2026-03-252025/26:SkU16 · p.6SkUTaxation
Phasing out environmentally harmful subsidies
Action plan to phase out climate-damaging subsidies
What's at stake: The decision matters for Sweden's climate efforts and for how quickly remaining fossil-fuel subsidies are phased out, while also affecting agriculture's economy and competitiveness.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should be tasked with presenting an action plan for how climate-damaging subsidies, including the tax reduction for agricultural diesel, can be phased out, or whether no such mandate should be given now.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that it recently rejected a similar motion calling for the government to present an action plan for how the tax reduction for agricultural diesel and other climate-damaging subsidies could be phased out in the near term, and it has not changed its position, so the motion is rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (V, MP)
V and MP want the government to present an action plan for how remaining climate-damaging subsidies can be phased out. The reasoning is that the climate crisis is an urgent threat, that environmental and climate taxes should be reformed as part of a coherent environmental policy, that only a handful of subsidies have been phased out so far, and that further action is needed urgently so Sweden does not lose momentum toward net-zero emissions.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 259–36Ja 245–50
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | match | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/0/14 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 17/0/0/7 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 57/0/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motion 2025/26:2783 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau et al. (V) demand 15.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:2783 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkande 15.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 103 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025. The motions concern, among other things, taxes on electricity, fuel, vehicles, aviation, alcohol, tobacco and pesticides. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work in the matters that the motions address and that the Riksdag has already taken a position on these matters.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to exempt electric buses from energy tax like other electric public transport. (V, MP) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to set fixed frames for taking Sweden out of fossil dependence and states that costs for emissions need to increase long-term.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to set fixed frames for taking Sweden out of fossil dependence and states that costs for emissions need to increase long-term. The election manifesto describes the situation as a climate emergency where all political decisions must take the crisis into account. An action plan to phase out remaining climate-damaging subsidies is a direct application of these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sätta fasta ramar för att ta Sverige ur fossilberoendet och slår fast att kostnaderna för utsläpp behöver öka långsiktigt. Valplattformen beskriver läget som ett klimatnödläge där alla politiska beslut måste ta hänsyn till krisen. En handlingsplan för att avveckla kvarvarande klimatskadliga subventioner är en direkt tillämpning av dessa åtaganden.
- rising emission costsdecisive»Kostnaderna för utsläpp behöver öka långsiktigt« (party programme ↗)“Costs for emissions need to increase long-term”
- emissions budget and transition program»Vi vill sätta fasta ramar för att ta Sverige ur fossilberoendet, med en« (party programme ↗)“We want to set fixed frames for taking Sweden out of fossil dependence, with a”
- urgent transition»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we are in.”
- climate emergency»Vi befinner oss i ett klimatnödläge.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We are in a climate emergency.”
The plan establishes that the climate policy framework remains fixed and that the principle that the polluter pays shall be applied in full, with Sweden as a fossil-free welfare nation by 2045.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the climate policy framework remains fixed and that the principle that the polluter pays shall be applied in full, with Sweden as a fossil-free welfare nation by 2045. Remaining climate-damaging subsidies go against both these commitments, and an action plan for phasing them out follows from them. The plan simultaneously requires that the transition be just and work throughout the country, which speaks for phase-out with consideration, not against it.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det klimatpolitiska ramverket ligger fast och att principen om att förorenaren betalar ska tillämpas fullt ut, med Sverige som fossilfri välfärdsnation 2045. Kvarvarande klimatskadliga subventioner går emot båda dessa åtaganden, och en handlingsplan för att avveckla dem följer av dem. Planen kräver samtidigt att omställningen ska vara rättvis och fungera i hela landet, vilket talar för avveckling med hänsyn tagen, inte mot den.
- the polluter paysdecisive»Principen om att förorenaren betalar tillämpas fullt ut.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that the polluter pays shall be fully applied.”
- climate policy framework»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework shall remain fixed.”
- fossil-free welfare nation»Sverige ska bli världens första fossilfria välfärdsnation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's first fossil-free welfare nation.”
- viable food production»Livskraftig svensk livsmedelsproduktion som stärker landets självförsörjningsförmåga.« (party programme ↗)“Viable Swedish food production that strengthens the country's self-sufficiency capacity.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly requires that fossil subsidies be phased out, and the party programme states that the world is in a climate emergency and that investments in new extraction of fossil fuels shall be prohibited.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly requires that fossil subsidies be phased out, and the party programme states that the world is in a climate emergency and that investments in new extraction of fossil fuels shall be prohibited. An action plan to phase out remaining climate-damaging subsidies is precisely the tool the plan's commitment requires. The plan provides no support for postponing the phase-out.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att fossila subventioner fasas ut, och partiprogrammet slår fast att världen befinner sig i ett klimatnödläge och att investeringar i nyutvinning av fossila bränslen ska förbjudas. En handlingsplan för att avveckla kvarvarande klimatskadliga subventioner är just det verktyg planens åtagande kräver. Planen ger inget stöd för att skjuta upp avvecklingen.
- phased out fossil subsidiesdecisive»fasa ut fossila subventioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out fossil subsidies.”
- stop fossil expansion»Investeringar i nyutvinning av fossila bränslen ska förbjudas, inga nya tillstånd för torvbrytning ska ges och uranbrytning ska vara förbjuden.« (party programme ↗)“Investments in new extraction of fossil fuels shall be prohibited, no new permits for peat extraction shall be granted and uranium mining shall be prohibited.”
- climate emergency requires urgency»Världen befinner sig i ett klimatnödläge.« (party programme ↗)“The world is in a climate emergency.”
- directing climate taxes»Syftet med klimatskatter är att minska utsläppen – inte att stärka statens finanser.« (party programme ↗)“The purpose of climate taxes is to reduce emissions – not to strengthen government finances.”
The election manifesto promises to use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies and that it shall cost more to pollute, and the party programme makes green tax switching with increased taxes on climate damage the main track.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises to use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies and that it shall cost more to pollute, and the party programme makes green tax switching with increased taxes on climate damage the main track. An action plan to phase out remaining climate-damaging subsidies follows from this. The plan simultaneously wants to value agriculture's competitiveness with agricultural deduction and biofuel premium.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att använda handelspolitiken för att kapa fossila subventioner och att det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner, och partiprogrammet gör grön skatteväxling med ökade skatter på klimatförstöring till huvudspåret. En handlingsplan för att avveckla kvarvarande klimatskadliga subventioner följer av detta. Planen vill samtidigt värna lantbrukets konkurrenskraft med jordbruksavdrag och biodrivmedelspremie.
- cut fossil subsidiesdecisive»Vi ska använda handelspolitiken för att kapa fossila subventioner runtom i världen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall use trade policy to cut fossil subsidies around the world”
- polluter pays»Det ska kosta mer att smutsa ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall cost more to pollute.”
- green tax switching»Omställningen kan påskyndas med grön skatteväxling, ökade skatter på klimatförstöring och sänkta skatter på arbete och annan välståndsskapande verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“The transition can be speeded up with green tax switching, increased taxes on climate damage and lower taxes on work and other wealth-creating activities.”
- agriculture's competitiveness»inklusive ett kraftfullt jordbruksavdrag och en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“including a strong agricultural deduction and a biofuel premium that makes sustainable agriculture more profitable”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that subsidies, including tax cuts and support, for fossil fuels shall be successively abolished, and the party programme wants to phase out all subsidies for what leads to climate and environmental destruction, explicitly including agriculture and fossil fuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that subsidies, including tax cuts and support, for fossil fuels shall be successively abolished, and the party programme wants to phase out all subsidies for what leads to climate and environmental destruction, explicitly including agriculture and fossil fuels. An action plan for how remaining climate-damaging subsidies are wound down is precisely that commitment put into practice. The plan's principle that the polluter pays points the same way.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att subventioner, inklusive skattelättnader och stöd, till fossila bränslen successivt ska avskaffas, och partiprogrammet vill fasa ut alla subventioner till det som leder till klimat- och miljöförstöring, uttryckligen inklusive jordbruket och fossila drivmedel. En handlingsplan för hur kvarvarande klimatskadliga subventioner avvecklas är precis det åtagandet omsatt i praktik. Planens princip att förorenaren betalar pekar åt samma håll.
- abolish fossil fuel subsidiesdecisive»Subventioner, inklusive skattelättnader och stöd, till fossila bränslen i Sverige såväl som globalt ska successivt avskaffas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Subsidies, including tax cuts and support, for fossil fuels in Sweden as well as globally should be successively abolished.”
- phased out climate-damaging subsidies»Alla subventioner i EU och dess medlemsländer liksom i övriga världen av det som leder till klimat- och miljöförstöring, såsom vissa subventioner till jordbruket eller för fossila drivmedel, behöver fasas ut för att senare avvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“All subsidies in the EU and its member states as well as in the rest of the world for what leads to climate and environmental destruction, such as certain subsidies to agriculture or for fossil fuels, need to be phased out in order to later be abolished.”
- equivalent taxation of fossil fuel»Skatterabatter till fossilt bränsle ska successivt avskaffas och användningen av fossilt bränsle ska beskattas mer likvärdigt oavsett användningsområde.« (party programme ↗)“Tax reductions for fossil fuel should be successively abolished and use of fossil fuel should be taxed more equivalently regardless of area of use.”
- polluter pays»Det är den som förorenar – ingen annan – som ska betala.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the one who pollutes – no one else – who should pay.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto promises cost reductions for agriculture to strengthen self-sufficiency and competitiveness and that fuel prices shall be cut substantially.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises cost reductions for agriculture to strengthen self-sufficiency and competitiveness and that fuel prices shall be cut substantially. An action plan to phase out remaining reductions, such as agricultural diesel, directly contradicts this and affects those dependent on cars to live and work throughout the country. The principle that the polluter pays exists in the plan but does not support precisely this requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar kostnadslättnader för lantbruket för att stärka självförsörjning och konkurrenskraft och att drivmedelspriserna ska sänkas rejält. En handlingsplan för att avveckla kvarvarande nedsättningar, som jordbruksdieseln, går rakt emot detta och drabbar dem som är beroende av bilen för att kunna leva och verka i hela landet. Principen att förorenaren betalar finns i planen men bär inte just detta krav.
- cost reductions for agriculturedecisive»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
- lower fuel prices»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices substantially for everyone, primarily by reducing expensive biofuel blending.”
- car dependence throughout the country»Tillgång till bil är för många en förutsättning för att kunna leva och verka« (party programme ↗)“Access to a car is for many a prerequisite for being able to live and work”
- the polluter pays»principen att förorenaren ska betala« (party programme ↗)“the principle that the polluter shall pay”
The election manifesto explicitly commits to improving conditions for farming through lower fuel taxes and to lower the price of petrol and diesel, and to strengthen agriculture for increased domestic food production.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly commits to improving conditions for farming through lower fuel taxes and to lower the price of petrol and diesel, and to strengthen agriculture for increased domestic food production. An action plan to phase out the reduction for agricultural diesel and other so-called climate-damaging subsidies runs directly counter to these commitments and to the tax increase cap. The plan therefore rejects the requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig uttryckligen att förbättra förutsättningarna för lantbruk genom sänkta skatter på drivmedel och att sänka priset på bensin och diesel, samt att stärka jordbruket för ökad inhemsk livsmedelsproduktion. En handlingsplan för att avveckla nedsättningen för jordbruksdiesel och övriga så kallade klimatskadliga subventioner går rakt emot dessa åtaganden och mot skattehöjarstoppet. Planen avvisar därför kravet.
- lower fuel tax for farmingdecisive»Moderaterna vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna, vilket vi redan börjat göra på drivmedel, och minska regelkrånglet så att kostnaderna för administration går ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to improve conditions for farming by lowering taxes, which we have already started doing on fuel, and reduce red tape so that administration costs go down.”
- lower fuel prices»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so you can manage your everyday finances”
- tax increase cap»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax increase cap for the coming term of office meaning that overall taxes are not raised”
- strengthened food production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production”
The election manifesto explicitly wants to lower tax on diesel for agriculture and forestry and lower fuel taxes generally.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly wants to lower tax on diesel for agriculture and forestry and lower fuel taxes generally. The counter-proposal's requirement for an action plan to phase out remaining reductions, including agricultural diesel, is the opposite of this commitment. The plan also states that increased fuel prices do not reduce emissions globally and prioritizes agriculture's competitiveness and self-sufficiency.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen sänka skatten på diesel för jord- och skogsbruket och sänka drivmedelsskatterna generellt. Motförslagets krav på en handlingsplan för att avveckla kvarvarande nedsättningar, däribland jordbruksdieseln, är motsatsen till detta åtagande. Planen slår dessutom fast att höjda drivmedelspriser inte minskar utsläppen globalt och prioriterar jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och självförsörjning.
- preserved diesel reductiondecisive»Sänka skatten på diesel för jord- och skogsbruket och den allmänna löneavgiften« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on diesel for agriculture and forestry and the general payroll tax”
- lowered fuel tax»Sänka skatten på drivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax on fuel”
- raised prices ineffective»Sverige bidrar exempelvis inte till minskade utsläpp genom att höja drivmedelspriserna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden does not contribute for example to reduced emissions by raising fuel prices”
- agriculture's competitiveness»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's self-sufficiency of food”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SkU16)
- Committee report full text (HD01SkU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1141 — Mer solenergi av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1253 — Rättvisare avgifter för tung trafik på svenska vägar av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2025/26:133 — Befrielse av fordonsskatt för familjer med tre barn av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:154 — Sänkt fordonsskatt på dieseldrivna personbilar och lätta lastbilar av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1842 — Förtydligande av punktskatten på bekämpningsmedel av Monica Haider (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1859 — Hänsyn till medicinska behov i omställningen av fordonsflottan av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1872 — Rättvisa villkor för energikooperativ av Tomas Kronståhl m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:189 — Antibiotikaskatt för att förebygga antibiotikaresistens av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:194 — Avskaffande av malus i fordonsskatten av Rashid Farivar m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1997 — Borttagen skatt på bekämpningsmedel av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2065 — Införande av en ny Lidingöregel av Kerstin Lundgren och Anna Lasses (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:2146 — Översyn och utvärdering av kemikalieskatten av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2191 — Återbetalning av fordonsskatt av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2425 — Beskattning av snus av Oliver Rosengren (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2466 — Ett fritt och konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk av John E Weinerhall (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2683 — Producentavgift på sockersötad dryck av Magnus Manhammar och Mats Wiking (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2699 — Sockersötade dryckers påverkan på folkhälsan av Per-Arne Håkansson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2780 — Transporteffektivt och hållbart samhälle av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2783 — Ett rättvist skattesystem av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2784 — Biologisk mångfald av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament