2024-03-072023/24:MJU9 · p.6MJUEnvironment & agriculture

Origin information in restaurants and public kitchens

What's at stake: The decision affects whether restaurant guests and diners in schools, hospitals and other public kitchens will be able to see where their meat comes from, which also matters for the competitiveness of Swedish meat producers.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether binding national rules on origin information for meat in restaurants and public kitchens should be introduced now, or whether it is enough for the government to investigate how consumers can get better access to such information.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee recommends rejecting the motions and shares the government's view that consumers should have the same opportunity to make informed choices whether the meat is bought in a shop or eaten at a restaurant, but wants to await the government's review of how such origin information could be designed before the Riksdag takes a position on binding rules.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 11 (S, C)

The reserving parties (S, C) want national rules on origin information for meat in restaurants and public kitchens introduced now, arguing this would benefit Swedish food producers, increase Sweden's self-sufficiency, and is fully possible under EU rules.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by S, C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 20/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/91/0/15follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/14/4departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Cown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 62/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:215 by Rebecka Le Moine et al. (MP) demand 1, 2023/24:413 by Mikael Eskilandersson et al. (SD) demand 8, 2023/24:1091 by Markus Wiechel and Victoria Tiblom (both SD) demand 3, 2023/24:1696 by Aida Birinxhiku (S), 2023/24:2040 by Sanna Backeskog et al. (S), 2023/24:2479 by Daniel Bäckström et al. (C) demand 8 and 2023/24:2628 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) demand 14.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:215 av Rebecka Le Moine m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1, 2023/24:413 av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 8, 2023/24:1091 av Markus Wiechel och Victoria Tiblom (båda SD) yrkande 3, 2023/24:1696 av Aida Birinxhiku (S), 2023/24:2040 av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S), 2023/24:2479 av Daniel Bäckström m.fl. (C) yrkande 8 och 2023/24:2628 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 14.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 100 motions on food policy. The motions deal, among other things, with the food chain's preparedness work. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway in the area, for example in investigations and in the Government Offices.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that it is the responsibility of politics, not individuals, to create opportunities to choose climate-smart alternatives, which speaks for binding rules on origin information instead of voluntary ones.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that it is the responsibility of politics, not individuals, to create opportunities to choose climate-smart alternatives, which speaks for binding rules on origin information instead of voluntary ones. It also wants healthier food from the country's own countryside and investments in sustainable food production. Origin labeling at restaurants is not mentioned in the plan, hence low confidence.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att det är politikens och inte individens ansvar att skapa möjligheter att välja klimatsmarta alternativ, vilket talar för bindande regler om ursprungsinformation framför frivillighet. Den vill också ha hälsosammare mat från den egna landsbygden och satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion. Ursprungsmärkning på restaurang nämns inte i planen, därav låg säkerhet.

  • political responsibility for conscious choicesdecisive»Det är politikens, och inte individens, ansvar att skapa möjligheter för människor att välja enkla och billiga klimatsmarta alternativ.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the responsibility of politics, not individuals, to create opportunities for people to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives.”
  • domestic food production»Hälsosammare mat från vår egen svenska landsbygd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Healthier food from our own Swedish countryside.”
  • sustainable food production»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investments in sustainable food production.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The party programme makes consumer perspective the starting point for food policy and builds the mixed economy on conscious, active consumers.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes consumer perspective the starting point for food policy and builds the mixed economy on conscious, active consumers. Origin information on meat in restaurants and public kitchens gives precisely the knowledge required for conscious choices. The plan also requires food policy with safe foodstuffs, which origin labelling serves.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör konsumentperspektivet till utgångspunkt för livsmedelspolitiken och bygger blandekonomin på medvetna, aktiva konsumenter. Ursprungsinformation om kött på restaurang och i offentliga kök ger just den kunskap som krävs för medvetna val. Planen kräver också en jordbrukspolitik med säkra livsmedel, vilket ursprungsmärkningen tjänar.

  • consumer perspective as basic principledecisive»Konsumentperspektivet, inte producentintresset, ska vara utgångspunkten för en politik där säkra livsmedel, miljöhänsyn och etisk djurhållning är grundprinciper.« (party programme ↗)“The consumer perspective, not producer interest, shall be the starting point for a policy where safe foodstuffs, environmental consideration and ethical animal husbandry are basic principles.”
  • conscious active consumers»De kräver den blandekonomi, som bygger på en kombination av samhällsåtgärder och marknadsmekanismer, en effektiv offentlig sektor, ansvarsfulla företag, starka fackliga organisationer och medvetna, aktiva konsumenter.« (party programme ↗)“They require the mixed economy, which builds on a combination of government measures and market mechanisms, an efficient public sector, responsible enterprises, strong trade union organisations and conscious, active consumers.”
  • safe foodstuffs»Jordbrukspolitiken ska utformas för att tillgodose kraven på ekologisk uthålligt åkerbruk och säkra livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“Food policy shall be designed to meet requirements for ecologically sustainable arable farming and safe foodstuffs.”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan explicitly requires clear country-of-origin marking and procurement of locally produced food for public kitchens as a means to level the playing field against food produced under worse conditions.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly requires clear country-of-origin marking and procurement of locally produced food for public kitchens as a means to level the playing field against food produced under worse conditions. The counter-proposal's requirement for national provisions on origin information for meat in restaurants and public kitchens is the same measure. The plan also wants consumers to be able to make free and informed choices through clear marking.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver uttryckligen tydlig ursprungsmärkning och upphandling av lokalproducerat till offentliga kök som medel för att utjämna konkurrensen mot mat producerad under sämre villkor. Motförslagets krav på nationella bestämmelser om ursprungsinformation för kött på restaurang och i offentliga kök är samma åtgärd. Planen vill dessutom att konsumenter ska kunna göra fria och upplysta val genom tydlig märkning.

  • clear country-of-origin markingdecisive»Därför vill vi utjämna konkurrensen genom att upphandla lokalproducerat till offentliga kök, genom tydlig ursprungsmärkning och genom ekonomiska styrmedel som missgynnar livsmedel som tillverkats under sämre villkor än vi tillåter i Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, we want to level the playing field through procuring locally produced food for public kitchens, through clear country-of-origin marking and through economic policy instruments that disadvantage food produced under worse conditions than we allow in Sweden.”
  • informed consumer choices»Konsumenter ska ha möjligheter att göra fria och upplysta val.« (party programme ↗)“Consumers shall have opportunities to make free and informed choices.”
  • clear marking of goods»Vi vill ha ett starkt skydd för konsumenterna genom god konsumentvägledning, tydlig märkning av varor och tjänster och en relevant konsumentutbildning i skolan.« (party programme ↗)“We want strong consumer protection through good consumer guidance, clear marking of goods and services and relevant consumer education in schools.”
  • prevent imports with poorer animal protection»Internationella handelsavtal ska inkludera djurskyddsfrågan för att undvika att billig import av mat från länder med sämre djurskydd ökar.« (party programme ↗)“International trade agreements shall include animal welfare issues to prevent cheaper imports of food from countries with poorer animal protection from increasing.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan promises to work for more locally grown food and to strengthen the green sectors' competitiveness, and demands increased food production and supply security.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan promises to work for more locally grown food and to strengthen the green sectors' competitiveness, and demands increased food production and supply security. Information on the origin of meat at restaurants and in public kitchens makes these choices possible for consumers and benefits domestic producers, which lies in line with the commitment. The plan simultaneously emphasizes regulatory simplification, but the food production line carries greater weight in the matter.

Original (Swedish)

Planen lovar att arbeta för mer närodlad mat och att stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft, och kräver ökad matproduktion och försörjningstrygghet. Ursprungsinformation om kött på restaurang och i offentliga kök gör dessa val möjliga för konsumenten och gynnar inhemska producenter, vilket ligger i linje med åtagandet. Planen betonar samtidigt regelförenkling, men livsmedelslinjen väger tyngre i sakfrågan.

  • locally grown food and green sectorsdecisive»Vi ska arbeta för mer närodlad och klimatsmart mat och ett levande, hållbart jordbruk som bidrar till den biologiska mångfalden. Vi vill stärka de gröna näringarnas konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall work for more locally grown and climate-smart food and a living, sustainable agriculture that contributes to biological diversity. We wish to strengthen the green sectors' competitiveness.”
  • increased food production»Sverige behöver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk. En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar, inklusive ett kraftfullt jordbruksavdrag och en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs an even more competitive agriculture. Long-term sustainable food supply with increased supply security and increased food production requires regulatory simplifications and tax cuts, including a powerful agricultural deduction and a biofuel premium that make sustainable farming more profitable.”
  • strengthened agricultural competitiveness»Det svenska lantbrukets konkurrenskraft, både inom EU och gentemot övriga världen, ska förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Swedish agriculture's competitiveness, both within the EU and against the rest of the world, shall be strengthened.”
  • increased self-sufficiency»Den är viktig i goda tider och livsviktig i händelse av krig eller kris. Matproduktionen måste öka, på kort och lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important in good times and vital in the event of war or crisis. Food production must increase, in the short and long term.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires consumer laws that give the right to correct product information and that food policy has a clear consumer perspective, which carries the counter-proposal's requirement for origin information for meat also in restaurants.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires consumer laws that give the right to correct product information and that food policy has a clear consumer perspective, which carries the counter-proposal's requirement for origin information for meat also in restaurants. At the same time the plan wants to keep down the regulatory burden for small businesses and sets the ambition level at EU level with respect for mutual recognition, which pulls in the other direction. Support therefore becomes weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt produktinformation och att livsmedelspolitiken har ett tydligt konsumentperspektiv, vilket bär motförslagets krav på ursprungsinformation för kött också på restaurang. Samtidigt vill planen hålla nere regelbördan för små företag och lägger ambitionsnivån på EU-nivå med respekt för ömsesidigt erkännande, vilket drar åt andra hållet. Stödet blir därför svagt.

  • right to correct product informationdecisive»Därför behövs en stark konkurrenslagstiftning och konsumentlagar som ger rätt till korrekt« (party programme ↗)“Therefore a strong competition law and consumer laws are needed that give the right to correct”
  • consumer perspective in food policy»ha ett tydligt konsument- och hållbarhetsperspektiv« (party programme ↗)“have a clear consumer and sustainability perspective”
  • mutual recognition in the EU»men med respekt för den inre marknadens grundläggande princip« (party programme ↗)“but with respect for the internal market's fundamental principle”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“The regulatory burden for small businesses shall be reduced”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires a well-developed consumer information and clear labelling so that the consumer can make informed choices, and wants agricultural policy to create closeness between producer and consumer.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires a well-developed consumer information and clear labelling so that the consumer can make informed choices, and wants agricultural policy to create closeness between producer and consumer. The election manifesto wants to increase self-sufficiency. National rules on origin information for meat in restaurants follow from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en väl utbyggd konsumentinformation och tydlig märkning så att konsumenten kan göra medvetna val, och vill att jordbrukspolitiken skapar närhet mellan producent och konsument. Valmanifestet vill öka självförsörjningen. Nationella regler om ursprungsinformation för kött på restaurang följer av dessa åtaganden.

  • consumer informationdecisive»En väl utbyggd konsumentinformation« (party programme ↗)“Well-developed consumer information”
  • clear labelling»En tydlig märkning, med möjlighet till kontroll« (party programme ↗)“Clear labelling, with possibility for control”
  • closeness between producer and consumer»Detta minskar behovet av långväga transporter.« (party programme ↗)“This reduces the need for long-distance transport.”
  • increased self-sufficiency»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory changes and cost relief for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's guiding commitment in this area is fewer and simpler rules: one third of company red tape removed and over-implementation of EU decisions countered, with minimum level as the main principle.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's guiding commitment in this area is fewer and simpler rules: one third of company red tape removed and over-implementation of EU decisions countered, with minimum level as the main principle. New national requirements for origin information for restaurants and public kitchens go in the opposite direction. While the plan at the same time wants to strengthen the food strategy and domestic production pulls in the other direction, but the deregulation promise is more specific.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande på området är färre och enklare regler: en tredjedel av företagens regelkrångel bort och överimplementering av EU-beslut motverkad, med miniminivå som huvudregel. Nya nationella krav på ursprungsinformation för restauranger och offentliga kök går i motsatt riktning. Att planen samtidigt vill stärka livsmedelsstrategin och den inhemska produktionen drar åt andra hållet, men regelförenklingslöftet är mer specifikt.

  • EU rules at minimum leveldecisive»motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut« (2022 manifesto ↗)“counteract over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions - as a main rule EU directives should be implemented at minimum level”
  • reduced administrative burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one third of companies' administrative costs and one third of red tape”
  • fewer rules in the food chain»Minska antalet regler för jordbruket och korta handläggningstider för miljötillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the number of regulations for agriculture and shorten processing times for environmental permits”
  • strengthened domestic food production»Förstärka livsmedelsstrategin« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the food strategy”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan sets Swedish food producers' competitiveness and the country's self-sufficiency as an explicit goal, and points out that Swedish special requirements make domestic production more expensive without compensation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sets Swedish food producers' competitiveness and the country's self-sufficiency as an explicit goal, and points out that Swedish special requirements make domestic production more expensive without compensation. Country-of-origin information in restaurants is a tool that lets the consumer choose Swedish and thus turns special requirements into an advantage. The plan also wants to stop importing meat from animals treated in violation of Swedish rules, which presupposes that the origin is known.

Original (Swedish)

Planen sätter svenska livsmedelsproducenters konkurrenskraft och landets självförsörjning som uttalat mål, och pekar på att svenska särkrav gör inhemsk produktion dyrare utan kompensation. Ursprungsinformation på restaurang är ett verktyg som låter konsumenten välja svenskt och därmed vänder särkraven till en fördel. Planen vill dessutom stoppa import av kött från djur som behandlats i strid med svenska regler, vilket förutsätter att ursprunget är känt.

  • strengthened food self-sufficiencydecisive»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency in food”
  • compensate Swedish special requirements»Svenska särkrav för miljöskydd och djurvälfärd gör dessutom ofta inhemsk produktion dyrare än konkurrenternas utan att svenska lantbrukare kompenseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish special requirements for environmental protection and animal welfare often make domestic production more expensive than competitors' without Swedish farmers being compensated.”
  • origin requirements for meat»Arbeta för ett förbud mot import av produkter från djur som har tvångsmatats eller slaktats utan bedövning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a ban on the import of products from animals that have been force-fed or slaughtered without stunning”
  • strategic food supply»landet har en hög självförsörjningsgrad vad avser livsmedelsproduktion« (party programme ↗)“the country has a high degree of self-sufficiency in food production”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament