2025-04-232024/25:KrU7 · p.11KrUCulture
Literature Policy
Literature policy and support for reading
What's at stake: Further reading initiatives could particularly benefit children from less advantaged socioeconomic backgrounds and support the book industry at a time of declining reading, but they would also mean new government commitments beyond existing grants.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether current literature policy and reading-promotion efforts are sufficient, or whether the government should take further initiatives to support reading and literary production.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the view that literature policy should promote diversity, quality and reading, but sees no reason to direct further initiatives to the government at this time, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 18 (S)
The reservation points out that many children fail to reach basic reading-comprehension levels and that the book industry is concerned about artistic quality and about AI's impact on, among others, translators, and wants the government to take the initiative on a wider range of measures to support reading and literature.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 18 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1774 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) demand 46, 2024/25:1932 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 13 and 2024/25:3110 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) demand 16.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1774 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 46, 2024/25:1932 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 13 och 2024/25:3110 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 16.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 60 proposals in motions concerning literature, language and performing arts, among other things referring to already taken measures and ongoing work. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and concern, among other things, the conditions of stage art, libraries, the status of the Swedish language, national minority languages and literature.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to strengthen national performing arts and increase investments in the national stages. (S) — Reservation 18
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto demands investments in public libraries and adult education and points to closed school libraries as impoverishment of culture, while the party programme wants to see plenty of spaces for cultural creativity that reach everyone.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands investments in public libraries and adult education and points to closed school libraries as impoverishment of culture, while the party programme wants to see plenty of spaces for cultural creativity that reach everyone. The counter-proposal's demands for more and broader measures for reading and literature lie directly in that line, as does the concern that capital's use of technology increases replaceability for translators. The plan sees reading and education as part of the democratic infrastructure.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver satsningar på folkbiblioteken och folkbildningen och pekar ut nedlagda skolbibliotek som en utarmning av kulturen, medan partiprogrammet vill se gott om utrymmen för kulturellt skapande som når alla. Motförslagets krav på fler och bredare åtgärder för läsning och litteratur ligger direkt i den linjen, liksom oron för att kapitalets teknikanvändning ökar utbytbarheten för översättare. Planen ser läsning och bildning som en del av den demokratiska infrastrukturen.
- invest in libraries and adult educationdecisive»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att satsa på och utveckla folkbiblioteken, folkbildningen och public services oberoende ställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore it is particularly important to invest in and develop public libraries, adult education and public services' independent position.”
- school libraries and reading»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sports have also been impoverished when school libraries are closed, swimming pools become more expensive and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
- conditions for literature's creators»Kulturpolitiken behöver skapa goda ekonomiska villkor för såväl« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy needs to create good economic conditions for both”
- technology must not increase replaceability»medan kapitalet tvärtom föredrar att öka utbytbarheten.« (party programme ↗)“while capital instead prefers to increase replaceability.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto gives libraries a central role in increased literacy and the party programme requires free libraries and that all pupils reach the curriculum goals in primary school.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto gives libraries a central role in increased literacy and the party programme requires free libraries and that all pupils reach the curriculum goals in primary school. More and broader measures to support reading and literature, with attention to the quality of publishing, are directly consistent with these commitments. However, the plan says nothing about the impact of AI on translators.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet ger biblioteken en central roll för ökad läskunnighet och partiprogrammet kräver avgiftsfria bibliotek och att alla elever når läroplanens mål i grundskolan. Fler och bredare åtgärder för att stödja läsning och litteratur, med hänsyn till kvaliteten i utgivningen, ligger direkt i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen säger däremot inget om AI:s påverkan på översättare.
- literacy through librariesdecisive»Skolbiblioteken har en central roll att spela för ökad läskunnighet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“School libraries have a central role to play in increased literacy”
- all pupils reach the goals»Alla elever ska ha nått läroplanens mål när de går ut grundskolan« (party programme ↗)“All pupils shall have reached the curriculum goals when they leave primary school”
- free libraries»Biblioteken ska vara avgiftsfria« (party programme ↗)“Libraries shall be free of charge”
The election manifesto wants to strengthen libraries in their important work for reading and democracy and invest in children's culture in schools with trained staff in all school libraries.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to strengthen libraries in their important work for reading and democracy and invest in children's culture in schools with trained staff in all school libraries. The party programme establishes that creators shall have the right to reasonable compensation, which carries the concern about AI's impact on translators. More and broader measures to support reading and literature are therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill stärka biblioteken i deras viktiga arbete för läsning och demokrati och satsa på barns kultur i skolan med utbildad personal på alla skolbibliotek. Partiprogrammet slår fast att upphovsmän ska ha rätt till en rimlig ersättning, vilket bär oron för AI:s påverkan på översättare. Fler och bredare åtgärder för att stödja läsning och litteratur ligger därför i linje med planen.
- libraries for readingdecisive»stärka biblioteken i deras viktiga arbete för läsning och demokrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen libraries in their important work for reading and democracy.”
- school libraries and children's reading»satsa på barns kultur i skolan, med utbildad personal på alla skolbibliotek och estetiska ämnen i alla gymnasieprogram.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in children's culture in schools, with trained staff in all school libraries and aesthetic subjects in all secondary programmes.”
- reasonable compensation to creators»upphovsmän ska ha rätt till en rimlig ersättning.« (party programme ↗)“creators shall have the right to reasonable compensation.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan prioritizes that all children learn to read and write early and makes improved school results a main priority.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritizes that all children learn to read and write early and makes improved school results a main priority. Broader measures to support reading and literature follow from this, as does the view of education as a fundamental part of democracy and on copyright that rewards creative talent. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar att alla barn tidigt lär sig läsa och skriva och gör förbättrade skolresultat till en huvudprioritering. Bredare åtgärder för att stödja läsning och litteratur följer av det, liksom av synen på bildning som en bärande del av demokratin och på en upphovsrätt som belönar skaparkraften. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- reading ability prioritizeddecisive»Att tidigt ge grundläggande färdigheter - som att kunna läsa, skriva och räkna - måste prioriteras« (party programme ↗)“To early provide fundamental skills - such as the ability to read, write and count - must be prioritized”
- better school results»Att förbättra skolresultaten måste vara en huvudprioritering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To improve school results must be a main priority.”
- education strengthens democracy»Bildning breddar våra horisonter, ökar vår frihet och egenmakt, stärker den demokratiska grunden för samhället och möjligheterna till livslångt lärande.« (party programme ↗)“Education broadens our horizons, increases our freedom and agency, strengthens the democratic foundation of society and the opportunities for lifelong learning.”
- copyright in new technology»Upphovsrätten måste bejaka och belöna skaparkraften« (party programme ↗)“Copyright must embrace and reward creative talent”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme establishes that reading should be highly prioritized in all stages of school and that libraries have a central role in everyone's access to literature; the election manifesto requires a major push on teaching materials and that all students read classic fiction.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that reading should be highly prioritized in all stages of school and that libraries have a central role in everyone's access to literature; the election manifesto requires a major push on teaching materials and that all students read classic fiction. The counter-proposal's requirements for more and broader measures for reading and literature follow from these commitments, and the requirement for copyright's adaptation to new technology covers AI concerns for translators.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att läsandet ska vara högt prioriterat i skolans alla stadier och att biblioteken har en central roll för allas tillgång till litteratur; valmanifestet kräver en storsatsning på läromedel och att alla elever läser skönlitterära klassiker. Motförslagets krav på fler och bredare åtgärder för läsning och litteratur följer av dessa åtaganden, och kravet på upphovsrättens anpassning till ny teknik täcker AI-oron för översättare.
- prioritized readingdecisive»Läsandet ska vara högt prioriterat i skolans alla stadier.« (party programme ↗)“Reading should be highly prioritized in all stages of school.”
- literature in school»Alla barn och elever ska få läsa både svenska och internationella skönlitterära klassiker i skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All children and students should read both Swedish and international classic fiction in school.”
- major push on teaching materials»En storsatsning på läromedel måste göras så att eleverna får riktiga skolböcker och landets lärare slipper stå och kopiera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A major push on teaching materials must be done so that students get real textbooks and the country's teachers don't have to stand and copy.”
- copyright adapted to new technology»Upphovsrätten måste dock anpassas till ny teknik« (party programme ↗)“Copyright must, however, be adapted to new technology”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes basic skills of reading, writing and arithmetic prioritized areas in primary school and wants to protect libraries as the unique place for reading and public education.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes basic skills of reading, writing and arithmetic prioritized areas in primary school and wants to protect libraries as the unique place for reading and public education. Further and broader efforts to support reading and literature follow from these commitments. The plan also places on the public a responsibility for the arts to get good conditions to work.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör basfärdigheterna att kunna läsa, skriva och räkna till prioriterade områden i grundskolan och vill värna biblioteken som den unika platsen för läsning och folkbildning. Fler och bredare åtgärder för att stödja läsning och litteratur följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen lägger också på det offentliga ett ansvar för att konstarterna får goda villkor att verka.
- reading as a basic skilldecisive»Prioriterade områden i grundskolan ska vara bas« (party programme ↗)“Prioritized areas in primary school shall be base”
- libraries as the place for reading»institutioner. Vi vill värna den unika plats för läsning,« (party programme ↗)“institutions. We want to protect the unique place for reading,”
- public education's role»Ett rikt kulturliv vitaliserar även demokratin. I detta sammanhang spelar folkbildningen en omistlig roll.« (party programme ↗)“A rich cultural life also vitalizes democracy. In this context, public education plays an irreplaceable role.”
- good conditions for the arts»Det offentliga har ansvar för att konstarterna får« (party programme ↗)“The public has responsibility for the arts to”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal's main argument is that many children do not reach basic level in reading comprehension and that more reading initiatives are needed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's main argument is that many children do not reach basic level in reading comprehension and that more reading initiatives are needed. The plan does exactly that - it makes children's reading and language development a main issue with mandatory language monitoring at age three, mandatory language preschool and mandatory homework help from primary school. However, the plan is silent on literature support as such, so the support rests on school commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets bärande skäl är att många barn inte når basnivån i läsförståelse och att fler åtgärder för läsning behövs. Planen gör just barns läs- och språkutveckling till en huvudfråga med obligatorisk språkuppföljning vid tre år, obligatorisk språkförskola och obligatorisk läxhjälp från lågstadiet. Planen är dock tyst om litteraturstöd som sådant, varför stödet vilar på skolåtagandena.
- early language monitoringdecisive»Införa obligatorisk språkuppföljning vid 3 års ålder för att upptäcka barn som inte kan tala svenska« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce mandatory language monitoring at age 3 to detect children who cannot speak Swedish”
- early language initiatives»Införa obligatorisk språkförskola för barn som visar en bristande språkutveckling« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce mandatory language preschool for children showing inadequate language development”
- support for pupils falling behind»Göra det obligatoriskt för kommuner att erbjuda läxhjälp från lågstadiet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it mandatory for municipalities to offer homework help from primary school”
- knowledge focus in schools»Fokusera på mätbara faktakunskaper, med inspiration från Finlands läroplan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus on measurable factual knowledge, inspired by Finland's curriculum”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that children's linguistic ability is fundamental and wants to re-establish a knowledge-focused school with clearer learning objectives and prioritized Swedish language.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that children's linguistic ability is fundamental and wants to re-establish a knowledge-focused school with clearer learning objectives and prioritized Swedish language. Broader measures to support children's reading align with these commitments. The plan also wants to adapt copyright law to the digital society, which addresses concerns about AI's impact on translators.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att barns språkliga förmåga är grundläggande och vill återupprätta en kunskapsfokuserad skola med tydligare kunskapsmål och prioriterat svenskt språk. Bredare åtgärder för att stödja barns läsning ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Planen vill dessutom anpassa upphovsrätten efter det digitala samhället, vilket berör oron för AI:s påverkan på översättare.
- linguistic ability earlydecisive»Att förskolebarnen utvecklar sin språkliga förmåga är grundläggande för en lyckad övergång till förskoleklassen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That preschool children develop their linguistic ability is fundamental to a successful transition to elementary school.”
- knowledge-focused school»Återupprätta en kunskapsfokuserad skola genom beprövad pedagogik och fokus på traditionellt lärande med lika villkor på alla skolor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Re-establish a knowledge-focused school through proven pedagogy and focus on traditional learning with equal conditions at all schools”
- Swedish language prioritized»Prioritera svenska språket inom barnomsorgen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish language in childcare”
- modernized copyright law»Föråldrade regler om upphovsrätt behöver också anpassas efter hur människor konsumerar och skapar innehåll i det digitala samhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Outdated copyright rules also need to be adapted to how people consume and create content in the digital society.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KrU7)
- Committee report full text (HC01KrU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1072 — Inrättande av en nationell Astrid Lindgren-dag av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1076 — Förlägga offentliggörande av Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award (Alma) till Astrid Lindgrens stad Vimmerby av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:128 — Fortsatta satsningar på blåsmusiken av Tomas Eneroth (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1288 — Teckenspråk av Carita Boulwén (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1301 — Skandinavisk språkförståelse av Runar Filper (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1336 — Mediefrågor av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1341 — Friluftsliv för folkhälsan av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1345 — Det svenska språkets bevarande av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1346 — Bibliotek i tradition och förnyelse av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1348 — Scenkonst av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1417 — Svenskt kulturarv av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1421 — Nationella minoriteter och urfolk i Sverige av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:152 — Offentliga satsningar på musik av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1737 — Flytt av Sveriges ambassad i Israel av Mikael Oscarsson och Magnus Oscarsson (båda KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1745 — Politik för minoriteter av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1747 — Politik för sverigefinländarna av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1754 — Politik för samer av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1774 — Stärkt kulturpolitik - stärkt demokrati av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1932 — Språk och litteratur av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1935 — Åtgärder för de nationella minoriteterna och minoritetsspråken av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament