2025-02-262024/25:MJU8 · p.17MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Government measures to promote domestically produced food
State measures to promote consumption of Swedish-produced food
What's at stake: The decision affects how much government effort goes into highlighting the benefits of Swedish food, affecting Swedish farmers and food companies as well as consumers' ability to make informed choices about the environment, animal welfare, and rural conditions.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the state should actively run campaigns and produce national guidelines to encourage consumers to choose Swedish-produced food, or whether existing information and labeling are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee emphasizes the importance of information on food origin being clear and accessible so that consumers can make informed choices, and points to the EU-wide framework as well as voluntary labeling initiatives taken by industry itself. In light of measures already taken, including new rules on origin information for meat served in restaurants, the committee does not see reason to now recommend a dedicated state campaign or national guidelines to promote the purchase of Swedish-produced food.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 28 (SD)
The reservation (SD) argues that it is desirable to choose locally produced food with a long shelf life, since it reduces environmental impact through shorter transport while also improving animal welfare conditions and supporting Swedish businesses. It wants the government to draw up national guidelines on the benefits of buying Swedish and to consider tasking county administrative boards with running a campaign aimed at public and private consumers to increase purchases of locally produced food, which would also strengthen the country's food preparedness.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 28 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 237–64Ja 221–80
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1373 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) demand 17 and 2024/25:1384 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) demand 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1373 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkande 17 och 2024/25:1384 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 80 proposals in motions from the general motions period 2024. In part with reference to work being underway in several matters. The proposals concern, for example, information about and labeling of food, food inspection, self-sufficiency, crisis preparedness, food prices, competition, and unfair trading practices in the food chain.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce mandatory origin labeling for all animal products in every stage of the production chain, including restaurants. (SD) — Reservation 28
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme gives the state a special responsibility for the country being sufficiently self-sufficient in food, and the election manifesto makes investments in sustainable food production and healthier food from the Swedish countryside part of the green transition.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme gives the state a special responsibility for the country being sufficiently self-sufficient in food, and the election manifesto makes investments in sustainable food production and healthier food from the Swedish countryside part of the green transition. National guidelines and a campaign for locally produced food are means for the same goal and furthermore strengthen food supply security. The plan also requires that more of production's value remains in the countryside.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet ger staten ett särskilt ansvar för att landet är tillräckligt självförsörjande med livsmedel, och valmanifestet gör satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion och hälsosammare mat från den svenska landsbygden till en del av den gröna omställningen. Nationella riktlinjer och en kampanj för närproducerade livsmedel är medel för samma mål och stärker dessutom livsmedelsberedskapen. Planen kräver också att mer av produktionens värden stannar på landsbygden.
- state responsibility for food self-sufficiencydecisive»se till att landet är tillräckligt självförsörjande med livsmedel« (party programme ↗)“ensure that the country is sufficiently self-sufficient in food”
- sustainable food production»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“An important part of the green transition is investments in sustainable food production.”
- food from Swedish countryside»Hälsosammare mat från vår egen svenska landsbygd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Healthier food from our own Swedish countryside.”
- shift toward sustainable eating habits»ett långsiktigt skifte mot mer hållbara matvanor« (party programme ↗)“a long-term shift toward more sustainable eating habits”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address campaigns for domestic food.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address campaigns for domestic food. However, the party programme requires agricultural policy for ecologically sustainable crop production and safe food with environmental consideration and ethical animal husbandry as basic principles, and the election manifesto wants to strengthen civil defence and preparedness. The counter-proposal's guidelines and campaign for locally produced food, motivated by shorter transport routes, animal welfare and food security, are in line with these commitments, but the support is indirect.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte upp kampanjer för inhemska livsmedel. Partiprogrammet kräver dock en jordbrukspolitik för ekologiskt uthålligt åkerbruk och säkra livsmedel med miljöhänsyn och etisk djurhållning som grundprinciper, och valmanifestet vill rusta upp det civila försvaret och beredskapen. Motförslagets riktlinjer och kampanj för närproducerat, motiverade av kortare transporter, djurvillkor och livsmedelsberedskap, ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden, men stödet är indirekt.
- sustainable agriculture and safe fooddecisive»kraven på ekologisk uthålligt åkerbruk och säkra livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“the requirements for ecologically sustainable crop production and safe food.”
- environmental consideration and ethical animal husbandry»producentintresset, ska vara utgångspunkten för en politik där säkra livsmedel, miljöhänsyn« (party programme ↗)“producer interest, shall be the starting point for a policy where safe food, environmental consideration”
- strengthened civil preparedness»Rusta upp det civila försvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen civil defence.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to level the playing field by procuring locally produced food for public kitchens and through clear country-of-origin labelling, and highlights buying more locally produced food as part of the transition.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to level the playing field by procuring locally produced food for public kitchens and through clear country-of-origin labelling, and highlights buying more locally produced food as part of the transition. National guidelines and a campaign for locally produced food are in line with this and simultaneously strengthen self-sufficiency, which the plan explicitly wants to increase. The plan does not mention regional authorities' campaign mandate, so support is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill utjämna konkurrensen genom att upphandla lokalproducerat till offentliga kök och genom tydlig ursprungsmärkning, och lyfter fram att handla mer lokalt producerat som en del av omställningen. Nationella riktlinjer och en kampanj för närproducerade livsmedel ligger i linje med detta och stärker samtidigt självförsörjningen, som planen uttryckligen vill öka. Planen talar inte om regionala myndigheters kampanjuppdrag, så stödet härleds.
- locally produced and country-of-origin labellingdecisive»upphandla lokalproducerat till offentliga kök, genom tydlig ursprungsmärkning« (party programme ↗)“procure locally produced food for public kitchens, through clear country-of-origin labelling”
- increased self-sufficiency»stärka det svenska jordbruket för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen Swedish agriculture for increased self-sufficiency with basic foodstuffs”
- locally produced food»handla mer lokalt producerat« (party programme ↗)“buy more locally produced”
- support for organic agriculture»ge mer stöd till lantbruket för omställning till ekologisk odling« (2022 manifesto ↗)“provide more support to agriculture for conversion to organic farming”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto commits to working for more locally-grown and climate-smart food and to increase food production and food security, and the party programme wants to raise the self-sufficiency rate for food.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to working for more locally-grown and climate-smart food and to increase food production and food security, and the party programme wants to raise the self-sufficiency rate for food. National guidelines and a campaign for locally-produced food serve these goals. The plan's commitment to free trade points in another direction but does not affect consumer information initiatives.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att arbeta för mer närodlad och klimatsmart mat och att öka matproduktionen och försörjningstryggheten, och partiprogrammet vill höja självförsörjningsgraden av livsmedel. Nationella riktlinjer och en kampanj för närproducerade livsmedel tjänar dessa mål. Planens frihandelsåtagande drar åt andra hållet men träffar inte informationsinsatser till konsumenter.
- more locally-grown fooddecisive»Vi ska arbeta för mer närodlad och klimatsmart mat och ett levande, hållbart jordbruk som bidrar till den biologiska mångfalden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall work for more locally-grown and climate-smart food and a living, sustainable agriculture that contributes to biodiversity.”
- increased food readiness»En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A long-term sustainable food supply with increased food security and increased food production requires regulatory simplification and tax cuts”
- increased self-sufficiency rate»Med olika medel ska självförsörjningsgraden« (party programme ↗)“By various means the self-sufficiency rate”
- free trade»Sverige klarar sig inte utan frihandel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden cannot manage without free trade.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is a free-trade plan: Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade, open markets stimulate food production and protectionism shall be consigned to history.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is a free-trade plan: Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade, open markets stimulate food production and protectionism shall be consigned to history. State guidelines and publicly funded campaigns to steer consumers towards domestic food are moreover precisely the kind of symbolic politics the plan distances itself from. The plan instead wants to give consumers correct product information and let choices be free.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är en frihandelsplan: Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel, öppna marknader stimulerar livsmedelsproduktion och protektionism ska höra till historien. Statliga riktlinjer och offentligt finansierade kampanjer för att styra konsumenter mot inhemska livsmedel är dessutom just den sorts symbolpolitik planen tar avstånd från. Planen vill i stället ge konsumenten korrekt produktinformation och låta valen vara fria.
- free trade as a starting pointdecisive»Sverige ska vara en stark röst för frihandel, i första hand genom globala avtal men annars genom regionala överenskommelser.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a strong voice for free trade, first and foremost through global agreements but otherwise through regional arrangements.”
- open food markets»Att öppna marknader för handel stimulerar livsmedelsproduktion och effektiv användning av åkermark.« (party programme ↗)“Opening markets for trade stimulates food production and efficient use of arable land.”
- distance from symbolic politics»Liberal miljöpolitik tar avstånd från symbolpolitik och åtgärder som dövar samveten i stället för att rädda miljön.« (party programme ↗)“Liberal environmental policy distances itself from symbolic politics and measures that dull the conscience instead of saving the environment.”
- correct product information»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt produktinformation.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore a strong competition law and consumer laws are needed that give the right to correct product information.”
The party programme establishes that agricultural policy should be designed so that it creates conditions for closeness between producer and consumer, which reduces the need for long-distance transport, and that Sweden should take advantage of its good conditions for environmentally friendly and safe food production.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that agricultural policy should be designed so that it creates conditions for closeness between producer and consumer, which reduces the need for long-distance transport, and that Sweden should take advantage of its good conditions for environmentally friendly and safe food production. The election manifesto also wants to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency. National guidelines and a campaign on the benefits of locally produced food are thus in line with the plan, which also requires well-developed consumer information.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att jordbrukspolitiken bör utformas så att den skapar förutsättningar för närhet mellan producent och konsument, vilket minskar behovet av långväga transporter, och att Sverige bör ta till vara sina goda förutsättningar för miljövänlig och säker livsmedelsproduktion. Valmanifestet vill dessutom öka Sveriges självförsörjning. Nationella riktlinjer och en kampanj om fördelarna med närproducerade livsmedel ligger därmed i linje med planen, som också kräver en väl utbyggd konsumentinformation.
- closeness between producer and consumerdecisive»skapar förutsättningar för närhet mellan producent och« (party programme ↗)“creates conditions for closeness between producer and”
- increased self-sufficiency»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory changes and cost relief for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
- Swedish food production»Sverige bör ta till vara sina mycket goda förutsättningar för miljövänlig och säker produktion« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should take advantage of its very good conditions for environmentally friendly and safe production”
- consumer information»En väl utbyggd konsumentinformation« (party programme ↗)“Well-developed consumer information”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's explicit method in food production is to support, not direct: conditions for farming should be improved through lower taxes and less red tape, and the food strategy strengthened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's explicit method in food production is to support, not direct: conditions for farming should be improved through lower taxes and less red tape, and the food strategy strengthened. National guidelines and state-funded campaigns meant to direct consumers' purchases are another kind of measure, and the plan also wants state spending to decrease. The goal of increased domestic production is shared, but the counter-proposal's means are rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planens uttryckliga metod på livsmedelsområdet är att stötta, inte styra: förutsättningarna för lantbruk ska förbättras genom sänkta skatter och mindre regelkrångel, och livsmedelsstrategin förstärkas. Nationella riktlinjer och statligt finansierade kampanjer som ska styra konsumenters inköp är en annan sorts åtgärd, och planen vill dessutom att statens utgifter minskar. Målet om ökad inhemsk produktion delas, men motförslagets medel avvisas.
- support not direct farmingdecisive»Vi ska stötta, inte styra, jord- och skogsbruket« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We should support, not direct, agriculture and forestry”
- lower taxes for farming»förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“improve conditions for running farms by lowering taxes”
- increased domestic production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen farming to increase domestic food production”
- reduced state spending»Statens utgifter ska minska« (2022 manifesto ↗)“State spending shall decrease”
The election manifesto undertakes to increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food, and the crisis preparedness section wants to increase the degree of self-sufficiency in critical goods.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto undertakes to increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food, and the crisis preparedness section wants to increase the degree of self-sufficiency in critical goods. The party programme sees a strong strategic value in a high degree of self-sufficiency in the food area. National guidelines and a campaign to increase purchases of domestic food thus serve precisely these commitments, even though the plan is otherwise sparing with public expenditure.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel, och krisberedskapsavsnittet vill öka självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska varor. Partiprogrammet ser ett starkt strategiskt värde i en hög självförsörjningsgrad på livsmedelsområdet. Nationella riktlinjer och en kampanj för att öka köpen av inhemska livsmedel tjänar just dessa åtaganden, även om planen i övrigt är sparsam med offentliga utgifter.
- Swedish food supplydecisive»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”
- strategic self-sufficiency»landet har en hög självförsörjningsgrad vad avser livsmedelsproduktion« (party programme ↗)“the country has a high degree of self-sufficiency in food production”
- preparedness through self-sufficiency»Öka den svenska självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska produkter och varor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Sweden's self-sufficiency degree in critical products and goods”
- Swedish interests first»Prioritera svenska medborgares intressen i den ekonomiska politiken« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritise Swedish citizens' interests in economic policy”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU8)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1001 — Fritidsodlingens betydelse för livsmedelsförsörjning och livsmedelsberedskap av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1119 — Skyddade personuppgifter för konsumenter vid missförhållanden efter inköp av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1202 — Statlig kontrollstyrka mot livsmedelsfusk av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1269 — Lagstadgad åldersgräns för energidryck av Arber Gashi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1314 — En åtgärdsplan för att skydda oss och våra livsmedel från PFAS av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1373 — Livsmedel av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1384 — Konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1396 — Jakt- och viltvård av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1398 — Cirkulär ekonomi av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1814 — Livskraftig skånsk landsbygd av Peter Ollén m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1927 — Ökad nationell självförsörjning med hållbart jordbruk av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:20 — Ytterligare öka självförsörjningsgraden i fråga om livsmedel av Dan Hovskär (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:202 — De gröna näringarna och äganderätten av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2421 — Ökat stöd för svenskt mathantverk av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2426 — Insatser mot hälsofarliga kosttillskott av Saila Quicklund (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2613 — En grön klimathandlingsplan för Sverige 2025 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2627 — Klimatanpassning av Sverige 2025 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2695 — Ökad självförsörjning på livsmedel av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2763 — Ökad självförsörjningsgrad och produktion av livsmedel av Sten Bergheden (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament