöd till forskning och med ekonomiska och legala styrmedel.« (party programme ↗)“To reduce road traffic emissions, policy should at national and EU level support and accelerate development, production and use of energy-efficient vehicles and non-fossil fuels, through support for research and with economic and legal instruments.”
- domestic renewable production»Inhemsk produktion ska stimuleras.« (party programme ↗)“Domestic production shall be stimulated.”
- state infrastructure responsibility»Staten har ansvar för att investeringsnivån i kommunikationssystemens infrastruktur såsom vägar, järnvägar och elektroniska kommunikationskanaler hålls på en långsiktigt hög nivå« (party programme ↗)“The state is responsible for maintaining investment levels in communication system infrastructure such as roads, railways and electronic communication channels at a long-term high level”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to investing in the manufacture of biofuels and to rapidly expanding charging infrastructure throughout the country, and it changes the energy policy target from renewable to fossil-free so that all fossil-free alternatives count.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to investing in the manufacture of biofuels and to rapidly expanding charging infrastructure throughout the country, and it changes the energy policy target from renewable to fossil-free so that all fossil-free alternatives count. A national plan for refueling stations for, for example, biogas in parallel with charging infrastructure is in line with the technology-neutral transition approach. The plan, however, does not explicitly mention refueling infrastructure for biogas.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel och att snabbt bygga ut laddinfrastruktur i hela landet, och den byter det energipolitiska målet från förnybart till fossilfritt så att alla fossilfria alternativ räknas. En nationell plan för tankställen för exempelvis biogas parallellt med laddinfrastrukturen ligger i linje med den teknikneutrala omställningslinjen. Planen nämner dock inte tankinfrastruktur för biogas uttryckligen.
- investment in biofuelsdecisive»Satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in the manufacture of biofuels”
- expanded refueling infrastructure»Bygga ut laddstolpar och laddstationer i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Build out charging points and charging stations throughout the country”
- fossil-freedom ahead of renewable»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy target from 100 per cent renewable to 100 per cent fossil-free”
- biofuels from the forest»Skogsbruket är även viktigt för att tillverka bland annat biodrivmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Forestry is also important for manufacturing, among other things, biofuels.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to expand charging infrastructure for electric vehicles and establishes that a strategy is needed for charging stations to be available across the country, while Swedish biofuel production shall be promoted.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to expand charging infrastructure for electric vehicles and establishes that a strategy is needed for charging stations to be available across the country, while Swedish biofuel production shall be promoted. A national plan for biogas stations and parallel expansion of renewable fuel infrastructure aligns with this. The plan emphasises, however, that the transition of the vehicle fleet shall take time and occur on market terms, which makes the support conditional.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill bygga ut laddinfrastrukturen för elbilar och slår fast att en strategi behövs för att laddstationer ska finnas i hela landet, samtidigt som svensk biobränsleproduktion ska främjas. En nationell plan för tankställen för biogas och parallell utbyggnad av förnybar tankinfrastruktur ligger i linje med det. Planen betonar dock att omställningen av fordonsflottan ska få ta tid och ske på marknadens villkor, vilket gör stödet villkorat.
- expanded charging infrastructuredecisive»Bygga ut laddinfrastrukturen för elbilar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand charging infrastructure for electric vehicles”
- national strategy for fuel infrastructure»När elektrifieringen av fordonsflottan tar fart så behövs en strategi för att laddstationer ska finnas tillgängliga i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“As electrification of the vehicle fleet takes off, a strategy is needed for charging stations to be available throughout the country.”
- Swedish biofuel production»Främja svensk biobränsleproduktion« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Promote Swedish biofuel production”
- transition at market pace»En omställning av fordonsflottan behöver både av ekonomiska och ekologiska skäl få ta tid, och ske utifrån marknadens villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A transition of the vehicle fleet needs both for economic and ecological reasons to take time and occur on market terms.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:TU9)
- Committee report full text (HD01TU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1007 — Skyltning längs med allmänna vägar av Christofer Bergenblock (C)
- Motion 2025/26:107 — Tillåtande av klampning och borttransport av fordon vid felparkering av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:113 — Utökade möjligheter för Kronofogdemyndigheten att utmäta fordon av Angelica Lundberg (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1191 — Fordonsbesiktning för ökad trafiksäkerhet av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1366 — Översyn av lagstiftningen om fastighetsägares ansvar vid parkeringsövervakning av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2025/26:140 — Stänkskydd på personbilar av Angelica Lundberg (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:146 — Parkering mot färdriktningen av Eric Palmqvist och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1496 — Obligatorisk prisangivelse för el vid tankstationer av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:155 — Besiktningsgaranti av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1565 — Åtgärder för att stoppa högljudda fordon och streetracing av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:170 — Flytt av fordon av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1797 — Förbättrad mobilitet för alla som är beroende av bilen av Magnus Jacobsson m.fl. (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1933 — Centrala register för arbetsmaskiner och båtar av Marie Nicholson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:196 — Krav på transparens och ansvar för fordonstillverkare samt en teknikneutral definition av miljöbil av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:223 — Motorcyklar i kollektivtrafikfält på statliga vägar av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2431 — Åtgärder för att försvåra för bilmålvakter av Oliver Rosengren m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2524 — Möjligheten att svänga höger vid rött ljus av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2592 — Trafikljus vid övergångsställen med nedräkning av tid av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2595 — Sekretess för uppgifter i fordonsregistret av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2614 — Motverkande av ljusföroreningar av Rickard Nordin (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament