2026-04-012025/26:CU18 · p.1CUCivil law & housing

Measures on the housing market

The government's housing market measures and the case for a broader housing commission

What's at stake: The outcome affects the pace of housebuilding and what tools exist to help people who are far from the regular housing market, including those affected by structural homelessness.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government's already-adopted and announced measures (such as on small-house construction, building-permit exemptions, rent guarantees and rent-to-own housing) are enough to address the housing market situation, or whether a broad commission and reform work toward a modern social housing policy are needed instead.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee rejects the motions. The National Board of Housing (Boverket) assesses that housebuilding is increasing somewhat and that the need has decreased, and the government's adopted and announced measures — including for more small-house construction, building-permit exemptions, rent guarantees for families with children, and a law on rent-to-own housing — are considered sufficient to meet needs in the housing policy area.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 3 (C)

The government should appoint a broad commission to address the structural problems in the housing and property markets and increase the building rate, and promptly launch investigation and reform work toward a modern social housing policy that can give people with limited economic means access to housing and combat structural homelessness, for example through investment support for non-profit housing companies or foundations.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/17/5departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
SNoAbstain 0/0/90/16departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Cown reservationYesNo 0/19/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LYesYes 12/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumexplicit
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 55/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDNoYes 59/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:15 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:656 by Peder Björk et al. (S) demand 1, 2025/26:857 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:930 by Serkan Köse (S) demand 1, 2025/26:1084 by Anna Wallentheim (S) demands 1 and 2, 2025/26:1210 by Adrian Magnusson and Amalia Rud Stenlöf (both S) demand 3, 2025/26:2732 by Markus Wiechel and Alexander Christiansson (both SD) demands 1-3, 2025/26:2821 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 9, 2025/26:3184 by Alireza Akhondi et al. (C) demands 1 and 29, 2025/26:3545 by Amanda Palmstierna et al. (MP) demand 1, 2025/26:3584 by Mattias Vepsä et al. (S) demand 5 and 2025/26:3650 by Joakim Järrebring et al. (S) demands 2, 3, 15 and 44.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:15 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:656 av Peder Björk m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2025/26:857 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:930 av Serkan Köse (S) yrkande 1, 2025/26:1084 av Anna Wallentheim (S) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2025/26:1210 av Adrian Magnusson och Amalia Rud Stenlöf (båda S) yrkande 3, 2025/26:2732 av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD) yrkandena 1-3, 2025/26:2821 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 9, 2025/26:3184 av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 29, 2025/26:3545 av Amanda Palmstierna m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3584 av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S) yrkande 5 och 2025/26:3650 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S) yrkandena 2, 3, 15 och 44.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 131 proposals on housing policy. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period of 2025 and concern, among other things, measures on the housing market, financing of housing construction, public housing companies, measures against segregation and exclusion, and circular economy in the construction and real estate sector. The Riksdag refers primarily to measures already taken and ongoing work.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan demands a state building company, investment support for increased house building and an active land policy, and states that the state shall take main responsibility for investments in rental housing.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands a state building company, investment support for increased house building and an active land policy, and states that the state shall take main responsibility for investments in rental housing. The counter-proposal's demands for reforms for a social housing policy and investment support directed to non-profit housing organisations align directly with that. The plan furthermore assumes that every person's right to housing shall become reality, which carries the demand for measures against structural homelessness.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik, och slår fast att staten ska ta huvudansvaret för investeringar i hyresbostäder. Motförslagets krav på reformer för en social bostadspolitik och investeringsstöd riktat till icke-vinstdrivande bostadsbolag ligger direkt i linje med det. Planen utgår dessutom från att varje människas rätt till en bostad ska bli verklighet, vilket bär kravet på insatser mot strukturell hemlöshet.

  • state investment support for buildingdecisive»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state building company, investment support for increased house building and an active land policy.”
  • state's main responsibility»Staten behöver ta huvudansvaret för att stärka« (party programme ↗)“The state needs to take main responsibility for strengthening”
  • right to housing»Vi vill bygga ett samhälle där varje människas rätt att ha någonstans att bo« (party programme ↗)“We want to build a society where every person's right to have somewhere to live”
  • massive house building»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step is a policy for massive house building, climate-smart renovations and reduced rents that go hand in hand with the green transition.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan establishes an active and social housing policy with state support to address the housing shortage and sees housing as a social right.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes an active and social housing policy with state support to address the housing shortage and sees housing as a social right. The counter-proposal's requirement for modern social housing policy with measures for the economically vulnerable and support directed to non-profit actors is thus the plan's own line. The plan additionally wants to continue building rental housing that ordinary people can afford.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast en aktiv och social bostadspolitik med statligt stöd för att häva bostadsbristen och ser bostaden som en social rättighet. Motförslagets krav på en modern social bostadspolitik med insatser för ekonomiskt utsatta och stöd riktat till icke-vinstdrivande aktörer är därmed planens egen linje. Planen vill dessutom fortsätta bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd med.

  • social housing policydecisive»Aktiv och social bostadspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Active and social housing policy.”
  • state support against housing shortage»Statligt stöd för att häva bostadsbristen, särskilt för unga.« (party programme ↗)“State support to address the housing shortage, especially for young people.”
  • more affordable rental housing»Vi ska fortsätta att bygga hyresrätter som vanligt folk har råd att bo i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall continue building rental housing that ordinary people can afford to live in.”
  • housing as a social right»Bostaden är en social rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“Housing is a social right.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly requires a national strategy against homelessness and a housing foundation financing housing for those lacking secure accommodation, and expanded and increased investment support.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly requires a national strategy against homelessness and a housing foundation financing housing for those lacking secure accommodation, and expanded and increased investment support. The party programme wishes to re-establish housing as a social right with state support for housing with reasonable rents. The counter-proposal's requirement for modern social housing policy and investment support directed to non-profit housing companies or foundations thereby coincides with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen en nationell strategi mot hemlöshet och en bostadsstiftelse som finansierar bostäder åt dem som saknar tryggt boende, samt ett utvecklat och utökat investeringsstöd. Partiprogrammet vill återupprätta bostaden som en social rättighet med statliga stöd för bostäder med rimliga hyror. Motförslagets krav på en modern social bostadspolitik och investeringsstöd riktat till icke-vinstdrivande bostadsbolag eller stiftelser sammanfaller därmed med planen.

  • national strategy against homelessnessdecisive»minska hemlösheten, genom en nationell strategi som på riktigt minskar hemlösheten och en bostadsstiftelse som finansierar en bostad för dem som inte har ett tryggt boende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“reduce homelessness, through a national strategy that genuinely reduces homelessness and a housing foundation that finances a home for those without secure accommodation.”
  • expanded investment support»utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop and expand investment support that made it cheaper to build”
  • housing as social right»Miljöpartiet vill återupprätta bostaden som en social rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wishes to re-establish housing as a social right.”
  • state support for reasonable rents»Statliga stöd ska underlätta byggandet av bostäder med rimliga hyror,« (party programme ↗)“State support shall facilitate the building of housing with reasonable rents,”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietYesNodeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's housing policy is regulatory simplification, reformed coastal protection, and stronger incentives to invest in housing, not targeted government support for particular ownership forms.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's housing policy is regulatory simplification, reformed coastal protection, and stronger incentives to invest in housing, not targeted government support for particular ownership forms. It is based on a market economy free from command economy hints and wants to abolish the reinforced amortization requirement to increase mobility. Investment support targeted at non-profit housing companies and a social housing policy lie outside and against that line.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bostadslinje är regelförenkling, reformerat strandskydd och starkare drivkrafter att investera i bostäder, inte riktade statliga stöd till särskilda ägarformer. Den bygger på en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar och vill avskaffa det förstärkta amorteringskravet för att öka rörligheten. Ett investeringsstöd riktat till icke-vinstdrivande bostadsbolag och en social bostadspolitik ligger utanför och emot den linjen.

  • regulatory simplification over supportdecisive»Strandskyddet ska reformeras så att det blir lättare att bygga och bo på landsbygden. Det är dags att ge landsbygdsborna mer självbestämmande över sin egen mark, och genom regelförenklingar göra det enklare att bygga och bo på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Coastal protection shall be reformed so it becomes easier to build and live in rural areas. It is time to give rural dwellers more self-determination over their own land, and through regulatory simplification make it easier to build and live in rural areas.”
  • abolished reinforced amortization requirement»Boendet är den största investeringen många människor gör. Det förstärkta amorteringskravet — ett påtvingat sparande för dem med lägst inkomster — bör avskaffas när ränteläget nu normaliseras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing is the biggest investment many people make. The reinforced amortization requirement — forced savings for those with the lowest incomes — should be abolished now that interest rates are normalizing.”
  • housing throughout the country»En förutsättning för utveckling är att det finns tillräckligt med bostäder i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for development is that there are sufficient housing options throughout the country.”

flags: citat_blockerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly states that today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished and that the housing shortage shall be met with more market, simpler building regulations and shorter appeal processes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly states that today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished and that the housing shortage shall be met with more market, simpler building regulations and shorter appeal processes. The counter-proposal's demands for investment support to non-profit housing companies and a new social housing policy go in the opposite direction. The plan admittedly wants need-based housing and increased state responsibility for the homeless, but solves the housing question with market and deregulation rather than with subsidies.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att dagens dyra byggsubventioner ska avskaffas och att bostadsbristen ska mötas med mer marknad, enklare byggregler och kortare överklagandeprocesser. Motförslagets krav på investeringsstöd till icke-vinstdrivande bostadsbolag och en ny social bostadspolitik går i motsatt riktning. Planen vill visserligen ha behovsbostäder och ett ökat statligt ansvar för bostadslösa, men löser bostadsfrågan med marknad och regelförenkling snarare än med subventioner.

  • no to building subsidiesdecisive»Dagens dyra byggsubventioner ska avskaffas och ett nytt system med behovsbostäder ska införas för grupper med särskilt stora bostadsbehov, såsom våldsutsatta och familjer med mycket svag ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished and a new system with need-based housing shall be introduced for groups with especially large housing needs, such as violence victims and families with very weak economies.”
  • more market in the housing market»Vi vill skapa en bostadsmarknad med fler bostäder och mer marknad, där fler vill bygga och fler har råd att flytta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create a housing market with more homes and more market, where more want to build and more can afford to move.”
  • simpler building regulations»Vi vill införa en stimulans för att spara ihop till den första insatsen, slopa det förhöjda amorteringskravet, korta överklagandeprocesserna och fortsätta förenkla byggreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce an incentive to save for the first down payment, remove the increased amortization requirement, shorten appeal processes and continue simplifying building regulations.”
  • state responsibility for the homeless»Staten bör ta ett ökat ansvar för att finansiera bostäder« (party programme ↗)“The state should take increased responsibility for financing homes”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal's main instrument is investment support aimed at non-profit housing companies, but the plan rejects direct business subsidies and requires that the state ensures equal conditions for different business forms.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal's main instrument is investment support aimed at non-profit housing companies, but the plan rejects direct business subsidies and requires that the state ensures equal conditions for different business forms. The plan also places the social responsibility for housing provision on municipalities and wants to remove bureaucracy rather than build new state support structures. The ambition to provide housing to the economically disadvantaged is shared, but the proposed path conflicts with the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslagets bärande instrument är investeringsstöd riktat till icke-vinstdrivande bostadsbolag, men planen avvisar direkta företagssubventioner och kräver att staten säkrar likvärdiga villkor för olika företagsformer. Planen lägger dessutom det sociala ansvaret för bostadsförsörjningen på kommunerna och vill undanröja krångel snarare än bygga nya statliga stödstrukturer. Ambitionen att ge ekonomiskt utsatta bostad delas, men den föreslagna vägen strider mot planens åtaganden.

  • no to business subsidiesdecisive»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct business subsidies are rejected.”
  • equal conditions for business forms»Dessutom måste staten ta det övergripande ansvaret för att likvärdiga villkor ska gälla för« (party programme ↗)“Moreover, the state must take the overall responsibility for equal conditions to apply for”
  • municipal housing provision responsibility»Kommunerna ska ha det sociala ansvaret för att trygga bostadsförsörjningen för sina« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities shall have the social responsibility for ensuring housing provision for their”
  • simplification of rules before support»Krångel och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun att leva upp till sitt« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and unnecessary rules must not stand in the way of a municipality fulfilling its”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's housing policy rests on ownership, simplified rules and increased building: abolished beach protection, simpler building plans, retained interest deduction and freer rent-setting.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's housing policy rests on ownership, simplified rules and increased building: abolished beach protection, simpler building plans, retained interest deduction and freer rent-setting. It contains no state investment support for non-profit housing companies and no new inquiry commissions, but instead points out that new reforms must fit within the surplus target. The counter-proposal's requirement for a broad commission and a social housing policy with investment support therefore lacks support in the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bostadspolitik vilar på ägande, förenklade regler och ökat byggande: avskaffat strandskydd, enklare byggplaner, behållet ränteavdrag och friare hyressättning. Den innehåller inga statliga investeringsstöd till icke-vinstdrivande bostadsbolag och inga nya utredningskommissioner, utan pekar tvärtom på att nya reformer måste rymmas inom överskottsmålet. Motförslagets krav på en bred kommission och en social bostadspolitik med investeringsstöd saknar därför stöd i planen.

  • simplification of rules for buildingdecisive»Avskaffa dagens strandskydd för att möjliggöra ökat byggande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish today's beach protection to enable increased building”
  • simpler planning process»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace complicated detailed plans with simpler building plans”
  • freer rent-setting»Möjliggöra mer rättvisa hyror genom att potentiella hyresgästers värdering av boendet ges större vikt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Enable more fair rents by giving potential tenants' valuation of the dwelling greater weight”
  • owner-occupied housing»I Moderaternas Sverige ska alla våga drömma om att äga sin egen bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In the Moderate party's Sweden everyone should dare dream of owning their own home.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that the market alone cannot guarantee all citizens the right to housing and that state and municipality together shall provide adequate housing even to resource-poor groups.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the market alone cannot guarantee all citizens the right to housing and that state and municipality together shall provide adequate housing even to resource-poor groups. Combating homelessness is explicitly stated as a prioritized social issue, and the plan wants to increase housing construction. The counter-proposal's demands for measures for the economically disadvantaged, against structural homelessness and for higher construction rates therefore align with the plan, even though neither commission nor investment support is mentioned there.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att marknaden inte ensam kan garantera alla medborgare rätten till en bostad och att stat och kommun gemensamt ska förse även resurssvaga grupper med ett värdigt boende. Att bekämpa hemlöshet anges uttryckligen som en prioriterad social fråga, och planen vill öka bostadsbyggandet. Motförslagets krav på insatser för ekonomiskt utsatta, mot strukturell hemlöshet och för högre byggtakt ligger därför i linje med planen, även om varken kommission eller investeringsstöd nämns där.

  • public responsibility for housing the resource-poordecisive»ansvar för att förse även resurssvaga grupper med ett värdigt boende.« (party programme ↗)“responsibility for providing adequate housing even to resource-poor groups.”
  • combat homelessness»Att bekämpa hemlöshet är en prioriterad social fråga för Sverigedemokraterna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combating homelessness is a prioritized social issue for Sweden Democrats.”
  • increased housing construction»Öka bostadsbyggandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase housing construction”
  • simplified building processes»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament