The question is whether the water authorities should be abolished and their tasks instead distributed to other named agencies, or whether the current authority structure for water management should be kept pending the government's own ongoing work.
Committee proposal adopted, 218–84
Plan → Vote
»Därför behövs en kraftfull lagstiftning, ekonomiska styrmedel, långsiktig samhällsplanering, klimatinvesteringar«“Therefore powerful legislation, economic instruments, long-term social planning, climate investments”powerful environmental governance · party programme ↗
»Detta kräver en strategisk miljöpolitik«“This requires a strategic environmental policy”strategic environmental policy · party programme ↗
»Naturvårdsfrågorna i Sverige och inom EU måste få«“Nature conservation issues in Sweden and within the EU must receive”stronger nature conservation · party programme ↗
»Sverige har utvecklats mot en allt mer komplicerad stat.«“Sweden has developed towards an increasingly complicated state.”simplify state structure · party programme ↗
»EU-samarbetet är vårt viktigaste instrument för att driva på miljöarbetet.«“EU cooperation is our most important instrument for driving environmental work.”EU drives environmental work · party programme ↗
»Rätt makt på rätt plats«“The right power in the right place”subsidiarity as power distribution · party programme ↗
»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret«“Establish an efficiency office that shall go through every agency's finances to free up resources for defence”make agencies more efficient · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Sverigedemokraterna vill också slå samman myndigheter och renodla offentliga verksamheter där det är möjligt.«“Sweden Democrats also wish to merge authorities and streamline public activities where possible.”streamlined authorities · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se