The question is whether the tax on chemicals in certain electronics and the tax on waste incineration should be automatically raised in line with economic growth (indexation), or whether the tax rates should stay fixed until the Riksdag decides otherwise.
Committee proposal adopted, 172–94
Plan → Vote
»en kraftfull lagstiftning, ekonomiska styrmedel«“powerful legislation, economic policy tools”economic policy tools against environmental threats · party programme ↗
»Hänsynen till miljöns krav ska byggas in i produktionsprocesserna redan från början.«“Environmental considerations shall be built into production processes from the beginning.”environmental requirements in production · party programme ↗
»det som är dåligt ska vara dyrt«“what is harmful should be expensive”environmentally harmful should be expensive · party programme ↗
»Det ska alltid vara lönsamt att vara miljövårdande och olönsamt att agera miljöförstörande.«“It should always be profitable to be environmentally responsible and unprofitable to cause environmental damage.”price environmental damage · party programme ↗
»Kemikalieskatt bidrar till att få bort farliga kemikalier.«“Chemical tax helps remove hazardous chemicals.”chemical tax against hazardous substances · party programme ↗
»i elskatten så att den sänks om elpriserna ökar.«“in the electricity tax so that it is lowered if electricity prices rise.”lower electricity tax when prices are high · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs«“Introduce a tax ceiling during the coming term that means that total taxes are not raised”tax ceiling · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen«“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish businesses in international competition”competitive taxes · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se