2024-04-032023/24:UU15 · p.7UUForeign affairs

Aid to Palestine

Sweden's development aid to Palestine

What's at stake: The decision concerns both the acute humanitarian situation for civilians in Gaza and the demands Sweden should place on the Palestinian Authority regarding corruption, democracy and terrorism as conditions for continued aid disbursement. It therefore affects both the scale of aid and the people in Gaza and the West Bank who depend on it.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Sweden's aid to the Palestinian Authority should be subject to stricter conditions - and eventually phased out if the requirements are not met - or whether the current approach, focused on humanitarian access and support for a negotiated two-state solution, should continue.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee stresses that all development aid to Palestine should support a negotiated two-state solution and notes that the humanitarian situation in Gaza is catastrophic. The committee emphasises that under humanitarian law all parties to the conflict are responsible for ensuring civilians' needs are met, and that humanitarian access must be secured swiftly, safely and unhindered. The committee welcomes Sweden's vote on 12 December 2023 in favour of the UN resolution on a humanitarian ceasefire, and against this background rejects the motions in question, 2023/24:477 and 2023/24:495.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 8 (SD)

The reservation (SD) criticises the Palestinian Authority for shortcomings in corruption, freedom of expression, the rule of law and discrimination against women, and points out that audit bodies have found extensive shortcomings in how aid funds are managed despite large sums from Sweden and the EU. The government should adopt a realistic stance and set clear demands on democracy, anti-corruption efforts and human rights, as well as requiring the authority to stop rewarding and glorifying terrorism, inciting terrorist acts and antisemitism - and aid should be phased out for as long as these demands are not met.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: highderived
SYesYes 85/0/7/14follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPYesYes 14/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesYes 20/0/1/3follows the planconfidence: lowderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDown reservationNoNo 0/63/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Broke with the party line

SAnna-Caren Sätherberg (S, Jämtlands län)Abstain — party line: Yes
SDaniel Vencu Velasquez Castro (S, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes
SJytte Guteland (S, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes
SKadir Kasirga (S, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes
SLawen Redar (S, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes
SMarkus Kallifatides (S, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes
SMats Wiking (S, Västra Götalands läns norra)Abstain — party line: Yes
CElisabeth Thand Ringqvist (C, Stockholms kommun)Abstain — party line: Yes

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:477 by Rasmus Giertz et al. (SD) proposal 4 and 2023/24:495 by Rasmus Giertz et al. (SD) proposal 18.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:477 av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD) yrkande 4 och 2023/24:495 av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD) yrkande 18.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 80 proposals in motions on the Middle East and North Africa that came in during the general motion period 2023. The Riksdag's assessments and positions are based on the current situation in the regions as well as on the information available at present.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme states that aid shall be given without selfish reservations and the election manifesto that Sweden should increase aid and strengthen the UN.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that aid shall be given without selfish reservations and the election manifesto that Sweden should increase aid and strengthen the UN. The counter-proposal requires the opposite: stricter conditions and dismantling of aid to the Palestinian authority. The plan's line on international solidarity and reduced global inequality speaks against cutting aid to one of the world's most vulnerable areas.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att bistånd ska ges utan egennyttiga förbehåll och valplattformen att Sverige ska öka biståndet och stärka FN. Motförslaget kräver motsatsen: hårdare villkor och avveckling av biståndet till den palestinska myndigheten. Planens linje om internationell solidaritet och minskad global ojämlikhet talar emot att strypa bistånd till ett av världens mest utsatta områden.

  • aid without reservationsdecisive»Internationellt bistånd ska ges till fattiga länder utan egennyttiga« (party programme ↗)“International aid shall be given to poor countries without selfish”
  • increased aid and strengthened UN»Sverige ska öka biståndet, stärka FN och skriva under kärnvapenkonventionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should increase aid, strengthen the UN and sign the nuclear weapons convention.”
  • reduced global inequality»I en rättvis värld måste den globala ojämlikheten kraftigt minskas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In a just world, global inequality must be sharply reduced.”
  • international solidarity»Därför är vi en rörelse som sätter den internationella solidariteten högt på dagordningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That is why we are a movement that puts international solidarity high on the agenda.”

Worldstate weighed in: UN Security Council adopts resolution calling for immediate ceasefire in Gaza — Reinforces the plan's UN and solidarity line and speaks against withdrawing aid in an acute humanitarian situation

SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan binds aid to at least one percent of GNI and wants development cooperation to build democratic institutions, in other words be developed rather than wound down.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan binds aid to at least one percent of GNI and wants development cooperation to build democratic institutions, in other words be developed rather than wound down. The requirements for democracy, anti-corruption and human rights admittedly lie close to the plan's line, but the counter-proposal's core is that aid shall be wound down if the requirements are not met, and the plan argues against that. The plan also emphasizes that aid shall tackle root causes of why people are forced to flee.

Original (Swedish)

Planen binder biståndet vid minst en procent av BNI och vill att utvecklingssamarbetet bygger upp demokratiska institutioner, alltså utvecklas snarare än avvecklas. Kraven på demokrati, korruptionsbekämpning och mänskliga rättigheter ligger visserligen nära planens linje, men motförslagets kärna är att biståndet ska avvecklas om kraven inte uppfylls, och det talar planen emot. Planen betonar dessutom att biståndet ska angripa grundorsakerna till att människor tvingas fly.

  • aid at least one percentdecisive»Det svenska biståndet ska motsvara minst en procent av bruttonationalinkomsten.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish aid shall correspond to at least one percent of gross national income.”
  • aid against flight causes»Svenskt bistånd ska tydligare bidra till att förhindra att människor tvingas på flykt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish aid shall more clearly help prevent people being forced into flight.”
  • support for democratic institutions»framväxten av demokratiska institutioner och ett starkt civilsamhälle« (party programme ↗)“the growth of democratic institutions and a strong civil society”
  • rights of the poor and women»Fattiga människors perspektiv och kvinnor och barns rättigheter ska vara i centrum.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Poor people's perspectives and women's and children's rights shall be central.”
MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto states that development aid should be guided by efficiency and poverty reduction and not conditioned on Sweden's domestic political interests, and that it is shameful to cut development aid.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto states that development aid should be guided by efficiency and poverty reduction and not conditioned on Sweden's domestic political interests, and that it is shameful to cut development aid. The counter-proposal instead demands strict political conditions and ending development aid to Palestine. The party programme also emphasises responsiveness to recipient countries' needs. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att biståndet ska styras av effektivitet och fattigdomsbekämpning och inte villkoras mot Sveriges inrikespolitiska intressen, och att det är skamligt att skära ned biståndet. Motförslaget kräver tvärtom hårda politiska villkor och avveckling av biståndet till Palestina. Partiprogrammet betonar dessutom lyhördhet för mottagarländernas behov. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • unconditional development aid commitmentdecisive»att mer än 1 procent av Sveriges bruttonationalinkomst fortsatt ska gå till bistånd, att biståndet ska styras av principer om effektivitet och fattigdomsbekämpning och inte villkoras mot Sveriges inrikespolitiska intressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that more than 1 per cent of Sweden's gross national income should continue to go to development aid, that development aid should be guided by principles of efficiency and poverty reduction and not conditioned on Sweden's domestic political interests.”
  • development aid must not be cut»Det är skamligt att skära ned biståndet och istället använda det till statens kostnader för flyktingmottagande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is shameful to cut development aid and instead use it for the state's costs for refugee reception.”
  • responsiveness to recipient countries»präglas av respekt och lyhördhet för mottagarländernas behov.« (party programme ↗)“is characterised by respect and responsiveness to recipient countries' needs.”
  • development aid against corruption and conflict»att utvecklingssamarbetet ska bidra till att bekämpa fattigdom, förebygga och hantera klimatförändringarna, bevara och skapa fred, förebygga konflikter, bygga upp demokratiska samhällen och motverka korruption.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that development cooperation should contribute to combating poverty, preventing and addressing climate change, preserving and creating peace, preventing conflicts, building up democratic societies and combating corruption.”

Worldstate weighed in: Catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza with civilian casualties during aid deliveries — Reinforces the plan's requirement that development aid must not be conditioned away; The UN Security Council adopts a resolution on immediate ceasefire — Supports the plan's line on peace and humanitarian responsibility rather than conditional aid

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan sees aid and cooperation organisations as tools for peace and poverty reduction and binds foreign policy to universal freedom and rights.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees aid and cooperation organisations as tools for peace and poverty reduction and binds foreign policy to universal freedom and rights. Demands for democracy and anti-corruption align closely with the plan's values, but the counter-proposal's core is to wind down aid until demands are met. This runs against the plan's commitment to peace and global poverty reduction, especially in an acute humanitarian situation.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser bistånd och samarbetsorganisationer som verktyg för fred och fattigdomsbekämpning och binder utrikespolitiken vid universella fri- och rättigheter. Kraven på demokrati och korruptionsbekämpning ligger nära planens värderingar, men motförslagets kärna är att avveckla biståndet tills kraven uppfylls. Det går emot planens åtagande om fred och global fattigdomsbekämpning, särskilt i en akut humanitär situation.

  • global responsibility for peacedecisive»Fred, skyddet av mänskliga rättigheter och hållbar utveckling är hela världens ansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Peace, the protection of human rights and sustainable development are the responsibility of the whole world.”
  • aid as peace tool»Samarbetsorganisationer som FN och EU, handelsavtal och bistånd, kan knyta länder närmare varandra« (party programme ↗)“Cooperation organisations such as the UN and EU, trade agreements and aid can tie countries closer together”
  • human rights guide foreign policy»Utrikes- och säkerhetspolitiken syftar ytterst till att värna universella mänskliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Foreign and security policy ultimately aims to protect universal human freedom and rights.”
  • conditions in international agreements»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set stricter demands on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”

Worldstate weighed in: Catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza — Makes winding down aid incompatible with the plan's poverty commitment; UN Security Council demands immediate ceasefire — Strengthens the line on international cooperation over unilateral aid cuts

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that aid policy is reformed with a focus on democracy, gender equality and reduced corruption, and that policies that legitimize undemocratic regimes are wound down.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that aid policy is reformed with a focus on democracy, gender equality and reduced corruption, and that policies that legitimize undemocratic regimes are wound down. Democracy shall be the overarching goal for development aid, which bears clear demands on the recipient regarding corruption, rule of law and human rights. The counter-proposal's demands therefore align with the plan, even though the plan's ambition of one per cent of GNI speaks for continued high aid in total.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att biståndspolitiken reformeras med fokus på demokrati, jämställdhet och minskad korruption, och att politik som legitimerar odemokratiska regimer avvecklas. Demokrati ska vara det övergripande målet för utvecklingsbiståndet, vilket bär tydliga krav på mottagaren i fråga om korruption, rättssäkerhet och mänskliga rättigheter. Motförslagets krav ligger därför i linje med planen, även om planens ambition om en procent av BNI talar för fortsatt högt bistånd i stort.

  • aid reform against corruptiondecisive»Den svenska biståndspolitiken måste genomgå stora reformer med fokus på demokrati, jämställdhet och minskad korruption.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish aid policy must undergo major reforms with a focus on democracy, gender equality and reduced corruption.”
  • democracy as an aid goal»Demokrati ska vara det övergripande målet för utvecklingsbiståndet.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy shall be the overarching goal for development aid.”
  • phase out legitimizing aid»Det handlar också om att avveckla politik som motverkar demokratisk utveckling« (party programme ↗)“It also involves phasing out policies that work against democratic development”
  • the one-per-cent target for aid»Därför vill vi att det svenska biståndet ska uppnå till en procent av BNI.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want Swedish aid to reach one per cent of GNI.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme makes human rights both a goal and a means in aid and states that development cooperation shall be based on respect for human rights and contribute to functioning state administration and legal system.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes human rights both a goal and a means in aid and states that development cooperation shall be based on respect for human rights and contribute to functioning state administration and legal system. The counter-proposal's requirements for democracy, corruption combat and human rights as conditions for aid to the Palestinian authority follow directly from that line. That the plan simultaneously wants to use positive impact means primarily dampens but does not reverse the conclusion.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör mänskliga rättigheter till både mål och medel i biståndet och slår fast att utvecklingssamarbetet ska baseras på respekt för mänskliga rättigheter samt bidra till fungerande statsförvaltning och rättssystem. Motförslagets krav på demokrati, korruptionsbekämpning och MR som villkor för biståndet till den palestinska myndigheten följer direkt av den linjen. Att planen samtidigt vill använda positiva verkningsmedel i första hand dämpar men upphäver inte slutsatsen.

  • human rights as goal and means in aiddecisive»Mänskliga rättigheter är både ett mål och ett medel« (party programme ↗)“Human rights are both a goal and a means”
  • aid conditioned on human rights»Även utvecklingssamarbetet ska baseras på respekt för mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Development cooperation shall also be based on respect for human rights.”
  • rule of law building in aid»I denna helhetssyn ingår såväl uppbyggande av en fungerande statsförvaltning och rättssystem som investeringar och handel.« (party programme ↗)“In this comprehensive view is included both building a functioning state administration and legal system as well as investments and trade.”
  • positive means before sanctions»positiva verkningsmedel användas, som till exempel finansiellt stöd, samarbetsprojekt, samtal och dialoger för att främja mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“positive impact means are used, such as for example financial support, cooperation projects, talks and dialogues to promote human rights.”

Worldstate weighed in: Acute humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and UN resolution on ceasefire — The plan's humanitarian aid principle is separated from development aid, so the conditions apply to the latter

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that aid shall be reformed so that tax funds do not disappear into corruption or end up with undemocratic leaders, and that Swedish values about democracy and rule of law shall to a greater degree guide the choice of measures.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that aid shall be reformed so that tax funds do not disappear into corruption or end up with undemocratic leaders, and that Swedish values about democracy and rule of law shall to a greater degree guide the choice of measures. The counter-proposal's demand for clear conditions on democracy, anti-corruption and human rights—and winding down if the conditions are not met—follows directly from that commitment. The plan also wants to focus aid where it does the most good and increase the humanitarian share.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att biståndet ska reformeras så att skattemedel inte försvinner i korruption eller hamnar hos odemokratiska ledare, och att svenska värderingar om demokrati och rättsstat i högre grad ska styra valet av insatser. Motförslagets krav på tydliga villkor om demokrati, korruptionsbekämpning och mänskliga rättigheter — och avveckling om kraven inte uppfylls — följer direkt av det åtagandet. Planen vill samtidigt fokusera biståndet dit det gör störst nytta och öka den humanitära andelen.

  • aid free from corruptiondecisive»Dina skattepengar ska inte försvinna i korruption eller hamna i fickorna på odemokratiska ledare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Your tax money shall not disappear into corruption or end up in the pockets of undemocratic leaders”
  • conditional and value-driven aid»Svenska intressen och värderingar om demokrati, rättsstat och individuell frihet ska i högre grad styra valet av biståndsinsatser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish interests and values about democracy, rule of law and individual freedom shall to a greater degree guide the choice of aid measures.”
  • focused aid»Fokusera det svenska biståndet till de länder, organisationer och tematiska områden där det gör störst nytta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus Swedish aid to the countries, organizations and thematic areas where it does the most good”
  • increased humanitarian share»Öka andelen humanitärt bistånd i den svenska biståndsbudgeten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the share of humanitarian aid in the Swedish aid budget”

Worldstate weighed in: Catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza and UN resolution on ceasefire — Speaks for the humanitarian share being guarded even if development aid is more strictly conditioned

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto requires aid that does not feed corruption or terrorism and that is distributed on a conditional and traceable basis all the way to the final recipient.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires aid that does not feed corruption or terrorism and that is distributed on a conditional and traceable basis all the way to the final recipient. The counter-proposal's requirements for clear conditions on democracy, anti-corruption, human rights and an end to glorification of terrorism are directly in line with this. The plan also wants to stop all aid to Islamist organizations or regimes. The plan thus supports the counter-proposal's requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver ett bistånd som inte göder korruption eller terrorism och som fördelas kravbaserat och spårbart ända till slutmottagaren. Motförslagets krav på tydliga villkor om demokrati, korruptionsbekämpning, mänskliga rättigheter och ett slut på hyllningar av terrorism ligger direkt i linje med detta. Planen vill dessutom stoppa allt bistånd till islamistiska organisationer eller regimer. Planen stöder därmed motförslagets krav.

  • aid without corruption and terrordecisive»Därför vill Sverigedemokraterna se ett effektivt bistånd som går till de mest hjälpbehövande och som inte göder korruption eller terrorism.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore Sweden Democrats want to see effective aid that goes to those most in need and that does not feed corruption or terrorism.”
  • no aid to Islamism»Stoppa allt bistånd till islamistiska organisationer eller regimer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop all aid to Islamist organizations or regimes”
  • traceable and results-based aid»Men biståndsanslag måste bättre kunna följas ända till slutmottagaren och fördelas utifrån konkreta resultat utifrån i förväg fastställda mål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But aid appropriations must be better able to be traced all the way to the final recipient and distributed on the basis of concrete results in accordance with pre-established goals.”
  • conditional aid»Biståndspolitiken skall bedrivas med respekt för mottagarländernas kultur och traditioner men också vara kravbaserad.« (party programme ↗)“Aid policy should be conducted with respect for recipient countries' culture and traditions but also be conditional.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament