The question is whether the government should investigate new funding models, such as a patronage system and tax incentives for private donations to culture, or whether ongoing work on the funding issue should be considered sufficient.
Committee proposal adopted, 111–63
Plan → Vote
»samhället och står fria från både politisk och affärsmässig styrning.«“society and stands free from both political and commercial control.”free from commercial control · party programme ↗
»Kulturen måste ha mötesplatser«“Culture must have meeting places”culture without return requirements · party programme ↗
»utöva och ta del av kultur på jämlika villkor.«“practise and participate in culture on equal terms.”equal access to culture · party programme ↗
»Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende, idrotten jämlik och inkluderande.«“Culture should be free and independent, sport equal and inclusive.”free and independent culture · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Fler stiftelser för kulturfinansiering ska skapas.«“More foundations for cultural financing shall be created.”more cultural foundations · party programme ↗
»civila samhället ska stödjas av det offentliga, men inte«“civil society shall be supported by the public, but not”support without steering · party programme ↗
»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet står fria från stat och politik.«“The goal shall be independent institutions that in their activities stand free from state and politics.”culture's independence from the state · party programme ↗
»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären«“Reduce public economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere”less public cultural control · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se