2026-02-252025/26:TU8 · p.6TUTransport & infrastructure
Access to electronic communication
Continued broadband and mobile-network rollout without a new parliamentary initiative
What's at stake: The decision affects how quickly rural areas, farms and small businesses gain reliable broadband and modern mobile coverage as older 2G and 3G networks are shut down.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether today's pace of broadband and mobile-network expansion, steered through assignments to the regulator PTS, is enough, or whether parliament should push for faster, more targeted rollout, especially in rural areas.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee holds that Sweden already has well-developed broadband infrastructure and that 5G rollout and the transition from 2G/3G are proceeding at a good pace through the regulator PTS's mandate to support users and operators, and therefore opposes the motions calling for faster or more targeted expansion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (C)
The C party holds that the pace of 5G rollout is too slow and that Sweden risks falling behind; it wants targeted support for farms and small rural businesses during the transition from 2G/3G, broader work on mobile coverage similar to the EU's roaming system, and full build-out of digital infrastructure by the end of the decade.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 153–20Nej 18–155
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/92/14 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | No 0/20/1/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| CAlireza Akhondi (C, Stockholms län) | Abstain — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:1082 by Markus Kauppinen et al. (S) demand 6, 2025/26:2370 by Malin Östh et al. (V) demands 8 and 9, 2025/26:2615 by Rickard Nordin (C) demands 1-3, 2025/26:2832 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) demands 1-3, 2025/26:2880 by Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:3028 by Thomas Ragnarsson (M), 2025/26:3179 by Christofer Bergenblock et al. (C) demand 24, 2025/26:3185 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) demand 29, 2025/26:3282 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demand 12, 2025/26:3405 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) demand 22, 2025/26:3638 by Mathias Bengtsson (KD), 2025/26:3652 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) demands 6, 9 and 22, and 2025/26:3659 by Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1082 av Markus Kauppinen m.fl. (S) yrkande 6, 2025/26:2370 av Malin Östh m.fl. (V) yrkandena 8 och 9, 2025/26:2615 av Rickard Nordin (C) yrkandena 1-3, 2025/26:2832 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1-3, 2025/26:2880 av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M), 2025/26:3028 av Thomas Ragnarsson (M), 2025/26:3179 av Christofer Bergenblock m.fl. (C) yrkande 24, 2025/26:3185 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 29, 2025/26:3282 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 12, 2025/26:3405 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 22, 2025/26:3638 av Mathias Bengtsson (KD), 2025/26:3652 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkandena 6, 9 och 22 samt 2025/26:3659 av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 110 proposals in motions on digitalization and postal issues. The Riksdag also tabled the Government's statement dealing with the Swedish National Audit Office's audit report on state strategic digitalization projects for the records, that is, concluded the matter. The motions were submitted during the general motion period 2025 and one of them from 2024. The proposals mainly deal with digital participation, digitalization in public activities, access to electronic communication, artificial intelligence, and postal issues. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work and measures taken. In the statement, the Government reports its assessment of the Swedish National Audit Office's findings and recommendations in the audit report State strategic digitalization projects – major shared challenges.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants public data open as a starting point and the state to take leadership in standards, structured data, and shared virtual infrastructure for data sharing. (C) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that fibre expansion is going far too slowly and that the state needs to take greater responsibility for it.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that fibre expansion is going far too slowly and that the state needs to take greater responsibility for it. The counter-proposal's demand for targeted support to agriculture and smaller enterprises in rural areas, better mobile coverage and fully built-out digital infrastructure before the end of the decade is precisely that. The plan moreover demands that rural areas are not drained and that society exists everywhere in the country.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att utbyggnaden av fiber går alldeles för sakta och att staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för den. Motförslagets krav på riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre företag på landsbygden, bättre mobiltäckning och fullt utbyggd digital infrastruktur före decenniets slut är just det. Planen kräver också att landsbygden inte utarmas och att samhället finns där var i landet man än bor.
- state responsibility for expansiondecisive»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fibre is going far too slowly, the state needs to take greater responsibility for the expansion.”
- rural areas must not be drained»Oavsett var i landet vi bor så har vi ett gemensamt intresse av att landsbygden inte utarmas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regardless of where in the country we live we have a common interest in rural areas not being drained.”
- society exists throughout the country»Alla ska känna att samhället finns där, var i landet vi än bor.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone should feel that society exists there, wherever in the country we live.”
- service throughout the country»Välfärden måste vara till för alla och finnas överallt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare must be for everyone and exist everywhere.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme requires good access to public services throughout the country and greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme requires good access to public services throughout the country and greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden. Targeted support for agriculture and small businesses in rural areas during transition from older mobile networks, and a fully built-out digital infrastructure, is precisely that equivalence. The plan's commitment to enterprise on all locations reinforces the support.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver god tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet och ett större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige. Riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre företag på landsbygden under övergången från äldre mobilnät, och en fullt utbyggd digital infrastruktur, är just den likvärdigheten. Planens åtagande om företagande på alla orter stärker stödet.
- services throughout the countrydecisive»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to public services throughout the country.”
- equivalent conditions»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equivalent conditions throughout Sweden.”
- enterprise on all locations»Stärkta förutsättningar för företagande på alla orter.« (party programme ↗)“Strengthened conditions for enterprise on all locations.”
- rural development»Landsbygdspolitik för utveckling och välstånd i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Rural policy for development and prosperity throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that everyone throughout the country has access to good digital infrastructure and notes that access today varies considerably between different parts of the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that everyone throughout the country has access to good digital infrastructure and notes that access today varies considerably between different parts of the country. Targeted support to farming and smaller rural businesses during the network transition and full expansion by the end of the decade meets the commitment to strengthen conditions for living, working and running businesses throughout Sweden. The plan thus does not see today's expansion as sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla i hela landet har tillgång till god digital infrastruktur och konstaterar att tillgången i dag varierar kraftigt mellan olika delar av landet. Riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre landsbygdsföretag under nätövergången och full utbyggnad före decenniets slut svarar mot åtagandet att stärka förutsättningarna att bo, leva och driva företag i hela Sverige. Planen ser alltså inte dagens utbyggnad som tillräcklig.
- digital infrastructure throughout the countrydecisive»Alla ska ha tillgång till likvärdig välfärd, god digital infrastruktur, kultur, service« (party programme ↗)“Everyone should have access to equivalent welfare, good digital infrastructure, culture, service”
- geographic digital divides»Även digital infrastruktur och kulturutbud varierar kraftigt.« (party programme ↗)“Digital infrastructure and cultural offerings also vary considerably.”
- vibrant countryside»Miljöpartiet vill stärka förutsättningarna för att bo, leva, arbeta och driva företag i hela« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wants to strengthen conditions for living, working and running businesses throughout”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly promises that everyone should have access to broadband, mobile telephony and internet in the entire country and that expansion and mobile coverage should continue to strengthen.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises that everyone should have access to broadband, mobile telephony and internet in the entire country and that expansion and mobile coverage should continue to strengthen. The counter-proposal's requirement for faster 5G rollout, targeted support during the transition from older networks and fully developed digital infrastructure is the same commitment converted into time frames and measures. Singling out agriculture and smaller rural businesses meets the plan's requirements for competitive agriculture and reliable infrastructure throughout the country.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att alla ska ha tillgång till bredband, mobiltelefoni och surf i hela landet och att utbyggnaden och mobiltäckningen ska fortsätta stärkas. Motförslagets krav på snabbare 5G-utbyggnad, riktat stöd under övergången från äldre nät och fullt utbyggd digital infrastruktur är samma åtagande omsatt i tid och åtgärder. Att lantbruk och mindre landsbygdsföretag pekas ut svarar mot planens krav på ett konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk och en pålitlig infrastruktur i hela landet.
- mobile coverage throughout the countrydecisive»Alla ska ha tillgång till bredband, mobiltelefoni och surf i hela landet. Vi vill fortsätta bygga ut bredbandet och stärka mobiltäckningen i hela landet, inklusive på tågen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone should have access to broadband, mobile telephony and internet throughout the country. We want to continue expanding broadband and strengthen mobile coverage throughout the country, including on trains.”
- reliable infrastructure throughout the country»Hela landet ska ha tillgång till en pålitlig infrastruktur, snabbt bredband och pålitlig mobiltäckning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The entire country should have access to reliable infrastructure, fast broadband and reliable mobile coverage.”
- digitalization on equal terms»Digitalisering på lika villkor, oavsett var man bor, är en förutsättning för demokrati och möjliggör decentralisering.« (party programme ↗)“Digitalization on equal terms, regardless of where one lives, is a prerequisite for democracy and enables decentralization.”
- competitive agriculture»Sverige behöver ett ännu mer konkurrenskraftigt jordbruk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs an even more competitive agriculture.”
The party programme establishes that Sweden must be a leader in IT infrastructure, that it is particularly important to enable better capacity outside cities and in rural areas, and that the state must where necessary co-finance expansion where costs are high.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that Sweden must be a leader in IT infrastructure, that it is particularly important to enable better capacity outside cities and in rural areas, and that the state must where necessary co-finance expansion where costs are high. This is exactly the counter-proposal's demand for targeted support to agriculture and smaller rural businesses and for complete expansion. The plan also requires that conditions for business are strengthened throughout the country.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att Sverige ska vara en föregångare i IT-infrastruktur, att det är särskilt viktigt att möjliggöra bättre kapacitet utanför städer och i glesbygd, och att staten vid behov ska medfinansiera utbyggnaden där kostnaderna är höga. Det är precis motförslagets krav på riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre landsbygdsföretag och på full utbyggnad. Planen kräver också att villkoren för företagande stärks i hela landet.
- state co-financing in rural areasdecisive»Särskilt viktigt är det att möjliggöra bättre IT-kapacitet utanför städer och i glesbygd. För att kompensera för höga utbyggnadskostnader i dessa områden ska staten vid behov medfinansiera denna utbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“It is particularly important to enable better IT capacity outside cities and in rural areas. To compensate for high expansion costs in these areas the state must where necessary co-finance this expansion.”
- leader in IT infrastructure»Sverige ska vara en föregångare vad gäller IT-infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must be a leader when it comes to IT infrastructure.”
- business throughout the country»Förutsättningarna för företagande, innovationer och tillväxt ska stärkas i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Conditions for business, innovation and growth must be strengthened throughout the country.”
- functioning infrastructure throughout the country»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network must function and state agencies must be present in all parts of Sweden.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan makes reliable electronic communications with high performance a prerequisite for regional balance and economic development, and a well-developed infrastructure the most important means of regional policy.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes reliable electronic communications with high performance a prerequisite for regional balance and economic development, and a well-developed infrastructure the most important means of regional policy. The election manifesto stipulates that the whole of Sweden shall function and that it shall be possible to live and work outside the major cities. Targeted support for agriculture and smaller rural enterprises during the network transition fits within the plan's framework where general measures are complemented with targeted ones. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör tillförlitliga elektroniska kommunikationer med hög prestanda till en förutsättning för regional balans och ekonomisk utveckling, och en väl utbyggd infrastruktur till regionalpolitikens viktigaste medel. Valmanifestet slår fast att hela Sverige ska fungera och att det ska gå att bo och verka utanför storstäderna. Riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre landsbygdsföretag under nätövergången ryms i planens ordning där generella åtgärder kompletteras med riktade. Planen stöder därför motförslaget.
- reliable digital infrastructuredecisive»tillförlitliga elektroniska kommunikationer med hög prestanda« (party programme ↗)“reliable electronic communications with high performance”
- the whole country shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The whole of Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work even outside the major cities.”
- infrastructure in regional policy»En väl utbyggd infrastruktur är ett av de viktigaste medlen« (party programme ↗)“A well-developed infrastructure is one of the most important means”
- reductions for agriculture»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning och stärka lantbrukets konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rule changes and cost reductions for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-sufficiency and strengthen agriculture's competitiveness.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly states that mobile coverage everywhere shall be a matter of course and that broadband shall be classified as national infrastructure and prioritised accordingly, precisely so that business shall be facilitated across the whole of Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that mobile coverage everywhere shall be a matter of course and that broadband shall be classified as national infrastructure and prioritised accordingly, precisely so that business shall be facilitated across the whole of Sweden. The counter-proposal's demands for faster 5G expansion, better coverage and targeted support to agriculture and small rural businesses during the network transition directly address these commitments. The plan's starting point is that the whole of Sweden shall function.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår uttryckligen fast att mobiltäckning överallt ska vara en självklarhet och att bredband ska klassas som nationell infrastruktur och prioriteras därefter, just för att företagande ska underlättas i hela Sverige. Motförslagets krav på snabbare 5G-utbyggnad, bättre täckning och riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre landsbygdsföretag under nätövergången svarar direkt mot dessa åtaganden. Planens utgångspunkt är att hela Sverige ska fungera.
- mobile coverage everywheredecisive»Mobiltäckning överallt ska vara en självklarhet, liksom vetskapen om att polisen kommer när du ringer oavsett var du bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mobile coverage everywhere shall be a matter of course, as shall the knowledge that police will come when you call no matter where you live.”
- broadband as national infrastructure»Klassa bredband som nationell infrastruktur och prioritera därefter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Classify broadband as national infrastructure and prioritise accordingly”
- broadband for rural businesses»Företagande ska underlättas i hela Sverige genom bättre tillgång till bredband.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Business shall be facilitated across the whole of Sweden through better access to broadband.”
- the whole country shall function»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates want to make use of the whole of Sweden's possibilities.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly states that the countryside is falling behind in broadband expansion and that mobile coverage is also worse in sparsely populated areas, and commits to investing in the expansion of broadband and telephony throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that the countryside is falling behind in broadband expansion and that mobile coverage is also worse in sparsely populated areas, and commits to investing in the expansion of broadband and telephony throughout the country. The counter-proposal's demands for faster 5G expansion, targeted support for farming and smaller rural enterprises and better mobile coverage directly respond to this. The plan also wants to facilitate enterprise throughout the country.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår uttryckligen fast att landsbygden halkar efter i bredbandsutbyggnaden och att även mobiltäckningen är sämre i glesbygden, och åtar sig att satsa på utbyggnad av bredband och telefoni i hela landet. Motförslagets krav på snabbare 5G-utbyggnad, riktat stöd till lantbruk och mindre landsbygdsföretag samt bättre mobiltäckning svarar direkt mot detta. Planen vill dessutom underlätta för näringsliv i hela landet.
- countryside's mobile coverage neglecteddecisive»Sverigedemokraterna ser med oro på hur landsbygden halkar efter i bredbandsutbyggnaden, men även mobiltäckningen och postutdelningen är sämre i glesbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats view with concern how the countryside is falling behind in broadband expansion, but mobile coverage and postal delivery are also worse in sparsely populated areas.”
- expansion throughout the country»Satsa på utbyggnad av bredband och telefoni i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in the expansion of broadband and telephony throughout the country”
- enterprise throughout the country»Underlätta för industri och näringsliv i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate industry and enterprise throughout the country”
- countryside's own conditions»Landsbygden finns i första hand till för de människor som bor och verkar här och inte för att storstadsborna ska ha någonstans att vistas på semestern eller som en tillflyktsort för människor som tröttnat på den urbana kulturen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The countryside exists in the first place for the people who live and work here and not for city dwellers to have somewhere to stay on holiday or as a refuge for people who have tired of urban culture.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:TU8)
- Committee report full text (HD01TU8)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3107 — Internationell samverkan av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1082 — Satsning på infrastruktur och digital tillgång i Jönköpings län av Markus Kauppinen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1165 — En säker e-legitimation under statlig kontroll av Adrian Magnusson och Amalia Rud Stenlöf (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1323 — Åtgärder för att motverka digitalt utanförskap av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1474 — Skyldighet för mobil- och teleoperatörer att samverka med rättsvårdande myndigheter av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1774 — Risker och möjligheter med artificiell intelligens (AI) av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1815 — Märkning av AI-genererat material för att motverka desinformation och deepfakes av Aylin Nouri och Eva Lindh (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1897 — Spetskompetens och digital utveckling inom tech av Mattias Jonsson och Johan Büser (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2297 — Skärpning av lagen om ansvar för elektroniska anslagstavlor - lex Flashback av Markus Selin (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2370 — Fungerande postservice, bredband och telefoni i hela landet av Malin Östh m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2391 — Obligatoriskt biometriskt register av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:251 — Förstärkta åtgärder för att bekämpa olagligt innehåll i postförsändelser av Johnny Svedin (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2591 — Registrering av geodata vid inloggning i bankappar av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2615 — Ökad transparens på bredbandsmarknaden av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2616 — Enkel rapportering av telefonbedrägerier direkt i telefonen av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2661 — Stärkt krav på mobiloperatörers reservkraft för ett robust samhälle av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:2780 — Transporteffektivt och hållbart samhälle av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2832 — Digitalisering för hela Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2880 — Likvärdig digital infrastruktur i hela Värmland med särskilt fokus på landsbygden av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3028 — En fungerande telekommunikation i hela landet av Thomas Ragnarsson (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament