The question is whether the government should take a special initiative - including an inventory of how the work and division of responsibility are organized today - to maintain and develop Sweden's signals-intelligence competence and capability, or whether the funding increases already approved and special assignments given to FRA are sufficient.
Committee proposal adopted, 196–91 · ⇄ The decision would have gone the other way
Plan → Vote
»vara tydligt inordnade i demokratiska strukturer.«“be clearly incorporated into democratic structures.”democratic control of the defence · party programme ↗
»Vi vill fortsätta internationella samarbeten och utveckla cyberförsvaret och underrättelseförmågan.«“We want to continue international cooperation and develop cyber defence and intelligence capabilities.”developed intelligence capabilities · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Sveriges medlemskap i Nato måste förenas med en självständig utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik.«“Sweden's NATO membership must be reconciled with an independent foreign and security policy.”independent security policy · party programme ↗
»Vi vill rusta det militära försvaret snabbt, kraftfullt och långsiktigt.«“We want to strengthen the military defence quickly, powerfully and in the long term.”rapid defence strengthening · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Sveriges nationella försvarsförmåga måste öka.«“Sweden's national defence capability must increase.”increased defence capability · party programme ↗
»bygger på tidiga varningssystem«“is built on early warning systems”early warning in security policy · party programme ↗
»Stärka försvarsunderrättelseförmågan«“Strengthen defence intelligence capability”strengthened defence intelligence capability · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Rusta Sverige inför en ny säkerhetspolitisk situation i vårt närområde«“Rearm Sweden for a new security situation in our near region”stärkt säkerhetsförmåga · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se