2024-05-292023/24:TU14 · p.1TUTransport & infrastructure
Financing and Support for Regional Airports
State support and financing for regional airports
What's at stake: The decision affects how regional airports across the country are financed and can continue to offer air links, which matters for businesses, tourism and people's ability to travel throughout the country.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the current system of state operating support for regional airports is sufficient, or whether it needs to be supplemented with, among other things, a review of Swedavia's revenue distribution and clearer state responsibility during crises.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses that regional airports are important for all of Sweden and recalls the EU's 2017 guidelines on airport support, as well as the fact that parliament decides annually on grants to non-state airports, with a significant increase for 2024. The committee welcomes the government's task to investigate the state's responsibility for the airport system and the work on a new regulation for operating support, as well as the task of reviewing how municipalities and regions can complement the state's flight-route offering.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C)
The reservation (C) stresses that Sweden's great distances make the country dependent on functioning regional airports for business and tourism, and calls for a review of Swedavia's profit-sharing model to achieve a better distribution of revenue. It also calls for the state to take greater responsibility for financing air traffic control and safety systems during crises, when fee revenue falls away, including through capital injections to Swedavia, a review of LFV's grant funding, and equivalent compensation for lost revenue to regional airports.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 194–19Ja 178–35
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/6 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 91/0/0/15 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 11/0/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/61/11 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:399 by Jimmy Ståhl et al. (SD) point 17, 2023/24:734 by Mikael Damsgaard and Caroline Högström (both M) point 5 in this part, 2023/24:960 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) point 6, 2023/24:1170 by Ann-Sofie Alm (M), 2023/24:1600 by Helena Lindahl and Daniel Bäckström (both C) and 2023/24:2465 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) points 13, 31, 99 and 101.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:399 av Jimmy Ståhl m.fl. (SD) yrkande 17, 2023/24:734 av Mikael Damsgaard och Caroline Högström (båda M) yrkande 5 i denna del, 2023/24:960 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 6, 2023/24:1170 av Ann-Sofie Alm (M), 2023/24:1600 av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C) och 2023/24:2465 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 13, 31, 99 och 101.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 70 proposals in motions on aviation matters from the general motion period in 2023. The motions address, among other things, regional airports, emergency airports, security-related issues in aviation, aviation's climate impact and electric aviation. The reason that the Riksdag says no to the motions is among other things already undertaken measures and ongoing investigation work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the state to take greater responsibility for financing air traffic control services and regional airports. (C) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme states that aviation is one of the major challenges of the transition and that economic frameworks should be built so that aviation begins to bear its socioeconomic costs.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that aviation is one of the major challenges of the transition and that economic frameworks should be built so that aviation begins to bear its socioeconomic costs. The counter-proposal's requirement for capital injections, increased grant financing and compensation for lost revenues to regional airports goes in the opposite direction by placing more of aviation's costs on the public. The plan wants instead to direct transport to rail.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att flyget är en av omställningens stora utmaningar och att ekonomiska ramverk ska byggas så att flyget börjar stå för sina samhällsekonomiska kostnader. Motförslagets krav på kapitaltillskott, ökad anslagsfinansiering och ersättning för uteblivna intäkter till regionala flygplatser går i motsatt riktning genom att lägga mer av flygets kostnader på det allmänna. Planen vill i stället styra transporter mot järnväg.
- aviation bears its costsdecisive»stå för sina samhällsekonomiska kostnader.« (party programme ↗)“bear their socioeconomic costs.”
- aviation as a climate challenge»Flygtrafiken är en av de stora utmaningarna i omställningen.« (party programme ↗)“Air traffic is one of the major challenges of the transition.”
- transport to rail»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be directed to rail and sustainable shipping.”
- unsustainable travel among the richest»framför allt finns i samhällets toppskikt.« (party programme ↗)“especially exists in society's top layer.”
The plan addresses neither airports nor Swedavia's profit-sharing.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan addresses neither airports nor Swedavia's profit-sharing. The closest-lying principle is that the entire country shall be able to live and develop and that the state shall be present throughout the country, together with rejection of burdening people dependent on transport in sparsely populated areas. On that basis, the plan speaks for greater state responsibility for the regional airports' basic functions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar varken flygplatser eller Swedavias vinstdelning. Närmast liggande princip är att hela landet ska kunna leva och utvecklas och att staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet, tillsammans med avvisandet av att skuldbelägga människor som är beroende av transporter i glesa delar av landet. Utifrån det talar planen för ett större statligt ansvar för de regionala flygplatsernas grundfunktioner.
- the entire country shall livedecisive»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the entire country being able to live and develop.”
- state presence throughout the country»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state shall be present throughout the country.”
- realistic transport conditions in sparsely populated areas»Klimatkrisen kan aldrig lösas med att skuldbelägga människor som behöver ta bilen till affären – det är helt nödvändigt i stora delar av vårt land.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate crisis can never be solved by burdening people who need to drive to the shop – it is entirely necessary in large parts of our country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly establishes that airports shall not be subsidized with public funds, and the election manifesto wants to raise the air tax, reduce air travel and instead invest in railways.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that airports shall not be subsidized with public funds, and the election manifesto wants to raise the air tax, reduce air travel and instead invest in railways. The counter-proposal's demands for increased state economic responsibility for regional airports and compensation for lost revenue directly contradict these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att flygplatser inte ska subventioneras med offentliga medel, och valmanifestet vill höja flygskatten, minska flygresandet och i stället investera i järnväg. Motförslagets krav på ökat statligt ekonomiskt ansvar för regionala flygplatser och ersättning för uteblivna intäkter går rakt emot dessa åtaganden.
- no airport subsidiesdecisive»ska inte subventioneras med offentliga medel.« (party programme ↗)“shall not be subsidized with public funds.”
- reduced air travel»minska flygets utsläpp — höja flygskatten, minska flygresandet och skynda på omställningen till förnybara bränslen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce aviation emissions — raise the air tax, reduce air travel and accelerate the transition to renewable fuels”
- money from aviation to railways»Staten borde sälja SAS och investera pengarna i järnväg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state should sell SAS and invest the money in railways.”
- railways before aviation»bygga ut och rusta upp järnvägsnätet för snabba tåg i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand and upgrade the railway network for fast trains across the country”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that regional aviation holds Sweden together and that flight infrastructure must function throughout the country, with regional airports equipped for electric aviation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that regional aviation holds Sweden together and that flight infrastructure must function throughout the country, with regional airports equipped for electric aviation. The counter-proposal's demand for greater state responsibility for air traffic control and safety systems and compensation to regional airports is a direct application of that undertaking. The plan's principle that value from local resources should to a greater extent remain in the locality also supports a review of the profit-sharing model.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att det regionala flyget håller ihop Sverige och att flyginfrastrukturen ska fungera i hela landet, med regionala flygplatser rustade inför elflyget. Motförslagets krav på ett större statligt ansvar för flygtrafikledning och säkerhetssystem samt ersättning till regionala flygplatser är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet. Planens princip att värden från lokala resurser i högre grad ska stanna i bygden stödjer också en översyn av vinstdelningsmodellen.
- functioning regional aviationdecisive»Det regionala flyget håller ihop Sverige. Flyginfrastrukturen ska fungera i hela landet. Vi vill säkerställa att de regionala flygplatserna står redo med rätt infrastruktur när elflyget utvecklas i snabb takt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regional aviation holds Sweden together. Flight infrastructure must function throughout the country. We want to ensure that regional airports are ready with the right infrastructure when electric aviation develops at rapid pace.”
- tourism requires communications»Besöksnäringen har stor betydelse för hela landets utveckling, och för att den ska kunna fortsätta växa krävs också bättre kommunikationer och infrastruktur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tourism is important for the whole country's development, and for it to continue to grow, better communications and infrastructure are also needed.”
- services nationwide»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services must be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- value remains locally»Vinsterna från lokal kraftproduktion — som vind och vatten — ska i större utsträckning stanna kvar i bygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Profits from local power production — such as wind and water — should to a greater extent remain in the locality.”
The plan states that it is those who pollute who shall pay, that all transport modes shall bear their climate costs and that more infrastructure projects shall be able to be financed through fees.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that it is those who pollute who shall pay, that all transport modes shall bear their climate costs and that more infrastructure projects shall be able to be financed through fees. Increased government grants and revenue compensation for regional airports works against that principle. The plan's demand for state presence throughout the country is a qualification but does not bear the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det är den som förorenar som ska betala, att alla transportslag ska bära sina klimatkostnader och att fler infrastrukturprojekt ska kunna avgiftsfinansieras. Utökade statliga tillskott och intäktsersättningar till regionala flygplatser går emot den principen. Planens krav på statlig närvaro i hela landet är en kvalificering men bär inte kravet.
- the polluter paysdecisive»Det är den som förorenar – ingen annan – som ska betala.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is those who pollute – no one else – who shall pay.”
- transport bears its climate costs»Beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och alla transportslag måste stå för sina« (party programme ↗)“Dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and all transport modes must cover their”
- fee-financed infrastructure»För att höja investeringstakten ska fler nya projekt kunna avgiftsfinansieras.« (party programme ↗)“In order to raise the investment rate more new projects shall be able to be financed through fees.”
- state presence throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and government agencies shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
The party programme explicitly places on the state a responsibility to maintain a system of national and regional airports and regionally significant air traffic that does not come about on commercial grounds.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly places on the state a responsibility to maintain a system of national and regional airports and regionally significant air traffic that does not come about on commercial grounds. That is precisely what the counter-proposal requires regarding financing of air traffic control and compensation for regional airports. The election manifesto states that all of Sweden shall function.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet lägger uttryckligen på staten ett ansvar att upprätthålla ett system av nationella och regionala flygplatser samt regionalt betydelsefull flygtrafik som inte kommer till stånd på kommersiella grunder. Det är precis vad motförslaget kräver i fråga om finansiering av flygtrafikledning och ersättning till regionala flygplatser. Valmanifestet slår fast att hela Sverige ska fungera.
- state responsibility for airportsdecisive»ett system av nationella och regionala flygplatser liksom regionalt betydelsefull flygtrafik som inte kommer till stånd på kommersiella grunder« (party programme ↗)“a system of national and regional airports as well as regionally significant air traffic that does not come about on commercial grounds”
- all of Sweden shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All of Sweden shall function and it should be possible to live and work even outside the major cities.”
- necessary domestic aviation»Ett välfungerande inrikesflyg« (party programme ↗)“A well-functioning domestic air service”
- state infrastructure responsibility»investeringsnivån i kommunikationssystemens infrastruktur såsom vägar, järnvägar och elektroniska« (party programme ↗)“the level of investment in communication systems' infrastructure such as roads, railways and electronic”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan states that high-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country and that all of Sweden must function, and it explicitly affirms aviation's development.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that high-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country and that all of Sweden must function, and it explicitly affirms aviation's development. The counter-proposal's demand for state responsibility for air traffic control and a review of revenue distribution to regional airports follows from that stance. The plan simultaneously requires that new expenses fit within the surplus target, which makes the support conditional.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att en infrastruktur av hög kvalitet är viktig för jobb och tillväxt i alla delar av landet och att hela Sverige måste fungera, och den bejakar uttryckligen flygets utveckling. Motförslagets krav på statligt ansvar för flygtrafikledning och en översyn av intäktsfördelningen till regionala flygplatser följer av den hållningen. Planen ställer samtidigt krav på att nya utgifter ryms inom överskottsmålet, vilket gör stödet villkorat.
- infrastructure in all of Swedendecisive»En infrastruktur av hög kvalitet är viktig för jobb och tillväxt i alla delar av landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“High-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country.”
- all of Sweden shall function»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to make use of all of Sweden's possibilities.”
- embrace aviation's transition»Det är en utveckling som Moderaterna vill bejaka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is a development that the Moderate Party wants to embrace.”
- financed commitments»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that all regional airports should be given standby airport status so that their public service gets a secured future, and notes that several are threatened with closure.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that all regional airports should be given standby airport status so that their public service gets a secured future, and notes that several are threatened with closure. That is precisely the responsible state financing the counter-proposal seeks for air traffic control, security systems and lost revenues. The plan also explicitly wants to preserve domestic flights and regional airports.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla regionala flygplatser ska få status som beredskapsflygplatser så att deras samhällsservice får en säkrad framtid, och konstaterar att flera är nedläggningshotade. Det är precis den statliga ansvarstagande finansiering motförslaget efterlyser för trafikledning, säkerhetssystem och uteblivna intäkter. Planen vill dessutom uttryckligen bevara inrikesflyget och de regionala flygplatserna.
- standby airportsdecisive»Alla regionala flygplatser behöver få status som beredskapsflygplatser, så att den service dessa flygplatser tillhandahåller samhället i stort får en säkrad framtid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All regional airports need to be given standby airport status so that the service these airports provide to society as a whole gets a secured future.”
- preserved regional airports»Bevara de regionala flygplatserna och att göra dem till beredskapsflygplatser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Preserve regional airports and make them standby airports”
- threatened airports»Många av landets regionala flygplatser har drabbats av minskat flygande och flera är nedläggningshotade.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many of the country's regional airports have been hit by reduced air traffic and several are threatened with closure.”
- preserved domestic flights»Bevara inrikesflyget och Bromma flygplats« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Preserve domestic flights and Bromma Airport”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:TU14)
- Committee report full text (HB01TU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1104 — Uppkalla Landvetter flygplats efter Evert Taube av Gustaf Göthberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:117 — Utbildningskrav för piloter som flyger fallskärmshoppare av Eric Palmqvist och Eric Westroth (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1170 — Trollhättan-Vänersborgs flygplats och dess betydelse för hela Sverige av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1174 — Behovsstyrd hinderbelysning för vindkraftverk av Åsa Eriksson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1256 — Luftbro med elflyg till Gotland av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1398 — Stärkt infrastruktur i Blekinge för väg, hamnar och flyg av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1453 — Direkt flygförbindelse med Taiwan av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1491 — Statligt ansvar och ägande för Ängelholm-Helsingborgs flygplats av Per-Arne Håkansson och Niklas Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1498 — Ronneby flygplats som statlig flygplats av Heléne Björklund (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1519 — En grön klimathandlingsplan för Sverige av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1600 — Ökat driftsbidrag till kommunala flygplatser med statligt upphandlad flygtrafik av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1664 — Ökad efterfrågan på biodrivmedel i flyget för att skynda på klimatomställningen av Anders Ygeman och Mattias Vepsä (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1936 — Skavsta - Stockholmsregionens andra största flygplats av Sofia Amloh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:205 — Upphandling av leverantörer av flygledning av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2112 — Fortsatt utveckling av Arlanda flygplats av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2279 — Bättre infrastruktur i Skåne av Lars Johnsson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2453 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2465 — Hållbara och tillgängliga transporter för hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2625 — Utgiftsområde 22 Kommunikationer av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2661 — Stockholm som en hållbar tillväxtmotor av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament