The question is whether the Riksdag Board should produce specific governing documents and measures — drawing inspiration from the Icelandic language model — to strengthen and preserve the distinct character of the Swedish language in the Riksdag's communication, or whether current writing guidelines are sufficient.
Committee proposal adopted, 230–64
Plan → Vote
»Nationalismen har ingen plats i en demokratisk vänsterpolitik.«“Nationalism has no place in a democratic left politics.”rejects nationalism · party programme ↗
»I detta ska också ingå att hävda och stödja nationella minoriteters möjligheter att«“This should also include upholding and supporting national minorities' opportunities to”support for minority languages · party programme ↗
»genomdrivandet av monokulturen som gång på«“the imposition of monoculture as having”rejects monoculture · party programme ↗
»Politiken ska akta sig för att agera smakdomare och diktera kulturens innehåll.«“Politics should refrain from acting as a taste arbiter and dictating cultural content.”political restraint on cultural matters · party programme ↗
»Svenska är och ska vara det samhällsbärande språket.«“Swedish is and should be the society's bearing language.”Swedish as the society's bearing language · party programme ↗
»det svenska språket, vars ställning som majoritetsspråk bör vara grundlagsskyddat«“the Swedish language, whose status as majority language should be constitutionally protected”cherish the Swedish language · party programme ↗
»Vi vet vad som måste göras – och vad som får vänta.«“We know what must be done – and what can wait.”hard prioritizations · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.«“Sweden Democrats want to preserve, maintain, and promote Swedish culture.”preserve Swedish culture · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se