The question is whether the bicycle should be recognised as its own, national mode of transport with dedicated, coherent planning and substantially increased investment in cycle paths, or whether it is sufficient to handle cycling infrastructure as part of road traffic within existing national and regional planning.
Committee proposal adopted, 199–19
Plan → Vote
»så att bilberoendet minskar.«“so that car dependency decreases.”reduce car dependency · party programme ↗
»Transportsystemen ska läggas om för mer gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik och så att«“Transport systems shall be restructured for more walking, cycling and public transport and so that”more walking, cycling and public transport · party programme ↗
»minska bilåkandet i storstäderna och främja gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik.«“reduce car driving in major cities and promote walking, cycling and public transport.”prioritize cycling and walking · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Landsbygden behöver bättre vägar och bättre tillgång till cykelvägar.«“Rural areas need better roads and better access to bike lanes.”improved bike lane access · 2022 manifesto ↗
»cykelvägar ska underlättas.«“cycling paths shall be facilitated.”facilitate expansion of cycling paths · party programme ↗
»Cykeln är för många ett viktigt och dagligt transportmedel.«“The bicycle is for many an important and daily means of transport”the bicycle as daily transport · party programme ↗
»Laga Sveriges vägar så att du kan komma fram säkert och i tid«“Repair Sweden's roads so that you can get around safely and on time”road maintenance prioritized · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Rusta upp väg- och järnvägsnätet i hela landet«“Upgrade road and rail networks throughout the country”upgrading of road and rail · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se