2026-03-112025/26:SkU15 · p.1SkUTaxation
Business and Investment; General Tax Issues
The level of corporate tax and measures against workplace crime
What's at stake: The decision affects companies' tax conditions and competitiveness, the state's ability to finance the defence build-up in the long term, and how hard the state acts against undeclared work and criminal infiltration in sectors such as construction.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether corporate tax should be cut further and whether new measures - such as an inquiry into a preparedness tax for total defence and a mandatory contractor withholding scheme against fraud in the construction industry - should be introduced, or whether the current tax rules and efforts against workplace crime are sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers good tax conditions for enterprise a precondition for growth across the whole country and notes that corporate tax has already been cut to 20.6 percent, and therefore sees no reason at present to propose further changes. The committee also points to measures already taken against workplace crime, including expanded police powers to inspect employers, doubled sanction fees, and a national delegation against workplace crime, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) welcomes the broad agreement on rapidly building up defence but regrets that there is no agreement on its ongoing funding, and proposes an inquiry into a preparedness tax to secure long-term financing for the defence build-up. The reservation also wants to reintroduce a mandatory contractor withholding scheme for construction firms, since workplace crime is closely linked to gang crime and risks driving out legitimate companies and undermining the quality of what gets built.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/89/0/17 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/14/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 56/0/0/12 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:469 by Anna-Lena Hedberg (SD), 2025/26:508 by Annika Hirvonen and others (MP), 2025/26:846 by Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) item 4, 2025/26:1343 by Magnus Berntsson (KD), 2025/26:1999 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:3185 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist and others (C) item 6, 2025/26:3282 by Katarina Luhr and others (MP) item 28, 2025/26:3428 by Emma Nohrén and others (MP) items 27 and 45, 2025/26:3553 by Niklas Karlsson and others (S) items 5 and 20, 2025/26:3556 by Peter Hultqvist and others (S) item 3, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin and others (C) item 50 and 2025/26:3650 by Joakim Järrebring and others (S) item 51.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:469 av Anna-Lena Hedberg (SD), 2025/26:508 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP), 2025/26:846 av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) yrkande 4, 2025/26:1343 av Magnus Berntsson (KD), 2025/26:1999 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2025/26:3185 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 6, 2025/26:3282 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 28, 2025/26:3428 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 27 och 45, 2025/26:3553 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 5 och 20, 2025/26:3556 av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 3, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 50 och 2025/26:3650 av Joakim Järrebring m.fl. (S) yrkande 51.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 75 proposals on taxation of business, capital and property in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals address issues concerning business, capital and property taxation. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to that the Riksdag has already taken a position on these issues and that investigations and reviews are underway.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to investigate a defense readiness tax and reintroduce mandatory contractor deduction for construction companies. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan points out wage dumping and economic crime as central threats and wants greater public transparency in companies to counter fraud with taxes and employment; a mandatory contractor deduction in the construction industry is precisely such a tool.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan points out wage dumping and economic crime as central threats and wants greater public transparency in companies to counter fraud with taxes and employment; a mandatory contractor deduction in the construction industry is precisely such a tool. The plan also states that tax levels need to increase to handle major societal challenges, which argues for investigating a standby tax rather than leaving financing unresolved.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut lönedumpning och ekonomisk brottslighet som centrala hot och vill ha större samhällelig insyn i företag för att stävja fusk med skatter och anställningar; ett obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag i byggbranschen är just ett sådant verktyg. Planen slår också fast att skattenivåerna behöver öka för att klara stora samhällsutmaningar, vilket talar för att utreda en beredskapsskatt snarare än att lämna finansieringen olöst.
- stop wage dumping and economic crimedecisive»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
- transparency to counter fraud»Vi vill gå mot en större samhällelig insyn« (party programme ↗)“We want to move towards greater public transparency”
- increased tax levels»För att ta tag i de stora samhällsutmaningarna kommer skattenivåerna« (party programme ↗)“In order to tackle the major societal challenges the tax levels will need to”
- serious conditions in construction»Vänsterpartiet ställer krav på kollektivavtal vid offentliga upphandlingar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party demands collective agreements in public procurement.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly contains the proposal for a preparedness tax on the very richest linked to defence building towards two per cent of GDP, which is exactly what the counter-proposal wants to investigate.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly contains the proposal for a preparedness tax on the very richest linked to defence building towards two per cent of GDP, which is exactly what the counter-proposal wants to investigate. The plan also requires forceful action against workplace crime and combating crime in the labour market, which supports the requirement for a reinstituted mandatory contractor tax deduction. Both parts of the counter-proposal thus have direct backing in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet innehåller uttryckligen förslaget om en beredskapsskatt för de allra rikaste kopplat till försvarsuppbyggnaden mot två procent av BNP, vilket är precis vad motförslaget vill utreda. Planen kräver dessutom krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten och bekämpande av kriminalitet på arbetsmarknaden, vilket bär kravet på ett återinfört obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag. Båda delarna av motförslaget har därmed direkt täckning i planen.
- preparedness tax on the richdecisive»Vi vill införa en beredskapsskatt för de allra rikaste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce a preparedness tax on the very richest.”
- forceful action against workplace crime»Krafttag mot arbetslivskriminaliteten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Forceful action against workplace crime.”
- combated labour market crime»Bekämpande av kriminalitet på arbetsmarknaden.« (party programme ↗)“Combating crime in the labour market.”
- increased defence appropriations»Anslagen till det militära försvaret ska öka till motsvarande två procent av BNP.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Appropriations for military defence shall increase to correspond to two per cent of GDP.”
The party programme demands strong measures against employers who exploit labour and do not respect Swedish labour law, and strengthened work against the criminal economy, which carries the counter-proposal's demand for mandatory subcontracting deduction in the construction sector.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands strong measures against employers who exploit labour and do not respect Swedish labour law, and strengthened work against the criminal economy, which carries the counter-proposal's demand for mandatory subcontracting deduction in the construction sector. The programme also establishes that credible total defence is needed and that the tax system should secure long-term sustainable financing, which speaks for investigating a preparedness tax. The tax form as such is not addressed, therefore inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver krafttag mot arbetsgivare som exploaterar arbetskraft och inte respekterar svensk arbetsrätt, samt förstärkt arbete mot den kriminella ekonomin, vilket bär motförslagets krav på obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag i byggsektorn. Programmet slår också fast att ett trovärdigt totalförsvar behövs och att skattesystemet ska säkra långsiktigt hållbar finansiering, vilket talar för att utreda en beredskapsskatt. Skatteformen som sådan behandlas inte, därför härledning.
- strong measures against labour crimedecisive»arbetskraft och inte respekterar svensk arbetsrätt eller gällande kollektivavtal.« (party programme ↗)“labour and do not respect Swedish labour law or applicable collective agreements.”
- combat criminal economy»Vi vill också stärka arbetet mot den kriminella ekonomin. Brottsvinster ska beslagtas och« (party programme ↗)“We also want to strengthen work against the criminal economy. Criminal profits shall be seized and”
- sustainable tax financing»utjämna de ekonomiska klyftorna och säkra en långsiktigt hållbar finansiering av« (party programme ↗)“reduce economic inequalities and secure long-term sustainable financing of”
- credible total defence»diplomatiska lösningar. Samtidigt är ett starkt och trovärdigt totalförsvar – både civilt« (party programme ↗)“diplomatic solutions. At the same time a strong and credible total defence – both civil”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises that the total tax burden shall come down next electoral period and that the party does not participate in tax increases that harm jobs.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises that the total tax burden shall come down next electoral period and that the party does not participate in tax increases that harm jobs. A new preparedness tax goes straight against that commitment, and a mandatory entrepreneur deduction increases precisely the regulatory burden the party wants to clear out. That defence shall be equipped to two per cent of GDP is however the plan's line, but not through tax increases. The plan therefore rejects the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att det totala skattetrycket ska ner nästa mandatperiod och att partiet inte medverkar till skattehöjningar som skadar jobben. En ny beredskapsskatt går rakt emot det åtagandet, och ett obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag ökar just den regelbörda partiet vill rensa bort. Att försvaret ska rustas till två procent av BNP är däremot planens linje, men inte genom höjda skatter. Planen avvisar därför motförslaget.
- reduced total tax burdendecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must come down next electoral period.”
- regulatory simplification for business»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clear out the rule tangle for entrepreneurs, large as small.”
- low tax on entrepreneurship»Skattebördan på jobbskapande i företag ska göras så liten som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“The tax burden on job-creating in companies shall be kept as small as possible.”
- increased defence appropriations»Sverige behöver satsa två procent av BNP på försvaret så snart det är praktiskt möjligt och gå med i Nato.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to invest two per cent of GDP in defence as soon as it is practically possible and join NATO.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The counter-proposal's core is a new preparedness tax and a reintroduced mandatory contractor deduction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal's core is a new preparedness tax and a reintroduced mandatory contractor deduction. The plan's decisive commitment is to lower taxes for both business owners and employees and to keep tax levels competitive and simple, while regulatory burden for small businesses shall decrease. The plan certainly wants a defence appropriation of two per cent of GDP, but does not finance it with new taxes.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslagets kärna är en ny beredskapsskatt och ett återinfört obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag. Planens avgörande åtagande är att sänka skatten för både företagare och anställda och att hålla skattenivåerna konkurrenskraftiga och enkla, samtidigt som regelbördan för små företag ska minska. Planen vill visserligen ha ett försvarsanslag om två procent av BNP, men finansierar det inte med nya skatter.
- lowered tax on work and businessdecisive»Vi vill sänka din skatt oavsett om du är företagare eller anställd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to lower your tax whether you are a business owner or employee.”
- competitive taxes»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax levels shall be competitive and easy to understand to encourage business, education and investment.”
- reduced regulatory burden»Regelbördan för små företag ska minska« (party programme ↗)“Regulatory burden for small businesses shall decrease”
- defence appropriation two per cent»Vi vill därför redan 2025 se ett försvarsanslag om 2 procent av BNP och därmed skapa tillräckliga förutsättningar att stärka både armen, marinen och flygvapnet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore already want to see a defence appropriation of 2 per cent of GDP in 2025 and thereby create sufficient conditions to strengthen both the army, navy and air force.”
The plan's decisive tax policy commitment is that the tax system shall stimulate work, savings and enterprise, be designed as simply as possible for small businesses and not drive enterprises out of the country.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive tax policy commitment is that the tax system shall stimulate work, savings and enterprise, be designed as simply as possible for small businesses and not drive enterprises out of the country. A new readiness tax and a reintroduced mandatory contractor deduction go in the opposite direction regarding tax burden and regulatory burden. That the plan requires that all crimes be prosecuted weighs the other way but does not support the demand for new taxes.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande skattepolitiska åtagande är att skattesystemet ska stimulera arbete, sparande och företagande, utformas så enkelt som möjligt för småföretagen och inte driva företag ur landet. En ny beredskapsskatt och ett återinfört obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag går i motsatt riktning i fråga om skattetryck och regelbörda. Att planen kräver att alla brott beivras väger åt andra hållet men bär inte kravet på nya skatter.
- tax shall favor work and enterprisedecisive»att det stimulerar arbete, hederlighet, sparande och företagande« (party programme ↗)“that it stimulates work, integrity, savings and enterprise”
- simple rules for small businesses»utformas så enkelt som möjligt för att därigenom underlätta för bland annat« (party programme ↗)“be designed as simply as possible to thereby facilitate among other things”
- competitive tax policy»att den inte driver människor och företag ut ur landet« (party programme ↗)“that it does not drive people and enterprises out of the country”
- all criminality shall be prosecuted»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception prosecuted”
The plan introduces a tax-increase ceiling meaning that combined taxes are not raised during the term of office and establishes that more tax is no solution.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan introduces a tax-increase ceiling meaning that combined taxes are not raised during the term of office and establishes that more tax is no solution. A investigated emergency tax directly contradicts that commitment, and an obligatory contractor deduction goes against the promise to significantly reduce companies' administration. Defense modernization shall according to the plan be financed through prioritization and efficiency improvements, not new taxes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen inför ett skattehöjarstopp som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs under mandatperioden och slår fast att mer skatt inte är någon lösning. En utredd beredskapsskatt strider direkt mot det åtagandet, och ett obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag går emot löftet att kraftigt minska företagens administration. Försvarets upprustning ska enligt planen finansieras genom prioriteringar och effektivisering, inte nya skatter.
- tax-increase ceilingdecisive»• Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Introduce a tax-increase ceiling during the coming term of office meaning that combined taxes are not raised”
- no new taxes(2022 manifesto)
- defense through reprioritization»• Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Establish an efficiency office that shall go through the economics of all agencies to free up resources for defense”
- smaller administrative burden»• Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Remove one-third of companies' administrative costs and one-third of regulatory complexity”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan's core tax commitment is that taxes should not hamper Swedish companies in international competition and that regulatory burden for smaller businesses should be eased.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's core tax commitment is that taxes should not hamper Swedish companies in international competition and that regulatory burden for smaller businesses should be eased. The counter-proposal wishes to investigate a new emergency tax and reintroduce a mandatory contractor deduction, thus both higher tax revenue and more administration for construction companies. The plan certainly wishes to guarantee the defence's long-term financing, but not through new taxes. Therefore the plan rejects the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planens bärande skatteåtagande är att skatterna inte ska hämma svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen och att regelbördan för mindre företag ska lättas. Motförslaget vill utreda en ny beredskapsskatt och återinföra ett obligatoriskt entreprenadavdrag, alltså både högre skatteuttag och mer administration för byggföretagen. Planen vill visserligen garantera försvarets långsiktiga finansiering, men inte genom nya skatter. Därför avvisar planen motförslagets krav.
- competitive business taxesdecisive»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish companies in international competition”
- lower regulatory burden»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for reducing red tape and ease the administrative burden on small businesses”
- lower taxes drive growth»Sänkta eller bättre utformade skatter kommer i många fall att på sikt öka skatteintäkterna eftersom en sådan politik leder till ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduced or better designed taxes will in many cases in the long run increase tax revenues because such policy leads to increased growth.”
- long-term defence financing»Garantera den långsiktiga finansieringen av ett starkt försvar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Guarantee the long-term financing of a strong defence”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SkU15)
- Committee report full text (HD01SkU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1149 — Beskattning av ersättning för nekad avverkning av Isak From och Helén Pettersson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1168 — Förändring av 3:12-reglerna av Adrian Magnusson och Niklas Sigvardsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1286 — Inflationsjustering av kapitalinkomstskatter av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:134 — Ökat ränteavdrag för unga föräldrar av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1343 — Stärkt givande genom tillfälliga skatteavdrag vid katastrofer av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1344 — Sänkt reavinstbeskattning av Hans Eklind och Larry Söder (båda KD)
- Motion 2025/26:135 — Slopad stämpelskatt för unga husköpare av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:136 — Inflationsjustering av skatt på kapitalvinst för bostäder av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1681 — Förenklade beskattningsregler för kombinationsföretag inom lantbruket av Ludvig Ceimertz m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:177 — Skatteflykt av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:1999 — Investeringar som gynnar tillväxt av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2012 — Attraktivt att sponsra ungdomsföreningsliv av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2193 — Differentierad reavinstskatt vid försäljning av bostad av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2239 — Förenklade regler för familjeföretag av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2444 — Avdrag för sponsring av föreningsliv av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2608 — En mer jämställd och lokalt anpassad sponsring av idrott av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2612 — Införande av bitcoin i valutareserven och skattebefrielse för små kryptobetalningar av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2635 — Beskattning av naturvårdsavtal av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist och Anders W Jonsson (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:2780 — Transporteffektivt och hållbart samhälle av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2783 — Ett rättvist skattesystem av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament