The question is whether the government should work to ensure that agencies and their employees refrain from opinion-forming activity in their official capacity, for example through clearer letters of appropriation, or whether current requirements of objectivity and impartiality are sufficient.
Committee proposal adopted, 234–63
Plan → Vote
»Vi lever i en tid då högerpopulistiska krafter försöker styra information och innehåll allt hårdare.«“We live in a time when right-wing populist forces attempt to control information and content ever more strongly.”against political content control · 2022 manifesto ↗
»ansvaret kan aldrig överlämnas till icke valda ämbetsmän.«“responsibility can never be handed over to unelected officials.”politics bears responsibility · party programme ↗
»Ett demokratiskt samhälle kräver saklig information, aktiv samhällsgranskning och grävande«“A democratic society requires factual information, active public scrutiny and investigative journalism”factual information and scrutiny · party programme ↗
»Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.«“Politics should contribute to good conditions but maintain a distance.”arm's length distance · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Liberalismen sätter en tydlig gräns för den offentliga makten.«“Liberalism sets a clear limit for public power.”limit for public power · party programme ↗
»Allt är inte politik. Alla människor och alla naturliga«“Not everything is politics. All people and all natural”limitation of politics's scope · party programme ↗
»och den agerar med opartiskhet och integritet.«“and it acts with impartiality and integrity.”impartial state administration · party programme ↗
»anställning av personal på myndigheter som driver aktivistisk symbolpolitik«“employment of staff at agencies conducting activist symbolic politics”against agency activism · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se