The question is whether parliament should push for a ban on mink and fur-animal farming, or whether current animal-welfare rules are seen as sufficient to address the welfare of animals in the fur industry.
Committee proposal adopted, 203–20
Plan → Vote
»pälsindustrin avvecklas«“the fur industry is phased out”phase out the fur industry · party programme ↗
»och etisk djurhållning är grundprinciper.«“and ethical animal husbandry are fundamental principles.”ethical animal husbandry · party programme ↗
»stänga minkfarmerna.«“close the mink farms.”close the mink farms · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Det man äger har man också ett ansvar för att vårda.«“What one owns, one also has responsibility for caring for.”owner responsibility for animals · party programme ↗
»djurhållning måste garantera djuren ett värdigt liv och en anständig död.«“animal husbandry must guarantee animals a worthy life and a dignified death.”worthy life for all animals · party programme ↗
»dessa djur får leva ett så naturligt liv som möjligt«“these animals live as natural a life as possible”natural life for animals · party programme ↗
»Vi ska stötta, inte styra, jord- och skogsbruket«“We shall support, not direct, agriculture and forestry”support not direct the industry · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Svenska särkrav för miljöskydd och djurvälfärd gör dessutom ofta inhemsk produktion dyrare än konkurrenternas utan att svenska lantbrukare kompenseras.«“Swedish-specific requirements for environmental protection and animal welfare moreover often make domestic production more expensive than competitors' without Swedish farmers being compensated.”avoid Swedish-specific requirements · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se