The question is whether the Forest Agency should be tasked with reviewing the boundary of near-mountain forest, so protection falls more on state-owned land of less interest for production, or whether the current boundary and the ongoing, voluntary-based strategy for formal forest protection should remain unchanged for now.
Committee proposal adopted, 205–63
Plan → Vote
»ett starkt skydd av skog med rika ekosystem«“strong protection of forests with rich ecosystems”strong forest protection · party programme ↗
»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.«“biological diversity must be protected.”protect biological diversity · party programme ↗
»skydda 30 procent av Sveriges natur, bland annat våra unika sammanhängande fjällskogar och skyddsvärda skogar i hela landet.«“protect 30 percent of Sweden's nature, including our unique contiguous boreal forests and particularly valuable forests throughout the country.”protection of boreal forests · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Skogen är en nyckel i den gröna omställningen. Ett hållbart skogsbruk förutsätter ett aktivt brukande av skogen.«“The forest is a key to green transition. Sustainable forestry requires active management of the forest.”active management of the forest · 2022 manifesto ↗
»sjöar och vattendrag med höga naturvärden ska ha ett starkt skydd.«“lakes and watercourses with high natural values shall have strong protection.”strong protection for high natural values · party programme ↗
»äganderätten över skogen hotas«“ownership of forests is threatened”threatened ownership right in forests · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Minska ytan av skog som är undantagen från skogsbruk«“Reduce the area of forest exempted from forestry”less forest exempted · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Värna skogsägarnas rätt att bruka sina skogar«“Protect forest owners' right to manage their forests”the right to manage forests · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se