2024-04-032023/24:SkU12 · p.10SkUTaxation
Deduction for sports sponsorship
Tax deduction for sponsorship of sport
What's at stake: A review could produce clearer rules and a more even distribution of sponsorship between, for example, women's and men's sport and smaller clubs, but a change would affect how businesses can reason about deductions for their sponsorship costs.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the rules on tax deductions for sponsoring sport should be reviewed and modernized to reflect today's ways of measuring market value, or whether the current framework should remain unchanged pending a review already under way.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for a new review of the sponsorship rules, since an earlier call for a review of the framework to ensure equal and sustainable sponsorship is already being processed within the Government Offices.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 17 (C, MP)
The reservation wants a review of the sponsorship-of-sport framework, arguing that deductibility today is governed by an outdated patchwork of precedent that ignores exposure through social media, which in practice favors sports with large in-person audiences over a more even distribution between, for example, women's and men's teams.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 17 by C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/14/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 15/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:2164 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M) and 2023/24:2480 by Helena Lindahl et al. (C) point 9.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2164 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M) och 2023/24:2480 av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C) yrkande 9.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 60 proposals regarding business, capital and property in motions from the general motions period 2023. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that the Riksdag has already taken a position on the current issues or that investigations are ongoing.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a new micro-enterprise business form with simplified administration and standard taxation. (C, MP) — Reservation 17
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about deductibility when sponsoring sports.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about deductibility when sponsoring sports. The closest underlying principle is that sports and culture have been impoverished and should be available to everyone, and that tax deductions should be weighed against what they provide society. A review aiming at more equal distribution between clubs and associations does not contradict these principles but aligns with them.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om avdragsrätt vid sponsring av idrott. Närmast liggande princip är att idrotten och kulturen har utarmats och ska komma alla till del, samt att skatteavdrag ska prövas mot vad de ger samhället. En översyn som syftar till en jämnare fördelning mellan lag och föreningar strider inte mot dessa principer utan ligger i linje med dem.
- sports have been impoverisheddecisive»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Even culture and sports have been impoverished when school libraries are shut down, the swimming school has become more expensive, and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
- tax deductions are weighed against benefit»Istället för rut-bidrag till städning hos fullt friska personer så kan vi använda skattekronorna till att förbättra hemtjänsten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of RUT subsidies for cleaning by fully healthy people, we can use our tax money to improve home care services.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address sponsorship deductions, but requires simplicity and clarity in the tax rules, which argues against the deduction right being governed by an outdated patchwork of precedents.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address sponsorship deductions, but requires simplicity and clarity in the tax rules, which argues against the deduction right being governed by an outdated patchwork of precedents. The plan also wants access to sports and leisure to increase and is explicitly feminist, which supports more equal distribution between different teams and associations. A review of the rules is thus in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte upp sponsringsavdrag, men kräver enkelhet och tydlighet i skatteregelverket, vilket talar mot att avdragsrätten styrs av ett föråldrat lapptäcke av prejudikat. Planen vill också att tillgången till idrott och fritid ökar och är uttalat feministisk, vilket stöder en jämnare fördelning mellan olika lag och föreningar. En översyn av regelverket ligger därmed i planens linje.
- simple and clear tax rulesdecisive»tydlighet i regelverket, breda skattebaser« (party programme ↗)“clarity in the rules, broad tax bases”
- increased access to sports»Tillgången till fritidsaktiviteter till rimliga kostnader, både vad gäller idrott och kultur, behöver öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Access to leisure activities at reasonable cost, both for sports and culture, needs to increase.”
- feminist party»Med denna grundsyn är socialdemokratin ett feministiskt parti.« (party programme ↗)“With this basic view, social democracy is a feminist party.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address deductibility for sponsorship.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address deductibility for sponsorship. The closest commitments are that money to sports shall be distributed evenly, that grassroots and youth sports are an investment in public health, and that unnecessary bureaucracy shall be avoided through regulatory simplification. A review that replaces an outdated patchwork of precedents with more even distribution is thereby in line with the plan, but the conclusion is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte avdragsrätt för sponsring. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att pengarna till idrotten ska fördelas jämnt, att bredd- och ungdomsidrott är en investering i folkhälsa och att onödig byråkrati ska undvikas genom regelförenkling. En översyn som ersätter ett föråldrat prejudikatlapptäcke med en jämnare fördelning ligger därmed i linje med planen, men slutsatsen är härledd.
- even distribution to sportsdecisive»De pengar som kommer idrotten och andra kultur- och fritidsaktiviteter till del måste fördelas jämnt mellan könen.« (party programme ↗)“The money that goes to sports and other cultural and recreational activities must be distributed evenly between genders.”
- investment in grassroots sports»Genom resurser till ungdoms- och breddidrotten, inklusive idrott för människor med funktionsnedsättning, korpidrott och motionsidrott, investerar vi i såväl livskvalitet som folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Through resources for youth and grassroots sports, including sports for people with disabilities, occupational sports and recreational sports, we invest in both quality of life and public health.”
- active regulatory simplification»Onödig byråkrati ska undvikas genom ett aktivt regelförenklingsarbete.« (party programme ↗)“Unnecessary bureaucracy shall be avoided through active regulatory simplification.”
The election manifesto states that sport should be equal and inclusive and that red tape for entrepreneurs should be cleared.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that sport should be equal and inclusive and that red tape for entrepreneurs should be cleared. A deduction regime based on outdated precedents and benefiting high-attendance sports runs counter to both these commitments, so a review aligns with the plan. The plan's gender equality goal also supports a more even distribution between clubs and associations.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att idrotten ska vara jämlik och inkluderande och att regelträsket för företagare ska rensas upp. Ett avdragsregelverk som bygger på föråldrade prejudikat och gynnar publikstarka idrotter strider mot båda dessa åtaganden, så en översyn ligger i planens linje. Planens jämställdhetsmål stöder också en jämnare fördelning mellan lag och föreningar.
- equal and inclusive sportdecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet. Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende, idrotten jämlik och inkluderande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party. Culture shall be free and independent, sport equal and inclusive.”
- modernize complicated rules»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear red tape for entrepreneurs, large and small.”
- gender equality as goal»Vi ska bygga ett jämställt Sverige med möjligheter och rättvisa för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall build an equal Sweden with opportunities and fairness for all.”
- value of voluntary organizations»Idrottsrörelsen och Sveriges folkrörelser gör värdefulla insatser för att bygga tillit och gemenskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sports organizations and Sweden's popular movements make valuable contributions to building trust and community.”
The plan does not address the sponsorship deduction specifically, but requires a tax system that is simple, transparent and easily understood, and that an equality perspective be weighed into all relevant public decisions.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the sponsorship deduction specifically, but requires a tax system that is simple, transparent and easily understood, and that an equality perspective be weighed into all relevant public decisions. A regulatory framework built on an outdated precedent patchwork and systematically favouring certain sports is incompatible with both these commitments. The plan also wants to strengthen civil society financing, which argues for reviewing the deduction right.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte upp sponsringsavdraget särskilt, men den kräver ett skattesystem som är enkelt, transparent och lättförståeligt, och att ett jämställdhetsperspektiv vägs in i alla relevanta offentliga beslut. Ett regelverk som bygger på ett föråldrat prejudikatlapptäcke och systematiskt gynnar vissa idrotter står i strid med båda dessa åtaganden. Planen vill dessutom stärka civilsamhällets finansiering, vilket talar för att se över avdragsrätten.
- simple and transparent tax systemdecisive»Skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna, vara så enkel och transparent som« (party programme ↗)“Tax policy shall favour the wealth-creating forces, be as simple and transparent as”
- easily understood tax rules»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax rates shall be competitive and easily understood to encourage enterprise, education and investments.”
- equality in public decisions»jämställdhetsperspektiv ska integreras i alla relevanta offentliga beslut.« (party programme ↗)“equality perspective shall be integrated into all relevant public decisions.”
- strengthened financing of civil society»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue to improve civil society financing through both broader tax deductions for gifts and long-term government grants.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme wants non-profit activities to be prioritized over commercial interests and that donations to non-profit organizations are tax-deductible, and that sport is promoted and supported.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants non-profit activities to be prioritized over commercial interests and that donations to non-profit organizations are tax-deductible, and that sport is promoted and supported. It also requires that tax rules are designed as simply as possible and that support for leisure activities is distributed equally. A review of an outdated precedent-driven deduction system that distorts between sports aligns with this.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet vill att ideell verksamhet prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen och att gåvor till ideella organisationer är skattebefriade, och att idrotten främjas och stödjas. Det kräver dessutom att skattereglerna utformas så enkelt som möjligt och att stödet till fritidsaktiviteter fördelas jämställt. En översyn av ett föråldrat prejudikatstyrt avdragssystem som snedvrider mellan idrotter ligger i linje med detta.
- support non-profit activities tax-wisedecisive»Ideell verksamhet ska prioriteras framför kommersiella intressen vid utformningen av statens och kommunernas fritidspolitik. Gåvor till ideella organisationer bör vara skattebefriade.« (party programme ↗)“Non-profit activities shall be prioritized over commercial interests in the design of the state's and municipalities' leisure policy. Donations to non-profit organizations should be tax-deductible.”
- simple tax rules»Det är dessutom viktigt att skattereglerna utformas så enkelt som möjligt för att därigenom underlätta för bland annat småföretagsamhet.« (party programme ↗)“It is also important that tax rules are designed as simply as possible to thereby facilitate, among other things, small business.”
- promote sport and exercise»Hälsa, motion och olika former av idrott ska främjas och stödjas av kommunerna.« (party programme ↗)“Health, exercise and various forms of sport shall be promoted and supported by the municipalities.”
- equal sports support»Det offentliga stödet till idrotten ska främja jämställdhet.« (party programme ↗)“Public support for sport shall promote equality.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan commits to making the tax system simpler and eliminating a third of businesses' administrative costs and red tape.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to making the tax system simpler and eliminating a third of businesses' administrative costs and red tape. A deduction system governed by an outdated patchwork of precedent is precisely the kind of lack of clarity that raises costs for businesses, and a review therefore aligns with the plan's direction. The plan's stated simplification ambition for tax rules, exemplified by 3:12, points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att göra skattesystemet enklare och att ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och regelkrångel. Ett avdragsregelverk som styrs av ett föråldrat lapptäcke av prejudikat är just en sådan otydlighet som fördyrar för företagen, och en översyn ligger därför i planens riktning. Planens uttalade förenklingsambition för skattereglerna, exemplifierad av 3:12, pekar åt samma håll.
- enklare skattesystemdecisive»Ska det ske måste skattesystemet bli enklare, och bolags-, kunskaps- och kapitalskatter vara konkurrenskraftiga och uppmuntra till investeringar i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If that is to happen the tax system must become simpler, and corporate, knowledge and capital taxes must be competitive and encourage investment in Sweden.”
- mindre regelkrångel»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Eliminate a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
- förenklade skatteregler»Förenkla 3:12-reglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Simplify the 3:12 rules”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that the design of taxes and rules is crucial for sports' conditions and wants to give sports movements the conditions for continued viability.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the design of taxes and rules is crucial for sports' conditions and wants to give sports movements the conditions for continued viability. The counter-proposal's demand for a review of the deduction rules for sports sponsorship, so that an outdated precedent patchwork does not distort between sports, directly aligns with this. The plan also wants to see regulatory simplification and appropriate rules developed in cooperation with the sports movement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att skatters och reglers utformning är avgörande för idrottens villkor och vill ge idrottsrörelserna förutsättningar till fortsatt livskraft. Motförslagets krav på en översyn av avdragsreglerna för idrottssponsring, så att ett föråldrat prejudikatlapptäcke inte snedvrider mellan idrotter, ligger direkt i linje med detta. Planen vill också se regelförenkling och ändamålsenliga regelverk framtagna i samverkan med idrottsrörelsen.
- tax rules determine sports' conditionsdecisive»Skatter och reglers utformning är avgörande för vilka förutsättningar det finns för livskraftiga elitidrotter och proffsligor som skapar engagemang hos hundratusentals.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Taxes and rules' design are crucial for what conditions exist for viable elite sports and professional leagues that create engagement among hundreds of thousands.”
- viable sports movement»Ge idrottsrörelserna förutsättningar till fortsatt livskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Give sports movements the conditions for continued viability”
- appropriate rules for sports»Tillståndsprocesser och regelverk bör präglas av samverkan mellan myndigheter, idrottsklubbar och supporterrörelse utifrån en konstruktiv anda.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Permission processes and regulations should be characterised by cooperation between authorities, sports clubs and supporter movement based on a constructive spirit.”
- regulatory simplification»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and ease the administrative burden on small businesses”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:SkU12)
- Committee report full text (HB01SkU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1389 — Skattetrappa för företagare av Peter Ollén (M)
- Motion 2023/24:141 — Möjlighet till lägre reavinstskatt vid försäljning av privatbostad av Jörgen Grubb (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1445 — Förenklade regler för familjeföretag av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1446 — Skatt kopplad till poängsystem för skogs- och lantbruk av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1481 — Ekonomisk rättvisa mellan boendeformer av Louise Thunström och Jessica Rodén (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1581 — Sänkning av stämpelskatten för lagfart och pantbrev av Lars Engsund och Jan Ericson (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1634 — AI:s betydelse för framtidens arbetsmarknad och skola av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1655 — Skatteförfarande av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1656 — Punktskatt av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1716 — Låg skatt på investeringssparkonton av Camilla Brunsberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1787 — Enklare regler för uthyrning av komplementbostad av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1818 — Beskattning av naturvårdsavtal av Anders W Jonsson och Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:1885 — Kulturpolitiska frågor av Amanda Lind och Jacob Risberg (båda MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2035 — Skatteöversyn för ekonomisk rättvisa mellan boendeformer av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2068 — Skogspolitik med helhetssyn av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2164 — Könsneutralt system för idrottssponsring av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2171 — Lägre flyttskatter för ökad rörlighet på bostadsmarknaden och ökad tillväxt av Johanna Hornberger (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2264 — Differentierad reavinstskatt vid försäljning av bostad av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2321 — Ett rättvist skattesystem av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2433 — Förbättrade tonnageskatteregler och slopad stämpelskatt på fartyg av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament