The question is whether the government's announced review of the student-aid system is enough to address the income ceiling (fribelopp), or whether the Riksdag should already now require that income students earn during the summer months without study grants be excluded from that ceiling.
Committee proposal adopted, 286–16
Plan → Vote
»nyckelroll i att se till att det går att både bo och studera med ekonomiskt trygga villkor.«“key role in ensuring that both housing and study are possible with economically secure conditions.”secure study economics · party programme ↗
»Avgiftsfri skola och högskola, långsiktigt även förskola och fritidshem.«“Free school and university, long-term also preschool and after-school care.”finances should not prevent studies · party programme ↗
»höja studiestödet och förbättra studenters a-kassa och sjukförsäkring.«“raise study support and improve students' unemployment insurance and health insurance.”better study economics · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Det ska löna sig att arbeta.«“It shall be worth working.”it shall be worth working · party programme ↗
»Fribeloppet bör på sikt kraftigt höjas.«“The tax-free allowance should in the long term be raised significantly.”raised tax-free allowance · party programme ↗
»Kostnaderna för försörjningen under studietiden ska delas mellan den enskilde och det offentliga.«“The costs of subsistence during study time shall be shared between the individual and the public.”shared subsistence cost · party programme ↗
»Sänka skatten på arbete så att din ansträngning lönar sig bättre«“Reduce the tax on work so that your effort pays better”work should pay · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Göra det mer lönsamt att arbeta«“Make it more profitable to work”work should pay · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se