2025-10-222025/26:CU2 · p.4CUCivil law & housing
Area-based differentiation of the permit requirement
What's at stake: The decision affects whether neighbours may face different building-permit rules depending on whether their area is covered by a detailed development plan, which can play out differently in densely built-up areas that lack such a plan.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the requirement for a building permit should be differentiated based on whether an area is covered by a detailed development plan, as the government proposes, or instead based on the concept of “cohesive built-up areas”, as the motions advocate.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and considers that the government's proposal to differentiate the permit requirement based on whether an area is covered by a detailed development plan strikes a well-balanced compromise between the interests at play in the planning and building process.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (S, MP)
The reservation (S, MP) wants the government to instead investigate area-based differentiation based on the concept of “cohesive built-up areas”. The reasoning is that dividing areas by whether they are covered by a detailed development plan can leave neighbours facing different rules, with unfortunate consequences in densely built-up areas that lack such a plan.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by S, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motions 2024/25:3441 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) request 3 and 2024/25:3442 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) request 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3441 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 och 2024/25:3442 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said yes to the Government's proposal for a simpler, more efficient and more appropriate regulatory framework for building permits. The purpose of the proposal is to create more homes and increase property owners' opportunities to decide how their own property shall be developed. The Government proposes, among other things, the following: In areas not covered by a detailed plan, it shall be possible to undertake more and larger measures without a building permit. However, a building permit shall still be required for construction near property lines, in areas of national interest for total defence and in particularly valuable areas. Larger extensions shall be able to be built without the requirement for a building permit. The requirement for building permits for facade changes to single- and two-family houses is abolished. Building permits shall be able to be granted for loft conversion in residential buildings despite a loft conversion prohibition in the detailed plan. The requirement for so-called plan-compliant initial status is abolished fifteen years after the implementation period of the detailed plan has expired. The legislative amendments come into force on 1 December 2025.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to maintain current building permit regulations and introduce broad notification requirements for attefalls measures. (S, MP) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan says nothing about how the duty to report shall be limited, but it requires urban planning with genuine democratic grounding and building with greater control and planning from society's side.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about how the duty to report shall be limited, but it requires urban planning with genuine democratic grounding and building with greater control and planning from society's side. To investigate a differentiation based on coherent development, so that neighbours do not meet different regulations, is in line with this and with the plan's requirement for deliberation before solutions are settled. The position is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om hur lovplikten ska avgränsas, men den kräver en samhällsplanering med genuin demokratisk förankring och ett byggande med större kontroll och planering från samhällets sida. Att utreda en differentiering utifrån sammanhållen bebyggelse, så att grannar inte möter olika regelverk, ligger i linje med det och med planens krav på eftertanke innan lösningar slås fast. Ställningstagandet är härlett och osäkert.
- democratically grounded planningdecisive»Planeringen behöver en genuin demokratisk förankring och utgå från människors kärlek till platsen man bor på.« (party programme ↗)“Planning needs genuine democratic grounding and should be based on people's love of the place they live.”
- investigate before deciding»Att utveckla kloka politiska lösningar kräver alltid tid och eftertanke.« (party programme ↗)“Developing wise political solutions always requires time and deliberation.”
- societal control over building»Med större kontroll och planering från samhällets sida, kan byggandet både öka i takt och bli miljösmart och lagra kol istället för att släppa ut koldioxid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With greater control and planning from society's side, building can both increase in pace and become environmentally smart and store carbon instead of emitting carbon dioxide.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address how the building obligation shall be differentiated.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address how the building obligation shall be differentiated. The closest principle is a legal order based on equality before the law for all, which supports the counter-proposal's objection that neighbours in the same neighbourhood otherwise meet different regulations. The plan's requirement for a guiding national housing policy and urban planning that prevents segregation points in the same direction, but the conclusion is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte hur lovplikten ska differentieras. Närmast liggande princip är en rättsordning som bygger på allas likhet inför lagen, vilket talar för motförslagets invändning att grannar i samma bebyggelse annars möter olika regelverk. Planens krav på en styrande nationell bostadspolitik och en samhällsplanering som motverkar segregation pekar åt samma håll, men slutsatsen är härledd och osäker.
- equality before the lawdecisive»En rättsordning som bygger på allas likhet inför lagen.« (party programme ↗)“A legal order based on equality before the law for all.”
- guiding housing policy»Styrande nationell bostadspolitik och stärkt kommunalt bostadsförsörjningsansvar.« (party programme ↗)“Guiding national housing policy and strengthened municipal housing supply responsibility.”
- cohesive urban planning»Samhällsplanering som i alla delar motverkar segregation, särskilt på bostadsområdet.« (party programme ↗)“Urban planning that in all respects prevents segregation, especially in housing areas.”
The plan requires that building development takes into account natural and cultural values and that decisions are made close to those affected.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that building development takes into account natural and cultural values and that decisions are made close to those affected. A differentiation based on coherent building development captures densely built areas lacking detailed plans and thus provides more targeted protection than a boundary at a detailed plan area. The plan does not address the demarcation of permit requirements, which is why the assessment is weakly supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att bebyggelse tar hänsyn till natur- och kulturvärden och att beslut fattas nära de människor som berörs. En differentiering utifrån sammanhållen bebyggelse fångar tätbebyggda områden som saknar detaljplan och ger därmed ett mer träffsäkert skydd än en gräns vid detaljplanelagt område. Planen behandlar inte lovpliktens avgränsning, varför bedömningen är svagt underbyggd.
- consideration of natural and cultural valuesdecisive»Bebyggelse ska ta hänsyn till kultur- och naturvärden och bidra till« (party programme ↗)“Building development should take into account cultural and natural values and contribute to”
- strengthened shore protection»försvara allemansrätten och stärka strandskyddet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“defend the right to public access to nature and strengthen shore protection”
- decisions close to those affected»Därför bör beslut tas så nära människor som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“Therefore decisions should be made as close to the people as possible”
The plan wants to make it simpler to build and live outside urban areas and give country people more self-determination over their own land.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make it simpler to build and live outside urban areas and give country people more self-determination over their own land. A differentiation according to detailed planning area gives precisely that freedom outside planned land, while the counter-proposal's alternative with coherent building would draw more areas into permit requirement and moreover delay the simplification through a new investigation. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra det enklare att bygga och bo utanför tätorterna och ge landsbygdsborna mer självbestämmande över sin egen mark. En differentiering efter detaljplanelagt område ger just den friheten utanför planlagd mark, medan motförslagets alternativ med sammanhållen bebyggelse skulle dra in fler områden i lovplikten och dessutom fördröja förenklingen genom en ny utredning. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- easier to build and livedecisive»Strandskyddet ska reformeras så att det blir lättare att bygga och bo på landsbygden. Det är dags att ge landsbygdsborna mer självbestämmande över sin egen mark, och genom regelförenklingar göra det enklare att bygga och bo på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The coastal shelter shall be reformed so that it becomes easier to build and live in the countryside. It is time to give country people more self-determination over their own land, and through regulatory simplifications make it easier to build and live in the countryside.”
- clear away redundant regulations»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-hampering regulations lie like a wet blanket over parts of the countryside. We shall clear away redundant regulations and bureaucracy.”
- strong property rights»Brott mot äganderätten, med konfiskatoriska och godtyckliga beskattningar och ingrepp, underminerar förtroendet och långsiktigheten i samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Violation of property rights, with confiscatory and arbitrary taxation and intrusions, undermines confidence and long-termism in society.”
The plan takes no position on how the duty to report is geographically limited.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan takes no position on how the duty to report is geographically limited. The nearest applicable principle is that building regulations shall be simplified and that more housing can be built, which speaks for a simple and predictable boundary rather than a new investigation of another, more difficult to define concept. The counter-proposal's demand for investigation of the term coherent construction thus lacks support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till hur lovplikten ska avgränsas geografiskt. Den närmast liggande principen är att byggreglerna ska förenklas och att fler bostäder ska kunna byggas, vilket talar för en enkel och förutsägbar gräns snarare än en ny utredning av ett annat, mer svårbestämt begrepp. Motförslagets krav på utredning av begreppet sammanhållen bebyggelse saknar därmed stöd i planen.
- simplified building regulationsdecisive»korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“shorten appeal processes and continue to simplify building regulations”
- simplified building standards»kring byggande på såväl statlig som kommunal nivå förenklas. Byggnormerna bör förenklas,« (party programme ↗)“around building on both state and municipal level shall be simplified. Building standards should be simplified,”
- increased residential construction»Det byggs för få bostäder. För att öka byggandet i Sverige bör konkurrensen öka och reglerna« (party programme ↗)“Too few homes are being built. To increase construction in Sweden, competition should increase and regulations”
The party programme requires that rules are applied equally where conditions are equal and that affected residents get to come in early in the planning process.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires that rules are applied equally where conditions are equal and that affected residents get to come in early in the planning process. The counter-proposal's objection that a boundary at a detailed-planned area gives neighbours in similar dense settlement different rules strikes at precisely that equal treatment principle, and an investigation of the concept of coherent settlement is a means to avoid it. The plan's demand for simple rules does not speak against such a review.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet kräver att regler tillämpas lika där förutsättningarna är lika och att berörda invånare får komma in tidigt i planprocessen. Motförslagets invändning att en gräns vid detaljplanelagt område ger grannar i likartad tätbebyggelse olika regler träffar just den likabehandlingsprincipen, och en utredning av begreppet sammanhållen bebyggelse är ett medel att undvika det. Planens krav på enkla regler talar inte emot en sådan prövning.
- equal rules with equal conditionsdecisive»Strandskyddsregler ska tillämpas lika där förutsättningarna är lika.« (party programme ↗)“Shore protection rules shall be applied equally where conditions are equal.”
- affected residents' influence»Det är viktigt att de invånare som är berörda av en plan får komma in med sina synpunkter så tidigt som möjligt i planprocessen.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the residents who are affected by a plan get to come in with their views as early as possible in the planning process.”
- away with unnecessary building rules»Krångel och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun att leva upp till sitt ansvar eller för enskildas möjligheter att utveckla sitt boende.« (party programme ↗)“Complication and unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of a municipality living up to its responsibility or for individuals' opportunities to develop their home.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to simplify planning and building regulations and shorten processes, not add new investigations about alternative definitions of building permit obligations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to simplify planning and building regulations and shorten processes, not add new investigations about alternative definitions of building permit obligations. An investigation of differentiation based on continuous development delays simplification and makes the regulatory framework less predictable. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill förenkla plan- och byggregelverket och korta processerna, inte tillföra nya utredningar om alternativa avgränsningar av lovplikten. En utredning av differentiering utifrån sammanhållen bebyggelse skjuter upp förenklingen och gör regelverket mindre förutsägbart. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- simpler building regulationsdecisive»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans”
- reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one third of companies' administrative costs and one third of red tape”
- shorter processing times»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten government agencies' processing times through a deadline”
The plan says nothing about how the notification requirement should be delimited geographically or about the concept of cohesive development.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about how the notification requirement should be delimited geographically or about the concept of cohesive development. The nearest principle is the demand for simpler, faster and more predictable rules for planning and construction, and the counter-proposal's demand for a new investigation of the delimitation delays the simplification already on the table. The assessment therefore rests on a general principle and is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om hur lovplikten bör avgränsas geografiskt eller om begreppet sammanhållen bebyggelse. Närmast liggande princip är kravet på enklare, snabbare och mer förutsägbara regler för planering och byggnation, och motförslagets krav på en ny utredning av avgränsningen fördröjer den förenkling som redan ligger på bordet. Bedömningen vilar därför på en allmän princip och är osäker.
- enklare byggreglerdecisive»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”
- snabbare beslutsprocesser»Sverigedemokraterna vill underlätta bostadsbyggande genom att förenkla och snabba på beslutsprocesser och se över de omfattande regelverk och krav som styr bostadsbyggande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to facilitate housing construction by simplifying and accelerating decision processes and reviewing the extensive regulations and requirements governing housing construction.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:CU2)
- Committee report full text (HD01CU2)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3440 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:169 Ett nytt regelverk för bygglov av Malcolm Momodou Jallow m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3441 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:169 Ett nytt regelverk för bygglov av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3442 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:169 Ett nytt regelverk för bygglov av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:3443 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:169 Ett nytt regelverk för bygglov av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2024/25:169 — Ett nytt regelverk för bygglov
Source: The Swedish Parliament